logo
Tribal families in Jammu & Kashmir are being violently forced out of their forest homes

Tribal families in Jammu & Kashmir are being violently forced out of their forest homes

Express Tribune20-02-2025

Gujjar community faces violence in Ganderbal, J&K in what is not just a land dispute, but a fight for survival.
In Jammu and Kashmir Ganderbal District tensions erupted in the remote village of Mamer located in Kangan Tehsil after officials from the Forest Department allegedly assaulted members of Gujjar community who were protesting against the construction of a nursery near the settlement.
The tribal community has expressed strong opposition to the project, fearing it would lead to the displacement and loss of vital grazing land that they rely on for their livelihoods.
What was intended to be a straightforward environmental initiative spiraled into a violent clash that has since sparked outrage and created deep rooted tensions between indigenous tribal communities and government led development projects.
Understanding the Forest Rights Act
Until 5 August 2019 the Forest Rights Act (FRA) of 2006, which provides legal recognition to the rights of tribal and forest dwelling communities, was not implemented in Jammu and Kashmir. The reason behind this was the special constitutional status granted to the region which allowed the state to decide whether to adopt central laws.
However, following the abrogation of Article 370 and the introduction of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act in 2019, the legal landscape of the region underwent significant changes.
The Act brought new law's including Forest Rights Act (FRA) which should have ideally provided legal safeguards to the Tribal communities.
Yet FRA has not been effectively implemented in the region leaving its promises largely unfulfilled.
The FRA, was formed for the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, and was enacted by the Government of India to recognize and vest the forest rights of forest-dwelling communities, particularly Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs).
The act aims to correct historical injustices by recognizing the rights of these communities to forest resources, land, and governance.
The incident in the first week of February highlights the ongoing struggle of tribal communities in Jammu and Kashmir to secure their rights under the FRA.
The plantation drive and the tribal community's concern
The story begins with the Forest Department's plantation drive which was a compensatory afforestation project initiated under the Compensatory Afforestation Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA).
The Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) of the Sindh Forest Division said:
'The project approved in 2022 aims to counter balance the loss of forest land due to the construction of the Thune village to Badipathri road."
In this project the forest authorities sought to plant new trees in specific regions including the Mamer village which is situated on the fringes of a forest area.
Under CAPMA, despite the initiatives intent, the plantation process was reportedly interrupted when a group of locals allegedly incited violence leading to stone throwing and physical confrontation with forest staff .
For the Tribal/ Gujjar people however this plantation drive was not seen as a simple environmental initiative. Instead it raised alarm bells.
The Gujjars, a predominantly pastoral and agrarian community, have lived in the area for generations depending on the forest for grazing land, firewood,and various other resources vital to their way of life.
The prospect of a nursery being built close to their settlement coupled with the fear of losing their land set off a series of protests among the locals. Their primary concern was their displacement and a loss of essential grazing resources that were crucial to their livestock.
Many in the community believed that the forest departments plantation initiative was a part of a broader effort to seize land from indigenous communities and use it for commercial or government projects.
The gujjar community felt increasingly alienated believing that their voices were unheard and their concerns ignored by the very institutions meant to protect them.
The government failure to consult or include these tribal groups in the decision making process only deepened the sense of injustice.
The forest officials, accompanied by guards and police, arrived in waves. Each visit brought new terror. Arshi Begum, a 61 year old woman, recalls how their repeated raids shattered their spirits:
"They came once, then twice and then four times. Each time I sat there with them pleading for mercy. I even touched their feet, hoping they would spare us. But instead of listening, they beat me with a stick' she said,"The men were not at home they had gone for labor work so we the women were left to face their wrath alone.'
