
A clash over a promotion puts Hegseth at odds with his generals
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Hegseth met with Sims one final time but refused to budge. Sims is expected to retire in the coming months after 34 years in the military, officials said. Through a spokesperson, Sims and Caine declined to comment. A Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment on Hegseth's role.
Advertisement
The standoff over his promotion reflects an ongoing clash between Hegseth's highly partisan worldview, in which he has written that the Democratic Party 'really does hate America,' and the longstanding tradition of an apolitical military that pledges an oath to the Constitution.
Hegseth's actions could shape the military's top ranks for years to come. His insistence on absolute loyalty, backed with repeated threats of polygraphs, also creates uncertainty and mistrust that threaten to undermine the readiness and effectiveness of the force, officials said.
Advertisement
The tension between top military officers and their civilian leaders has been persistent since the earliest days of Trump's second term, when senior administration officials ordered the removal of Milley's portrait from a Pentagon hallway.
Caine, who pressed Hegseth on Sims's behalf, got the job of Joint Chiefs chair after Hegseth and Trump fired General Charles Q. Brown Jr., his predecessor. Hegseth accused Brown, who is Black, of prioritizing diversity over the combat effectiveness of the force.
Also removed during the first months of the new administration were the first woman to command the Navy, Admiral Lisa Franchetti; the first woman to command the Coast Guard, Admiral Linda Fagan; Hegseth's senior military assistant, Lieutenant General Jennifer Short; and the US military representative to the NATO military committee, Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield. All were dismissed as part of a campaign to root out diversity, equity, and inclusion from the military and restore what Hegseth has described as a 'warrior ethos.'
Hegseth also recently withdrew the nomination of Rear Admiral Michael 'Buzz' Donnelly to lead the Navy's Seventh Fleet in Japan -- its largest overseas force -- amid reports in conservative media that seven years earlier the admiral had allowed a drag performance to take place on the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan.
The decision not to promote Sims, who is white, seems unrelated to any issues of race or gender. Rather, the general's career seems to have become tangled up in broader suspicions about leaks and a mistrust of senior military officers that have defined much of Hegseth's first six months on the job.
Advertisement
Hegseth, a former Fox News host and an Iraq War veteran, came to the Pentagon with little managerial experience. Since his arrival, a series of firings and resignations in his inner circle have left him with only a skeleton staff of civilian aides to run his office. He has been without a permanent chief of staff since late April. Ricky Buria, a recently retired Marine colonel who has forged a close relationship with Hegseth, has been serving in the critical role.
But White House officials, who have concerns about Buria's competence and qualifications, have blocked Hegseth from formally appointing him to the job, officials said. Buria, meanwhile, has clashed repeatedly with many of Hegseth's closest aides and some officers in the Pentagon.
This spring, Eric Geressy, a retired sergeant major who served with Hegseth in Iraq and now advises him in the Pentagon, threatened to quit after an argument with Buria, according to people with knowledge of the situation. The rift was reported earlier by The Washington Post. Geressy briefly went to his home in Florida before Hegseth persuaded him to return, officials said.
Hegseth is also still contending with a review by the Pentagon's inspector general related to his disclosure on the Signal messaging app of the precise timing of US fighter jets' airstrikes against the Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen in March.
The office has received evidence that the information that Hegseth put in the commercial chat app came from a classified Central Command document, according to two US officials with knowledge of the review. The classified origins of the information were reported earlier by the Post.
The infighting, investigations, and personnel churn have strained Hegseth's ability to manage critical operations in the Pentagon. Hegseth found himself in the crosshairs this month after Democrats and Republicans in Congress blamed him for pausing critical shipments of interceptors and other arms to Ukraine without sufficiently consulting with the White House or the State Department.
Advertisement
The suspension was particularly jarring because just days earlier Trump had said he was open to selling more weapons to Ukraine after meeting with President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of a NATO meeting in The Hague.
It also left the impression that Hegseth and his top aides had failed to keep the president and senior White House officials in the loop.
