This is how we'll know if California Gov. Gavin Newsom's epiphany on 'liberal governance' is real
California Gov. Gavin Newsom seems to have received a political wake-up call. In a recent interview with Bill Maher, he admitted that many of California's woes reflect "an indictment of liberal governance and leadership."
His candor is striking, especially coming after a seismic shift in the Golden State: the resounding passage of Proposition 36.
As a principal architect and senior leader of the Prop 36 campaign, I helped craft this citizens' ballot initiative, which won nearly 70% voter approval – sweeping every county, even deep-blue San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Frustrated Californians demanded tougher penalties for repeat thieves, fentanyl dealers and hard-drug offenders. Yet Newsom and Sacramento's Democratic supermajority fought relentlessly to kill it. I witnessed their resistance firsthand.
With decades as one of California's longest-serving elected district attorneys and a former president of the California District Attorneys' Association, I was ready for policy debates on crime. But nothing prepared me for the cynical tactics of those desperate to cling to power.
Privately, Newsom's staff admitted they feared the high-profile measure would boost turnout among moderate and conservative voters in November 2024. Publicly, they smeared Prop 36 as a far-right throwback, dismissing its broad support from Democratic mayors across the state.
For years, California's liberal leadership championed "progressive reforms" to decriminalize, decarcerate and dismantle a criminal justice system they branded racist and punitive. Accountability eroded, replaced by vague promises of safety through equity and compassion.
The results were disastrous. Drug-ravaged homeless encampments spread through our cities. Open drug use, needle-strewn streets, locked-down stores, shuttered businesses, and viral videos of smash-and-grab thefts became all too familiar.
These aren't mere "quality of life" issues or victimless crimes. Organized retail thieves plundering California's store shelves often tie back to international criminal syndicates dealing in scams, guns, drugs and human trafficking.
Crime lords manage their portfolios like any investor, with store-robbing foot soldiers delivering steady, low-risk revenue at scale. Homeland Security investigations warn that stolen goods fuel money laundering, propping up the global black market. No surprise, then, that violent crime has steadily climbed. The public had seen enough.
Prop 36's landslide victory in a state of nearly 40 million laid bare a gaping disconnect between California's liberal elite and its voters on crime and safety. It was a mandate for common sense – a rejection of soft-on-crime policies that had gone too far.
That mandate, and the tools voters delivered, have empowered prosecutors like me to target repeat offenders and merchants of death selling fentanyl. It has also reinvigorated drug courts and mandated treatment for the chronically addicted. The electorate, wide awake, spoke with one voice, and many of us are listening.
Will Newsom and his party listen? Early signs suggest otherwise. Reports indicate they're reluctant to fully fund Prop 36's implementation – a serious misstep. Voters want results, not rhetoric or stubborn loyalty to ideology. This isn't about ideology; it's about reality. Californians are fed up with stepping over needles, witnessing brazen theft, and fearing for their safety.
But it's bigger than that. Prop 36's success offers a roadmap for other states wrestling with the fallout of lenient crime policies. It proves that when leaders ignore the public's commonsense demands, they risk waking a sleeping giant – and facing its wrath.
Newsom's recent epiphany about his party's failures is a start, but words ring hollow without action. If he and Sacramento's Democrats dig in their heels, they'll only widen the divide.
As someone who battled Newsom's machine to get Prop 36 on the ballot and secure its victory, I know what's at stake. Californians didn't just vote for tougher laws – they voted for accountability, deterrence and a return to sanity.
