logo
Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations

Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations

Gulf Insider7 hours ago

At a moment both sides are still engaged in highly sensitive nuclear negotiations, Iran has strongly condemned US President Donald Trump's new travel ban, blasting it as 'racist' and indicative of Washington's deep hostility toward Iranians and Muslims.
The executive order restricts travel from 19 countries, primarily in Africa and the Middle East, in a new 'Muslim travel ban' of sorts – given it mirrors similar policies from Trump's first term in office, and will take effect Monday. There are outright bans imposed on a dozen of the nations.
Iranian official Alireza Hashemi-Raja criticized the move as reflecting a 'supremacist and racist mentality' among American policymakers.
According to more via Al Jazeera:
Hashemi-Raja argued that the policy breaches international legal norms and denies millions the basic right to travel, based solely on nationality or faith. He said the ban would 'entail international responsibility for the US government', without elaborating.
The ban heavily features Mideast and North African countries like Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and others – but is not limited to countries with Muslim majority populations.
Among the countries listed are also Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti. There are 'partial bans' and some new visa restrictions for Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.
President Trump had explained this week in a statement posted to the White House: 'The United States must ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already present in the United States do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles, and do not advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists or other threats to our national security.'
And further:
I directed the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, to identify countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a full or partial suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries pursuant to section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f). After completing that process, the Secretary of State determined that a number of countries remain deficient with regards to screening and vetting. Many of these countries have also taken advantage of the United States in their exploitation of our visa system and their historic failure to accept back their removable nationals. Source: NBC News
Interestingly, Syria was on the controversial ban during Trump's first term, but is notably absent this time around – despite the fact that the decade-plus long proxy war saw foreign jihadists flow there from around the world. There are even foreign jihadists who hold government positions in the Jolani (Sharaa) regime, in the wake of Assad's December ouster.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran authorities expand dog walking ban
Iran authorities expand dog walking ban

Daily Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Tribune

Iran authorities expand dog walking ban

AFP | Iranian authorities have expanded a ban on walking dogs in public to multiple cities nationwide, citing public health, social order and safety concerns, domestic media reported Sunday. The ban -- which echoes a 2019 police directive that barred walking dogs in Tehran -- was expanded to Ilam city in the west on Sunday, according to reports. At least 17 other cities introduced similar bans in recent days, including Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south. Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious topic since the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, though there is no law outrightly banning dog ownership. Many religious scholars however consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as "najis" or ritually impure, while some officials view them as a symbol of Western cultural influence. Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership. Enforcing the restrictions has been largely inconsistent, as many owners continue to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across Iran. On Sunday, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying that "legal action will be taken against violators", without elaborating. On Saturday, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures are aimed at "maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health". "Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort," said Abbas Najafi, prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, as quoted by Iran newspaper. In 2021, some 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a "destructive social problem", saying it could "gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life". In 2017, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that "keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible".

Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations
Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations

Gulf Insider

time7 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations

At a moment both sides are still engaged in highly sensitive nuclear negotiations, Iran has strongly condemned US President Donald Trump's new travel ban, blasting it as 'racist' and indicative of Washington's deep hostility toward Iranians and Muslims. The executive order restricts travel from 19 countries, primarily in Africa and the Middle East, in a new 'Muslim travel ban' of sorts – given it mirrors similar policies from Trump's first term in office, and will take effect Monday. There are outright bans imposed on a dozen of the nations. Iranian official Alireza Hashemi-Raja criticized the move as reflecting a 'supremacist and racist mentality' among American policymakers. According to more via Al Jazeera: Hashemi-Raja argued that the policy breaches international legal norms and denies millions the basic right to travel, based solely on nationality or faith. He said the ban would 'entail international responsibility for the US government', without elaborating. The ban heavily features Mideast and North African countries like Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and others – but is not limited to countries with Muslim majority populations. Among the countries listed are also Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti. There are 'partial bans' and some new visa restrictions for Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. President Trump had explained this week in a statement posted to the White House: 'The United States must ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already present in the United States do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles, and do not advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists or other threats to our national security.' And further: I directed the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, to identify countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a full or partial suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries pursuant to section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f). After completing that process, the Secretary of State determined that a number of countries remain deficient with regards to screening and vetting. Many of these countries have also taken advantage of the United States in their exploitation of our visa system and their historic failure to accept back their removable nationals. Source: NBC News Interestingly, Syria was on the controversial ban during Trump's first term, but is notably absent this time around – despite the fact that the decade-plus long proxy war saw foreign jihadists flow there from around the world. There are even foreign jihadists who hold government positions in the Jolani (Sharaa) regime, in the wake of Assad's December ouster.