As aides to Hegseth traded blame, and then tried to play down the impact of the pause, Trump dramatically overruled the Pentagon, saying he was unhappy with President Vladimir Putin of Russia.
The frustration with Hegseth is seeping out. Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who cast the deciding vote to confirm Hegseth, this month called him ill-suited to lead the Pentagon.
'With the passing of time, I think it's clear he's out of his depth as a manager of a large, complex organization,' Tillis told CNN.
For now, Hegseth's missteps do not seem to have hurt his standing with the person who matters most: Trump.
Like Trump, Hegseth had a career in television before joining the administration and relishes the performative aspects of his job. As defense secretary, he regularly posts videos that show him exercising with troops. The photo ops -- known inside the Pentagon as 'troop touches' -- are a central part of almost all his public appearances, current and former aides said.
Several officials have complained that the photos and videos -- including one that he posted from Omaha Beach in Normandy in which he joins Army Rangers carrying a soldier on a stretcher as part of D-Day remembrances -- are distractions that serve primarily to bolster his image.
Advertisement
Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said that Hegseth retained Trump's 'full confidence' and cited the 'critical role' he played 'in ensuring the flawless execution' of the strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June.
Current and former military officials said that Trump largely bypassed Hegseth in the days leading up to the strikes and instead relied on Caine and General Michael Erik Kurilla, the head of Central Command, for counsel.
But officials with knowledge of the president's thinking said Trump especially admired his defense secretary's combative response at a news conference to reports questioning the effectiveness of the attack.
In the wake of staff dismissals and a series of negative stories about Hegseth's performance in the job, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, offered a window into how Hegseth views the department he now runs.
'This is what happens when the entire Pentagon is working against you and working against the monumental change you are trying to implement,' she said.
This article originally appeared in

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
31 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Who People Want As The New Face Of The Democratic Party
After a resounding defeat last November, it's clear that the Democratic Party needs to figure out how to move forward. So, we asked the BuzzFeed Community who they would like to see as the new face of the party. Here's what they said: "AOC or Jasmine Crockett. We need someone who actually wants the best for the American people and has our best interests at heart." —Anonymous "I hadn't heard of Andy Beshear until that period where we were all wondering who was going to be chosen as Kamala's running mate, but he seems like a great fit to lead the party right now. He's connected with voters enough to keep winning elections in his red state of Kentucky, and we could certainly use some of that in the next presidential election." —Anonymous "I love those videos of Katie Porter breaking things down on her whiteboard to emphasize how corrupt and greedy corporations have gotten. She fearlessly calls out companies that don't pay their workers enough, Big Pharma for exploiting sick people, etc. She is a true supporter of the middle class and exactly who I want to represent me." —Anonymous "I feel like the clear option has to be a governor or early-term senator. Historically, Democratic candidates have often won elections by being outsiders to Washington politics. So, I think the key faces of the Democratic Party should be people like Pete Buttigieg or Wes Moore. What we need the least is for another senator or other person with a long Washington record to come in and march the party to another defeat." —Anonymous "I think Adam Schiff should run as the Democratic nominee for president in 2028. He's really smart, has experience in Congress, and is well-spoken. Most importantly, he has no fear of Trump or Trumpites. Go Adam!" —Anonymous "I recently saw clips of James Talarico speaking on Joe Rogan's podcast, and I was blown away. I hadn't heard of him before, but he was smart, had common sense, and made me hopeful for the future of the Democratic Party. He wants to return the party to really looking out for the working class — something we should all agree on. Even Joe agreed with him and urged him to run for president. I don't think James has the name recognition for a 2028 run, but he's a rising star, and I hope to see much more of him." —Anonymous "Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois. She's a veteran who lost both her legs fighting for her country and is committed to members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and their families. She had to use IVF to become a mother and went public about what it took for her to have children. She's not going to sit idly by while the rights of women and reproductive healthcare are being