Chrismas gifts ruined in ram-raid on children's chairity shop in Sale
At 1:30am on Tuesday an allegedly stolen car was reversed into the front window of the shop on Raymond Street in Sale.
The store is the new home of A Better Life for Foster Kids.
"The shop was there to do our Christmas presents for the kids in out-of-home care and now this has set us back at least a month," charity founder Heather Baird said.
"We had only just got the shop … we don't really need this at this time of year.
Ms Baird said the stock would have to be thrown out.
"We can't take the chance that there's any glass or slivers or anything, so that means we will have to disregard all of those things," she said.
Four Melbourne men aged between 20 and 22 were arrested this morning in Darnum, about 100 kilometres west of Sale.
Detective Sergeant Margaret Schulz said police did not believe it was a targeted incident.
Debbie Clancy, the owner of the Town Square Boutique next door, said the incident was concerning.
"I have never seen something like this happen here," she said.
"Unfortunately, it is a changing landscape in Australia — not just in this rural community, but all over."
Ms Clancy, who has owned her store for 24 years, said she had noticed a rise in crime on the street in the last year.
"Everyone is working hard to stop it — the locals, the police, but I really believe it comes back to the legal system," she said.
On Tuesday morning the Sale Business and Tourism Association held a meeting with Raymond Street business owners and police.
"There are a number of shops, not only on the main street but throughout Sale, that have had break-ins or things stolen," president Julian McIvor said.
Ms Baird is still coming to grips with the incident.
"At this stage I haven't really gotten anywhere, started with anything," she said.
"We didn't have insurance on the contents of the shop at this stage because it … was just all a little bit too quick."
Ms Baird hopes the community will help the charity get back on track.
"Just get behind us, support us," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
36 minutes ago
- ABC News
The trial of celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright starts this week. Here's what we know
Three years ago, a helicopter carrying television personality Chris "Willow" Wilson and pilot Sebastian Robinson crashed in remote Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory. Mr Wilson, 34, was killed, leaving behind his wife, Danielle Wilson, and their two young children. Mr Robinson, who was 28 at the time, survived, but suffered permanent injuries. This week, the criminal trial of the victim's close friend and Outback Wrangler co-star, Matthew Wright, begins in the NT Supreme Court in Darwin. Mr Wright is facing three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice, in relation to the aftermath of the accident. The charges carry a maximum penalty of seven years in prison. Mr Wright first rose to stardom on National Geographic's Outback Wrangler — a TV program delving into the wild world of crocodile wrangling in the NT and giving a glimpse into Mr Wright's family life. A second program starring Mr Wright, Wild Croc Territory, aired on Netflix in 2022. The show was pulled from the platform following Mr Wilson's death. The 45-year-old father-of-two is also behind NT adventure tourism company Wild Territory, which offers helicopter rides, airboat tours and accommodation. The helicopter accident occurred on February 28, 2022, during a crocodile egg-collecting mission on the King River, west of Maningrida, in an isolated part of the Top End. Crocodile egg collecting involves a helicopter able to carry a crew member, or "sling person", who is lowered from the chopper via a long line to access crocodile nests. The three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice that Mr Wright is facing relate to events which allegedly occurred in the aftermath of the accident. Details about what the allegations include will not be revealed until later in the week, when the prosecution and the defence give their opening arguments before a jury. Mr Wright has previously denied any wrongdoing. No, Mr Wright has never formally entered a plea. This will happen on Monday when Mr Wright is arraigned — a court proceeding where an accused person has their charges read to them and is asked how they want to plea. They can respond "guilty" or "not guilty". The trial is expected to run for at least three weeks, but it won't start straight away. Mr Wright's legal team and the Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) have requested a few days for legal argument before a jury is selected on Wednesday. The jury empanelment process can take a long time, so it's unlikely that any evidence will be heard until Thursday. Representing the DPP will be Melbourne silk Jason Gullaci SC. He has indicated that Mr Robinson is likely to be one of the first witnesses to give evidence at the trial. During a pre-trial hearing, Mr Gullaci said the Crown intended to call two witnesses to "set the scene" before Mr Robinson would be called. Mr Wright is being represented by prominent South Australian barrister David Edwardson KC and Luke Officer. The trial will be heard before Acting Justice Alan Blow. Mr Wilson's wife and parents have been granted permission to listen to the court proceedings from outside the courtroom via an audio-visual link. During a hearing earlier this month, Mr Gullaci told the judge Ms Wilson was invested in the proceedings but, due to delays in the trial getting underway, may not be able to attend court in person for the full three weeks.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament
