Delta Extraction loses appeal of its revoked license following Missouri cannabis recall
The company at the center of a massive cannabis product recall in 2023 lost its appeal to get its license back on Tuesday, with Missouri's administrative hearing commission concluding it had a 'corporate culture of lax compliance with regulatory requirements.'
The scathing 137-page ruling, issued by Commissioner Carole Iles, comes almost a year after a three-day hearing on the appeal filed by Robertsville-based Delta Extraction.
Iles agreed with the Missouri Division of Cannabis Regulation that the company's practice of bringing in hemp-derived THC concentrate from other states and adding it to Missouri-grown marijuana products was a violation of state law.
Almost all of the reasons cited for revoking Delta's license and pulling 60,000 marijuana products off the shelves were upheld. That list included failing to notify law enforcement immediately after someone broke into Delta's Robertsville facility and stole the company's server, just days after the state shut down its operation. The server included the only copy of Delta's video surveillance files.
It also included allowing a contractor who was previously convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine to operate its facility on the weekends when he didn't have a state-issued agent identification card. During that time, regulators say the contractor was using another Delta employee's ID to enter the facility and logging information into the state's system used to track and trace products, Iles wrote.
Chuck Hatfield, an attorney for Delta Extraction, said the company has no comment. A spokeswoman for the division said in an email to The Independent that the department is currently reviewing the decision.
The case has been widely watched by companies who had to destroy the products they purchased from Delta or have had them locked in vaults since the recall in August 2023.
The company's challenge also posed major questions about whether the state has the authority to regulate intoxicating hemp products.
Delta Extraction admitted to importing a large amount of THC-A — a non-psychoactive compound of the cannabis plant that becomes intoxicating when heated — purportedly extracted from hemp plants. The company's contractor, Jason Sparks, would mix it with a smaller amount of THC-A extracted from Missouri-regulated marijuana.
Delta argued the hemp-derived THC-A should fall under the same rules as added ingredients, like flavors or the non-intoxicating cannabis compound CBD, because hemp is not a federally controlled substance like marijuana.
But Iles wrote that THC-A becomes intoxicating through the exact same process no matter if it's extracted from hemp or marijuana, so the state is correct in regulating the THC the same as marijuana.
That means it must be grown and manufactured in licensed Missouri facilities, Iles concluded, and tracked from the time the seed goes into the soil.
'THC originating from other sources is prohibited,' her order states.
Iles' order outlined the timeline of how Delta came into a 'partnership' with Sparks, who worked with the Oklahoma-based marijuana brand Conte.
In December 2021, Rachael Herndon, who was serving as Delta's chief operations and compliance officer, learned that Conte had broken off its relationship with a different manufacturer and might be looking for a new partner. She met with Sparks to discuss Delta partnering with Conte to manufacture and sell its brand.
As part of their agreements, Iles' ruling states that Conte licensed its brand to Delta, which at the time was called SLCC, and received a royalty for all products sold under the Conte brand in Missouri.
'The parameters of the arrangements were not entirely clear, but there were oral arrangements' between Delta and Sparks' company SND Equipment Leasing LLC and Conte, Iles wrote.
Sparks became responsible for providing the unregulated THC-A oil to be used in the Conte products, Iles wrote, along with extracting and distilling the final THC distillate that would be incorporated into the Conte products. In a separate agreement, Sparks and Delta agreed that he'd manufacture a bulk distillate that was later sold to about 100 other Missouri manufacturers.
This operation at Delta's facility took place on the weekends. Sparks, Conte owner Tania Conte and Conte employees would drive up from Oklahoma, Iles wrote, and up to 20 temporary workers were brought in by Sparks from the St. Louis area.
In August 2022, Sparks applied for an agent ID and submitted an offer of employment from Delta, signed by Herndon, in support of his application. It was denied because he had a disqualifying felony conviction. However, he was later issued an agent ID in June 2023, according to the division, because of a moratorium on FBI criminal background checks after recreational marijuana was legalized in December 2022.
Sparks was in the facility on a regular basis between February through July 2023 and never properly signed in or out of the visitor log, Iles wrote.
'Because Delta had to sponsor Sparks by making a written offer of employment for him to apply for the facility agent card, Delta knew that Sparks' application for an agent card had been denied and the reason for it,' Iles wrote. 'Because Sparks was central to the efforts of Delta to create the bulk distillate and Conte products, we conclude Sparks and Delta intentionally kept his name from appearing on the visitor log.'
