Two Irish tourists arrested on suspicion of raping Irish woman in Spain
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Two Irish tourists have been arrested on suspicion of raping a compatriot in the Majorcan party resort of Magaluf. The pair, who police say they believe are brothers, were hauled to court today hours after being held.
It was not immediately clear if they have already appeared before an investigating judge to be remanded in prison or released on bail. The alleged sex attack they are being investigated over occurred in the early hours of this morning.
It is thought to have happened at a hotel in Magaluf. A spokesman for the Civil Guard said today: "Two men, supposedly brothers, met the woman and her female friend and after a few hours, invited them to continue partying in their room.
"There the victim, after consuming alcohol, began to feel unwell and fell asleep. When she woke up she realised she had been sexually assaulted. Police attended and helped the victim.
"After interviewing her and carrying out a rapid investigation, they tracked down the suspected offenders and proceeded to arrest them. The two men were handed over to the courts earlier today."
Well-placed sources said the two men and the woman are all Irish passport holders. Court officials could not be reached early this afternoon. Both suspects were escorted into the court building in the Majorcan capital Palma separately in handcuffs by an armed police officer.
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cianan Brennan: Why didn't government admit its error with biometric public services cards?
Six years ago, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) went mano-a-mano with the government of the day over the infamous public services card, and ended up in a long legal war of attrition. That battle involved a simple question: Could the card be used as a catch-all portal for citizens accessing the State's services, regardless of their wishes? That particular spat was more than a little unedifying, ending up in a wholesale climbdown on the part of the Department of Social Protection in December 2021. However, yesterday's decision by the commission to fine the department €550,000 and order it to suspend the biometric processing of the public's data via the card should be even more seismic. €550,000 is five times the amount of the next-largest fine for breach of GDPR by a public body, and more than half of the maximum allowable. Puzzling defence of the indefensible Six years is a long time, however, and the world is a different place now. This time round, the State may be more willing to take its punishment from its own regulator. That in itself would be borderline farcical. The government — former social protection minister Regina Doherty being probably the most noteworthy culprit — argued for years that the card did not carry biometric data, despite it being plainly obvious to anyone with common sense that it did — in this case, a photo used for facial matching. Why did the State spend hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible? The answer may be because it couldn't afford not to. Why did it do so? Because it couldn't afford not to. Having stated until it was blue in the face that black was indeed white, to change tack in any way would have been legally disastrous. Why the government of the day couldn't just hold its hands up and admit fault in the first place, rather than spending hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible, we may never definitively know. However, we can speculate. The card is deeply ingrained in Irish society now, but that wasn't the case to quite the same extent in 2019. Furthermore, back then GDPR was brand new. It was so new that the initial investigation into the public service card was carried out under Ireland's previous Data Protection Act. Under that act, the commission had far fewer teeth to impose fines. GDPR is now a firmly embedded, if not universally beloved, EU policy. Maybe in 2019 it was felt the time wasn't right for the government to eat crow on its ambitious biometric card venture. Range of views in data protection community Those we polled yesterday across Ireland's niche data protection community had different views as to whether or not the Government, in the guise of the Department of Social Protection, will go the legal route once more. One said: The circumstances have changed. The data protection and GDPR landscape is much clearer now than it was under the old act. 'It seems more likely than not that this is one that won't be challenged, at least not in court.' However, there was little consensus. 'For years, they [the department] have been shouting that there is no biometric data on the card. Now this decision from the regulator is unequivocal that there is. Can they really back down from that? Would that be in character?' a second expert asked. DPC will defend its decision 'very robustly' Should the Government press the nuclear button once more and appeal the decision to the courts, deciding commissioner Dale Sutherland has made it clear that 'we will very robustly defend our decision'. He said: We are well used to this. It is a feature of our system. There are other puzzling aspects to yesterday's decision, not least the sheer length of time it took. The biometrics investigation had been set in train even before the 2019 decision, which dealt specifically with whether or not the government had the right to make the card mandatory for public services such as passport applications, yet it was only officially commenced in July of 2021. It then took four more years to complete, during which time the card has become ever more embedded in Irish society. That is surely an inordinate amount of time to take over a key investigation concerning personal data. 'This was a complex inquiry with complex issues,' Mr Sutherland said. 'The resources these inquiries take are just extraordinary. This one took a bit of time,' he added, while allowing 'it's probably a bit longer than we would have liked'. Digital Rights Ireland, whose initial complaint spurred the investigations back in 2017, professed itself 'concerned' at the length of time it had taken to finalise the probe. A spokesperson added that the decision 'leaves the Government in a very serious situation', given it has spent 'hundreds of millions of euro on an illegal public service card project'. Mr Sutherland stressed, however, that 'the important thing is that it [the investigation] is done now'. Asked whether the world had moved on in the last six years, he said: 'The principles haven't.'
