Assisted dying law faces crunch Commons vote as MPs switch sides
Assisted dying could move a step closer to becoming law in England and Wales as Parliament prepares for a crunch vote on the issue.
The outcome on Friday could see the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill either clear the House of Commons and move to the Lords, or fall completely.
The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday.
As an example, the Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained.
In what will be seen as a blow to the Bill, four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they will switch sides to oppose the proposed new law.
Labour's Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan wrote to fellow MPs to voice concerns about the safety of the proposed legislation.
They branded it 'drastically weakened', citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the replacement of High Court judge approval with the multidisciplinary panels is a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications.
Ahead of confirmation of the four vote-switchers, Ms Leadbeater acknowledged she expected 'some small movement in the middle' but that she did not 'anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded'.
She insisted her Bill is 'the most robust piece of legislation in the world' and has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives in a conversation which has seen support from high-profile figures including Dame Esther Rantzen.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Ms Leadbeater has warned it could be a decade before assisted dying legislation returns to Parliament if MPs vote to reject her Bill on Friday.
A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains high at 73% – unchanged from November.
The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PHIL BRICKELL: 'Spending review will bring real improvements to our area'
As the MP for Bolton West, I'm pleased that the government's 2025 Spending Review will bring real improvements for our area. Its plans will deliver the growth we need to make everyday life better for families and businesses across Blackrod, Bolton, Horwich and Westhoughton. First, with more money for the NHS and our schools. The Chancellor has increased NHS funding by three per cent and committed to the biggest ever investment in NHS building repairs. Having already made significant progress in reducing NHS waiting times, this further investment will help even more in ensuring we all get the swift, good quality care we deserve. Education also sees a major boost, with an extra £2billion in funding. Here in Bolton West, Devonshire Road Primary School has already received support to run a breakfast club, helping children start their day well-fed and ready to learn. And, from 2026, more children will also get free school meals, giving extra help to many local families struggling with the weekly cost of living. Second, with landmark support for more genuinely affordable and warmer houses. The government is investing a blockbuster £39 billion to build 1.5 million new homes across the country, allowing my constituents the opportunity to fulfil their ambition for a secure roof over their heads at a genuinely affordable price. And, after 14 years of neglect by the last government, Greater Manchester will get £73.6 million to improve social housing, making homes more energy-efficient, cutting heating bills and helping the environment. Third, with investment in better transport infrastructure. Good transport links are vital for work, school, and leisure. Greater Manchester will receive an additional £2.5 billion to improve public transport, including bringing rail under the Bee Network and adding 1,000 new electric buses by 2030. Far too much time is currently lost stuck in traffic or waiting on platforms for delayed trains – a frustration I myself feel only too keenly on the way to my office in Horwich. Delays not only impact our collective wellbeing, they also hold us back in terms of our economic productivity. The spending review gets us back on track. Fourth, by ensuring we're stronger both at home and abroad. The Chancellor pledged funding to end the use of hotels as accommodation for those seeking asylum, which spiralled out of control under the Conservatives. Securing our borders and creating a fairer immigration system are key initiatives and I'll continue to work to deliver this. And, as well as securing our borders at home, the further investment in our armed forces will support well-paid, new jobs including at the MBDA site at Logistics North. Finally, by boosting jobs through new trade deals. The government has also secured important new trade deals with India, the United States, and the European Union. These deals cut costs and help industries across the North West, such as car manufacturing and steel production, as well as local firms involved in their supply chains. They'll also secure lower prices for consumers, relying on goods coming from those countries – a win-win for British workers and customers. The 2025 Spending Review is good news and it sets the course for a brighter future. Upon my election, I promised the people of Bolton West that I would deliver a stronger NHS, tackle the cost of living and secure our borders. I'm confident this spending review ensures the government will deliver on those promises. And, as your MP, I'll keep working hard to make sure these benefits reach everyone across our towns.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Can the UK Afford to Defend Itself?