The question now is whether Newsom will heed this wake-up call or hit the snooze button. For the sake of our state – and perhaps our country – I hope it's the former. The people have spoken. It's time to listen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 minutes ago
US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling President Donald Trump's military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles an assault on democracy and has sued to try to stop it. Meanwhile, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is putting the National Guard on standby in areas in his state where demonstrations are planned. The divergent approaches illustrate the ways the two parties are trying to navigate national politics and the role of executive power in enforcing immigration policies. In his live TV address this week, Newsom said that Trump's move escalated the situation — and for political gain. All 22 other Democratic governors signed a statement sent by the Democratic Governors Association on Sunday backing Newsom, calling the Guard deployment and threats to send in Marines 'an alarming abuse of power' that "undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' The protests in Los Angeles have mostly been contained to five blocks in a small section of downtown; nearly 200 people were detained on Tuesday and at least seven police officers have been injured. In Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they're planning to deploy military troops for protests. Since Trump's return to office, Democratic governors have been calculating about when to criticize him, when to emphasize common ground and when to bite their tongues. The governors' responses are guided partly by a series of political considerations, said Kristoffer Shields, director of the Eagleton Center on the American Governor at Rutgers University: How would criticizing Trump play with Democrats, Republicans and independent voters in their states? And for those with presidential ambitions, how does that message resonate nationally? Democratic governors are weighing a number of considerations. 'There probably is some concern about retributions — what the reaction of the administration could be for a governor who takes a strong stance," Shields said. And in this case, polling indicates about half of U.S. adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, though that polling was conducted before the recent military deployment. On other issues, Democratic governors have taken a variety of approaches with Trump. At a White House meeting in February, Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills told Trump, ' we'll see you in court ' over his push to cut off funding to the state because it allowed transgender athletes in girls' school sports. Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, a possible 2028 presidential candidate, publicly sparred with Trump during his first term but this time around, has met with him privately to find common ground. Initially, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green referred to Trump as a 'straight-up dictator," but the next month he told a local outlet that he was treading carefully, saying: 'I'm not going to criticize him directly much at all." Apart from their joint statement, some of the highest-profile Democratic governors have not talked publicly about the situation in California. When asked, on Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office pointed to a Sunday social media post about the joint statement. Whitmer didn't respond. The office of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who is set to testify before Congress on Thursday about his state laws protecting people who are in the country without legal status, reiterated in a statement that he stands with Newsom. The office said 'local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in an interview Wednesday in The Washington Post, said Trump should not send troops to a weekend protest scheduled in Philadelphia. 'He's injected chaos into the world order, he's injected it into our economy, he is trying to inject chaos into our streets by doing what he did with the Guard in California," Shapiro said. As state attorney general during Trump's first term, Shapiro routinely boasted that he sued Trump over 40 times and won each time. As governor he has often treaded more carefully, by bashing Trump's tariffs, but not necessarily targeting Trump himself. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has often clashed with Newsom, a fellow term-limited governor with national ambitions. Newsom's office said DeSantis offered to send Florida State Guard troops to California. 'Given the guard were not needed in the first place, we declined Governor DeSantis attempt to inflame an already chaotic situation made worse by his Party's leader,' Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in an email to The Associated Press. Speaking on Fox News on Tuesday, DeSantis said the gesture was a typical offer of mutual aid during a crisis — and was dismissive of the reasons it was turned down. 'The way to put the fire out is to make sure you have law and order,' he said. Protests against immigration enforcement raids have sprung up in other cities — and a series of 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned for the weekend — with governors preparing to respond. In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said he has spoken with his public safety commissioner to make sure state and local police work together. 'I don't want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarize the situation. That just makes the situation worse,' said Lamont, who called Trump "a little eager to send federal troops and militarize the situation in Los Angeles.' It is unclear how many Texas National Guard members will be deployed or how many cities asked for assistance. In Austin, where police used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred protesters on Monday, the mayor's office said the National Guard was not requested. San Antonio officials also said they didn't request the Guard. Florida's DeSantis said law enforcement in his state is preparing 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you,' DeSantis said Tuesday. 'And we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.' ___ Associated Press reporters Nadia Lathan and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas; Sophie Austin in Sacramento, California; Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan; Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas; Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut; Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago; contributed.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump and the 'rhetoric of emergency'