actively suppressed and undermined." —Anonymous "Jasmine Crockett, Maxwell Frost, and AOC. They're young enough to know how to play this game MAGA plays. We should have learned from the first election Trump won. Americans who voted for the economy, without any regard for the morality of the one they voted for, got exactly that — look at all the immoral and chaotic mess! Now, we all have to deal with it." —Anonymous "Given the results of our presidential election and a discombobulated Democratic Party (plus the reluctance to replace career old farts with modern-day thinkers), I don't believe our country is capable of voting in a woman, let alone a woman of color. Hurts me to believe that, as a lifelong Democrat of mixed race and a mother of adult Democrats. But if we make it beyond Trump, we'll need healing and major rebuilding by — sadly and likely — a more centrist white male. One with the integrity and guts to empower the brilliance and partnership of a woman like Jasmine or AOC. Perhaps Walz?" —Anonymous "Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico should also be in the limelight as a true leader. She had the courage to call out Congressmembers who objected to placing the entirety of Project 2025 into the public record." —Anonymous "I've been very impressed with Zohran Mamdani. He's getting people engaged and passionate. His proposals are good for the many, rather than the few. I believe a democratic socialist is precisely what the US needs right now, despite what old, corporate Democrats think. It's so frustrating how other countries can take care of their citizens while the US is too focused on greed. It's time we caught up with the rest of the world." —Anonymous "Andy Kim of New Jersey. He's shown that he's willing to fight. I'm looking three years ahead, and I think he might actually be presidential material." —Anonymous "Pete Buttigieg has such a way with words. Very smart and articulate, with the ability to break complicated issues down in ways that regular people can understand and care about. He also seems to have a calm demeanor, patiently explaining stuff without becoming hot-headed, but still standing his ground. It would be a welcome change after Trump." —Anonymous "Jamie Raskin has demonstrated he is willing and capable of fighting back." —Anonymous And finally, "AOC, because I like that she works with the left wing of the party while the rest of the establishment is courting moderate votes. Jasmine Crockett is also a good candidate to lead the party, but I'd like to know more about her inter-party strategies as well. For now, AOC seems to connect with the people and has the ability to use the system to make the most possible change of the moment. Hey, maybe AOC-Crockett 2028!" —Anonymous Who would you like to see as the new face of the Democratic Party? Why? Share your thoughts in the comments or in the anonymous Google form below.

32 minutes ago
'Highballed': How disproportionate property taxes are forcing some Americans out of their homes
Bonita Anderson's favorite part of living in Baltimore is having family nearby. A family matriarch with five children and eight grandchildren, Anderson worked hard to buy a place in the city for her family to call home in 2009. "It was an accomplishment for me," she said. "That's where we used to gather to bring the family together." Last week, what was once Anderson's cherished home was listed for sale at nearly $540,000 -- more than five times what she paid for it. But Anderson won't see any of the proceeds. After more than a decade of making payments toward her $100,000 mortgage, Anderson was diagnosed with cancer in 2020. Amid mounting medical bills and property taxes, the lifelong Baltimore resident says she had to choose between fighting for her life and fighting for her home. While undergoing treatment, Anderson fell behind on her property taxes by about $5,000. In 2022, she lost her house at a Baltimore City tax sale. "I sat down and thought, 'Oh my god, I'm 70 years old and I'm homeless,'" Anderson told ABC News Senior Political Correspondent Rachel Scott. The City of Baltimore had put a lien on Anderson's tax debt and auctioned it off to the highest bidder -- a company that specializes in tax lien purchases -- for just $69,500. "If you can't afford to pay your property taxes and you keep missing your payments, government is going to auction your property off for back taxes," said Lawrence Levy, executive dean at the National Center for Suburban Studies at Hofstra University. Court records show Anderson tried to make good and redeem her home, paying the city $18,900 by the end of 2022 -- more than triple her outstanding taxes. But instead of putting these payments toward her back taxes, the city applied the money to taxes that had accrued under the new owner. Anderson was unknowingly paying the investor's tax bills instead of her own, allowing the company to foreclose on her home in 2023. "I was just baffled," she said. 