The confrontation and assault
The protests began peacefully with the tribal women leading the charge against the construction of the nursery. They gathered outside the plantation site hoping to engage in a dialogue with the officials.
However what followed would soon escalate into a violent confrontation. According to reports when the women began protesting against the project the Forest Department personnel reacted with aggression.
The absence of male family members emboldened the officials who saw no restraint in their actions. Yursa Begum, a 40 year old woman, remembers the horror of one particular day.
'As we protested the forester turned to one guards and said, 'Rape these women'. His words sent shivers down my spine. I couldn't believe what I had just heard. The guard laughed cruelly and replied 'I will rape them in such away that they will never be able to go anywhere again. They will be torn apart'. At that moment we knew there was no limit to their brutality."
Videos that later went viral on social media showed disturbing scenes of forest officials physically assaulting the women pushing them aside and even using vulgar language against them.
The women who had initially approached the situation with the hope of peaceful resolution were subjected to unwarranted brutality. Hafiza Begum, a 34 year old woman, recalls the day.
'The forester told us that we had to plant 8,000 trees here in the nursery right in front of our homes. We told them, 'How can we do this? What if a cheetah comes and attacks our children? Our families are already living in danger, and now you want us to risk even more? But they didn't care. They just wanted the work done, no matter what happened to us."
Tribal local residents have claimed that the officials went too far in their efforts to quell the protest with several women being beaten and humiliated in front of their families.
The brutality of the assault became evident as it was later revealed that the officials not physically harmed the women but also verbally abused them using offensive language.
When threats weren't enough, the violence escalated. Jamila, a widow, described how the officials physically assaulted them sparing no one.
"They did not stop at threats They kept beating us mercilessly. My body ached from the blows. My dupatta,my dignity was torn from me as they humiliated us further.we were helpless and abandoned.Who would listen to our cries? Who would save us from their cruelty?'
Even young girls were not spared. Amriza, a 19 year old student, trembled as she spoke about the moment she feared for her life.
"They abused us in ways i cannot even describe.The way they looked at us it felt they could rape us anytime, do anything to us. I don't know if we will ever feel safe again ,' she whispered.
These actions went against the very ethos of public service leaving the Gujjar community, questioning the integrity and fairness of the Forest Department's approach.
Community reaction and outrage
The incident quickly became a flash point for the Gujjar and Bakerwal communities who have long felt marginalized by the government.
Tribal leaders such as Zahid Parwaz Chowdhary condemned the actions of the Forest Department, calling it yet another example of systematic discrimination against the tribal people:
'Our people are not just being humiliated they are being jailed for resisting," Chowdhary stated, 'Even if the officials were attacked does that justify them assaulting women?'
His words resonate with many in the region who felt that the violence was an overreaction to a peaceful protest and that the authorities had acted with disproportionate force.
Social media platforms erupted with the support of Gujjar women with many calling for justice and accountability.
Tribal activists and community members demanded that the government take immediate actions to protect the rights of indigenous communities and ensure that such incidents never happen again.
The incident served as powerful reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by tribal communities when it comes to defending their land rights in the face of state backed development projects.
Alongside this, the Forest Department filed an FIR against seven male members of the community accusing them of inciting violence and attacking the officials with stones and sticks. The authorities also used legal pressure to silence the community.
Ishtiyaq Ahmed kasana, a 40 year old tribal man spoke out against the false FIRs filed against them.
'If you check our location on the 3rd of February,we were in sonamarg,doing our work," he explained,"But the FIR against us? It's completely fake, we were not even present at the moment they were talking about. Our women went to the police station to submit an application about the violence they faced but no reply came. Instead they filed cases against us. Is this justice?'
