logo
Ipswich County Hall fails to find buyer in online auction

Ipswich County Hall fails to find buyer in online auction

BBC News13-05-2025

A historic building in the heart of a town that has laid empty for more than 20 years has failed to sell at auction.Ipswich County Hall - a Grade II listed site where the divorce of Wallis Simpson was granted in 1936 ahead of her marriage to the then King Edward VIII - was not sold during the online event.The Tudor-style building had a reserve price of £895,000 and came with planning permission to convert it into 40 flats.However, no successful bids were placed at the remote auction, which started at 09:00 BST and was conducted by Savills.
Dating back to 1837, County Hall in St Helen's Street has been a prison, a courthouse and the headquarters of Suffolk County Council.The local authority moved its 1,300 staff to nearby Russell Road in 2004 and it has remained empty ever since, falling into a state of disrepair.Last year, Ipswich Borough Council members voted to approve plans to convert the hall into flats.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plans for rejected Appleby horse sculpture resubmitted
Plans for rejected Appleby horse sculpture resubmitted

BBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Plans for rejected Appleby horse sculpture resubmitted

Plans for a sculpture to celebrate a town's links to the Gypsy and traveller community have been submitted again after being rejected. In April, Westmorland and Furness Council refused a planning application for a stallion statue on the River Eden in Appleby, Cumbria, to celebrate the town's role in hosting the annual horse fair - a big event in the traveller community interest firm Drive 2 Survive, which is behind the statue, has amended its proposal, with the artwork now planned for Salt Tip Corner, opposite the entrance to Roman firm said it hoped the sculpture, which would be 7ft (2m) tall on top of a concrete plinth, would be "visible and celebrated". Previous plans for the sculpture were rejected by the council following backlash by locals over the "impact of the sculpture's symbolic presence on community cohesion, emotional comfort and the shared use of the site", according to the council.A report prepared by council planning officers said those plans received 163 letters of support, 72 objections and 21 observation new plans are currently in consultation. 'Celebrate Gypsy community' According to an artist's statement submitted with the application, the team has chosen the new location because it is where the most expensive horses are bought and sold for cash during the fair. It said the sculpture was intended to make the contribution of the Gypsy and traveller community to Appleby "visible, permanent and celebrated".It said when the fair was not on, there was "little tangible evidence" of the event in the town. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Farage ‘seeks less powerful chairman' after Yusuf quits
Farage ‘seeks less powerful chairman' after Yusuf quits

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Farage ‘seeks less powerful chairman' after Yusuf quits