A bill to criminalise the use of AI tools purpose-built to create child sexual abuse material is set to be introduced to parliament. Independent MP Kate Chaney, who will introduce the bill, says the urgent issue cannot wait for the government's wider response to artificial intelligence. While it is an offence to possess or share child abuse material, there is no criminal prohibition on downloading or distributing the wave of emerging AI generators designed to create the illegal material. The tools are becoming easier to access online, with some of the most popular visited millions of times. Their spread is diverting police resources and allowing material to be created offline, where it is harder to track. A roundtable convened last week to address the issue recommended swift action to make the tools illegal, prompting Ms Chaney's bill. "[This] clearly needs to be done urgently and I can't see why we need to wait to respond to this really significant and quite alarming issue," Ms Chaney said. "I recognise the challenges of regulating AI — the technology is changing so fast it's hard to even come up with a workable definition of AI — but while we are working on that holistic approach, there are gaps in our existing legislation we can plug to address the highest-risk-use cases like this, so we can continue to build trust in AI." Ms Chaney said she had met with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland, who she said recognised there was a gap in the law. The MP for Curtin's bill would create a new offence for using a carriage service to download, access, supply or facilitate technologies that are designed to create child abuse material. A new offence for scraping or distributing data with the intention of training or creating those tools would also be created. The offences would carry a maximum 15-year term of imprisonment. A public defence would be available for law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others with express authorisation to be able to investigate child abuse cases. "There are a few reasons we need this," Ms Chaney said. "These tools enable the on-demand, unlimited creation of this type of material, which means perpetrators can train AI tools with images of a particular child, delete the offending material so they can't be detected, and then still be able to generate material with word prompts. "It also makes police work more challenging. It is [getting] harder to identify real children who are victims. "And every AI abuse image starts with photos of a real child, so a child is harmed somewhere in the process." The federal government continues to develop its response to the explosion in the use of AI tools, including by enabling the tools where they are productive and useful. It is yet to respond to a major review of the Online Safety Act handed to the government last year, which also recommended that so-called "nudify" apps be criminalised. Members of last week's roundtable said there was no public benefit to consider in the case of these child abuse generators, and there was no reason to wait for a whole-of-economy response to criminalise them. Former police detective inspector Jon Rouse, who participated in that roundtable, said Ms Chaney's bill addressed an urgent legislative gap. "While existing Australian legislation provides for the prosecution of child sexual abuse material production, it does not yet address the use of AI in generating such material," Professor Rouse said. Colm Gannon, Australian chief of the International Centre for Mission and Exploited Children, said there was a strong consensus that the AI tools had no place in society and Ms Chaney's bill was a "clear and targeted step to close an urgent gap". In a statement, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the foremost priority of any government was "to keep our most vulnerable safe". "As Attorney-General, I am fully committed to combating child sexual exploitation and abuse in all settings, including online, and the government has a robust legislative framework in place to support this," Ms Rowland said. "Keeping young people safe from emerging harms is above politics, and the government will carefully consider any proposal that aims to strengthen our responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse." Ms Chaney said regulating AI must become a priority for the government this term. "This is going to have to be an urgent focus for this government, regulating the AI space," she said. "Existing laws do apply to AI, and so we need to plug the gaps in those so they continue to be fit-for-purpose. "We do also need a coordinated approach and a holistic approach so we can balance individual rights with productivity, global governance and trust in information and institutions. "The challenge is the technology moves fast and government does not move fast, so we need to get it right but we also need to plug these gaps as they appear. An inquiry established by former industry minister Ed Husic last year recommended the government take the strongest option in regulating AI by creating standalone laws that could adapt to the rapidly shifting technology.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Aussie drivers say Australian roads have never been more dangerous
