Federal judge blocks Idaho immigration law with preliminary injunction
A federal judge in Idaho has temporarily blocked a state immigration bill aimed at allowing local police to arrest migrants suspected of crossing into the state illegally if they are involved in another crime.
Federal judge Amanda Brailsford, a President Biden appointee, issued a preliminary injunction against parts of Idaho's House Bill 83, which criminalizes state entry and reentry and was passed by the legislature in March. It also aims to assist the federal deportation process.
The bill, also known as the Immigration Cooperation and Enforcement Act, mirrors a similar 2023 Texas law which faced pushback by the Biden administration.
Why Are Americans Fleeing The West Coast For This Deep Red State? Freedom And Friendliness
Gov. Brad Little signed the bill into law on March 27 and it became effective immediately, but Brailsford blocked Idaho from enforcing it through a temporary restraining order that she later extended in response to a lawsuit by the ACLU of Idaho, according to the Idaho Capital Sun. The ACLU argues that the law attempts to supersede federal immigration enforcement by allowing local law enforcement to act as immigration agents.
On Tuesday, Brailsford issued a longer-lasting preliminary injunction, effectively halting its enforcement.
Read On The Fox News App
In her ruling, the judge stated that the ACLU of Idaho had demonstrated a strong likelihood of success on several key claims, including that the new offenses established by the law may violate the U.S. Constitution's due process clause.
She also wrote that the law is likely preempted by federal immigration law and that the organizations and five unnamed individuals represented in the lawsuit could face irreparable harm if the law were enforced, per the Idaho Capital Sun.
Idaho Judge Issues Order On Kohberger's Bid To Have His Family Guaranteed Courtroom Seating
Under the law, entering the state unlawfully is classified as a misdemeanor. However, if the person is involved in another crime—such as theft—or is under investigation, the offense could be elevated to a felony and may trigger deportation by federal authorities, according to Idaho News.
The preliminary injunction was welcomed by the ACLU of Idaho.
"We are pleased the court recognized that enforcement of this law is harmful and unconstitutional," ACLU of Idaho Staff Attorney Emily Croston said in a statement, per the Idaho Capital Sun. "We are confident this lawsuit will succeed on its merits, and we hope it sends a message to Idaho's lawmakers that passing anti-immigrant, unconstitutional legislation is not what Idaho needs."
The outlet reports that the state's attorney general's office said it is reviewing the decision to determine next steps.Original article source: Federal judge blocks Idaho immigration law with preliminary injunction
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank
The Trump administration is asking a judge to drop a 2022 settlement the Justice Department had reached with North Jersey-based Lakeland Bank — which was later absorbed by Provident Bank — over allegations of redlining against Black and Hispanic customers. While Provident Bank said it will continue to provide low-cost mortgages to underserved communities, the motion by the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the settlement has drawn the ire of community advocates and legal experts, who say it would make it easier for banks to engage in redlining. 'It goes without saying it's a good thing when financial institutions are complying with those consent orders, but when you take away the teeth — the actual enforcement — who's to say that they will continue to comply,' said Leila Amirhamzeh, director of community reinvestment for New Jersey Citizen Action, a consumer advocacy four-page motion by the Justice Department, filed May 28 in U.S. District Court, seeks to terminate the consent order the Biden administration negotiated with what was then Lakeland Bank. In the initial complaint, the Justice Department said Lakeland violated the federal Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act by deliberately avoiding banking with Black and Hispanic customers, particularly in and around Newark. The discrimination in question allegedly took place between 2015 and 2021, according to the Biden administration. To settle the complaint, Lakeland agreed to pay $12 million to subsidize mortgages, home improvement loans and home refinancing loans for Black and Hispanic residents and open two branches in underserved neighborhoods. Lakeland also had to provide $150,000 a year for advertising, outreach and consumer finance education in the Newark area. Newark Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ras Baraka wanted one of those new branches to be in his city, and the Greater Toms River Chamber of Commerce also wanted a branch in its area. According to the Provident Bank website, there are currently four locations in Newark and three in Toms River. After acquiring Lakeland, Provident took ownership of the settlement and the mandate to open two branches in underserved areas of New Jersey. The Justice Department in its motion to terminate the order said Lakeland reached substantial commitment to comply with the consent agreement and it is committed to continuing its disbursement of the loan subsidy. Provident spokesperson Keith Buscio told and the USA TODAY Network New Jersey that the bank remains committed to the loan subsidy initiative. He said Provident is not a party to the litigation and referred other questions to the Justice Department. The Justice Department could not immediately be reached for comment. Baraka's office in Newark said it is planning to hold a press conference about the motion by the Justice Department on June 5. Court filings show two attorneys who helped file the initial complaint against Lakeland, Michael Campion and Susan Millenky, withdrew as counsel from the case. Campion was appointed in 2022 to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office's