'Filled with distortions' Anderson's home was just one of nearly 44,000 Baltimore properties that were listed at municipal tax sales from 2019 through 2023. It was also among the 92% of those properties located in majority-nonwhite neighborhoods -- which account for 70% of parcels citywide. An analysis of ATTOM and U.S. Census Bureau data by ABC Owned Television Stations showed one likely reason for this disparity: disproportionate property taxes. Property taxes are based on a government assessment of each home's value. But researchers say property values are highly subjective, and these estimates don't always align with market prices. Data shows discrepancies in assessments -- and therefore tax bills -- affect some communities more than others. ABC's analysis found that across the country, homeowners in predominantly Black and Brown areas tend to pay higher taxes than those in mostly white neighborhoods for a house worth the same amount on the open market. "When property tax systems are filled with distortions the people punished tend to be the poorest homeowners," Levy said. "In suburbia, where you have a high level of segregation, the people who are being taxed unfairly based on not accurately capturing the value of the home are people of color." For some of these homeowners who are "highballed" on their assessments, missed bills lead to tax sales, leaving them with nothing. From the time Anderson bought her home until she lost it, the property's assessment more than tripled -- but the home's booming value ultimately went to its new owner. "I don't know what's worse, losing the house or being diagnosed with cancer," Anderson said. "It hurts still." Until recently, Levy noted, tax sales most often took place in cities. As urban neighborhoods gentrified and property values shifted rapidly, longtime residents couldn't always keep up with rising bills. "We're now starting to see more of that in suburban areas, particularly in the poorer suburban areas as we're seeing demographic change," Levy said. In Garden City, a predominantly white suburb on New York's Long Island with a median home value of around $1 million, a typical residential tax bill is around $10,000 to $15,000, property data shows. Down the road in Hempstead, where 88% of residents are Black or Latino, homes tend to be worth less than half that. But the typical tax bill is similar, meaning Hempstead homeowners pay proportionally more in taxes relative to the value of their homes. John Rao, senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, says U.S. homeowners in communities of color face a "double whammy." They often receive "lowballed" appraisals when trying to purchase or refinance their homes, Rao explained, "but when it comes to paying their taxes, once they've owned the home ... often their assessments are proportionally higher than what they should be." 'Stripping generational wealth' In suburban Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 91-year-old Gloria Gaynor, who suffers from dementia, lost her home of 25 years because of $3,500 in taxes she didn't pay during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gaynor's daughter, Jackie Davis, told ABC station WPVI-TV that her mother stayed home during the pandemic. She skipped her annual trip to the tax office after hearing that tax collectors had paused enforcement as COVID-19 spread through the Philadelphia suburbs. When the government restarted collection efforts and the county tax office reopened, Gaynor went in and made a payment, intending to cover her previous year's taxes, according to her attorney, Alexander Barth. Instead, the money was applied to Gaynor's 2021 and 2022 taxes and not her outstanding balance from 2020, "leaving what is essentially a donut in her tax payment history," Barth explained. A real estate investor bought Gaynor's home from Delaware County for $14,000, the cost of her overdue taxes plus interest and fees. Gaynor had paid off most of her mortgage on the house, which is now worth an estimated $247,000. But she did not make any money from the sale. "This is stripping generational wealth from the have-nots and allowing the haves to have it," Barth said. Gaynor's family went to court in an attempt to get back her home, but two courts upheld the sale. The Delaware County Tax Claim Bureau told ABC's Philadelphia station that while it "sympathizes with the emotional toll" on Gaynor, the county government acted within Pennsylvania law and issued multiple notices ahead of the sale. If Gaynor had lived just a few miles away inside Philadelphia's city limits, officials there would have taken extra steps to try to keep her in her home. Since property taxes are handled differently in different communities, some local governments like Philadelphia have layers of protection for vulnerable homeowners, such as requiring in-person notifications before a tax sale or offering payment plans to redeem a home afterward. "Although local governments should do everything they can to keep people in their homes, whether it's an owner or a renter, at some point they have an obligation to all the other taxpayers, the businesses, the families that are paying their fair share to make sure that these taxes are collected," Levy said. From the living room to the courtroom Just over 90 miles down the road from Gaynor, Anderson spends her days looking back on the memories she built in the home that was once the centerpiece of her family. Now living with her daughter in a Baltimore suburb, Anderson has taken her case to court, joining a lawsuit claiming that the City of Baltimore broke federal law by selling her former home to a private company for pennies on the dollar. The City of Baltimore, which did not respond to ABC News' requests for comment, has defended its actions in court, saying it notified Anderson as required and did not profit from the sale. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local governments could not profit from tax sales, finding that homeowners have a constitutional right to any payments beyond the taxes and penalties they owe. Over the last two years, many states across the country have changed their laws in light of the court's decision. But some experts say the federal government also has a role to play. "The federal answer to lower local property taxes is more funding for local services," Levy said. "They need more help from Congress and the White House." As the Trump administration has slashed the federal budget, local governments will have to make up the difference to provide the same services. According to experts, municipalities will likely rely more on property taxes, which in turn, could mean more situations like Anderson's, where homeowners in majority-nonwhite neighborhoods too often pay more than their fair share. When asked by ABC News what happened to her dream of passing down her home to the next generation of her family, Anderson said, "it died." "It still makes me emotional," Anderson said. "It's just hard. Very hard."


CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Pro-Israel Democrats try breaking with Netanyahu to stop party's shift amid Gaza crisis
The Middle East Israel-Hamas war Donald Trump Primary electionsFacebookTweetLink Follow Fearing Zionism could die among Democrats, many party leaders are explicitly breaking with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to try to stop anti-Israel attitudes from becoming a litmus test for next year's midterms and the 2028 presidential primaries. But privately, several tell CNN, they worry it may be too late. Last week's failed resolution to block new arms sales to Israel, supported by a record number of Senate Democrats, was just the start. A new letter to recognize a Palestinian state is gaining signatures in the House. Devoted allies of Israel are speaking out against its government, brushing off whatever texts and phone calls they've been getting from the dwindling number of party voters or donors still standing steadfast behind Israeli actions in Gaza nearly two years after Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack. It's no longer just the far left rejecting Netanyahu's years of identifying more with Republicans. There is also a bitter backlash among many Democratic politicians, who have felt bullied by the Israeli government and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a lobbying group, and there's revulsion over the images of starvation and dying children. 'We can disagree about a lot of things in the foreign policy space, but there's no room to tolerate mass starvation,' said Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz, who is Jewish and widely seen as one of the party's future leaders in the Senate. Schatz argues there's a conflation of opposing the Israeli government and opposing Israel's right to exist that he calls 'ridiculous' and an 'intentional strategy' meant to distract. 'I think there's a recognition that Netanyahu is making Israel and Israelis and Jews unsafe all over the world,' Schatz said. 'More and more of us are saying so and voting accordingly.' US Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who represents a moderate district in New Jersey with a significant Jewish population and is now the Democratic nominee for governor in a traditionally blue state where Trump ran stronger than expected, said she has sensed a clear shift among voters. 'We are seeing more and more people coming to: October 7 was horrific, the hostages need to be released, Israel has a right to exist, Netanyahu has been a really bad actor in this space, the starvation of people in Gaza is unacceptable, the idea that in rooting out Hamas you're going to kill hundreds and hundreds of innocent children and families is not the way the United States conducts their support of their allies,' Sherrill told CNN in an interview last week. 'So Netanyahu has to be held accountable.' And Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who was the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee and is considering his own presidential run, said after how he saw the Israel conflict resonate on the trail last year, 'it'll still be an issue' for 2028. As for what comes next, Walz said, 'People are going to have the conviction of how they talk about it.' When Netanyahu visited Capitol Hill during a trip to Washington in July, only a handful of Democratic senators participated in a bipartisan photo with him. Among those was New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, an adamant defender of Israel who was mocked on social media for seeming to stand in a way that his face couldn't be seen in the shot. Booker, who has been raising money ahead of another potential