Defence casts doubt over key witness, CCTV evidence in Adelaide murder trial
Matthew Charles Draganoff, 48, is standing trial in South Australia's Supreme Court after pleading not guilty to the murder of Simon Middleton, 49, at Viriginia, on the northern outskirts of Adelaide, in March 2021.
Defence barrister Michelle Barnes, for Mr Draganoff, told the jury CCTV footage of the shooting was of "quite poor quality" and could not clearly identify an offender because it was "too far away, too dark and too grainy".
She said it was difficult to see key detail such as clothing and "not good enough" to identify the shooter or draw any inferences about the physical appearance of the shooter.
"You should be careful not to jump to conclusions or to assume what the footage shows," she said.
She said it was not enough to think that Mr Draganoff "maybe", "possibly" or "probably" shot Mr Middleton, because in those scenarios, "you could still have a doubt".
"Mr Draganoff is charged with an extremely serious offence, he must not be convicted on evidence that is weak, questionable or has gaps."
Ms Barnes also told the jury one of the prosecution's key witnesses was "simply not a truthful witness" and his account of what happened contained "too many inconsistencies".
"There were that many inconsistencies, different versions and lies in the accounts he gave at different times that you just cannot accept that he is a truthful witness," she said.
"They add up to a picture of a witness who is simply not telling you the truth and whose evidence you cannot accept."
Ms Barnes told the jury a second key witness, however, gave evidence without inconsistencies which she said was "consistent with Mr Draganoff's innocence".
She said despite that witness spending time with Mr Draganoff in the days prior to the alleged murder "he knew nothing about any plan held by Matthew Draganoff to shoot Mr Middleton".
Previously, the court heard Mr Draganoff was accused of shooting Mr Middleton three times — in the head, chest and buttocks — with a high-powered Marlin 30-30 rifle at a property on Brady Street on March 8, 2021.
Opening the trial in April, prosecutor Lucy Boord SC told the jury it was alleged there had been "growing animosity" between the pair over a "range of issues" prior to the shooting, including a dispute over the sale of a stolen caravan and Mr Middleton living rent-free at one of Mr Draganoff's properties.
"In the lead up to the murder, there'd been an accumulation of grievances held by the accused towards the deceased," Ms Boord had told the jury.
She had told the jury the alleged final "catalyst" for the crime came after a "home invasion" that was reported to police on March 6, and that Mr Draganoff had believed Mr Middleton and his friends had been stealing from him.
Ms Boord had also told the jury Mr Middleton had been on the phone just prior to being shot, and a witness had reported hearing him say "oh no, don't shoot" before screaming and then three shots.
Ms Barnes will continue the defence closing address on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
11 minutes ago
- ABC News
NT Police arrest 48-year-old man over alleged fatal poisoning of female partner
Northern Territory police have charged a 48-year-old man over the alleged fatal poisoning of his female partner. The man's arrest on Thursday comes almost 18 months after his 41-year-old partner was found dead in her Darwin River home. On March 12, 2024, emergency services received a report the woman had been found "unresponsive" in her home. Police and St John Ambulance paramedics attended and declared her dead at the scene. In a statement on Thursday, a police spokesperson said there were "no indications of suspicious circumstances at the time". On Thursday, detectives from NT Police's Major Crime Squad arrested the man and charged him with manslaughter and fail to rescue. Detective Acting Superintendent Paul Morrissey commended the efforts of those involved in the investigation. "This case underscores the diligent investigative efforts undertaken by our detectives," he said. "We will continue to work tirelessly to ensure that offenders are brought before the courts no matter how long it takes." The man has been remanded to appear in Darwin Local Court on Friday.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
NSW police officer denies using excessive force against teenagers during arrest
A New South Wales police officer accused of assaulting two teenagers during their arrest has told a court he used an approved police technique he called a "distraction strike". Prosecutors told the Batemans Bay local court on Thursday that Senior Constable Brett David Lindsay used excessive force while arresting two teenage boys, aged 14 and 17, in October 2023. Prosecutor Brendon Donnelly alleged the excessive force included punching the 17-year-old near the head and grabbing the younger boy by his shoulders and throwing him onto a concrete floor. Senior Constable Lindsay previously pleaded not guilty to the charges. The court heard Senior Constable Lindsay and his partner were investigating claims of a potential home invasion in Batemans Bay, which led them to a block of units where a number of teenagers were. Senior Constable Lindsay, who has been suspended on pay awaiting the trial, told the court the person who had called triple-0 about the potential home invasion had named some of the teenagers in the flat as the offenders. During the arrest, the court heard a scuffle broke out between Senior Constable Lindsay and the 17-year-old, and the officer ended up on top of the teenager. Senior Constable Lindsay told the court the teenager tensed up, and he feared the boy was in reach of his gun and handcuffs, so he struck him to what he thought was his collarbone. On the video, the older teenager can be heard repeatedly calling the officer a "white gronk" and a "f***ing dog". Giving evidence, the 17-year-old said, "I didn't think a copper would hit me at that age." The other assault charges relate