Tariffs, immigration, energy: In all these areas, Donald Trump has granted himself exceptional and broad presidential powers by declaring "emergency" situations that his critics insist do not exist. "In the United States, there is no tradition of emergency powers (granted to the president) under the Constitution," New York University professor Noah Rosenblum told AFP. But various laws allow the commander-in-chief's powers to be expanded on an exceptional -- and usually temporary -- basis. Historically such emergency powers have been invoked to deal with natural disasters, to deploy responders or troops, and to unlock critical funding. "But that, of course, is not how Donald Trump is using it," Rosenblum said. Since returning to the White House on January 20, the Republican president has repeatedly invoked states of emergency in a variety of areas -- eight times in all, according to National Public Radio -- thus green-lighting swift and forceful intervention on his administration's part. They have had little to do with hurricanes, floods or earthquakes. On his first day in office, Trump declared a "national energy emergency" in the United States -- the world's leading oil producer. By early April, frustrated by the trade deficits the United States had with many countries, including some imbalances going back decades, Trump declared a national emergency, among other reasons, "to increase our competitive edge," the White House said. The result? Tariffs slapped on adversaries and allies alike. The flow of migrants arriving from Mexico has prompted Trump to declare a state of emergency at the US southern border, and he apparently feels empowered to respond with massive import duties, or forced deportations of undocumented migrants. - 'Aspiring autocrat' - Now, Trump has sent the US military into Los Angeles to quell protests, invoking a seldom-used law that allows the president to deploy National Guard units if there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion." The move countered the wishes of local authorities and California Governor Gavin Newsom, who accused Trump of a "dictatorial" drift. "The president is simply announcing emergencies when there aren't any," said Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, noting how local police have said they are capable of handling clashes with protesters opposed to raids by immigration agents. "All of these grants of potential emergency powers really don't account for the election of a president like Mr. Trump, who is not entirely rational, who is not dedicated to the rule of law, who is, in fact, an aspiring autocrat who is looking... to exercise extraordinary power," Bowman told AFP. Trump is not the first US leader to invoke exceptional circumstances to justify such moves, even if he does so in a way without precedent. His Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, for example, decided to forgive student debt given the "emergency" created by the Covid pandemic. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court was not convinced, however, and blocked the plan. - Eisenhower and Nixon - In Trump's case, will the courts, which have been flooded by lawsuits, affirm the legality of actions taken in the name of imminent peril? The tendency of judges "in these kinds of things is to defer pretty heavily to the president," Bowman said. On Thursday, a California court will consider a request by Governor Newsom to suspend Trump's troop deployment. In a filing to the court, the administration said Trump's judgment has historical precedent. Courts did not interfere when President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops to protect school desegregation or when Richard Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail during a postal workers' strike, "and courts should not interfere here either," it said. Beyond the legal tussles, the relentless use of the language of urgency, of imminent threat or national peril, is part of a broader strategy, professor Rosenblum stressed. Trump, he said, "is using the perpetual rhetoric of emergency to keep us perpetually riled up and either on the defensive and so increasingly exhausted or scared and aggressive -- and so demanding government intervention." aue-mlm/sla/sco
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal agents block LA protest suspect with vehicles