He continued, his voice shaking in anger:
"We are demanding that they give us back our honor and not threaten our women publicly. The foresters came with guards and told our women to leave the place.'Where are your men?' they asked mockingly. And when our women tried to resist they started abusing them. We have already agreed to leave two acres of land to them to build whatever they want. But we asked for a small portion where we can graze our animal's. We they build a nursery here, wild animals will start coming to our areas. Our kids already in danger. And now with no land to live on, no safe space for our families,what are we supposed to do? We are helpless. Kindly help us.'
The legal proceedings painted a picture of the forest authorities framing the incident as an act of aggression by the villagers, whole ignoring the violence that had been inflicted upon the women.
The FIR listed charges under section 115(2) and 132 of the Indian Penal Code. This legal action only intensified the sense of injustice felt by the tribal community.
The accusations against the men many of whom were not even present during the confrontation were seen by the Gujjar people as a form of retaliation a way for the authorities to deflect attention from the brutality shown to the women.
Rafaqat Ahmed Kasana, a 32 year old villager, was deeply distressed over the treatment of his people said:
"They say we are illegal settlers but we have been here for generations. If we are not the rightful owners of this land, then who is?'
This legal move was perceived by the Gujjar and Bakerwal communities as a deliberate attempt to suppress their resistance to development projects that they believed threatened their existence.
Winter in these remote areas is always a challenging time with cold making it difficult but this year it feels even more unbearable.
School going students of tribal community are struggling to complete their assignments and focus on their studies in private tutions due to the overwhelming anxiety caused by the constant fear that they could lose their homes at any moment.
For students receiving extra tuition to help them perform better in school, there is an added source of stress as they struggle to concentrate on their homework amidst the worry of what might happen to their families.
Many students are unable to focus on their assignments with their minds constantly consumed by the possibility of displacement.
One student Shabnam Bano, a 17 year old girl who had once been an avid learner, confesses:
"I try to do my winter homework but I just can't concentrate. Every time I sit to study I think will I still have a home tomorrow? It is hard to focus as my parents are struggling. My mother cried several times because we are helpless."
This anxiety is affecting their mental health as well; a sense of hopelessness clouds their future.
The stress they face is far more than the usual pressure of school winter work it is the weight of an entire community's struggle against a government that seems intent on taking everything from them.
The violence in the Mamer area of Ganderbal District of Jammu and Kashmir against tribal Gujjar community has left a deep scar on the tribal people. What started as a protest against a project perceived as threatening their livelihood has turned into a symbol of resistance against systematic injustice.
The assault on the women, the unfair legal actions and the lack of accountability for the officials involved have a underscored the urgent need for a more inclusive and respectful approach to development in tribal areas.
For the Gujjar community message is clear they are not willing to accept the displacement of their people or the erosion of their rights without a fight.
This incident has galvanized the community to stand up for their rights more than ever before demanding justice not just for the women who were assaulted but for the future of their entire community.
The issue of land rights remains a sensitive one as these communities are often caught between the need for development and the preservation of their traditional way of life.
Tribal rights in Jammu and Kashmir are enshrined in various laws and policies including the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. This law was intended to protect the rights of forest dwelling tribes including their rights to access, use and manage forest resources.
However the implementation of such laws has often been slow and tribal communities continue to face the threat of displacement due to large scale development projects.
With all this uncertianity, every day feels like a countdown to an unknown fate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world
Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world