presidential run, told CNN that was just about a bad angle and he stood where the photographer directed. He said he agrees in being critical of Netanyahu, but 'you cannot demand, negotiate, work towards a resolution of the conflict if you are not having conversations with the principal players that are doing those things.' Leaders of multiple Jewish and pro-Israel groups told CNN privately that they have grimly determined their best and most practical approach is to see what Israelis do in elections next year. But critics have tried in vain for parts of four decades to wait out Israel's longest-serving prime minister, a conservative who has stymied Democratic presidents going back to Bill Clinton. Netanyahu rejects the creation of a Palestinian state and has claimed there is 'no starvation' in Gaza, even as his government has been under international pressure to permit the distribution of more aid. And there are still top Democrats who will stand with Netanyahu or at least limit the distance they keep from him. Asked whether they were ready to break with Netanyahu, an aide to House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries pointed to recent statements decrying violence and calling for humanitarian aid. An aide to Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer did not respond. The traditional AIPAC-funded trip of House Democratic freshmen to Israel, this year led by Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer, the former House majority leader, and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar of California, leaves later this week. The group is expected to meet with Netanyahu while there. A Hoyer spokesperson declined to confirm details of the trip, including whether the group would meet with Netanyahu. The rare Democrat to stick with Netanyahu in public, voicing feelings that still resonate among some voters and donors, is Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman. 'That's the democratically elected leader. If you have to make a choice, Hamas or the democratically elected leader, I'm always going to stand with Israel through this,' Fetterman said. 'I saw those pictures. Obviously it's appalling, heartbreaking. Many people will blame Israel for that. I only blame Hamas, and I blame Iran ultimately.' Zohran Mamdani's June win in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary proved both that being unwilling to affirm support for Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state or calling Israel's conduct a genocide is not disqualifying, even in a city where Jews make up a large portion of the electorate. A mid-July CNN poll found just 23% of Americans saying Israel's actions have been fully justified, in a 27-point drop from a poll shortly after the October 7 attacks. The share of Democrats and Democratic-leaning adults saying that the US provides too much military aid for Israel rose from 44% in March to 59%. Democratic-aligned adults under the age of 35 are particularly opposed to US military aid to Israel, with 72% saying the US is doing too much. Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, known much more for the seriousness with which he approaches military matters than for chasing political trends, said he voted for a narrow rifle sales stoppage amendment to last week's resolution to get Netanyahu's attention, though 'we have to balance sending a message and also ensuring that strategically they can protect themselves.' Being out of the White House and either majority in Congress limits their options, Reed said, arguing Republicans have not done enough beyond President Donald Trump expressing dismay over the photos of starving children and trendsetter Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene using the word 'genocide.' But Reed, 75, said he's disturbed to see anti-Israel sentiment taking root anywhere, including among younger Democratic voters. 'Part of it is they're reacting to the scenes of the violence against children, and they're also, I think, a generation that have not, like me, literally grown up with Israel, when you saw a struggling nation that had been persecuted worse than any people on Earth start building a real democracy,' Reed said. To Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, another Democrat stoking chatter about a 2028 run, there's no ambiguity in how to talk about it. 'I know our political enemies want to make people believe that if you don't support what Netanyahu is doing right now inside Gaza then you don't support Israel. We shouldn't concede that. We shouldn't operate from a position of fear,' Murphy told CNN. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, also being talked about as a presidential hopeful, said his own conviction is that 'we always need an Israel that is able to defend itself, both for its and the United States' national security, and also people shouldn't be starving in Gaza.' Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who wrote the military aid resolution but also cautioned Mamdani when they huddled last month to be more deliberate about making clear he wasn't anti-Israel or antisemitic, told CNN he thinks his colleagues risk losing an authentic connection to voters if they don't rapidly change what they're doing and saying on Israel. Asked whether that risked Democrats being seen as anti-Israel, Sanders pointed out that he is Jewish himself and decades ago lived in Israel for a few months. 