The temporary workers Sparks hired also only wrote their first names in the log and didn't include the purpose for being in the facility or times they were there.
'As with Sparks' failure to sign the visitor log, we conclude this non-compliance was intentional,' Iles wrote. 'Neither Sparks nor Tania Conte could identify the individuals who were doing the work. They were paid in cash and Sparks was vague on how or where he found the workers. For its part, Delta simply turned its facility over to SND and Conte for the weekends and did nothing to identify who was in the facility or monitor their compliance with the security requirements.'
Before May 2023, the unregulated THC-A oil Sparks was bringing into the Delta facility came from Sparks' network of personal associates.
'Sparks believed it was derived from hemp,' Iles wrote.
Illes focused on what was produced between Feb. 3, 2023 — when the initial recreational marijuana rules were in place — and August 2023.
To understand Delta's alleged violation, Iles said it is necessary to first understand 'the basics.'
The psychoactive chemical that produces the high consumers look for in marijuana products is tetrahydrocannabinol, otherwise known as THC.
'THC does not occur naturally in either the marijuana plant or the hemp plant,' she states. 'THC-A does.'
THC-A is found in large amounts in marijuana plants and smaller amounts in hemp plants. By itself, it's not intoxicating.
For example, if you eat a raw cannabis bud, you shouldn't get high because the THC-A has not been heated yet, through a process called decarboxylation. That happens when you light a joint or bake pot brownies.
The THC-A oil used at Delta was extracted from hemp plants by sources outside Missouri, Iles wrote, not by Delta or Sparks in the Delta facility.
The oil was converted into THC before products were sold, she said. And that's a major reason it violates state rules.
'It was not resold as THC-A,' she states.
Delta believed the company was compliant as long as 'a single gram of THC sourced from a marijuana plant obtained from a licensed Missouri cultivator is included in a batch of product that might contain hundreds or thousands of grams of psychoactive THC' that come from hemp plants.
'This interpretation is unreasonable,' Iles wrote.
In a lawsuit filed last year, Sparks' group SND claimed Delta owes the company more than $13 million for producing about 1,100 liters of THC concentrate oil, or distillate, and other products.
A liter of 80% concentrated THC can make more than 70,000 individual gummies at 10mg THC a piece, industry experts say. That's almost 80 million doses — or twice that amount if they're 5mg THC gummies.
The company is also asking for $5 million in loss of revenue, after the state confiscated its extraction equipment that was inside Delta's facility for five months.
SND has agreed to enter into arbitration, and a hearing is scheduled for that case next month in Franklin County Circuit Court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn't saying thank you
Asia China AI Donald Trump FacebookTweetLink In a surprising reversal of the United States' years-long technology restrictions on China, President Donald Trump last month allowed Nvidia to resume sales of a key AI chip designed specifically for the Chinese market. Yet rather than celebrating, Beijing's response has been noticeably lukewarm, despite having long urged Washington to ease the stringent export controls. In the weeks since the policy U-turn, Beijing has called the chip a security risk, summoned Nvidia for explanations and discouraged its companies from using it. The less-than-welcoming sentiment reflects Beijing's drive to build a self-sufficient semiconductor supply chain – and its confidence in the progress its rapidly advancing chip industry has made. But the cold shoulder may also represent some political posturing. Despite significant advances in its semiconductor sector, China still needs America's chips and technology. Experts said China's national champion Huawei has developed chips with performance comparable to — and in some cases surpassing — the newly approved Nvidia chip. However, China still wants the more advanced AI processors that remain blocked under US export controls. In the years since Trump first imposed tech restrictions on Huawei during his first term, China's chip technology has made significant strides, spurred by the frustration that mounted as Washington piled on export controls, said Xiang Ligang, director-general of a Beijing-based technology industry group and an advisor to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 'We have this capability, it's not as they imagine – that if China is blocked, China won't be able to function, or that China will be finished,' he said. To him, the policy about-face only reflects the importance of having a wholly homegrown chip supply chain. 'For Chinese companies, we may only have one choice if we wish to ensure a relatively secure supply of chips – that means relying on our own domestically produced chips,' Xiang said. That may be China's goal, but in the high-stakes AI race, with all its national security implications, the US remains the leader, at least for now. The chip in focus is Nvidia's H20, which was released by the AI chip leader last year to maintain access to the Chinese market following strict export controls put in place under the Biden administration that stopped the export of chips with high processing power. Last month, Trump greenlit the sales of the chip to China after banning it in April as the US trade frictions with China deepened. Trump has justified his decision by calling the chip 'obsolete,' as it lags behind the company's cutting-edge AI processors like Blackwell or H100, from which H20 is derived. He and his officials appeared to have embraced a view long promoted by Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang – that US can maintain its tech leadership only through ensuring its chips remain the global standard. 