Civil Rights Division that was created to enforce federal civil rights laws in New Jersey. The Fair Housing Act was passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 to prohibit landlords and mortgage lenders from discriminating based on race, religion, national origin or sex. Nearly 60 years later, racial wealth disparity remains vast. In New Jersey, the median household wealth of white families is $322,500, compared with $17,700 for Black families and $26,100 for Hispanic families, the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice said. In New Jersey, 77.3% of white residents owned a home in 2020. By comparison, 42.8% of Black residents and 32.7% of Hispanic residents were homeowners, according to the Urban Institute, a research group. Critics said the Justice Department's motion to drop the Lakeland settlement is a step by the Trump administration's bid to reverse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. David Troutt, a professor at Rutgers Law School in Newark, said the motion by the Justice Department to terminate the consent decree is part of a larger campaign by the department to rescind investigations and agreements involving anti-Black racism, while beginning investigations into what it deems 'illegal DEI.' 'The Trump administration's withdrawal from a federal consent decree without justification is an extraordinary act of endorsing racist practices and housing market manipulation,' Troutt said. 'For the very government that successfully enforced those borrowers' civil rights to now repudiate them sends a message unlike any we've seen since the federal government first endorsed redlining in the 1930s,' Troutt said. Lakeland isn't the only New Jersey bank that faced scrutiny under the Biden administration. Toms River-based OceanFirst Financial Corp. agreed to pay $14 million to subsidize mortgages, helping settle a lawsuit that alleged the bank violated federal discrimination laws. Since then, it has improved the rating given by federal bank regulators who oversee investments in underserved communities to 'outstanding.' The Justice Department hasn't filed a motion seeking to terminate the consent order with OceanFirst. But two attorneys who represented the U.S. in the initial complaint, Millenky and Nathan Shulock, have filed motions to withdraw from the case, according to the court docket. A combined 22 Provident and Lakeland branches closed in 2024 following the $1.3 billion merger creating a 'super community bank.' Each branch that closed was within roughly three miles of a nearby branch. Activists and opponents warned that the merger would mean fewer banking services would be available for underserved communities, such as people of color, the elderly and disabled. New Jersey Citizen Action applauded Provident for its continued commitment to the terms of the consent order. But the group said the Justice Department should continue to enforce it. 'When you actually terminate these consent orders, there's no deterrence, and it's basically telling financial institutions that the Department of Justice is going to be taking a hands-off approach to fair lending issues, to redlining,' New Jersey Citizen Action's Amirhamzeh said. Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook Michael L. Diamond is a business reporter for the Asbury Park Press. He has been writing about the New Jersey economy and health care industry since 1999. He can be reached at mdiamond@ This article originally appeared on Feds seek to drop Lakeland Bank settlement over alleged redlining
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump fires heat experts as summer begins
The Trump administration's purge of federal personnel poses the latest threat to a rule meant to protect workers from extreme heat. As part of an agency reorganization, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the research team tasked with studying the deadly effects of high temperatures and how to safeguard against them, writes Ariel Wittenberg. The layoffs take effect this week, just before the start of a summer that is forecast to be hotter than normal across the United States. The nation has suffered a string of record-breaking temperatures in recent years as climate change driven by burning fossil fuels supercharges heat waves. Extreme heat kills more U.S. residents each year than hurricanes, floods and tornadoes combined, federal data shows. The heat team will disappear just days before the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is scheduled to hold a hearing on the government's first-ever proposal to protect workers from extreme heat. Drafted under the Biden administration, the long-delayed rule would require employers to offer outdoor workers paid water and rest breaks when combined heat and humidity exceed 80 degrees. Almost every aspect of the proposed rule has a citation that leads back to research conducted by the heat team within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advocating for the rule without the experts on hand is 'like going to trial without your expert witness,' Doug Parker, who led OSHA during the Biden administration, told Ariel. Congress created the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health — which housed the heat team — in 1970 to recommend safety standards to regulators. The OSHA regulation relied on the team to define heat stress, to explain how heat affects the human body and to describe how hydration helps prevent heat-related dangers, which include kidney damage and sudden death from heat stroke. Oil and gas industry lobbyists have urged Trump to ax the proposal. Rebecca Reindel, safety and health director at the AFL-CIO, said she worries that without the heat team's testimony, the Trump administration will be more likely to kill the rule. The heat team's demise has already led to a halt in public communications on heat. In past years, the agency used social media campaigns and in-person presentations to raise awareness about staying safe in extreme heat. The team's social media accounts have been silent since April 1, when Kennedy announced the layoffs. It's Tuesday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Alex Guillén breaks down details of President Donald Trump's newest budget proposal and its calls for a 55 percent reduction for the Environmental Protection Agency. Power Centers Auto giants in China's gripThe nation's leading automakers are growing increasingly worried as Trump's trade war with Beijing ramps up and China slows the flow of rare earth elements they rely on to build parts for electric cars and other vehicles, writes Hannah Northey. 