Many people were killed when an Air India plane bound for London with 242 people on board crashed minutes after taking off from India's western city of Ahmedabad on Thursday, authorities said. All 242 people on board Air India plane have died, Indian Express reports Here's what world leaders have said so far: Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, on X: 'The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words.' 'In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected.' British prime minister Keir Starmer, on X: 'The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating.' 'I am being kept updated as the situation develops, and my thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time.' Britain's King Charles, in a statement on X: 'My wife and I have been desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning. Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations, as they await news of their loved ones.' Bangladesh chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in a message to Modi: 'We extend our deepest condolences to all the families who lost their dear ones at this tragic incident.' 'We stand in solidarity with the people and Government of India, and offer our full support in any form.' European Commission president Ursula Von Der Leyen, on X: 'My deepest condolences to the families and loved ones grieving this terrible loss.' 'Dear @narendramodi, Europe stands in solidarity with you and the people of India in this moment of sorrow.' Russian president Vladimir Putin to Modi, in an official Telegram published on Kremlin website: 'Please accept my deep condolences on the tragic consequences of the airliner crash at Ahmedabad airport.' 'Please convey words of sincere sympathy and support to the families and friends of the victims, as well as wishes of a swift recovery to all those injured in this catastrophe.' French president Emmanuel Macron, on X: 'We have learned with deep emotion of the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. In this time of sorrow, I extend our heartfelt thoughts to the victims' loved ones and to Prime Minister @NarendraModi.' Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese, on X: 'The news of a passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad is absolutely devastating. In this time of tragedy, Australia's thoughts are with everyone affected.' 'Our government is receiving regular updates and we will continue to monitor the situation closely.' IRISH PRIME MINISTER MICHEAL MARTIN, ON X: 'My thoughts and prayers are with the people of India after the terrible plane crash in Ahmedabad earlier today. Thinking of the families of all those on board, along with the emergency services attending the scene.' General secretary of British airline pilots' association Amy Leversidge: 'Pilots around the globe are deeply saddened by this news. Members of the British Airline Pilots' Association send condolences to all those affected. 'It is vital a full and thorough investigation is now carried out without interference or unhelpful speculation about the contributory factors so that future tragedies can be avoided.'