OPINION: I don't know what's going on at the moment, but it seems like half of Australia has forgotten how to drive, or maybe they never learnt. Every week, I'm in a different cars for work, from American muscle vehicles like the Silverado to a cute Corolla Cross. But lately, it feels like no matter what I'm behind the wheel of, I'm a moving target for bad behaviour, road rage and a total disregard for basic driving etiquette. On a typical day this week, I saw a Jeep mounted on a concrete highway divider. You read that right, not next to it, not against it, on top of it while leaning against a car, it was like an off-road adventure gone wrong. A few days before that? A truck collided with a school bus. The same week, a car flew across three lanes and T-boned someone trying to merge. You might think I'm exaggerating, but I'm not. Australia's national road toll is the highest it's been in years. As of this month, 1,329 people have died on our roads in the past year, a 3.3 per cent increase compared to the same period last year. These numbers are no surprise when you witness what is happening on Australian streets. This morning, for instance, I was in a Toyota Corolla Cross, cruising along the freeway at 99 in a 100 zone, in the middle lane, just listening to good music. That was apparently too much for the truckie behind me, who decided that tailgating me within an inch of my rear bumper was the best way to say hello. He sat there flashing his lights. I think that's the polite way to tell me to get the f*** out of his way, I didn't. He then sped up in the left lane, overtook me and slammed on his brakes. Nice one, mate. You won what? An extra five metres? A false sense of masculinity? Five minutes later, I've got a P-plater in a '90s LandCruiser crawling up my tail. Here we go again. I move over this time, because clearly today I'm a rolling doormat, and as he speeds past, he gives me the finger like I just insulted his beautiful, beaten-up LandCruiser. Let me write this again…he gave me the finger for doing the speed limit in the middle lane. I'm sorry, when did being a decent human on the road become something to be punished for? I began my research, I called a few friends and started scrolling through chat groups. I'm not the only one fed up. Drivers are saying they're too anxious to drive at night, or the moment they see a truck with a semi trailer, they pull right over into the left lane, and some even avoid the freeway altogether. Reddit threads on Australian driving have exploded lately with fed-up drivers venting. For instance, Thomwas1111, who recently moved back to Australia from Denmark, said, 'The absolute state of some of the drivers here is impressively shit compared to there. Zero patience. All rage.' Knewell82 lost it over bad merging: 'The one that shits me the most is people doing 60km/h on a ramp and only speeding up to 100 once they're actually on the freeway. It's so much more dangerous trying to merge with a 40km/h speed difference.' It's getting so bad that some drivers admit they've changed how they drive. MiserablePiano5211 wrote: 'I leave a huge gap in front of me for trucks and psychos, because if they don't see me, I'm the one who's f*****.' Others go even further, SkelerAries admitted they park far away from the shopping centre just to avoid the 'shit driver who can't reverse without hitting something'. Then my favourite, Rodza81, who dropped this iconic summary of Australian roads: 'Rule 1: Assume everyone is trying to kill you. Rule 2: Speed cameras aren't for safety. Rule 3: Most drivers never bothered to actually learn the road rules.' He's not wrong, some Aussie drivers don't signal anymore, they cut across lanes, they tailgate, speed, swerve and treat road rules like they don't even exist. When something goes wrong? 'It's the other guy's fault'. Of course it is. Also, why are these people on the road? How do they have a license? I don't mean to generalise, but I'm going to, because it is always the same people. It's the lifted ute with a massive bullbar, the 4WDs, it's the grey HiLux with one headlight and zero care. It's the P-plater doing 140 down the Monash, or the truck driver who just loves being a bully. Just last year, my colleague David McCowen wrote a piece similar to this topic it was about how drivers in compact cars are treated with less respect on the road. How he was bullied driving a MG 3 hatch. So question for all you bullies - where the hell are you all going in such a rush? If you're consistently risking your life, and mine, to shave two minutes off your trip, maybe the issue isn't traffic, maybe you're the issue, poor time management or perhaps poor manners? As someone who drives for a living, can we all calm down? Being a 'good driver' isn't about speed or confidence, or owning the road. It's about not being a jerk. This isn't the Grand Prix track. If you want that, then go book a driving day with Audi or Mercedes, and go let off some steam in a controlled space. I'm fed up, and I know I'm not the only one.