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
An Irishwoman released from Israeli custody tells us about her ordeal
An Irish woman who was arrested in the Occupied West Bank on May 31st was released yesterday morning. Dee Murphy has now returned to her family in Swansea, she spoke to Sarah about her ordeal.
Extra.ie
5 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Dublin firefighter denies contact with woman in Boston rape trial
Dublin firefighter Terence Crosbie told US police that he had no physical contact with the woman he is accused of raping, his trial heard on Wednesday. Mr Crosbie, 39, was visiting Boston with the Dublin Fire Brigade to take part in the St Patrick's Day parade last year and is alleged to have raped a 29-year-old lawyer, while his colleague slept in the same hotel room. He has pleaded not guilty. The third day of the trial included Boston Police Detective Joseph McDonough describing the sexual assault investigation that led to Mr Crosbie's arrest the evening after the alleged incident. A 20-minute tape-recorded interview of Mr Crosbie was also played for the jury of nine men and six women, the Boston Globe reported. The firefighter was asked if he had 'any interactions' with a woman in the Omni Parker Hotel in the centre of Boston in the room he was sharing with fellow Dublin firefighter Liam O'Brien. He responded 'no'. Mr Crosbie said he never touched or spoke to the woman. Mr McDonough asked him: 'Would you be surprised if she said differently?'. Terence Crosbie. Mr Crosbie replied: 'Absolutely I would.' When asked if she was crying when she left, he said: 'I don't know, she didn't show that she was crying'. In another audio recording, Mr Crosbie asked if he could take a walk outside for some fresh air before continuing the interview. He told the detective that he 'felt like getting sick'. At another point during the interview, he asked: 'Am I being accused of something or is Liam being accused of something.' The woman in the case, who cannot be named for legal reasons, attended Massachusetts General Hospital and said she was sexually assaulted at the hotel earlier that morning on March 15. In Mr. Crosbie's police interview played to the trial he said he visited Boston Irish pubs such as The Dubliner and The Black Rose before making his way back to the shared hotel room. Mr Crosbie said that he was first back to the room, but when Mr O'Brien returned with a woman he had been talking to at The Black Rose, he left to give them some privacy. He claimed he had waited on a chair beside the hotel's lifts and eventually returned to the room. The court heard Mr Crosbie tell police that the room was pitch black and he used the light of his phone to find his way into his bed, which he claimed was empty. He said he removed his outer clothing and lay down and that several minutes later, he heard the woman who was with Mr O'Brien 'rummaging around' for her things and leaving the room. During her testimony, the woman said that after having consensual sex with Mr O'Brien, she went to the other bed in the room because of his loud snoring and got under the covers naked, unaware that Mr O'Brien was sharing the room. She stated that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me', raping her. The woman stated that she believed it was not Mr O'Brien because he was bald and the person on top of her was not. On cross-examination, Mr Crosbie's lawyer Daniel C. Reilly asked the Boston detective, Mr McDonough, about his initial interview with the woman after meeting her at the hospital, where she was admitted just after 3am. Mr Reilly told jurors that Mr Crosbie's DNA was not found on the woman. Mr McDonough told the court that the woman did not report seeing any tattoos on her assailant. 'His booking photos indicate he has tattoos, correct?' Mr Reilly asked. 'Yes, it does,' the detective stated, according to the Boston Globe. The detective also provided a timeline about the movements of the woman, Mr Crosbie, and Mr O'Brien through Boston on the night in question. He said the woman and Mr O'Brien were seen entering the Omni Parker House hotel at 11:51 p.m and that Mr Crosbie arrived on the sixth floor of the hotel just before midnight. The detective stated that Mr Crosbie briefly stopped at the shared hotel room and then went to the opposite end of the hallway, where he sat in a chair until about 1:55 a.m. At 2:16 a.m., the hotel door is reopened and the woman is seen leaving the hotel, according to the detective. Detective McDonough stated that later on March 15, after reaching a standard of probable cause to arrest Mr Crosbie, he returned to the hotel with a colleague and was informed that Mr Crosbie was not there. Mr Crosbie had booked an airline ticket on a flight from Boston to Dublin at 7:10pm that evening and was removed from the boarded plane and taken into custody. He has been held in the Nashua Street jail in Boston since his arrest. The trial continues in Boston.