Nigel Farage is considering appointing a less powerful Reform UK chairman after the sudden departure of Zia Yusuf, The Telegraph understands. Senior party figures have discussed splitting the role into several positions when Mr Yusuf is replaced, following his dramatic resignation on Thursday. Reform sources told The Telegraph that the former chairman had 'rubbed some people up the wrong way', and that a key factor in his departure was high workload. 'He was on a mission, working 18 hours a day,' said one source. 'He was doing it all unpaid, and he expected everyone else to work equally hard.' Mr Farage and the party's officials are working out how to replace the 38-year-old businessman, who said he no longer thought it was 'a good use of his time' to work on getting Reform into government. It came after an apparent dispute between Mr Yusuf and other senior figures over whether the party should campaign to ban the burka, which was suggested by the newest Reform MP Sarah Pochin at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Mr Yusuf said later it was 'dumb' to suggest policies Reform did not support, but Lee Anderson, the Reform chief whip, said he backed a ban. Mr Farage and Richard Tice, the deputy leader, both said they thought there should be a 'debate' on face coverings, including burkas, in the UK. One party source said Mr Yusuf was 'unpopular' with other members of staff, and had become 'super stretched' in managing the day-to-day running of Reform and the party's new ' Doge ' efficiency drive in the ten councils it won in last month's local elections. That workload led him to become 'authoritarian' and a 'control freak', said another figure close to Reform. Mr Farage said on Thursday that Mr Yusuf brought a 'bit of a Goldman Sachs mentality' to the role, which others said was a coded reference to his high-pressure management style. But the Reform leader also said he was 'sad' his chairman was leaving, and that he had only ten minutes' notice that he intended to resign. The tipping point for Mr Yusuf came on Wednesday, when he learned of Ms Pochin's question about burkas to Sir Keir Starmer from reading about it online. Mr Yusuf, who is a Muslim, had been receiving abuse from far-Right trolls online, which Mr Farage said had become difficult for him to bear. He had also reportedly become frustrated that another staff member had taken control of the party's operations, and felt he had been isolated from conversations about policy. He said on Thursday: '11 months ago I became Chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' Multiple sources said Mr Yusuf had performed well in the job, but was not a popular figure within the team. 'He didn't do what a chairman is meant to do, which is to bring people in and bring them along with you,' said one Reform source, adding: 'He isolated a lot of the staff.' Another added: 'Everyone is very sad about it. He wasn't popular with the staff, but he did a good job in the role. It all happened very suddenly – he'd had enough.' The next chairman may be given a more traditional figurehead role within the party, rather than running its expansion, elections and financial affairs as Mr Yusuf did. Mr Farage could appoint a chief executive alongside a new chairman, using funds raised by Nick Candy, the Reform treasurer. Upcoming donations returns are expected to show that the party raised more than £2.5 million in the first quarter of this year – putting Reform in contention to be the biggest fundraiser among the Westminster parties. Both the Conservatives and Labour have suffered a cash crunch since last year's election, and have laid off staff members. Early contenders to replace Mr Yusuf include Andy Wigmore and Arron Banks, the ' bad boys of Brexit ' who worked with Mr Farage on the campaign in 2016. One figure close to the party said Mr Farage could approach Ann Widdecombe, the former Conservative MP and MEP who stood for Reform at the 2019 election. Ms Widdecombe, who said last month she disagreed with Reform's policy to expand access to the winter fuel allowance, told The Telegraph she had not been approached about the job. Mr Yusuf's departure is the latest in a series of internal disputes within Reform, including a public row between the chairman and Rupert Lowe, who was elected for the party last year but has since been ejected. Mr Yusuf did not respond to a request for comment.

The sneaky service charges adding thousands to YOUR bill and how to fight back
The sneaky service charges adding thousands to YOUR bill and how to fight back

