NC House advances bill to restrict cellphone use in schools
The House judiciary committee passed House Bill 87, mandating each school district to adopt a policy either banning cellphones or restricting their use during class time. A similar bill has already passed in the state Senate, but the House bill has yet to be voted on in the full chamber.
Accoridng to WRAL, Rep. Neal Jackson, R-Moore, the lead sponsor of the bill, emphasized the importance of allowing local school boards to determine the specifics of the policy.
'Our thought is these school boards are smart people that are elected,' Jackson said. 'They can flesh out the policy. They don't need someone from Raleigh telling them all the specifics of how this needs to work.'
ALSO READ: School districts crack down on cellphone usage in classrooms
About two-thirds of North Carolina's school districts already have policies regarding cellphone use. Some schools require students to keep phones in locked pouches throughout the day, while others have bins at the front of each classroom but permit phone use between classes.
Supporters of the bill argue that stricter rules are necessary to ensure effective enforcement.
Mary Anne Tierney from Buncombe County advocated for more comprehensive regulations, suggesting that bans should apply during the entire school day, not just class time. Karl Johnson, a public health professor at UNC-Chapel Hill, highlighted the need for technologies like lockable pouches and storage lockers to aid in enforcement.
If enacted, the cellphone restriction policies would take effect next school year, with bipartisan support increasing the likelihood of the bill becoming law.
Gov. Josh Stein has expressed support, citing cellphones as a 'major distraction' for students and a 'disruption' for teachers.
VIDEO: School districts crack down on cellphone usage in classrooms
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Doggett says he won't run against Casar if Texas maps are approved
'If the courts give Trump a victory in his scheme to maintain control of a compliant House, I will not seek reelection in the reconfigured CD37, even though it contains over 2/3rd of my current constituents,' Doggett said in the statement. Doggett said he will run for reelection in his current district if Texas Republicans' 'racially gerrymandered Trump map' is rejected. Doggett's office did not immediately respond to requests for clarification about his intentions if the maps are approved. A spokesperson for Casar declined to comment. Doggett quickly announced his intention to run in his home district last month after Texas released its redrawn maps. Last week, he leaned on Casar to run in the new 35th District, a bloc east of San Antonio where Trump won 54 percent of the vote last year. Days later, Casar's chief of staff said he would only run for Congress in his native Austin, and chastised Doggett for attempting to force him to run elsewhere. 'I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump,' Doggett said in the statement. 'While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats.' Pressure against Doggett ramped up in recent days after David Hogg's super PAC said it planned to financially support Casar if the two members squared off in a primary. Doggett, who holds over $6 million in his campaign account, had said he planned to spend significantly to defend his seat. Hogg's group said they had intended to help Casar make up some of the difference. 'Thank you, Congressman Lloyd Doggett, for letting the next generation lead and for your decades of progressive service. I hope more members of Congress follow his example and pass the torch,' Hogg said in a statement to POLITICO.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
California Democrats pass Newsom's redistricting plan
California's Democrat-controlled legislature on Thursday formally approved a plan to redraw the state's congressional lines, teeing up a special election this fall that will let Californians weigh in on mid-decade redistricting in response to a plan pushed by Texas Republicans. Both the state Assembly and Senate approved three pieces of the 'Election Rigging Response Act' legislative package, which include a proposed constitutional amendment and two separate bills that lay out the logistics for the special election and map proposal. Those bills now head to Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) desk for approval. Democrats in the Golden State have been racing against the clock to get the package through by Friday in order to set up a Nov. 4 special election. Unlike in Texas, where the GOP-controlled legislature and the governor's approval will be enough to make the Lone Star State maps official, California ultimately has to put the question before voters. Californians will be asked to greenlight plan that could give Democrats five additional House seats, effectively cancelling out the five would-be Republican gains in Texas, by going around the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade. 'This proposal would give Californians a choice to fight back — and bring much needed accountability and oversight to the Trump Administration,' Newsom said in a statement this week. Newsom has pitched the plan as a way to 'fight fire with fire' after President Trump pushed Texas to find five new GOP seats. He's also underscored that the plan would be temporary, reverting back to the independent commission's regular post-census redistricting schedule after the 2030 cycle. Republicans, on the other hand, argue that the plan goes against the will of the voters, who approved the commission in 2008 and 2010. During hours of proceedings on Thursday, they also raised questions about who drew the maps and concerns about the cost of a special election. California GOP legislators earlier this week filed suit with a petition asking the state Supreme Court to block action on the legislation, arguing that the sprint to vote on the legislation package violated the state constitution. The state court rejected that petition on Wednesday, allowing the efforts to move forward in the Legislature. California's plan comes after talk of new maps in Texas kicked off a national redistricting tit-for-tat in the run-up to next year's high-stakes midterms. Republicans hold a slim 219-212 majority in the House, and control of Congress could come down to just a few seats. The GOP currently controls just nine of California's 52 House slots. The Republican incumbents affected by the new map are Reps. Kevin Kiley (R), Doug LaMalfa (R), Darrell Issa (R), Ken Calvert (R) and David Valadao (R). Redistricting has also been floated in the red states of Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri — and in Democratic strongholds such as Maryland and Illinois. Meanwhile, the Texas House advanced its redistricting plan on Wednesday. Now, both Houses have to reconcile the legislation before it kicks over to Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for approval.
