
Can Mike Waltz put ‘America First' at the United Nations?
In his confirmation hearing, Waltz spun himself as a tough advocate for American interests. Yet he kept bumping up against the same dilemma: in spite of the robust 'America First' rhetoric, the Trump administration is taking steps that will weaken American leverage at the U.N.
The stakes are high. The U.N. remains the world's preeminent global forum, where countries gather to exchange views and set rules for the future. The central issues of our time — geopolitical competition, conflict, nuclear proliferation, global health and emerging technology — play out at the U.N. and its many agencies.
Yet the U.N. has struggled in recent years. Its Security Council has been deadlocked, with Russia using its veto to get away with an illegal war of aggression against Ukraine. China is increasingly throwing around its weight, demanding more influence in the organization and watering down the U.N.'s work on human rights. The U.N.'s bureaucracy has struggled to streamline and focus its work.
The war in Gaza has further challenged the organization. After Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attacks in Israel, far too many countries at the U.N. refused to condemn the atrocity — a moral failure casting a long shadow. Since then, Israel's brutal war on Gaza, including illegal obstruction of humanitarian assistance and obscene levels of civilian harm, has further poisoned the atmosphere.
Despite these challenges, decisions are still made at the U.N. every day that impact American interests at home and abroad. The organization also retains a great capacity to contain and end wars before they spread and require U.S. intervention. U.N. human rights monitors, while not perfect, help promote accountability for violations in places such as Iran, Sudan and North Korea.
Debates in U.N. technical bodies and standard-setting agencies affect many American economic sectors, such as telecommunications, biopharmaceutical research and agriculture. The U.N. is also playing a key role in establishing global rules and principles for the development and use of artificial intelligence.
While Trump complains about global freeloading, the U.N. is actually an effective burden-sharing mechanism. The U.N.'s 193 member countries pool their dues to tackle shared challenges, such as responding to humanitarian disasters. Countries come together to collectively fund and supply nearly 70,000 U.N. peacekeeping troops to help protect civilians and stabilize troubled regions.
Given the breadth of U.S. equities at stake, senators wanted to hear from Waltz a credible strategy to strengthen American leverage at the U.N. and enact needed reforms there. Every American, Republican and Democrat, agrees that the U.S., not our adversaries, should prevail in shaping outcomes at the U.N.
Waltz had a chance to explain how he would work there to promote peace and strengthen U.S. security, protect American jobs, spur innovation and advance American values, particularly human rights. But Waltz could not explain away Trump administration decisions that will make it much harder for any U.S. ambassador to stand up for American interests at the U.N.
For example, Trump has proposed that the U.S. cease paying its U.N. dues, which amount to around a quarter of the organization's budget. In addition to gutting essential U.N. functions, this would create an opening for Beijing and other countries to expand their influence at the organization through stepped-up donations.
Trump's withdrawal from U.N. bodies, such as the World Health Organization and Human Rights Council, has similarly abandoned the field to other countries, including those that do not share our values. You can't fight for American interests if you're not in the room.
Waltz's job would also be much more difficult thanks to last week's bloodbath at the State Department, where more than 1,300 national security professionals were fired without cause. The Trump administration claimed that this blow to U.S. diplomacy was about 'efficiency' and 'streamlining' — this is hogwash. These arbitrary and ill-conceived firings will unquestionably deprive our government of critical talent and expertise. Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice called the mass firings ' superpower suicide,' as she imagined the champagne corks popping in Beijing and Moscow.
Ironically, Mike Waltz has been known as a 'China hawk,' someone who has long believed that the United States is in a high-stakes competition with China. In his confirmation hearing, he emphasized that countering China at the U.N. is 'absolutely is critical' — a view shared by both Democrats and Republicans. Yet, deep down, Waltz must surely realize that Trump's actions will make it harder to push back on Beijing's influence at the U.N.
