'Just cause' for evictions? How a bill would make it harder to raise rents, evict tenants
A group of lawmakers in the House and Senate is pushing to end those practices by bringing "just cause" evictions to the state via House Bill 5503.
Why is it needed? Tenants testified that, especially in a constricted housing market, they are often afraid to ask for repairs or complain about conditions over worries that their leases won't be renewed.
Redfin declared the Providence metro area as the least affordable for renters in the country.
"Just cause" evictions aren't just about evictions; they're about people being forced to leave for reasons that are, right now, entirely legal.
Just cause evictions require landlords to have a "just cause," or a good reason, listed in the bill, to evict tenants or not renew their leases.
Multiple tenants said they were afraid to report bad conditions, ask for repairs or take steps to hold their landlords accountable for fear that either their lease won't be renewed in retaliation, or their landlord will exponentially increase the rent, effectively forcing them to not renew.
Tenants who testified before the House Judiciary Committee on March 18 talked about horrible conditions and landlords who refuse to repair problems, such as leaks, or allow issues to continue unabated, such as crippling mold.
During a rally before the hearing, Melissa Potter, of Cranston, talked about how her landlord has been trying to evict her from 1890 Broad St. for attempting to start a tenants union. Among her chief complaints was a 6-foot trench that appeared in front of her front door.
The bill would prevent tenants both from being evicted and from having their leases not renewed, unless it's for "good cause."
Here's what the bill defines as good cause for an eviction/non-renewal of a lease:
Failure to pay rent
Violating the lease
"Committing or permitting a nuisance"
Conduct that interferes with "the comfort of the landlord or other tenants" or neighbors
Using their housing for "an illegal purpose"
Refusing to give the landlord access to make repairs or improvements, or show to a prospective buyer
The landlord, in a building of 11 units or fewer, needs the unit for themselves or a family member, unless the tenant is 62 or older or disabled
Landlords came in droves to the hearing to decry both the "just cause" eviction bill and to ask that the lead paint registry law be pushed out or rescinded.
Many contended that rent control doesn't work, despite the bill not proposing rent control. Instead, it proposes rent stabilization.
Rent control means a hard cap on rent, limiting the amount that a landlord can charge.
Rent stabilization broadly means that the rate of rent increases is regulated or capped, the way cities and towns have a cap on how much they can raise property taxes each year (4%).
Under the bill, rent increases would be capped at 4% annually or 1½ times the annual percentage change in the consumer price index (CPI), whichever is greater.
During the pandemic, the consumer-price index increased drastically. In 2021, the national increase was 4.7%, in 2022 it was 8%, in 2023 it was 4.1% and in 2024, it was 3.2%.
According to the bill, a landlord could still raise the rent above the prescribed percentage, but if they tried to evict a tenant for not paying an increase above that amount, it becomes a "rebuttable presumption" in housing court that the rent increase was unreasonable.
Providence city councilors Miguel Sanchez, Althea Graves and Justin Roias jointly penned a letter in support, noting that the consequences of an eviction can be devastating and that evictions have contributed to the rapid rise in homelessness.
Among the changes from past years was exempting owner-occupied landlords with five units or fewer, and general landlords with four or fewer units from the law. Sen. Tiara Mack, D-Providence, said she heard the criticisms loud and clear and took steps to address them in this year's version of the bill.
In the House, the bill is being sponsored by, among others, Rep. Cherie Cruz, D-Pawtucket.
Providers of services for homeless people across the state have cited the rapid rise in rents as a large reason for the huge rise in Rhode Island's unhoused population since the pandemic.
How much rent has gone up differs, depending on who is doing the counting. That Redfin study put the current median rent at $2,145. A report by the company Rent put it at $2,618 last year, with a baseline of $1,845 in 2019, a 42% increase.
The HousingWorks RI Housing Fact Book put rent at $2,107 in the state for its latest iteration, and at $1,869 in 2017, before the pandemic run-up in rents, a 13% increase.
The number of units that are affordable for the poorest residents has decreased drastically in the state because of rising rents. The National Low Income Housing Coalition's newest "GAP" report finds there are 47 "affordable and available" rental units for every 100 extremely low-income people, compared with 74 before the pandemic.
Just like last year's report, this year's report notes that the shortage of housing units available across all income spectrums pushes up rents for the poorest renters.
"As a result of this shortage, most extremely low-income renters are forced to rent homes they cannot afford and that would otherwise be available to higher-income renters who could afford them," according to the report.
Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Providence Journal subscription. .
Follow Wheeler Cowperthwaite on X, @WheelerReporter, or reach him by email at wcowperthwaite@providencejournal.com.
