Public defenders look back on 2025 legislative session
Chief Public Defender Bennet Baur. (Photo courtesy of the Law Offices of the Public Defender)
Philip Larragoite, chief of staff for the New Mexico Legislature's Senate Judiciary Committee, says his measure of a legislative session's success isn't so much the bills lawmakers passed but, rather, the ones they did not.
'You can't hear 'em all, and the Judiciary Committee in the Senate was pretty rigorous about what it hears and what it acts on,' Larragoite told the state Public Defender Commission on Friday during its regular meeting in Albuquerque — its first since the session ended on March 22. 'Our Constitution is hard-wired — it's supposed to be hard to adopt legislation, hard to pass bills.'
The commission oversees the Law Offices of the Public Defender, the independent state agency that employs public defenders who represent anyone charged with a crime in New Mexico.
Larragoite, who is also LOPD's deputy chief of policy and statewide offices, noted that he has participated in more than 70 legislative sessions, the earliest in 1961 as a page for Jack Campbell, who was House Speaker at the time.
Appellate Defender Kim Chavez Cook, who also works as LOPD's policy advocate during legislation sessions, agreed that it is important to note the bills that did not pass.
She highlighted two examples of bills that were 'priorities for us to stop': House Bill 204, a proposal that comes up every year to try to remove defense pre-trial interviews from certain cases; and House Bill 190, which would have given alleged victims in criminal cases the right to be a litigant in those cases.
Chavez Cook said LOPD had 'serious due process concerns' with HB204, and put a lot of time and energy into discussions about it. HB190 raised 'some serious separation of powers and other related concerns,' she said. Neither bill received a single vote in committee this year.
'We'll keep doing that year after year, many of these things will come back again,' Chavez Cook said.
Policy aside, Chief Public Defender Bennet Baur told the Commission on Friday he was disappointed by the budget outcomes. During the recent session, his agency asked lawmakers for a nearly 13% increase in its annual budget but only received a 4.1% increase.
Lawmakers did not give LOPD any money for additional full-time staff positions, Baur said, but they did give the agency $450,000 to spend over the next two years for recruitment and retention.
Hundreds of additional public defenders would be needed to properly handle all of the cases coming through the state's criminal legal system, and there is a longstanding disparity of resources between public defenders and their opponents in court, district attorneys.
The American Bar Association found in 2022 that New Mexico needs at least 602 full-time attorneys and is currently only meeting 33% of clients who need a legal defense.
Baur said many lawmakers were concerned about the economy in the U.S. and the state as they considered the budget, and are probably even more concerned about it now than they were during the session.
In the last four years, he said, lawmakers have funded 54 new staff positions. LOPD has an overall vacancy rate of 11%, better than most state agencies, he said. That rate is higher for attorney positions, at 16.8%, he said.
Many public defenders aren't actually full-time staff employed by LOPD, but are contractors who are paid a flat fee for taking on cases rather than an hourly rate.
For example, when a contractor takes on a first-degree murder case, the state pays them a base rate of $5,400. For the whole case. That means, on average, that attorney is making $13.81 per hour representing their client, according to the ABA's study.
In some jurisdictions, paying a public defender a flat fee is outlawed, said Commissioner Jacqueline Flores, a former Second Judicial District Court judge.
Baur said lawmakers didn't give LOPD money to launch a pilot project for paying contract attorneys an hourly rate. But he said he's determined to still try to do it by 'rearranging money' within the agency's existing budget.