Undermining U.S. alliances in East Asia through tariff threats? Firing U.S. national security experts and diplomats? Shuttering the Voice of America and other offices that communicate our messages to the world? Abruptly ending U.S.-provided life-saving humanitarian assistance? Collectively, these steps will weaken American leverage around the world — all to the benefit of China. Senators appropriately pressed Waltz to explain how these self-inflicted wounds would impact his work at the U.N. Waltz had few good answers.
It is now up to the U.S. Senate to determine whether Mike Waltz should serve in one of the most critical and high-profile diplomatic jobs. Senators will weigh many factors, including Waltz's role in ' Signalgate,' his shockingly poor decision to convene a classified discussion on an insecure messaging app. In line with standard Trump world protocol, Waltz refused to take any responsibility for the breach.
Just as critical, though, the Senate must respond to the gap between Waltz's tough rhetoric and the Trump administration's crippling of American diplomatic capacity. If Trump and Waltz truly believe in their 'America First' rhetoric, they will need to do much more to stand up for our country.
Josh Black served in the Biden White House as special assistant to the president and senior director for multilateral affairs. He previously advised U.S. Ambassadors to the U.N. Susan Rice, Samantha Power and Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Takeaways of US-Japan deal include potential gains for Trump, Ishiba and EU
(Reuters) -An emerging U.S.-Japanese trade deal could unlock major investment, avert a potential shock to the global economy and may deliver political wins for both U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, though many specifics of the agreement remain unclear. Here's a closer look at the early takeaways: * The deal stabilizes the global trade outlook by imposing a 15% tariff on Japanese goods — down from a threatened 25% — while Japan commits to investing $550 billion in the U.S. economy, a boost to U.S. jobs. It almost certainly averts a worst-case scenario for the Japanese economy. Moreover, if it signals that the balance of U.S. tariff rates are likely to settle in that range, Jefferies Chief Economist and Strategist for Europe Mohit Kumar said: "the world can live with 15% or so tariffs." * Trump gains some political capital ahead of November 2026 midterm elections by reinforcing his 'America First' trade stance and potentially bolstering his influence with industrial and agricultural constituencies while avoiding the market instability that loomed under earlier tariff threats. Still, not every U.S. constituency was happy with the announcement. The decision has angered the Detroit Three automakers, who still face a 25% levy on significant segments of their non-U.S. produced vehicles. * For Ishiba, the deal is a diplomatic and economic win amid domestic political turbulence. Just days earlier, Japan's ruling coalition lost its majority in upper house elections. * Analysts say the deal could serve as a benchmark for other economies negotiating with Washington, including the EU and China, both facing August tariff deadlines. * American exporters could gain broader access to Japan's markets, especially in autos and agriculture — sectors vital to U.S. economic growth. * Global financial markets are rallying led by automakers. Stocks of major Japanese firms surged following the announcement, and capital inflows are expected to continue as investors seek exposure to Japan's innovation-led growth. * Despite the investment commitments, the deal may not significantly reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Japan in the short term. Critics argue that without stronger enforcement mechanisms or structural reforms, the imbalance could persist. * A 15% tariff, though lower than the threatened 25%, still represents a significantly higher import tax for consumer goods, especially for cars and electronics, which are heavily imported to the U.S. from Japan. Yale Budget Lab last week estimated the overall average U.S. tariff rate under Trump's policy shifts has climbed to around 20% from between 2% and 3% prior to his return to the White House in January. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Abruptly Ends CNN Interview After Being Questioned About New Epstein Photos