Indus River indeed an ‘ever-flowing' river
Indus River indeed an ‘ever-flowing' river

Business Recorder

time4 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Indus River indeed an ‘ever-flowing' river

To divert or stop the waters of the 'Sarnash', the name of the Indus in Hindu mythology means the 'ever flowing' will not be easy. The Hindu gods were more knowledgeable than the current Prime Minister of India, they were certainly more benign. What they knew and perhaps the Government of India does not is that rivers flow according to the topography of the land, the principles of geography and not as per the whims of the rulers of the time. They are 'ever flowing.' Their water flows not just on the surface of the land but subterraneously as well. In many districts of the Punjab and Sindh through which the Sarnash and its tributaries flow most of the irrigation needs of the farmers are met from wells and not through canals and the water channels. As per Dr Daanish Mustafa, a professor of Geography at King's College, 80% of the water flowing into Tarbela dam on the Indus is from within the territory under Pakistani control. I have been to the Indus at Raana Dheri 10 km downstream of Tarbela when the spillways were totally closed, and the water from the generators was fed to the channels joining the river at Kalabagh. To me the river felt huge and was flowing with considerable water. It appears that there is enough seepage and the subterranean flows fill up the river again below the spillways. Any damming above the ground will not be able to stop the flow of subterranean flows. So to talk of stopping the waters of the Indus is impossible. As regards the waters of the Jhelum, the river flows through the center of Srinagar through the Uri gorge and any dam there will submerge the whole valley. Anyways, the Kashmiris do take some water from it to irrigate adjoining crops or domestic usage. The Kashmir valley is already aflush with enough rainfall not to require any additional irrigation. To divert the water across the Kashmiri valleys to East Punjab is an impossible task. We have had our own experience with the Neelum hydroelectric project. The tunnels made to cross just one ridge for the waters of the Neelam river has been a very difficult job taking decades and costing billions. Within two years the tunnels were damaged and then blocked by the debris that comes down with the water. The Indians will have no easier time with the much bigger flows of the Chenab and the Jhelum. They have to cross multiple ridges and higher ground to take the water to Haryana or Rajasthan. The river probably at some risk is possibly the Chenab. I have travelled from Chandigarh to Kullu Manali, high valleys close to Laddakh, by road. The road runs along the riverbed of the Chenab. On three different occasions I saw the water disappears to re-appear a few kilometers upstream. The water is diverted to generate hydro power and then goes back to the natural river bed. Where the river Chenab flows out of the Himalayas onto the plains the land is already aflush with the waters of the Ravi and Sutlej irrigation systems. The upper valleys off Kullu already have enough rainfall as do most of our mountain valleys. The Indians have already exploited the rights given to them by the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) to the full. The rivers Ravi and Sutlej have had all their water siphoned off, yet they flow across the border with substantial water flows. All these dams, canals, hydro power stations have been made over 50 years of vast efforts and with heavy expenditures. Similar resources and time will be required to divert the waters of the Chenab. The dams made shall be clearly visible to all, thanks to satellite surveillance. These days the Google maps app can tell you if there is a traffic jam around the corner. Dams and canals are much more visible. While the Indians will have no easy time to divert waters flowing into Pakistan, we can very easily discomfort them easily. If you examine the chapter 4 of the IWT it states as under: 'Pakistan shall maintain in good order its portion of the drainages mentioned below with capacities as on the effective date: Hudiara drain, Kasur Nulla, Salimshah drain, Fazilka drain, So if the IWT is cancelled then we could prevent these nullahs from flowing into Pakistan from India. The Indians should keep their drains and sewage to themselves and do what they like with it. Thousands of acres can be flooded with sewage water and the crops destroyed and villages and towns be made unlivable. We have not even bothered to check the quantum of flows in these drains. I am sure the volumes going through have swelled since the IWT was signed in the 1960s. The Indians should have paid for them and for the treatment of their waste water. Subsoil water flows have still not been examined carefully. If the river flow is reduced then how does it affect the subterranean flows? The river Ravi when it passes through Lahore is now a shadow of its former self because of the water diverted by India. The city of Lahore has grown massively since the 1960s. Not only has the population multiplied but the gardens, parks and roads have been kept lush and green. The sub soil water level has fallen but not drastically. To get potable clean water you may have to go below 400 feet, but water is available at 150 feet. This is true not only in the city but also throughout the districts of Lahore and Kasur. It is clear that we need to study these geographic phenomena much more for our own future planning as well as to counter the threats from India with or without the IWT. It is also clear that Modi did not consult his gods before threatening us. For once the Indians have taken a step without much thought for its consequences. If they are to stop our waters then what's stopping China diverting the mighty Brahmaputra? Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Dreams of hegemony
Dreams of hegemony