'You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month. But the dramatic reversal has fueled questions about Trump's transactional approach to national security – once considered off-limits to bargaining. China, on the other hand, is alarmed by the alleged security risks of Nvidia's H20s like 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' features, capabilities that some US lawmakers have called for but Nvidia denies it has placed in its chips. China's cyberspace watchdog and industry ministry have since summoned the American chip giant over the security concerns and urged firms to avoid H20 chips, a development which was previously reported by Bloomberg. One major Chinese tech company which has developed its AI models has received notice from the authorities urging it to exercise caution in the use of H20s, and advising it not to purchase them, a company insider said on the condition of anonymity. CNN has reached out to the ministry and the cyberspace authorities for comment. An Nvidia spokesperson told CNN that NVIDIA 'does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them.' 'Banning the sale of H20 in China would only harm US economic and technology leadership with zero national security benefit,' the spokesperson added. But China believes the US isn't playing fairly, Xiang said. 'What we actually want, you refuse to sell us. For the things you already consider obsolete, you still want to dump them into our market and occupy our market. Do you really think we're that naive?' he said. Despite Beijing's concerns and the H20's reduced performance, the chips remain highly sought after by Chinese companies. Equity research firm Bernstein estimated that shipment of the chips to China this year would have reached 1.5 million units, or about 23 billion in revenue, without Trump's export restrictions. Major buyers include Chinese tech giants such as TikTok owner ByteDance, Alibaba and Tencent. While Huawei's top AI chips excel in computing power – one of the key measures in evaluating processors' performance – in comparison with H20, they fall short in terms of memory bandwidth, which determines how much data can move between a chip's memory and computing unit. That bandwidth depends on a technology known as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) used in AI chips to ensure efficient data transmission in AI model training. China's top HBM maker CXMT, or ChangXin Memory Technologies, is still about three to four years behind industry leaders like South Korea's SK Hynix and Samsung, and American Micron, according to MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, a research firm. Last year, the Biden administration further tightened export controls on China, including restrictions on HBM sales, forcing Chinese companies to rely on existing stockpiles. Beijing has requested Washington to lift restrictions on HBM as part of the trade deal negotiations, Financial Times reported this week. Key appeal of H20 for Chinese companies also lies in Huawei's limited production capacity and Nvidia's well-established ecosystem, said Qingyuan Lin, senior analyst at Bernstein focusing China's semiconductor industry. 'Even when you want to completely replace the H20 demand with the local guys, they're not able to deliver the amount of chips that's needed,' he said. The supply bottlenecks stem from constraints in scaling up production of both the manufacturing of computing units of the AI chips and the integration of various components in them, a technology known as advanced packaging in the industry, Lin said. Bernstein estimated that Huawei's shipments of its advanced AI chips in 2025 would amount to around 700,000 units, still far short of the demand in the country. CNN has reached out to Huawei for comment. Meanwhile, Nvidia's powerful ecosystem, which integrates its chips with its software platform, has created what experts call a 'moat,' making it difficult and costly for AI developers who train models on its software to switch to alternatives. 'The H20 comes with a complete ecosystem covering both hardware and software support, ensuring better compatibility and ease of integration,' said Brady Wang, associate director at Counterpoint. 'This ecosystem maturity is still a challenge for many Chinese-developed chips, making the H20 more attractive despite its cost disadvantage.' Still, experts said China's rapid progress in semiconductor technology should not be underestimated. Years of tightening export controls have injected both urgency and opportunity into Beijing's push for self-sufficiency, Lin said. While chipmaking technology appeared to stall after Huawei's 2023 flagship smartphone showcased advanced chips that American officials had deemed extremely difficult to produce, domestic chipmaking equipment companies have been steadily gaining ground, he said. 'The local guys actually had very little chance to gain share from the global players because of the technology gap, but export controls created a market that didn't exist before and accelerated the domestic substitution,' he said. Bernstein projects that the percentage of homemade AI chips in China will surge from 17% in 2023 to 55% by 2027, while American suppliers like Nvidia and AMD will shrink to 45% from 83%. In April, Huang of Nvidia met with Trump in Washington, urging the administration to loosen export controls on chips and saying that the diffusion of American AI technology around the world needs to be accelerated. 'There's no question that Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world…they made enormous progress in the last several years,' he said. 'China is right behind us. We're very, very close.' CNN's Hassan Tayir and Fred He contributed reporting.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mom Charged After Allegedly Packing Gun in Child's School Backpack to 'Return' It to Their Father: 'Could've Ended in Tragedy'