'Those of you that know the budget process know that you never get what you ask for,' Baur said. 'But if you don't ask for it, then you don't get it.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC Senators spar over rewrite of bill intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of women, minors
Senator Sydney Batch (seated far left) questions the proposed committee substitute for HB 805. (Screengrab of NCGA videostream) House Bill 805 started as a bipartisan bill to fight human trafficking and provide women with an avenue to remove nonconsensual content and images from the internet. House members on both sides of the aisle felt so strongly about the issue, they passed the bill 113-0 last month. But when the bill ('Prevent the Sexual Exploitation of Women and Minors Act') moved to the upper chamber, Senator Buck Newton (R- Greene, Wayne, Wilson) saw an opportunity to rework the legislation. Newton's proposed committee substitute for HB 805, spells out there are only two sexes – male and female – and that gender identity shall not be treated as legally equivalent to biological sex. 'This section ensures that our state follows federal policy and aligns with President Trump's executive order,' Newton told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday. 'This ensures our state maintains eligibility for any and all federal funding.' Newton's proposal would ban the use of state funds for transgender surgeries for any prisoner incarcerated in the state prison system. The final section of Newton's PCS would require that when a person changes their sex on a birth certificate, the State Registrar must attach the new certificate to the original certificate of birth on file, preserving both copies. The state would also forward a copy of the new certificate to the register of deeds in the county of birth where both would be kept on file. 'What problem are we really trying to solve in terms of efficiency or cost savings?' asked Senator Sophia Chitlik (D-Durham). 'Well, there seems to be a great deal of confusion among our society about the fluidity of sex,' replied Newton. 'And it is time that we clarify, once and for all, what most people recognize would be obvious, which is that there are only two sexes.' 'I actually don't understand why this chamber is so obsessed with genitalia, but here we are,' said Sen. Sydney Batch (D-Wake) noting the new PCS does not allow for a definition that's based in science. Batch said the original House bill intended to safeguard women and children from exploitation by the pornography industry was a 'fantastic bill' and that Newton's proposal should be a standalone bill judged on its own merits. Senator Mujtaba Mohammed (D-Mecklenburg) questioned why the bill which once enjoyed unanimous support seeks to bar gender affirming care in the prison system. 'We reached out to our state agencies, and they confirmed that they've never authorized sexual procedures, there's never been gender affirming care, there's never been any authorized gender affirming surgeries,' Mohammed said. 'As a Republican, supporting limited government, why are we coming up with unnecessary laws?' Newton acknowledged while such medical surgeries had not happened yet using North Carolina funds, he believes taxpayers would appreciate that state funds will not be spent in this manner. 'We draw the line now, before anybody attempts to do such a thing.' Sen. Lisa Grafstein (D-Wake) said Newton's proposal reminded her of the hurricane Helene recovery bill – a clean bill that passed the House only to be muddied and politicized when it moved to the Senate. 'The idea that we're going to put into law that you cannot be transgendered, or that you cannot be all the things that you are railing against is a fool's errand,' said Grafstein. Reighlah Collins, Policy Counsel for the ACLU of North Carolina, said the PCS enforces rigid definitions of sex and gender, while forcibly outing people who change their sex on their birth certificate. 'These attempts are part of a larger strategy to push transgender people out of public life,' said Collins. Sen. Batch said she'd like to see the Judiciary Committee vote on the original House bill, setting aside Newton's additions. Rep. Laura Budd (D-Mecklenburg), a primary sponsor of the bill in the House, appealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee to remember the original intent of the bipartisan legislation. 'If you are the victim of human trafficking and there are images or videos of you online there is no remedy in the state of North Carolina to have those images or videos removed from the internet, which means that you're stuck,' said Budd. Budd said House Bill 805 was a long time coming and is an important tool to help women who've been taken advantage of to have these images removed and the videos taken down. Budd requested that Newton remove his proposal and find another avenue to advance his PCS. 'When we take this bill and we layer it with those things [in the PCS] we're not doing good for people with Carolina. We are imposing onto the bill things that are going to make it become the political football,' said Budd. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee adjourned Tuesday before voting on the matter. The bill is back on the agenda for Wednesday afternoon.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Targeted In Texas A&M Political Science Course Material
(Texas Scorecard) – A Texas A&M summer class uses a textbook that promotes the establishment narrative that President Donald Trump is a criminal. A source provided Texas Scorecard with information regarding the textbook for a Texas A&M political science course offered this summer semester. The textbook in question is the 11th edition of 'Keeping the Republic: Power and Citizenship in American Politics,' by Christine Barbour and Gerald C. Wright. Wright is an emeritus professor at Indiana University Bloomington. Barbour is his wife and a political science lecturer at the same university. Barbour and Wright sharply contrasted how they believed the country viewed former President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump when presenting them in the first chapter. 'When President Biden was elected in 2020, we thought we had turned a new page in our political history,' Barbour and Wright wrote in the first chapter. 