Business Recorder

time21-05-2025

  • Business Recorder

Dreams of hegemony

Hegemony is the political, economic, and military predominance of one state over other states, either regional or global. India is one country that is trying to take advantage of her size, population, and economic prowess and is fixated on achieving her perverted objective of Akhand Bharat. It occupies a central place in the ideological framework of RSS and further enforced by the RSS long-term insistence on imposing the Hindutva ideology on the nearly 1.50 billion denizens where 14 percent or over 200 million are Muslims. Hindutva is a dominant form of Hindu nationalist politics in India, and it has become a rallying cry for a large segment of the population. According to RSS ideology, 'These words include the feeling that this entire land from Attock to Cutack, Kutch to Kamrup and Kashmir to Kanya Kumari is not only sacred to us but is a part of us. The people who have been born in it since times immemorial and who still live in it may have all the differences superficially brought about by place and time, but the basic unity of their entire life can be seen in every devotee of Akhand Bharat.' With the BJP in full control, with the fascist and prejudicial mindset of Narendra Modi, with huge funding by tycoons in India as well as by Indian Diaspora, and with street power and hooliganism of fundamentalists, the RSS has intensified its goal of imposing Hindutva ideology. Besides RSS, other Hindu nationalist political groups such as Shiv Sena, have sought the repossession of Jammu and Kashmir under the pretence of Akhand Bharat, especially after the abrogation of Article 370 and 35A of the Indian Constitution that removed the semi-autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019. Hindutva highlights the concept of Akhand Bharat under it and advocates for inclusive Hindu nationhood and religion-centered chauvinism, cultural integration, and hegemony by elite social class. However, its doctrine is not fully accepted by those who do not subscribe to the exclusion of other religious, caste, or ethnic groups. They are averse to political polarization, economic inequality, and overt religious discrimination, mostly against Muslims, and even Christians, Sikhs, and others. India, which prides herself as the world's largest democracy, the bastion of secularism, and overarching inclusivity, with universally advertised boasts of Incredible India and Shining India, has lost the razzle-dazzle of such boasting and conceit. The Akhand Bharat target of bringing neighbours such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and more importantly, Pakistan under its banner has gone off the mark. Pakistan has steadfastly stood as a bulwark against all Indian designs of a jingoistic mentality of Akhand Bharat. Gradually, the regional dynamics are changing. Today, after the ouster of Hasina Wajed, the government and people of Bangladesh are steering away from their large neighbour. Hasina was a puppet on a string, and her genuflection at the altar of New Delhi was a black stain in the history of Bangladesh. Indian communication network is still just one mile away from the Indo-Bangladesh border. India had granted easy access to Bangladeshis to cross the border to work, take advantage of medical facilities, and establish Haat Markets at the border. The Indian influence had brainwashed Hasina against Pakistan, much to the consternation of millions of her country's citizens, who still felt affinity with their former country persons on the other side of India. The ignominious exodus of Hasina enabled these hidden warm feelings to come out, and the ensuing events and pronouncements are proof positive that Bangladeshis want to be hand-in-hand with Pakistanis. Bhutan was heavily dependent on India for security, economy, and development. Being a landlocked kingdom, Bhutan was strapped and even received foreign aid from India. Now, Bhutan is reaching out to China, having resolved most of the territorial issues. Bhutan's China policy also reflects its self-interest that extends to economic self-sufficiency and self-reliance. China can be a strong partner and assist Bhutan through various initiatives that India provided for decades. At the same time, Bhutan is opening up to foreign direct investment, and this is a paradigm shift for a nation that was not comfortable with any foreign influence. Nepal, another landlocked Indian neighbour, is also dependent on India primarily due to trade, foreign direct investment, and shared cultural and socio-economic ties. India is the largest trading partner and source of investment for Nepal, with a significant portion of Nepal's trade and investment flowing through India. Nepal and China are bonding their friendship in a strong way and both desire to be more connected, despite some border issues. Although the dependence on India is overarching, there is now a new thinking in Nepal that China can provide substantial investment, allow liberal imports of Nepali goods, give access to Chinese Ports, and finance infrastructure projects. The shift from dependency on India is slowly taking a new trajectory. Sri Lanka-India relations move from right to left depending on which government is in power in Colombo. India is a major trading partner, and this has resulted in economic dependency on India, primarily due to the proximity between the two nations. However, China has made, and is vigorously making, huge strides in fostering relations. China financed the construction of Hambantota Port, providing market access, supplying essential raw materials and defence equipment, and loans, especially during the difficult times faced by Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is very important for China since Colombo Port City and Hambantota Port have become flagship projects of the Belt and Road Initiative cooperation between the two countries. Chinese influence is rising, and it is to the credit of Sri Lankan government that it is delicately balancing ties with both large Asian countries. India was very influential in Afghanistan, doing large trade, financing many projects, promoting Kabul at world forums, and, at the same time, financing terrorists to attack Pakistan. Come the new Taliban government, the ecosystem changed, and India made an inglorious exit, lock, stock, and barrel. Trade does continue, and Pakistan even during the recent conflict, magnanimously allows Afghan trucks carrying goods to cross the Wagah Border. Although there were reports that New Delhi was making overtures to Kabul, there has not been significant progress. The new evolving regional scenario is putting immense pressure on Indian intrigues and machinations to prove that it is still a dominant authority in South Asia. It seems the policymakers in India probably do not realize the futility of obsolete rhetoric and the gravity of its consequences. The incessant fulminations of Modi and his cohorts have always been provocative and aggressive, and now the world is fully aware of his words and deeds, which are a combination of obfuscation and inaccuracies. His pathetic address to Indians after the ceasefire is a manifestation of his hate harangue. He is still under pernicious delusions to repeat his misadventure, neglecting to accept that the next conflict would be like a volcano that would erupt and there is no telling how far its fire will spread. Advice to Modi is to pack bags and go on a long yatra to some remote Ashram. The BJP, RSS, and Hindutva adherents must now realize that their dream of Akhand Bharat and hegemony have been blown to smithereens. It's time to live and let live. Madam Nadira Panjwani, a renowned philanthropist, recited a prayer that is so essential for all. She prayed that 'May our mothers sleep without fear for their children, may our children wake up to laughter and hope, may the gentle winds of peace sweep across our region and may the people of Pakistan and India walk together towards a future filled with dignity and happiness for both nations.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store