Federal agents block LA protest suspect with vehicles Video shows the moment federal officers took a man into custody they say is wanted on suspicion of assaulting a border patrol agent at an anti-ICE protest in Los Angeles. The agents boxed in the suspect's vehicle at an intersection in the Boyle Heights neighborhood while his partner and toddler were inside. The man's partner said he was at a protest in Paramount over the weekend and there was a warrant out for his arrest after a confrontation with authorities. A spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security indicated that the incident was not a hit-and-run, but rather, a 'targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer.' 00:44 - Source: CNN "Jane' testifies for fifth day in Combs trial 'Jane" continued cross-examination in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial for her fifth day. Prosecutors expect to rest their case at some point next week. CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister reports. 02:18 - Source: CNN Trump says why his second term is different from the first In an interview with The New York Post's Pod Force One, President Trump explained why he "can be stronger on an attack on Los Angeles" in his second term compared to his first. Trump also said he told Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, he planned to deploy National Guard troops before doing so. 01:09 - Source: CNN China's 'trump' card in the US trade war The US and China have agreed on a plan to roll out their trade truce after days of negotiations in London. CNN's Phil Mattingly explained what brought both sides to the table, and where the relationship goes from here. 02:00 - Source: CNN Construction begins on Trump's changes to White House Rose Garden Construction on President Trump's redesign of the historic White House Rose Garden is underway. Trump says he's replacing part of the grass with a patio 00:48 - Source: CNN Roads in DC being prepared for military parade Ahead of the June 14 military parade, crews were working late to prepare the roads in Washington, DC. The event is expected to showcase some seven million pounds of military equipment including tanks, artillery, and nearly 7000 soldiers and will commemorate the 250th anniversary of the US army. 00:30 - Source: CNN LAPD pull CNN crew through police line as they disperse protesters Tensions were high in downtown Los Angeles, as authorities tried to quell a fifth day of anti-ICE protests. CNN Senior Investigative Correspondent Kyung Lah was reporting on the ground. 01:32 - Source: CNN Curfew goes into effect in downtown LA A curfew is now in effect in parts of downtown Los Angeles, covering an area of roughly one square mile. A law enforcement source familiar with the situation told CNN fewer than 100,000 of the city's 4 million residents will be affected. CNN's Nick Watt reports. 00:32 - Source: CNN Newsom blames Trump for escalating violence in LA 01:17 - Source: CNN Hegseth defends Trump sending federal military to protests in LA During a subcommittee hearing, Democratic Rep. Pete Aguilar of California pressed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about President Donald Trump's decision to mobilize the National Guard and deploy Marines to help quell protests in Los Angeles. 01:56 - Source: CNN Car plows through protesters in Chicago CNN law enforcement correspondent Whitney Wild reports that a car was seen driving through an ICE demonstration near Federal Plaza in downtown Chicago. The car appears to push a few sign holders before continuing through the protest and speeding away. 00:31 - Source: CNN Scenes from New York City amid ICE protests New York police have started detaining protesters after warning that the anti-ICE marchers should stay on the side walk. CNN has reached out the NYPD for more information. Shimon Prokupecz describes what he sees on the streets of New York City. 00:56 - Source: CNN Combs requests mistrial for a second time CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister explains that Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team requested a mistrial for a second time, which was denied. Combs' team accused the prosecution of presenting false testimony from Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Cassie Ventura's, who testified that Combs dangled her over a balcony. 01:26 - Source: CNN Analysis: Is Netanyahu's government under threat? Among an ongoing corruption trial, protests against his leadership and an upcoming vote to dissolve the government, CNN's Oren Liebermann looks at the growing pressure on Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 01:59 - Source: CNN Tanks arrive in DC ahead of US Army parade As the 250th anniversary celebration for the US Army approaches, a freight train of tanks was seen making its way into the nation's capital. The long-planned celebration in Washington will coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and include thousands of troops. The Army had said it has no plans to recognize the president's birthday. 00:40 - Source: CNN Colombian presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota A Colombian senator and presidential hopeful is in a critical condition after being shot twice at an event in Bogota, according to national police and prosecutors. Police arrested a 15-year-old carrying a Glock pistol, according to the Attorney General's Office. Miguel Uribe expressed intentions to run in the 2026 presidential election for the country's largest opposition party, the center-right Centro Democrático, or Democratic Center. 01:05 - Source: CNN Immigration protests break out in Los Angeles President Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to disperse the protests that began in the Los Angeles area in response to immigration raids. Law enforcement authorities and demonstrators have clashed for two days. CNN's Julia Vargas Jones reports. 01:34 - Source: CNN Coco Gauff reacts to winning the French Open Coco Gauff claimed her second career grand slam singles title, defeating world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in the French Open women's final. 00:46 - Source: CNN Protesters confront authorities following ICE raids in Los Angeles Federal immigration operations in Los Angeles were met by protests. ICE declined to discuss the details of its operations. 00:43 - Source: CNN Attorney for mistakenly deported man talks to Erin Burnett CNN's Erin Burnett talks with Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, attorney for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March, who has been returned to the United States to face federal criminal charges. 02:37 - Source: CNN
