Ex-officer sentenced to nearly three years for role in Breonna Taylor's killing
Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman's death. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality five years ago.
Last week, the justice department recommended a one-day jail sentence and supervised release in Hankison's case. In a sentencing memorandum, assistant attorney general for civil rights Harmeet K Dhillon and senior counsel Robert J Keenan said Hankison had suffered psychological stress from the legal battle.
The US district judge Rebecca Grady Jennings sentenced Hankison at a hearing Monday afternoon. She said that no prison time 'is not appropriate' for Hankison and said she was 'startled' that there weren't more people injured in the raid.
Hankison will serve 33 months in prison as well as three years of supervised probation.
Although Hankison did not hit anyone, he shot into Taylor's bedroom window, through blinds and a blackout curtain, and a neighboring apartment, where a couple with a five-year-old child lived.
He was found guilty in November 2024 of one count of civil rights abuse and faced a maximum sentence of life in prison.
In May, Donald Trump's justice department canceled work on an agreement to enter into a consent decree with the city of Louisville. The agreement would have given the justice department authority to supervise Louisville's efforts to overhaul its police training and use-of-force policies.
In September 2020, six months after her death, Taylor's family received a $12m wrongful death settlement from the city of Louisville. Her family's civil rights attorney, Ben Crump, told the Associated Press on Monday that he hoped Hankison would get more time but 'we are grateful that he is at least going to prison and has to think for those three years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ghislaine Maxwell given ‘limited immunity' in meetings with deputy attorney general: reports
Ghislaine Maxwell was granted a form of limited immunity to talk during her meetings with Department of Justice officials, according to reports. The British socialite and former ex-girlfriend of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, met with Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche on multiple occasions this week. The so-called proffer immunity is commonly granted to those that prosecutors are seeking cooperation from in a criminal case. Maxwell was tried, convicted and sentenced in 2022 for sex trafficking underage girls. Such an agreement allowed Maxwell to answer questions from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche – which her attorneys claimed she did fully – sources close to the matter told ABC. Her responses to those questions would not be able to be used against her at a later stage, the sources added.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago 'sanctuary' laws
A judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he was pleased with the decision and the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Child's interview can't be used in her father's trial in killings of wife and other man, judge rules
A northern Virginia circuit judge ruled on Friday that prosecutors' case against an IRS agent charged with killing his wife and another man cannot include a recorded interview from the defendant's young daughter. Fairfax Circuit Court Chief Judge Penney Azcarate on Friday denied prosecutors' motion on the admissibility of the young child's conversation with a forensic interviewer about what she believed was happening the morning her mother was killed at her home. That child's father, Brendan Banfield, was later charged with aggravated murder in the February 2023 deaths of his wife, Christine Banfield, and Joe Ryan, a man who was invited to the house that day. Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Eric Clingan argued that the child's interview should be admissible evidence at trial because she is a victim of her father's alleged killing. The killings occurred while the child was in the Banfields' basement, authorities have said. In December, Banfield was indicted with child abuse and felony child cruelty in connection with the case. 'It's an act of abuse against her by virtue of what her father did that morning,' Clingan said in court. Meanwhile, John F. Carroll, who represents the father, argued in court that Banfield did not consent for his child to be interviewed by authorities at the police's headquarters. Azcarate sided with the defense, citing a statute that a child's interview would be admissible only if the child was being directly victimized by the parent. She acknowledged authorities later pressed child abuse-related charges, but she said those indictments were not the basis for officials' interview of Banfield's daughter that day. 'The interview doesn't fall within the statute,' Azcarate said. Complex investigation and prosecution The evidentiary hearing is one of a series of developments in the officials' multifaceted investigation and prosecution of Christine Banfield and Ryan's killings. Carroll also moved on Friday for the court to rescind Banfield's indictment and remove Clingan, the lead prosecutor, from the case. In his arguments, Carroll argued that Clingan guided Banfield's co-defendant in an interview, though Azcarate denied both motions. That co-defendant, Juliana Peres Magalhães, was originally arrested and charged with second-degree murder in the case. At the time of the killings, Magalhães and Banfield informed authorities that they walked in on Ryan attacking Christine Banfield and both shot him with different weapons, attorneys have said in court. But last year, Magalhães pleaded guilty to manslaughter in what prosecutors have long described as a scheme led by Banfield and the au pair to frame Ryan in the stabbing of Christine Banfield. Ahead of her plea, Magalhães provided a proffer to officials and was interviewed by Clingan, attorneys have stated in court. Her proffer corroborated a catfishing theory that Ryan was lured to the home on a social networking platform for people interested in sexual fetishes. She also corroborated the theory that Magalhães, who began working for the family in 2021, and Brendan Banfield had a romantic relationship that began before the killings, and that she helped the husband in his conspiracy to kill his wife. 'I'm just so upset and heartbroken for doing this to Brendan,' the au pair wrote to her mother from the Fairfax County jail last October in a message, which has since been entered into court evidence. 'I love him and he loves me too, I have no doubts. But it's the right thing to do. For you. I want to be with you again.' Dispute arises over catfishing theory Despite her proffer, a divide appears evident among officials over the catfishing theory. Brendan Miller, a digital forensic examiner with the police department, testified earlier this month that his analysis of forensic evidence also suggested Christine Banfield was seeking to have an affair with Ryan. Miller testified that his analysis was based on multiple devices, and he concluded that Christine Banfield had connected with Ryan through a social networking platform for people interested in sexual fetishes and matched her with Ryan. His findings diverged from a theory held by other officials in the department that the messages Ryan had been receiving were actually from Brendan Banfield posing as his wife. Deputy Chief Patrick Brusch, who oversaw the department's major crimes bureau at the time, confirmed in testimony earlier this month that he said Miller would 'never be doing another digital forensics case in your major crimes bureau' after he analyzed the evidence. Carroll, Banfield's attorney, argued in court that officials were not adhering to proper investigative guidelines when building their case and backing Brusch's catfishing theory without the supporting facts. In a court filing, Carroll wrote that Brusch resigned from the department after the hearing in which he had testified. He wrote in another motion that 'there is a willfulness in the lack of recognition of the science,' adding: 'The digital forensics are facts, and the Commonwealth chooses to ignore and disregard those facts.' ___