President Donald Trump hung up on a CNN reporter during a phone call Tuesday that lasted a mere 30 seconds after the journalist questioned him about resurfaced images showing Jeffrey Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to his second wife, Marla Maples. While appearing Tuesday on 'Erin Burnett OutFront,' reporter Andrew Kaczynski shared details about the abrupt phone call with Trump that ended in name-calling. The call took place after CNN's 'KFile' found photos of Epstein and Trump that had not been widely reported on before. One photo showed the disgraced financier and sex offender attending Trump's Plaza Hotel wedding to Maples. In a separate image, Epstein was seen with Trump and his children at a Harley-Davidson Cafe that same year. CNN also released a video of Trump and Epstein chatting with each other at a Victoria's Secret Fashion Show in New York in February 1999. Kaczynski told host Burnett that the call, in which he asked Trump about the images, ended with the president slamming CNN as 'fake news' and hanging up after he refused to answer questions about his past connection to Epstein. 'We were not on the phone very long. I think our call was about 30 seconds or so,' Kaczynski told Burnett. 'But when I asked him about the wedding photo, he said, he sort of paused for a second and then said, 'You've got to be kidding me,' before calling CNN 'fake news' and then hanging up on me.' In a statement to CNN, Kaczynski said, White House communications director Steven Cheung said, 'These are nothing more than out-of-context frame grabs of innocuous videos and pictures of widely attended events to disgustingly infer something nefarious.' Cheung added: 'The fact is that the president kicked [Epstein] out of his club for being a 'creep.'' Kaczynski's heated yet ultra-brief conversation with Trump comes after the Department of Justice and FBI released a two-page memo earlier this month, claiming their Epstein investigation determined that there was no evidence Epstein was murdered or had a 'client list' of powerful figures he could potentially blackmail. Following the memo release, Trump faced scrutiny over his administration's handling of the Epstein files. Trump supporters and right-wing figures called on the president and his administration to release more information. Watch Kaczynski's appearance below. #CNNExclusive: #CNN obtains never before published photos of #PresidentTrump with #JeffreyEpstein, including photos at Trump's wedding and photos with two of #Trump's children.#BreakingNews#OutFrontCNN#EpsteinFiles#CNN#News#A3# — Erin Burnett OutFront (@OutFrontCNN) July 23, 2025 Related... 'Now Do Epstein': Martin Luther King Jr.'s Daughter Takes Aim At Trump Over Released MLK Files Trump Boldly Claims The 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' Has Boosted His Approval Rating 'Significantly' MAGA Is Probably Going To Be Pretty Disappointed By Trump's Latest Promise


UPI
23 minutes ago
- UPI
Rubio says Harvard might lose visa program eligibility
The State Department on Wednesday announced it is investigating Harvard University's participation in a visa program to determine if it runs counter to Trump administration policies or compromises national security. File Photo (2019) by Matthew Healey/UPI | License Photo July 23 (UPI) -- The State Department is investigating whether Harvard University undermines U.S. policy via educational and cultural exchanges that enable international students, professors and others to obtain visas. The investigation's purpose is to determine whether or not Harvard officials are undermining national security and foreign policy through its participation in the Exchange Visitor Program, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Wednesday. "All sponsors participating in this program are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded," Rubio said in a prepared statement. Harvard "must comply with all regulations ... in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States," Rubio continued. "The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law and provide safe environments for all students." He said the investigation will ensure the university's participation in State Department programs does not "run contrary to our nation's interests." The Trump administration in May revoked Harvard's eligibility to participate in the Exchange Visitor Program. U.S. District Court of Massachusetts Judge Allison Burroughs overturned the revocation of Harvard's program eligibility. Rubio notified Harvard University President Dr. Alan Garber of the investigation on Wednesday but did not accuse university officials of any wrongdoing in the matter. He gave Harvard a week to provide relevant university records and said the department will interview university staff and possibly students who are participating in the exchange program. The Department of Homeland Security in July likewise subpoenaed Harvard to obtain information on the university's program participation. The State Department's investigation will not affect Harvard's sponsorship and enrollment of students, professors and researchers, according to a statement shared with United Press International. "This investigation is yet another retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights," a Harvard spokesperson said. "Harvard continues to enroll and sponsor international scholars, researchers and students and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for U.S. visas and travel to campus this fall."