'But so much of the country's attention remained on Donald Trump, who demanded the limelight during his presidency and refused to relinquish it, as well as political power.' The first chapter contained more anti-Trump messaging. The authors repeated the establishment media narrative that President Donald Trump is a criminal but didn't mention the politicization and manipulation of the prosecution against him. 'Donald Trump is okay with rules that constrain other people's behavior, but he chafes under rules that apply to him. There is a reason why, when he left office in 2021, he faced a barrage of lawsuits and criminal indictments at the state and federal level, and that reason was not that his political enemies wanted to go after him,' Barbour and Wright wrote. 'It's because he broke or ignored multiple laws he didn't want to follow or that he decided didn't apply to him, and some of the consequences caught up with him.' 'Donald Trump doesn't like to be bound by rules, even the ones written in the Constitution,' the authors continued. This textbook is required reading in American National Government, a political science course at Texas A&M offered during the summer semester from May 26 to July 4 of this year. The Bush School of Government & Public Service houses Texas A&M College Station's political science department. Named after former President George H. W. Bush, members of the Bush family serve on the school's advisory board, including former Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush. Neil Bush, son of George H.W. Bush, is board chair. Neil Bush is also the founder and chairman of the George H.W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations. Use of Barbour and Wright's textbook has not been confined to the College Station campus. Dr. Shane Gleason used the ninth edition of the textbook in a Spring 2022 political science class at Texas A&M Corpus Christi. Meanwhile, former Texas A&M Galveston professor John Carhart praised an earlier version of the book. Several of Carhart's student reviews on RateMyProfessor claim he had a very liberal bias in the classroom. Other universities have used earlier versions of this textbook. Previous versions were used at Stephen F. Austin State University in Fall 2014, and at the University of North Texas in Fall 2016 and Spring 2017. Texas A&M did not respond to a request for comment before publication.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal crackdown on protests raises 1st Amendment concerns
It's been a chaotic few days in Los Angeles amid immigration raids, protests against those raids and violence that stemmed from the throngs who took to the streets of downtown Los Angeles. It's prompted the deployment of military personnel to augment law enforcement in L.A., something Gov. Gavin Newsom and other local leaders say is an unconstitutional use of power by federal officials. But the use of the military isn't the only alleged violation of the Constitution to emerge from this crackdown. Free-speech advocates have noted that some actions by law enforcement aren't targeting those suspected of being in the country illegally. Instead, they're taking aim at those who stand with immigrants and against federal law enforcement, which they characterize as violations of the First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceful protest. Perhaps the most prominent example over the weekend was the arrest of David Huerta, president of the California branch of the Service Employees International Union, who faces a felony charge of conspiracy to impede an officer after a protest on Friday. But the alleged infringement upon First Amendment rights in Southern California dates back farther than just this weekend. In a report about Stephen Miller, a top White House advisor, pressuring federal law enforcement to deport more people, the Wall Street Journal listed a May 1 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid on a home in Irvine as an example of established rules and best practices being thrown out. That day, ICE was looking for Michael Chang, who'd allegedly put up fliers identifying ICE officers in the area. Even though Chang had moved to New York the month before, his parents' Turtle Rock home was raided while they slept by ICE agents who arrived in 'a phalanx of military vehicles.' Federal officials say Chang's fliers were an act of 'doxxing,' or publicizing personal information often with malicious intent. A Department of Homeland Security official responded to KTLA's request for an interview with an agency representative with the following statement: 'Homeland Security Investigations & U.S. Secret Service served a criminal search warrant in an upscale Irvine neighborhood, targeting the suspect they believe was responsible for posting fliers w/ the names, photos, phone numbers, & locations of ICE agents in Southern California in February.' However, Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said identifying law enforcement officers is not a crime unless there's a call for violence or harm. 'In this case, from what we know about what was on the flier, there was nothing that amounted to a threat,' Terr told KTLA. 'There's no evidence of a threat or intent to harm anybody, just the dissemination of information coupled with political criticism.' In the weeks since that Irvine raid, federal officials have kept mum, even as FIRE requested more detailed information, Terr said. U.S. Rep. Dave Min (D-Irvine) released a statement last month saying his office also sought more information, but if they received any updates, they haven't been disclosed. Min's office did not return a request for more information prior to publication. Further complicating the issue, President Donald Trump and his so-called 'border czar' Tom Homan have threatened political opponents and protesters with criminal prosecution, which they say could be necessary to protect the safety of officers. But it's not just officers' safety that seems to be Trump's concern. He's said that anyone who protests the military parade on Saturday — which is also Trump's birthday — will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said, as reported by NBC News. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Terr said that notion doesn't align with the Bill of Rights. 'That's concerning because people who are peacefully protesting shouldn't be met with any level of government force … It's very important for the government and for law enforcement to understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect and to let that guide their actions.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.