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

The sneaky service charges adding thousands to YOUR bill and how to fight back

MILLIONS of people living in leasehold properties are being hit with spiralling service charge fees - but there is a way to fight back. Almost five million homeowners pay service fees, which have risen 11% in the last year to an average of £2,300 per month, according to Hamptons. 3 Some leaseholders have seen charges sky rocket, making it unaffordable and tricky to sell their home. While others have been hit by unfair charges. The government has planned to reform the system - but there are delays. This week JAMES FLANDERS explains how to challenge unfair charges. SOARING FEES Service charges are a fee paid by a leaseholder or resident set by a landlord. The amount varies each year depending on costs to the landlord. They can include charges for maintenance, repairs and insurance. The details are usually set out in your lease. The fee is usually set on what the landlord thinks they will spend. At the end of year the landlord should provide a statement. Detail of world's tallest apartment block revealed - including price of penthouses Some leases allow landlords to ask for contributions towards a "sinking fund" to build up reserves for future larger scale works. David Fell, lead analyst at Hamptons, said: "Both buyers and mortgage lenders have become increasingly cautious about committing to high service charge costs, particularly where they perceive charges to be disproportionate to the amenities they get in return. "As a result, would-be sellers paying high charges have often seen the value of their homes rise more slowly or even fall. "In some cases, sellers are offering potential buyers a cash contribution towards future service charge payments." 3 UNFAIR CHARGES Some leaseholders have found that they are being charged unfair fees. Tribunal judges have made some landlords pay back up to £100,000. In one example, they ruled that a £135 fee to change two light bulbs was excessive. In February 2023, it was revealed that landlords and insurance brokers were secretly taking up to 60% of the £1.6billion leaseholders paid for building insurance as hidden commissions. New rules now stop insurance companies from choosing policies just to earn the highest commission, helping leaseholders get better value. But brokers and managing agents are still allowed to take commissions. The government has promised to ban excessive building insurance commissions through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024. Instead, landlords will only be able to charge a straightforward and fair "permitted insurance fee" for the work they actually do, making costs clearer and protecting leaseholders from hidden charges. However, these proposed laws still need further legislation to come into effect, and the government hasn't yet provided a timetable for this. New rules planned by the government also plan to introduce commonhold agreements to replace leasehold ones. Commonhold allows flat owners to jointly own and manage their buildings, cutting out landlords and property management companies. But the proposed rules only apply to new homes. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing said they know "far too many leaseholders" are being hit with "unreasonable and extortionate charges". A draft of the bill is expected later this year but leaseholders may have to wait months before it becomes law. 3 HOW TO CHALLENGE FEES Leaseholders have a legal right within six months of receiving a summary of costs to request extra information from their landlord. You can challenge a cost if you think it's unreasonable, the standard of work is poor or you don't think you should be paying it. For example, you might question a fee for lift maintenance if you live in a ground-floor flat and it's not included in your lease. Or you could challenge charges for communal services, like a gym that's always closed or a concierge service that doesn't have staff. You will need to apply to a tribunal which has the power to rule on whether the service charge is reasonable or payable. In England this is the first-tier tribunal (property chamber). In Wales it's the leasehold valuation tribunal. Applying to the tribunal usually costs a fixed fee of £110, though this may be waived if you're on certain benefits. If your case is transferred from court to the tribunal, you'll only pay the difference between the court fees and the tribunal fee - or nothing if you've already paid more than £110 in court fees. If a hearing is scheduled, you'll need to pay an additional £220 hearing fee. Speak to the Leasehold Advisory Service online at or call them on 020 7832 2500 to find out more and get free advice on service charge issues. You could also apply to the Housing Ombudsman if you have a complaint about how your service charge fees have been managed. It says cases have jumped by 25 per cent in the last four years. If you're finding it hard to pay your service charges, there's support available. If you're on Universal Credit and have been receiving it for at least nine months, you could get help with your service charges if you own a leasehold property. People over the state pension age can also get support through pension credit. £5.3k charge but I waited months for vital repairs LAWYER Liam Spender, 41, thought he'd bought his dream home when he purchased his £591,000 two-bed flat six years ago. But within months it had turned into a nightmare. "I regret buying it to this day," said Liam, who lives in the Isle of Dogs, east London. Initially he paid a £4,200 a year service charge but it has rocketed to £5,300 in just four years - a 26% increase. A huge chunk of his bill - over £1,200 a year - was for buildings insurance, according to Liam. Yet, despite paying so much, Liam had to wait months for repairs after part of his flat's floor collapsed. To make matters worse, he discovered £300 of the insurance fee was being taken as commission by his landlord and their broker. In 2021, Liam teamed up with 103 homeowners in his building block and applied to the property tribunal. A few days before the case their landlord conceded and awarded the homeowners £100,000 in backdated commission payments. It meant that Liam got £300 back, while his neighbours in larger properties received significantly more. "There are millions of people like me in the same boat and they are owed money they don't even know about", said Liam, who has since founded Leaseholder Action to help other people being hit with secret commission fees. RIGHT TO MANAGE If you don't get anywhere by approaching your management company, you could take over managing the charges yourself via Right to Manage. It is a legal process where leasehold residents in flats can take over managing the maintenance and services. To do this, enough long-leaseholders (those with leases originally over 21 years) need to get together and form an RTM company. It costs £50 to set up a company and takes 24 hours to register. You then need to serve notice to the freeholder of the development - the person who owns the land - letting them know you are taking over the right to manage. They then have one month to dispute this. The government is also planning to remove the requirement for leaseholders to cover the landlords expenses during the process, which will save homeowners around £3,000. It's also not allowed if there are four or fewer flats and a landlord lives in the building. It could help you cut out management fee costs and charges for unnecessary work - but you will be responsible for the company and annual reporting. Unless one of you is trained in these areas you may need to take on an accountant or managing agent. Applications to set up RTM companies rose by 20% last year, according to Direct Line.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store