'Very Disrespectful': Trump 'Assumes' Musk Relationship Is Over
'Very Disrespectful': Trump 'Assumes' Musk Relationship Is Over

Gulf Insider

time8 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

'Very Disrespectful': Trump 'Assumes' Musk Relationship Is Over

Here's the latest in the Trump-Musk feud. Trump told NBC News that there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk turns around and backs Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who support the 'Big Beautiful Bill' (no doubt a loaded question from NBC ). that there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk turns around and backs Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who support the 'Big Beautiful Bill' (no doubt a loaded question from ). ' If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that ,' Trump told the outlet. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' ,' Trump told the outlet. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' When asked if he had a desire to repair the relationship, Trump said 'No,' and he 'would assume' it's over between the two. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said, adding 'I have no intention of speaking to him.'Trump was also frank, accusing Musk of being 'very disrespectful,' saying'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President.' Musk, meanwhile, was a mix of de-escalation and pushing his 'America Party' – described as his 'vision to dismantle the establishment. While continuing to express concern over US debt levels. Alarming — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 7, 2025 It was a turbulent week in American politics as the Trump–Musk feud erupted over the 'Big Beautiful Bill' – shattering their alliance with little indication of reconciliation in the near term, though both men appear to have simmered down . Speaking to reporters Friday evening, Trump weighed in on Musk, saying: 'I just wish him well.' That said, he also reiterated a threat to 'look at everything' in regards to Musk's government contracts. 🚨 President Trump on canceling Elon Musk's contracts:"We'll take a look at everything. He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it yeah but it has to be fair." — DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) June 7, 2025 Vice President JD Vance weighed in on 'This Past Weekend w/Theo Von' 'I'm always going to be loyal to the president and I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold,' said Vance, adding 'Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear, but I hope it is.' JD Vance on the Elon – Trump feud: President Trump took a bullet for this country. He is doing more than anyone to bring the American Dream back & this bill is a big part of the agenda he promised. War between them isn't good for America — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 7, 2025 Vance also gave credit to DOGE for rooting out waste, fraud and abuse (which the BBB does nothing about): 🚨 JD Vance says DOGE found that for "every dollar we were spending on humanitarian assistance, $0.12 was actually making it to people who needed it." — Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) June 7, 2025 In the overnight hours, Jerry Dunleavy, chief investigative reporter at Just The News , cited now-deleted X posts from Elon Musk, in which Musk said he would 'apologize' to the president for mean tweets 'as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' It was unclear on Saturday morning whether a genuine détente had developed between Musk and the president, who had feuded throughout the day on Thursday. To recap the week (read more here): Earlier in the week, Musk came out against the 'Big Beautiful Bill' – which raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, and either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion, or lowers it by $1.4 trillion – depending on who you believe, and fails to address any of the waste, fraud and abuse found by DOGE. Thursday morning, Trump was asked about Musk's opposition to the bill, telling reporters on Thursday that he's 'very disappointed in Elon,' and that Musk only opposes the bill because they eliminated electric vehicle tax credits from it. Trump then suggested he might pull government funding from Musk's companies such as SpaceX, which owns the only operational US spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts . I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' -President Donald Trump via Truth Social Musk went ballistic – announcing he would 'immediately' decommission the Dragon program (which he later walked back Thursday night), proposed a new political party (that's still his pinned post on X), endorsed another Trump impeachment, and said in a now-deleted post Trump is 'in the Epstein files,' which is why they haven't been released. The optics of what happened last week between Musk and the president are wild, with Musk standing up for MAGA ideals that Trump campaigned on, and Trump peddling the Big Beautiful Bill Act (BBB) that came from the swamp. Musk's key issue is that BBB raises the debt ceiling by another $5 trillion, while – and this part is in contention – the bill either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion or lowers it by $1.4 trillion, depending on who you believe. We note that it also makes little to no effort to a ddress the waste, fraud, or abuse identified by DOGE. What's very concerning about some in the MAGA Republican team is the failure to codify DOGE spending cuts in a way that safeguards taxpayer dollars from wasteful and fraudulent spending. MAGA campaigned on this and has yet to act. Musk appears to be set on breaking away from the two-party duopoly and creating a new party. The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!And exactly 80% of people agree 😂This is fate. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 1) Elon starts a new political party2) It gets 20% of the vote3) Mostly from former Republicans4) Dems win a supermajority5) Dems throw Elon in prison — Roman Helmet Guy (@romanhelmetguy) June 6, 2025 We're guessing the BBB will still pass – no doubt with some modifications. For better or worse, the BBB will pass. Instead of clashing over what is autopilot spending to satisfy legacy obligations, focus on how to generate the biggest GDP growth — zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 5, 2025 At least it's going to be a quiet weeke– or not.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store