India decries 'sabre rattling' after Pakistan army chief's reported nuclear remarks
Indian media reports, citing sources, quoted Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir as saying: "We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us".
An excerpt of his speech shared by Pakistani security officials did not include the "nuclear nation" remarks.
"Pakistan is a responsible nuclear weapon state with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control," a statement from Pakistan's foreign office said.
"It has always exercised discipline and restraint, while dealing with the issues of such importance."
Munir reportedly made the remarks at a black-tie dinner hosted by a Pakistani-origin businessman in Florida on Saturday, where he spoke to a crowd of more than 100 people. Reuters could not independently verify the remarks.
India and Pakistan both possess nuclear weapons and fought their deadliest battle in decades in May, sparked by an attack on tourists the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians.
Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for India's foreign ministry, said: "Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade," adding: "The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks."
He said it was also regrettable that the reported remarks should have been made while in a friendly third country.
In a version of the speech shared by Pakistani security officials, Munir said: "The (Indian) aggression has brought the region to the brink of a dangerously escalating war, where a bilateral conflict due to any miscalculation will be a grave mistake."
Munir was on a visit to the U.S. to attend a farewell event for General Michael Kurilla, the 15th commander of the United States Central Command.
India previously lodged a private diplomatic protest with Washington when President Donald Trump hosted Munir for a lunch at the White House in June.
Analysts have said that India's disagreement with Washington over the May 10 ceasefire with Pakistan, and Trump's renewed engagement with Islamabad, have contributed to a recent setback in ties between India and the U.S. under the Trump administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Indian court orders removal of thousands of stray dogs from Delhi region
India's supreme court has ordered the immediate removal of thousands of stray dogs from the Delhi capital region, citing canine attacks and the country's alarming rabies toll. The sweeping move has set up a clash between public safety advocates and those who see the animals as beloved fixtures of their neighbourhoods. The ruling on Monday, one of the strongest in the nation's long-running struggle with its street dog population, directs civic authorities to capture all strays, sterilise and vaccinate them and relocate them to newly built shelters. The court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back on to the streets. The bench stressed the need for immediate action. 'Round up all stray dogs from all localities … whether sterilised or unsterilised,' Justice JB Pardiwala declared. 'Children must feel safe while cycling and playing. The elderly must feel safe on their walks.' Stray dog control has become a lightning rod civic issue in Delhi and other Indian cities. While some residents see the dogs as a menace, others consider them to be like family. Many of the dogs are fed daily by 'community feeders' who provide food, water and veterinary care. Nishima Bhagat, who attended a candlelight march in the centre of the city on Monday night to protest against the court ruling, said: 'We are walking in solidarity to show that there are people for the voiceless. They [the dogs] cannot speak for themselves. They cannot be put into the pounds. We cannot uproot them from the place where they live.' India bears the highest rabies burden globally. Each year about 5,700 people die from rabies, according to government figures, and the World Health Organization believes the toll to be as high as 20,000 deaths. The last dog census, in 2012, put Delhi's stray population at 60,000 and the figure now is estimated to be closer to 1 million. Dog packs roam parks, construction sites and residential lanes. Attacks on children and elderly people often make news headlines. Between January and June this year, Delhi reported 35,198 animal bite incidents and 49 rabies cases, municipal data shows. Pardiwala dismissed India's animal birth control (ABC) rules, which mandate that sterilised dogs be returned to their territories, as 'absurd' and ineffective. 'All these so-called animal lovers, will they bring back the children who have lost their lives?' he said, urging civic authorities to act decisively rather than debate policy. The ruling said there could be no exceptions and that anyone resisting the removals would face charges. Animal protection groups called the order 'impractical and inhumane'. Bharati Ramachandran, the chief executive of the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations, urged large-scale sterilisation, vaccination, and public awareness campaigns. Mini Aravindan, a senior official at Peta India, said: 'It's infeasible to build and staff enough shelters for hundreds of thousands of dogs' and the cost would be huge.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
US, China extend tariff truce by 90 days, staving off surge in duties
WASHINGTON, Aug 11 (Reuters) - The United States and China on Monday extended a tariff truce for another 90 days, staving off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as U.S. retailers get ready to ramp up inventories ahead of the critical end-of-year holiday season. U.S. President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that he had signed an executive order suspending the imposition of higher tariffs until 12:01 a.m. EST on November 10, with all other elements of the truce to remain in place. China's Commerce Ministry issued parallel moves early local China time on Tuesday, saying it would adopt and maintain all necessary measures to suspend or remove non-tariff measures. Trump on Sunday had demanded China quadruple its purchases of U.S. soybeans, but the order included no mention of any additional purchases. "The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns," Trump's executive order stated. "Through these discussions, (China) continues to take significant steps toward remedying non-reciprocal trade arrangements and addressing the concerns of the United States relating to economic and national security matters." The tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been due to expire on Tuesday at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). The extension until early November buys crucial time for the seasonal autumn surge of imports for the Christmas season, including electronics, apparel and toys at lower tariff rates. The new order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods were set to hit 125% - rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. It locks in place - at least for now - a 30% tariff on Chinese imports, with Chinese duties on U.S. imports at 10%. "We'll see what happens," Trump told a news conference earlier on Monday, highlighting what he called his good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump told CNBC last week that the U.S. and China were getting very close to a trade agreement and he would meet with Xi before the end of the year if a deal was struck. "It's positive news," said Wendy Cutler, a former senior U.S. trade official who is now a vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. "Combined with some of the de-escalatory steps both the United States and China have taken in recent weeks, it demonstrated that both sides are trying to see if they can reach some kind of a deal that would lay the groundwork for a Xi-Trump meeting this fall." The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, and U.S. negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that Trump extend the deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said repeatedly that the triple-digit import duties both sides slapped on each other's goods in the spring were untenable and had essentially imposed a trade embargo between the world's two largest economies. "It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire," said Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. She said Trump had likely pressed China for further concessions before agreeing to the extension. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. "The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend," Shaw said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, said the news would give both sides more time to work through longstanding trade concerns. 'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall," he said. Imports from China early this year had surged to beat Trump's tariffs, but dropped steeply in June, Commerce Department data showed last week. The U.S. trade deficit with China tumbled by roughly a third in June to $9.5 billion, its narrowest since February 2004. Over five consecutive months of declines, the U.S. trade gap with China has narrowed by $22.2 billion - a 70% reduction from a year earlier. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Stateless Tibetans in exile in India yearn for identity and homeland
What does it mean to live in exile?"When we were in school, our teachers used to say that there is an 'R' on our forehead - meaning refugees," says Tibetan writer-activist Tenzin Tsundue is one of around 70,000 Tibetans living in India, spread across 35 designated 1959, thousands of Tibetans fled after a failed uprising against Chinese rule. Following their spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, they crossed treacherous Himalayan passes and reached India, where they were accepted as refugees on humanitarian grounds and because of shared religious and cultural living, or even being born, in India doesn't make them Indians, says Mr Tsundue. Tibetans in India live on renewable registration certificates issued every five years. Those born here can apply for passports if a parent was born in India between 1950 and 1987 - but must surrender the certificate to do so. Many hesitate, as it's closely tied to their Tibetan July, as the Dalai Lama turned 90, thousands of Tibetan Buddhists gathered in Dharamshala - a quiet town nestled in the foothills of the Himalayas in the north Indian state of Himachal Pradesh. The town serves as the headquarters of Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) - the Tibetan as they prayed for their leader's long life, many like Mr Tsundue found themselves reflecting on the uncertainty of living in exile. The emotional weight of displacement, the legal limbo of statelessness and geopolitics around the Dalai Lama hung heavy on the birthday turn out to mark Dalai Lama's 90 birthday Tibetans continued migrating to India for decades after 1959, fleeing China's tightening grip on their Sangbo, 85, reached Dharamshala in 1970 after a gruelling seven-day trek through Nepal. "We ran at night and hid by day," he no place to stay in India, he survived by living in a tent for 12 years and selling spices in villages near Dharamshala. He now lives with his son and wife in a neighbourhood largely inhabited by many like Mr Sangbo, fleeing to India may have provided security - but they still yearn for their homeland."A home is a home, after all," says Pasang Gyalpo, who fled Tibet to Nepal before settling in India in years later, Mr Gyalpo bribed Nepalese guards and slipped into Tibet to bring his family to India. But Chinese police chased him soon after arrival, forcing him to flee. His family remains in Tibet."They are in their homeland, I am in a foreign land. What else can I feel but pain?" he younger Tibetans like Mr Tsunde, who are born in India, the pain is more existential."The trauma for us is not that we lost our land," he says. "It's that we were not born in Tibet and don't have the right to live in Tibet. It is also this great sense of deprivation that something so very essential of our land, culture, and language has been taken away from us."Lobsang Yangtso, a researcher on Tibet and Himalayan regions, explains that being stateless means lacking a sense of belonging."It's painful," she says. "I have lived all my life here [in India] but I still feel homeless." Tibetans in exile are grateful to India for refuge but lament their lack of rights - they cannot vote, own property or easily travel abroad without an Indian passport."We have the IC [an official travel document] which is given by the Indian government as an identity certificate," says Phurbu Dolma. But airport immigration staff often don't recognise Phuntsok, a Tibetan born in India, pointed out that many corporate jobs in India often require Indian passports. "Without one, we miss out on many opportunities."Who is the Dalai Lama and why does he live in exile?In recent years, thousands of Tibetans in India have emigrated to Western countries using the IC, which some nations accept for visa have left on student or work visas, resettled in countries like the US and Canada, or gone abroad on sponsorships from religious and humanitarian Tsering, the president of the CTA, believes that the reason is mainly economic. "Dollars and euros go further than what's available here," he for some like Thupten Wangchuk, 36, who crossed over to India as an eight-year-old, the motivation is more personal."For [almost] 30 long years, I haven't met my parents and relatives. I've no one here," he says. "The sole reason I want to go to a Western country is that I can become a citizen there. Then I can apply for a visa and go into Tibet to visit my parents." Some Tibetans acknowledge the need to be pragmatic given the geopolitical pulls and pressures."If you ask any Tibetan, they'll say they want to go back," says Kunchok Migmar, a CTA official. "But right now, there is no freedom in Tibet. No one wants to go back just to be beaten by the Chinese."The latest flashpoint emerged days before the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday. He said his successor would be chosen by a trust under his office - a move China rejected, insisting it would decide under its law. Beijing called the succession issue a "thorn" in its ties with official stance is that it "does not take any position concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion". Notably, two senior ministers of the Indian government shared the stage with Dalai Lama on his Dalai Lama's announcement that he would have a successor brought relief among Tibetans. But there is uncertainty over what his death could mean for the Tibetan movement."If we prepare ourselves well from now, when His Holiness is alive and [if] the future leaders who will follow us can continue the same momentum, then I think it should not affect us as much as people think it could," says Mr optimism is not shared by all Tibetans."It's thanks to the current Dalai Lama that we have these opportunities and resources," says Mr Phuntsok. He adds many Tibetans fear that after his passing, the community may lose the long-standing support that has sustained them. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.