This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: These bills would make it harder to evict tenants, raise rent in RI

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery
After California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would move forward with a state redistricting plan – replete with implied mockery of President Donald Trump – California Republicans responded late Thursday. Newsom had declared "liberation day" – an apparent reference to Trump's own moniker for the day he introduced a comprehensive tariff regime – and preceded the announcement with "ALL CAPS" social media posts meant to mock the president's penchant for doing the same on Truth Social. California Republicans were not amused and pushed back on the project that could put an end to their already muted federal representation in America's most populous state. "Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite," the top Republican on the state's Elections Committee said. California's Top Republican Rips Dems Blocking 'Oil Goldmine' After New Trump Project Rebuffs Schiff "There is no public input," lamented state Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, R-Tulare, as the state hosts nine Republican federal House lawmakers of the 52 total. The state's last Republican senator was Sen. John Seymour in 1991 – who had been appointed for a brief stint after Sen. Pete Wilson resigned to take the governor's office. Read On The Fox News App Macedo suggested Newsom would go to great lengths just to grab national headlines, no matter what the "will of the voters" is in reality. "Governor Newsom is on a mission to take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission," Macedo said of the panel that typically would help decide decennial mapping. "Governor Newsom's power-grab erodes public trust in our government. Undermining the commission's hard work … is shortsighted and insulting to voters," said Macedo, whose caucus holds 19 of the 60 assembly seats. Mamdani Studies 'America's Worst Mayor' Brandon Johnson To Avoid His Political Pitfalls: Report Newsom, however, defended his decision, saying that Trump "poked the bear" – the animal which also appears on the Golden State's flag – and that California will therefore push back. "DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!)," Newsom wrote in his Trump-esque post. Trump has supported a "simple redrawing" of the Texas congressional map to represent the state's Republican bent, he said. "We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas, I got the highest vote in the history of Texas as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats," Trump recently said. Sen. Brian Jones, R-San Diego, leader of the upper chamber's minority in Sacramento, directed Fox News Digital to recent comments prior to the official announcement by Newsom. "Californians didn't elect Newsom to play gerrymandering games to boost his presidential campaign, they elected him to solve problems here at home," said Jones, who leads 10 senators compared to the Democrats' 30. "What he's doing now undermines the independent redistricting commission that voters created to stop exactly this kind of political manipulation." He also ripped Democrats after hearing that California Secretary of State Shirley Weber told reporters the legislature would have only a short window to schedule a special election for redistricting to coincide with the November elections. California lawmakers are on summer recess until Monday. The process would have to finish by next Friday; five days. "Once again, Newsom convinced Senate and Assembly Democrats to roll over, ignore voters, rush sham hearings, and violate the California Constitution," Jones said. "Democracy is dead in California, killed by Newsom's corrupt pursuit of the presidency." Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this article source: California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Texas state senators take first step toward redistricting
State senators in Texas launched a public hearing Sunday on a bill to redraw congressional voting districts in the state, a move that could win Republicans five more seats in the House if the GOP plan works perfectly. The public hearing is a required step before a bill can advance for a vote on the state Senate floor, Nexstar's KXAN reported. Democrats fled the state earlier this summer to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans from having the legislative quorum necessary to pass legislation. But Democrats are expected to attend the new special session after garnering attention with their walkout, and triggering more redistricting efforts around the country. 'We did exactly what we said we needed to do, and that is bringing a spotlight on this issue,' State Rep. Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio) said in an interview with KXAN one day before Abbott called the second special session. Most notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is spearheading an effort to change district lines in his state to make up for any potential losses for Democrats in Texas. Democrats released their proposed map on Friday evening. Newsom (D) is vying to hold a special election this fall on a ballot measure that would suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade in an effort to keep up with Republican gerrymandering. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the commission, which Californians approved back in 2008 and 2010, would be temporary, and that redrawing the lines would only be triggered by redistricting in red states. 'They do five seats, we do five seats,' Newsom has said. KXAN reported that Texas House leaders expect that the House will have enough members present Monday to conduct legislative business. GOP State Sen. Phil King told KXAN that the new mapy would be legal and will perform better for Republicans in the state. 'We heard a lot of testimony that the current map had a number of districts that were not compact, were not close together, were not tight, in in their in their design, and in this map, listening to that testimony, we applied it, and this map also is much more compact than the current congressional redistricting map.' The proposed changes target five districts in areas around Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, creating Republican-leaning seats. The Texas push was directed by President Trump, who has also been pushing other states where Republicans are in control of government to look at redistricting to gain Republicans seats. The states considering such options include Missouri and Indiana. Trump was impeached twice in his first term after Democrats regained control of the House. Because the GOP has a very narrow majority in the House and the president's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, the possibility of Democrats regaining the House majority is a real possibility in 2026.


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump ‘bela' post is new ‘covfefe,' stirs Newsom into action
A key meeting on the Russia-Ukraine war is set for Monday. Erin has been downgraded to a tropical storm but could still cause danger. But some on the internet want to know what Trump was talking about with his 'bela' post. Trump at 8:31 a.m. on Sunday posted the one-word message on his Truth Social media account. The word means beautiful in Italian if spelled with a double L, as 'bella.' Perhaps the president was looking at something, outside or on television, that sparked him to send the message. Whatever it was, it had a number of notables weighing in. Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have been feuding, and the Democrat's press office took the occasion to argue it is winning. 'We broke Donald Trump,' Newsom's press office wrote in response to the 'bela' post. In an earlier post, Newsom's office took more shots at Trump, seemingly inviting the president into an online fight with shots at his 'tiny hands.' The Lincoln Project, the conservative group that opposes Trump and is active on social media, wrote that Trump had dropped the new 'Covfefe.' Trump, during his first term, bewildered much of the country back in 2017 with the original covfefe tweet, which was likely a typo of some sort. Back then, the president's musings on Twitter were watched by much of the country and world – perhap more avidly than now. George Conway, the frequent Trump critic, was also reminded of covfefe, writing that bela was a 'blend' of covfefe. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), responding to the tweet, wrote 'that's what we call Comer,' apparently a reference to the chairman of the House Oversight panel, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.). Another account suggested a simple explanation. Trump was writing about Belarus, and got cut off with a typo.