to the way Senior Constable Lindsay forced the two boys to the ground during the arrest. The court heard the police officer forced the 17-year-old to the ground with his knee coming into contact with the teenager's stomach. Senior Constable Lindsay testified the teen then clenched his fist. On the body-worn video, the police officer can be heard saying to the teen: "Do you want a f***ing punch mate, you'll get one." The 14-year-old boy, now aged 16, said he also refused to sit down. "We didn't sit down because we didn't know what we were getting arrested for," he told the court. Mr Donnelly alleged Senior Constable Lindsay used an unnecessary amount of force by throwing the younger boy on a concrete floor, which the officer refuted, saying it was a safety issue having him on his feet. He later told his defence lawyer both the strike and use of force putting the teenagers to the ground were techniques taught at the Goulburn Police Academy. Mr Donnelly questioned Senior Constable Lindsay about why the use of force was not mentioned in his police report. "Were you trying to conceal those events?" he asked. "No," the officer replied. "I get it was a use of force, but it was quite a trivial use of force." The hearing is expected to conclude on Friday.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
AFL's suspension of Izak Rankine over homophobic slur sends a strong message
The AFL faces a reckoning over just how seriously it takes homophobic abuse — and the four-game ban handed down to Adelaide Crows star Izak Rankine for allegedly using a homophobic slur during a game sends a signal to a generation of young men. This is not hyperbole. The penalties we issue in response to racism and homophobia matter. They send a powerful message about what we regard as acceptable. Rankine allegedly used a homophobic slur during the Crows' game against Collingwood on Saturday. The alleged slur is not just a throw-away word, but a degrading put-down that sends chills down the spines of gay people who know its dangers and the way it is used to dehumanise. Collingwood vice-captain Brayden Maynard said the AFL must "stamp out" homophobic slurs. Full disclosure: Collingwood is my team. And in my long love for Collingwood I watched as my team turned a blind eye to racism. It was deplorable. It fills me with pride to hear our vice-captain stand up against homophobia and take the club in the direction of never minimising abuse that literally can kill. The AFL did ultimately hold Rankine accountable for his alleged comments but the tenor of this week's debate tells us we still have a long way to go before discrimination is eradicated from our sporting fields. The conversations centred on whether Rankine should be allowed to play again this season with widespread hand-wringing about whether the Crows could win the premiership without him. Is it a wonder that the AFL has never had an out and proud AFL player in the men's league in its history? Incidents like this make it clear why no one feels they can be their true self on our football field. That is profoundly sad. The fact that so much of the conversation has focused on the grand final shows that many don't get it. An AFL statement said along with the four-match ban Rankine had been ordered to undertake Pride In Sport training. "It should be noted that on Sunday, Rankine rang the Collingwood player to personally apologise and he fully cooperated with the subsequent investigation by the AFL Integrity Unit including by admitting the use of the homophobic slur and being remorseful for it," the AFL statement said. "The language used was offensive, hurtful and highly inappropriate. Our players have a very clear understanding of what is acceptable on the football field. Importantly, in this instance it was called out by players and acknowledged by Izak himself as wrong — and that reflects the standards we expect and demand in our game," AFL General Counsel Stephen Meade said. "Izak has said he knew it was not acceptable. Adelaide have said they know it is not acceptable. In an AFL environment, this behaviour is not acceptable. Homophobia has no place in football. The suspension is significant, but stamping out vilification in our game is incredibly important. Everyone in football understands the rules, and there are consequences of breaching them." Meade said the AFL had a responsibility to every player, official and fan who "deserves respect when they come to our game". "We know people in the LGBTQI+ community and allies hurt when an incident like this happens," he said. "One incident of this nature is too many, and the fact there have been multiple this year shows we still have more work to do and we are committed to that." Victoria's LGBTIQA+ Communities Commissioner Joe Ball said on Tuesday he was concerned about a leniency on this issue. "Homophobic slurs cause real harm," Ball said. "Our sporting heroes must do better because young people are watching. Sport should be safe and inclusive. Slurs undermine that, and incidents like this must drive real culture change across the game, league and clubs." If we want hate and bullying to stop in the schoolyard it has to stop at the MCG. Gold Coast coach Damien Hardwick said the AFL had "painted [itself] into a corner" regarding the punishment that is coming Rankine. "There's certainly no place for it [homophobic language] in the game … but at what stage [do we ask] what can we say and can't we say? This is completely on the 'we cannot say this and we understand', but it's probably the penalty to me that I have a little bit of an issue with … It's a significant penalty, I feel," he said. "The challenge at the moment — and even me here, it's hard having the conversation — but what is it?" There is nothing hard about this conversation. It's simple. There should be zero tolerance for this abuse if we ever hope to make this sport truly safe for all the young men we love to watch thrive to be their authentic selves. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