'Without those essential automotive components, it will only be a matter of time — before the end of this month, most likely — until vehicle assembly in the U.S. is disrupted,' a group of major automakers wrote in a letter to the administration last month. 'In severe cases, this could include the need for reduced production volumes or even a shutdown of vehicle assembly lines.' Bromance over? Musk slams Trump tax billElon Musk just went nuclear on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The billionaire took to his social media platform X to slam the GOP spending package as a 'disgusting abomination,' writes Giselle Ruhiyyih Ewing. Musk's comments come just days after he stepped away from his federal-agency-slashing role in the administration — and as the House-passed bill faces Senate scrutiny. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Trump picks new energy regulatorInstead of renominating Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Mark Christie, Trump picked energy attorney Laura Swett to fill his term-limited seat, writes Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho. Swett, a litigation counsel at the law firm Vinson & Elkins, previously served as an oil pipeline adviser to former FERC Chair Kevin McIntyre and Commissioner Bernard McNamee, who wrote the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 section on FERC. Greenpeace activists 'borrow' Macron statue Greenpeace activists snatched French President Emmanuel Macron's statue from Paris' wax museum and hauled it off to the Russian Embassy in a dramatic stunt to protest France's ongoing business ties with Moscow, writes Victor Goury-Laffont. In a statement, the French branch of the environmentalist group said its members had 'borrowed' the statute because they believe Macron 'does not deserve to be displayed in this world-renowned cultural institution until he has terminated France's contracts with Russia and promoted an ambitious and sustainable ecological transition at the European level.' In Other News Pro-gas attack: The gas lobby is trying to weaken Southern California's boldest clean-air plan in decades. Study: Why some clownfish are shrinking. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Trump is seeking a multibillion-dollar spending increase for disasters next year after vowing for months to cut the federal response to hurricanes, wildfires and other damaging events. A panel of judges expressed skepticism about the science used by EPA to implement a broad ban on methylene chloride in an unusual case that had the Trump administration defending most of the provisions of a regulation issued by the Biden administration. EPA's inspector general found no malpractice in the agency's deployment of key air detection technology after the fiery train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, two years ago. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Navy ordered to rename USNS Harvey Milk in deliberate Pride Month move
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the U.S. Navy to rename a ship honoring late LGBTQ rights hero Harvey Milk — in a move intentionally set to coincide with Pride Month. According to a memo from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy reviewed by officials have already drawn up a plan for the USNS Harvey Milk to be renamed. The ship is a John Lewis-class oiler, part of a series of vessels named after civil rights leaders and activists. While its new name has yet to be announced, Navy Secretary John Phelan and former Fox News host Pete Hegseth are expected to unveil the change on June 13, according to the memo. An unnamed defense official confirmed to the decision to make the announcement in June was deliberate. The move was slammed by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as a 'shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream.' Milk, who was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, made history as California's first openly gay elected official. He was assassinated inside San Francisco City Hall on Nov. 27, 1978 — just months after helping pass a landmark city ordinance banning discrimination in housing and employment based on sexual orientation. Before his short-lived career in public office, the trailblazing LGBTQ+ rights leader also served as a diving officer in the Navy, but resigned with the rank of lieutenant junior grade in 1955 after being questioned about his sexual orientation. In late 2016, the Navy announced it would name a ship after the slain LGBTQ icon. Construction began in late 2019 and, two years later, Navy Veteran Paula Neira christened the Navy's USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO 206) in a ceremony in San Diego Bay attended by state and local leaders. 'Harvey fought for the dignity and worth of every person,' Pelosi, who represents California's 11th congressional district, which includes most of San Francisco, said in a statement Tuesday. 'In San Francisco, we take great pride that our Harvey's name adorns a mighty ship among a new class of Navy vessels — named for the conscience of the Congress, John Lewis — which honors titans in the fight for freedom,' Pelosi said. 'As the rest of us are celebrating the joy of Pride Month, it is my hope that the Navy will reconsider this egregious decision and continue to recognize the extraordinary contributions of Harvey Milk, a veteran himself, and all Americans who forged historic progress for our nation,' she concluded. _____