The student found the firearm in their bag during the first week back at Coppergate Elementary School NEED TO KNOW A Florida mom allegedly sent her young child to school on Aug. 13 with a gun in their backpack, so they could "return the firearm to their father," authorities said The child, "unaware" of the gun, told teachers, who informed the local sheriff's office Mother Sierra Bronner was arrested and charged with child neglect and giving a firearm to a minor A Florida mom has been charged with two felonies after allegedly sending her young child to school with a firearm. During the first week of classes at Coppergate Elementary School, also known as Coppergate School of the Arts, officials found a gun in a student's backpack, according to a news release from the Clay County Sheriff's Office (CCSO). Upon arriving at the Middleburg-based school on Wednesday, Aug. 13, the student 'discovered' the weapon in their bag, the CCSO said. They then 'told their teacher,' who alerted school officials and the sheriff's office, which was quick to alert the community to the situation. "All children are safe,' Clay County Sheriff Michelle Cook wrote in a Facebook post shared early that morning. The notification came as the school was placed in what the CCSO called 'secure status,' meaning educators could 'continue instructing while preventing anyone to leave or enter school grounds,' the sheriff's office said. The gun, meanwhile, was confiscated by CCSO deputies. With the school secure and the gun in CCSO possession, the sheriff's office began an investigation — which quickly led them to the student's mother, Sierra Bronner. "Through investigative techniques and interviews, we discovered the child's parents don't live together; the mother placed the gun in the backpack and told the young child to return the firearm to their father before they left for school,' the CCSO wrote in the news release. 'The child was taken to Coppergate Elementary by their father, who was unaware the gun was in the backpack. Therefore, the firearm ended up on school grounds,' the release stated. Upon learning that Bronner, 39, had allegedly sent the child to school with the firearm, she was arrested and charged with 'child neglect and giving a firearm to a minor,' the CCSO said. Both are felony charges, according to arrest records viewed by PEOPLE. PEOPLE reached out to Bronner and a Coppergate School of the Arts spokesperson for comment, but did not receive an immediate response. The Florida Department of Children and Families was also alerted to the situation and 'responded,' according to the CCSO. Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. In a statement, Sheriff Cook attributed the incident to a 'poor decision,' and said the situation very well could have 'ended in tragedy.' "It's crucial that parents know what their children are bringing to school before they leave home. Look in their backpacks, ask questions and have conversations on what's appropriate to bring to school,' the sheriff said. 'In this specific case, this was a poor decision and could've ended in tragedy.' "I'm grateful for our partnership with Clay County District Schools and applaud our school resource deputies and detectives for their work to keep our students safe,' Cook added. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Klook taps banks for US IPO, sources say
By Echo Wang and Julie Zhu NEW YORK (Reuters) -Klook, a travel booking services company, has hired investment banks to help arrange a potential initial public offering in the U.S., according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The Hong Kong-based company, backed by investors including SoftBank Group and Goldman Sachs Group, is working with bankers at Goldman, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan on the planned first-time share sale, said the people, asking not to be identified as the process is private. The deal could come as early as this year and raise around $500 million, they said, cautioning that the timing and deal size are subject to market conditions. U.S. IPO activity has gained momentum, bolstered by strong tech earnings and signs of progress in trade negotiations that have restored investor confidence. Recent listings, including cryptocurrency exchange operator Bullish, and design software company Figma, underscore the uptick in market debuts, reversing a period in the year when uncertainty over President Donald Trump's tariff policies weighed on new offerings. Klook, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan declined to comment. Morgan Stanley did not respond to a request for comment. It was not immediately clear whether Klook will be selling a stake in the IPO, or whether it will be an investor sell-down or a combination of both. Bloomberg News reported earlier the company was exploring a U.S. IPO. Founded in 2014, Klook turned profitable in 2023. It provides various booking services to travelers across a range of locations globally and competes with other global travel booking sites such as and TripAdvisor, as well as China's and South Korea's Yanolja. The company said in February it had raised $100 million in a funding round led by European investment firm Vitruvian Partners, but did not disclose its valuation at the time. Other investors in Klook include HSG, formerly known as Sequoia Capital China. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data