The British Army has been in decline, and Russia's war on Ukraine is highlighting the urgency it faces to reverse course. But that comes against a backdrop of weak UK growth and rising borrowing costs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cowardly Starmer has put Britain on the wrong side of history
There are cowards, there are the morally bankrupt, and then there is Sir Keir Starmer. Never one to miss an opportunity to humiliate Britain, the Prime Minister's cataclysmic misreading of the conflict in the Middle East has put him, and the UK, on the wrong side of history. Instead of standing with Israel in its existential struggle to rid the world of a millenarian death cult intent on building nuclear weapons, Starmer found it easier to hoist the white flag. Rather than offering to help shoot down Iranian missiles slaughtering Israeli civilians, the Prime Minister spent the past week calling for 'de-escalation' (and thus for the preservation of the genocidal nuclear programme); in lieu of pleading with Donald Trump to send B-2 stealth bombers to take out Iran's Fordow enrichment plant, Starmer chose to spout neo-pacifist verbiage and to demonstrate how embarrassingly little access and influence he retains in Washington. To our great shame, at a moment of maximal global danger, the nation of Wilberforce and Churchill has chosen to go AWOL for the first time, betraying our friends and allies, making a mockery of our supposed values and admitting to the world that we are no longer a serious power. What is even more galling is that Iran is one of our bitter enemies: its spies and propagandists operate in the UK, it has kidnapped and threatened our citizens and it despises us as one of two 'Little Satans' (the other is Israel) to America's Big Satan. We should be thanking Jerusalem for taking care of the Mullahs and the IRGC on our behalf, and yet our Government of non-entities is sitting on the sidelines, terrified of its Israelophobic electoral 'base'. What kind of country opposes a military intervention that will directly make its citizens safer? The answer is an irrelevant one, which is what Britain has become under Labour. Everything has suddenly changed in the Middle East, no thanks to us – or, for that matter, Brussels or Paris. The good guys are winning a key battle in the great global conflict that broke out when Russia invaded Ukraine. Israel and America are reestablishing Western deterrence after Joe Biden's half-hearted response to Vladimir Putin and following the debacle of the retreat from Afghanistan. They are well on their way to preempting a nuclear apocalypse. North Korea and Pakistan obtained the bomb, which was a disaster; Iran's defenestration amounts to a rare yet hugely important victory in the fight against atomic proliferation. It is hard to exaggerate the outsized role that Israel is now playing, and how much it is aiding an ungrateful and ethically compromised Europe. By necessity and out of self-interest, it has become the West's praetorian guard, a nation of heroes dedicated to doing our dirty work for us, as well as a (not always comfortable) proxy of sorts for the US. A tiny country the size of Wales, its population barely larger than London's, Israel is annihilating – from 1,000 miles away, in an unprecedented long-distance war – an oil-rich regional superpower that is nine times more populous and boasts a 75 times larger land area, while waging a conflict on seven fronts. The Jewish state has demonstrated a level of military and strategic brilliance over the past year last witnessed from a Western nation in the Second World War. This isn't Desert Storm-style bulldozing; this is the real deal, a la Hannibal or Carl von Clausewitz, and it will be studied for centuries to come. It turns out that October 7 was Israel's Pearl Harbor, not its 9/11: its fightback has been astonishing, and is helping to undo the narrative of Western decline. Israel has shrugged off a Blitz-style attack that no European country could have remotely coped with, and is emerging as the uncontested regional hegemon. America too might yet still be much more powerful than we realised; its weapons remain the best. The notion of a multi-polar world has been undermined: Russia and China were happy to use Iran, but aren't lifting a finger to defend it. The forces of Islamism are in historic retreat: Israel's destruction of the Iranian proxy system is an even greater victory for Western civilisation than the ending of al-Qaeda and Islamic State. The regime pioneered modern Islamism and state terrorism; it funded Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Iraqi Shia militias and the Houthis. Some 2563 years after Cyrus the Great of Persia freed the Jews from captivity, Israel is returning the favour, with a little help from Trump. The Iranian people, savagely oppressed by the Mullahs, may soon liberate themselves; unlike in other Middle Eastern countries, where the opposition is often worse than the ruling tyrants, most ordinary Iranians are desperate for Westernisation. Bereft of Iran's financial, military and psychological support, unable to siphon aid from the UN, Hamas could sue for a ceasefire, its leaders opting for exile in return for the hostages. Israel's triumph over Iran and its proxies, combined with the end of the war in Gaza, would undoubtedly be enough to precipitate an expansion of the Abraham Accords. For all their flaws, Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump, if they finish the task at hand, would deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. I doubted both men – Trump looked as if he was going soft, and I feared Netanyahu, who now looks positively Churchillian, could never redeem himself for the October 7 pogroms happening on his watch. They appear to have proved me wrong. It is striking how Europe's objections to Israel's actions – the alleged violation of international law, the militarism – embody all the pathologies that are eating away at the soul of our nations. Ever since Michel Foucault, a key figure in the woke movement, penned pro-Islamic revolution propaganda masquerading as journalism in 1978, much of the Left has had a blind spot for the regime. France even put up Ayatollah Khomeini in a luxury villa. By defiling progressive pieties, Israel is mending the world. Netanyahu and Trump are drivers of history. They are changing rather than merely experiencing reality, unlike vapid non-player characters like Starmer or Emmanuel Macron. With the West being rescued from its own stupidity, perhaps now is the time to allow ourselves a fleeting moment of optimism. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
