
Harvey Weinstein does not plan to testify at sex crimes retrial
That means jurors soon will get the case against the former movie studio boss who propelled the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct.
The trial will move on to closing arguments on Tuesday without testimony from Weinstein, Arthur Aidala said on Sunday night.
The court handles other cases on Mondays.
It is unclear whether jury deliberations would begin on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday.
Harvey Weinstein attends his retrial at a Manhattan court (John Angelillo/Pool via AP)
It was a fraught decision for Weinstein, who has never answered questions in open court about any of the accusations women have made. He did not testify at previous trials in New York and California and was convicted in both.
He denies the allegations, and lawyer Mr Aidala has said that Weinstein was giving a lot of thought to whether to take the stand this time.
While his California appeal winds on, Weinstein won a new trial in his New York rape and sexual assault case when the state's highest court overturned his 2020 conviction.
He is charged in New York with raping Jessica Mann in 2013 and forcing oral sex on Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola, separately, in 2006.
Ms Mann was an actor and hairstylist, Ms Haley a production assistant and producer, and Ms Sokola a model who aspired to an acting career.
All three women have testified for days at the retrial, giving emotional and graphic accounts of what they say they endured from a powerbroker who suggested he would help them achieve their show-business dreams, but then manoeuvred them into private settings and preyed on them.
His lawyers have argued that anything that happened between him and his accusers was consensual.
In the US, defendants in criminal cases are not obligated to testify, and many decide not to, for various reasons.
Among them: the prospect of being questioned by prosecutors.
Weinstein has been watching the New York retrial intently from the defence table, sometimes shaking his head at accusers' testimony and often leaning over to one or another of his lawyers to convey his thoughts.
One of the lawyers, Mr Aidala, said outside court on Thursday that Weinstein thought a lot of holes had been poked in the accusers' accounts, but that he also was pondering whether jurors would feel they needed to hear from him.
The jury has heard from a few other defence witnesses — one of them via a transcript read by court employees.
That witness, Talita Maia, testified at the 2020 trial but was unavailable this time, so jurors instead got a reading Friday of her earlier testimony.
One court stenographer voiced the 2020 lawyers' questions, while another stenographer sat in the witness box and rendered Ms Maia's answers, at times with emphasis.
Ms Maia and Ms Mann were roommates and friends in 2013, but later fell out.
According to Ms Maia, Ms Mann never mentioned in those days that Weinstein had hurt her in any way.
Both Ms Maia and another witness, Thomas Richards, met up with Ms Mann and Weinstein shortly after Ms Mann has said she was raped.
Both witnesses testified that they saw nothing amiss.
Mr Richards, who was subpoenaed to appear and said he did not want to be seen as a Weinstein supporter, recalled Ms Mann and Weinstein having a 'friendly conversation' at a meal he shared with them that day.
Ms Mann testified earlier this month that she never told police or anyone else that Weinstein had sexually assaulted her because she didn't think she'd be believed, and she was scared of how he might react.
Weinstein's defence also brought in Ms Sokola's pal Helga Samuelsen, who also has friendly ties to the former producer.
Ms Samuelsen testified on Thursday that Weinstein visited Ms Sokola once and spent about a half- hour in a bedroom with her in a New York apartment the women briefly shared in 2005; Ms Sokola told jurors no such thing happened.
The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, but Ms Sokola, Ms Mann and Ms Haley have given their permission to be identified.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Family of terrorist who hurled Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel demonstrators detained by US immigration cops
The family of a terrorist suspect who threw Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel activists were detained by immigration cops. Mohamed Sabry Soliman's wife and five kids were yesterday seized by the Department of Homeland Security after it emerged he illegally outstayed his US visa. 2 Mohamed Sabry Soliman is alleged to have yelled 'you all deserve to die' and 'Free Palestine' in Boulder, Colorado, at American Jews Credit: AP 2 Soliman was seen bandaged in his mugshot after the horror attack Credit: Alamy Egyptian national Soliman, 45, reportedly injured 12 people, including an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor, on Sunday. The suspect yelled 'you all deserve to die' and 'Free Palestine' in Boulder, Colorado, at American Jews calling for the return of Israeli hostages. The shirtless fiend used an improvised flamethrower and petrol bombs, leaving several victims with severe burns, in the attack at a busy shopping centre in Boulder, Colorado. Kristi Noem of the DHS said: 'This terrorist will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. 'We are investigating to what extent his family knew about this attack. 'I am continuing to pray for the victims of this attack and their families.' Soliman will be charged tomorrow, including with 16 counts of attempted murder. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for allowing Soliman to illegally overstay a tourist visa. Prosecutors believe he had planned the attack for a year and was only put off by waiting for one of his daughters to graduate from high school. Soliman was born in Egypt and lived in Kuwait for 17 years before moving to Colorado, where he worked as an Uber driver, in August 2022.