'To be anti-Netanyahu, anti-a-right-wing-racist-extremist government, that's anti-Israeli government,' Sanders said. 'If you're against Trump, you're not against America.' Rahm Emanuel, whose middle name is literally Israel, recalled Netanyahu calling him a self-hating Jew when he was President Barack Obama's chief of staff. Devoted Obama supporters raged at what they perceived as disrespect, especially as Obama approved aid increases, including for the missile defense system known as the Iron Dome. In 2015, Netanyahu broke protocol to go around Obama and address a joint session of Congress to blast the Iran nuclear deal the president was pursuing. By 2016, he was building up a supportive relationship with Trump, which eventually had him talking up the Republican just days before the close 2020 election. Netanyahu cleaved close to Trump to the point of hesitating to condemn the president's 'some very fine people on both sides' comment following the neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017. Last month, Netanyahu accepted an interview with a MAGA-friendly podcast and when asked about Mamdani's position on Israel, responded first by talking about the candidate's past support of 'defund the police,' a favorite Trump topic. 'He made a conscious decision to position Israel as a partisan political issue. Everybody warned him it was a mistake,' said Emanuel, a CNN contributor. 'As always, he thought he was the only smart guy in the room.' Now Emanuel is considering a presidential run of his own. Asked whether he worried Israel support would be a litmus test, he said, 'I don't believe you can say where things will be in two or three years, but if we don't change course, you can see where this road leads.' Leaders of multiple Jewish and pro-Israel groups told CNN privately that they have grimly determined their best and most practical approach is essentially to quietly wait out the trauma and hope the politics turns. There's another Israeli election next year, and while Netanyahu is now in a minority coalition, he has been counted out before. 'To the extent that Democrats are increasingly voicing their concern and disapproval on the situation in Gaza, this is largely aligned with where the vast majority of Jewish Americans are as well,' said Halie Soifer, the CEO of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, a group formed in the aftermath of Trump's comments about Charlottesville and which she said has seen a massive increase in its membership since his second inauguration. Many American Jewish voters last year were driven toward Republicans by a mix of feelings that Democratic leaders were not pro-Israel enough and that they had been too accepting as some anti-Israel protests tipped into antisemitism. That was with Joe Biden in the White House, a president who was unabashedly Zionist and who in retrospect, several Democratic leaders say, should be seen as having staved off how much worse the humanitarian crisis has gotten since he left office. Biden's actions and comments also fueled the 'Uncommitted' movement and protesters who regularly interrupted his events last year, arguing that the same positions that others deemed insufficiently pro-Israel were in fact overly pro-Israel. By November, Kamala Harris' campaign had been tied into knots trying to satisfy all the factions. The widespread disappointment helped fuel narrow losses in Michigan and Pennsylvania, which both have large Jewish and Arab American populations, and beyond. There are three major Democrats running Michigan's open Senate seat next year: Abdul El-Sayed, who backed the Uncommitted movement and has accused Israel of genocide; state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, who at a campaign event on Wednesday spoke about being a mother watching the suffering and said of Netanyahu, 'We cannot let this man tell us that what we are seeing with our own eyes is not what is actually happening'; and US Rep. Haley Stevens, who has been praised by AIPAC for her support of Israel and described it in April as a 'strong ally of the United States of America, a democracy, and a beacon of hope.' Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who leads the Senate Democrats' campaign arm, have expressed a preference for Stevens, who put out a statement last week calling for cooperation to get food into Gaza and Israeli hostages out. North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein, the first Jewish leader of his state, said that he is not convinced the issue will move voters overall. But he said there is no way to look at the policy or politics and not be incredibly sad. 'Democrats have a tougher line simply because Republicans say, 'We're all in with Israel,' so people know to either go or leave, whereas people just get angrier at Democrats,' Stein said. 'I think you can be a Zionist and critical of the government of Israel. I don't think those things are in conflict. And the reason I think that is because that's where I am personally.'