STV News
4 hours ago
- STV News
Gaza officials say at least 27 killed in third aid site shooting in three days
Witnesses and Palestinian health authorities say Israeli forces opened fire on large crowds around one kilometre from an Israeli run aid distribution site, as ITV News Correspondent Lucy Watson reports Health officials in Gaza say Israeli forces again fired on people heading to an aid site in Rafah on Tuesday, killing at least 27 and wounding over 180, the third time this has happened in the last three days. The Israeli army said it fired 'near a few individual suspects' who left the designated route and approached armed forces. They say they are looking into reports of casualties and have denied firing on civilians. Mourners pray beside the body of Alfat Za'rab who was killed while heading to a Gaza aid hub / Credit: AP The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a joint US and Israeli backed aid distribution, is a new operation which Israel says is designed to circumvent Hamas. The UN has rejected this, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis and allows Israel to use aid as a weapon. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates the sites, says there has been no violence in or around them. On Tuesday, it acknowledged that the Israeli military was investigating whether civilians were wounded 'after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone,' in an area that was 'well beyond our secure distribution site.' Palestinians pray during the funeral of a person killed heading to a Gaza aid hub. / Credit: AP The latest incident occurred close to Gaza's southern city of Rafah which is now mostly uninhabited. Hisham Mhanna, a spokesperson for the International Committee of the Red Cross, said its field hospital in Rafah received 184 wounded people, 19 of whom were declared dead on arrival and eight more who later died of their wounds. The 27 dead were transferred to Nasser Hospital in the city of Khan Younis. At least two women who survived the shooting described finding no aid supplies at the site when they got there. Neima al-Aaraj said: 'There were many martyrs and wounded.' Adding: 'There was no aid there. After the martyrs and wounded, I won't return, either way we will die.' Still from a video released by Israel's military, which claims to show gunmen shooting into a crowd at a similar shooting three days ago. / Credit: IDF Tuesday's shooting follows a similar incident on Sunday which killed at least 31 and was disputed by the IDF, ,as well as a second on Monday at the same site which left three dead. Meanwhile the Israeli military said Tuesday that three of its soldiers were killed in the Gaza Strip, in what appeared to be the deadliest attack on Israel's forces since it ended a ceasefire with Hamas in March. The military said the three soldiers, all in their early 20s, fell during combat in northern Gaza on Monday, without providing details. Israeli media reported that they were killed in an explosion in the Jabaliya area. What we know about the shootings so far? Early on Sunday, witnesses and Palestinian health authorities say Israeli forces opened fire on large crowds around one kilometre from an Israeli run aid distribution site, killing at least 31 and wounding over 170. On Monday, authorities said Israeli forces fired at people in the same location, killing at least three and wounding dozens. Now most recently on Tuesday, crowds were again fired on, killing at least 27 and injuring at least 184 according to the International Committee of the Red Cross. A spokesperson for the UN also confirmed these deaths. What have the Israeli army said? The Israeli army described the claims about Sunday's attack as false reports and said initial investigations showed 'the IDF did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site and that reports to this effect are false.' They later published drone footage which they claim shows masked Hamas gunmen opening fire on people queuing for aid. On the Monday shooting which killed three, the IDF said they fired warning shots toward, 'several suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them.' They say this took place at a time when the aid distribution centre was closed and denied preventing people from accessing the site. They claimed the same about Tuesday's shooting and said that reports regarding casualties were 'being looked into,' adding: 'IDF troops are not preventing the arrival of Gazan civilians to the humanitarian aid distribution sites. The warning shots were fired approximately half a kilometer away from the humanitarian aid distribution site toward several suspects who advanced toward the troops in such a way that posed a threat to them.' The US-Isareli backed, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates the aid sites, says there has been no violence in or around them. On Tuesday, it acknowledged that the Israeli military was investigating whether civilians were wounded 'after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone,' in an area that was 'well beyond our secure distribution site.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Powys County Times
5 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Extremists kill dozens of soldiers at a Mali military base, sources say
Extremists have killed dozens of soldiers in an attack on a military base in Mali, civil society and military sources said on Tuesday, in the latest militant violence in West Africa's restive Sahel region. The attack on Sunday on the base in Boulkessi, near the border with Burkina Faso, killed at least 60 soldiers and wounded 40 more, a civil society activist in the area told The Associated Press. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk to reporters. The al Qaeda-linked JNIM group claimed responsibility. A military source told the AP there were around 280 soldiers in the base, and 'all of those who didn't die were taken prisoner by the terrorists'. Mali's army acknowledged the attack in a statement on Monday, adding that soldiers had fought 'to their last breath'. It did not provide an exact death toll. Mali, along with neighbouring Burkina Faso and Niger, has battled an insurgency by armed groups, including some allied with al Qaeda and the Islamic State group. Following military coups in all three nations in recent years, they have expelled French forces and turned to Russia's mercenary units for security assistance. In a separate attack on Monday, JNIM claimed responsibility for co-ordinated attacks on a military airport, a military base and army checkpoints in the northern town of Timbuktu. Mali's army said on social media it repelled the attack and that 13 extremists had been killed. It did not say whether any soldiers were killed. A hospital employee in the town said one soldier died of his wounds and 10 other people were wounded. Timbuktu residents said they heard heavy gunfire and saw armed men enter the town on motorcycles. They spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisals. Rida Lyammouri, a Sahel expert at the Morocco-based Policy Centre for the New South, said the high level of co-ordination in the two attacks shows that JNIM had been planning them for a while. Attacks by extremists have been on the rise in Mali and neighbouring Burkina Faso in recent weeks. JNIM has established a strong presence in both.