logo
Ten dead, a missed warning to the gunman's mother and no clear motive: All we know about Austria's worst school shooting

Ten dead, a missed warning to the gunman's mother and no clear motive: All we know about Austria's worst school shooting

Independent4 days ago

Austria has been left reeling after ten people were killed in the deadliest gun attack in its recent history, carried out in the gunman's former school.
Thousands of Austrians lit candles in a vigil for the victims in Graz on Tuesday evening. Police have confirmed they are nine teenagers ranging from 14 to 17 years old, and a 59-year-old teacher.
The gunman, a 21-year-old former student who reportedly felt bullied during his time at the BORG school, was found dead in a toilet, suspected of having turned the gun on himself.
As the country mourns, the horrors of Tuesday morning have now been laid bare in traumatic witness accounts from the students and teachers who barricaded themselves in their classrooms as booming gunfire rattled through the school.
It would be 17 minutes before armed police had secured the school and began the speedy evacuation of the survivors. Here is the full story of Austria's deadliest shooting in decades.
It has also been reported that a chance to stop the gunman may have been missed, after he sent his mother a suicide note.
What happened on Tuesday morning?
Armed with a shotgun and a pistol, the gunman descended on the school at around 10am on Tuesday.
He was spotted trying to shoot the lock off a door to the building by religious studies teacher Paul Nitsche, who was leaving his classroom as the gunman tried to enter.
"This is something I couldn't even imagine before," Mr Nitsche told national broadcaster ORF. "That's what the situation was like as I ran down the stairwell. I thought to myself: 'This wasn't real.'"
Eyewitness videos show panicked students hiding under tables as the shots echo out in the background. Students and teachers called family members to say goodbye and tell them they loved them, survivors told Kronen Zeitung.
"We're safe, but the situation is dire. Shooting's going on constantly,' one teacher told her husband over the phone.
Meanwhile, hundreds of police officers and dozens of ambulances were rushing to the scene of the deadliest crime Austria has suffered in decades. Not long more than quarter of an hour had passed before police had swarmed the site and declared the danger over.
At this point, ten people had died including the gunman, and 12 had been injured. Paramedics faced a scene of horror, nearly two dozen people having suffered gunshot wounds at the hands of the suspected attacker. An eleventh victim later died from their injuries.
Traumatised survivors were taken to a nearby centre where they were cared for by medics and counsellors.
What do we know about the victims?
Details on the victims have so far been limited.
Ten people, including students, were killed by the gunman according to police. According to Kronen Zeitung, police confirmed that the youngest victim, one of nine teenagers killed in the attack was 14 years old. The other teenagers were between 15 and 17, while a 59-year-old teacher was also killed.
Another 12 were injured, but it is unclear whether this total became 11 after confirmation that a 10th victim had died in hospital. Nine of those injured were in a serious condition and two were critical, the Austria Red Cross said.
The names of the victims have not yet been confirmed by authorities, but at least one teacher is believed to be among the dead.
What do we know about the shooter?
The 21-year-old Austrian gunman, who lived in the Graz area, was once a pupil at the same school in which he unleashed gunfire, police said. He failed to complete his studies.
He had not attracted any previous police attention, but upon searching his apartment police found discarded plans for a bomb attack, alongside a non-functional pipe bomb.
Police also reportedly found a suicide note, according to reports in Salzburger Nachrichten and Kronen Zeitung. The note appeared to show that he considered himself a victim of bullying.
Austrian news programme Heute reported that the suspect's mother was sent a video clip from her son declaring his intentions to carry out the shooting.
However, she did not open it for 24 minutes and by that time she had seen it and reported it to the police it was too late, Heute adds.
In a press conference on Tuesday, police said they believed the gunman took his own life in the school's toilet and that he had been carrying two firearms, for which he had licences. Mr Karner said 'everything else is still speculation', and investigators were working to find out the shooter's motives.
What is happening now?
Austria has declared a three-day period of national mourning, following one of the largest peacetime tragedies in the country's history.
The governor of Styria, Mario Kunasek, said no public events will be held in the state for the mourning period. Chancellor Christian Stocker, vice chancellor Andreas Babler, education minister Christoph Wiederkehr and interior minister Gerhard Karner attended a memorial service at Graz cathedral on Tuesday evening.
The police investigation into the shooting will continue, as Austrians question how and why the gunman was able to carry out the attack.
Police have not named the shooter nor his supposed motive.
The identities of the ten victims are likely to be released in the near future, after authorities have formally confirmed their identities and informed the families.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?
What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?

Senior politicians, lawyers and doctors have warned that a lack of regulation over the use of expert witnesses in English courts could be leading to miscarriages of justice. But what is an expert witness and who gets to be one? An expert witness is someone who has specialised knowledge in a particular field, and appears in court to provide an objective and impartial opinion to help those involved in a case, such as a judge or jury, understand a particular issue. Expert witnesses can be useful to magistrates and juries in helping them to determine the issues in a criminal case, including whether a defendant is guilty or innocent. They are used in many aspects of civil law, and different experts have been used to provide evidence on everything from medical issues and forensics to construction and engineering. A solicitor or legal team will choose an expert with the necessary qualifications and experience in their relevant field, and it is ultimately up to a court to decide whether they can appear as a witness. However, there is no regulatory body that governs expert witnesses, and there are concerns that someone who wants to appear as a witness can 'self-appoint' and declare themselves to be an expert in a particular area. Sometimes solicitors will contact someone directly who they believe may have expertise in a particular area. There are also listing sites where experts can register and these private companies will connect lawyers to people in various fields, including forensics and medical specialists. Some agencies offer 'urgent quotes within the hour'. Rates can vary hugely, with fees varying between the type of expert and the type of case. Some will be paid less than £100 an hour in legal aid cases, but fees for others will be much more. In criminal prosecutions, the crown must provide defence teams with access to all material that is capable of undermining the prosecution case, including expert opinions. However, there is no requirement on the defence to do the same. In civil litigation, there is also a legal obligation for parties to share any relevant documents or other information that could support or undermine their case.

Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts
Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts

A lack of regulation over the use of expert witnesses in English courts could be leading to miscarriages of justice, senior politicians, lawyers and doctors have said. The former attorney general Dominic Grieve and the former justice secretary Jack Straw were among those to tell the Guardian that criminal and civil trials were sometimes hanging on evidence by self-appointed 'experts' who could lack relevant knowledge. Grieve warned that although experts were supposed to be independent, they often came across as being 'hired guns'. 'Expert evidence is clearly critical, legitimate and in some cases can be absolute clinchers,' he said. But when dealing with issues 'at the limits of human scientific knowledge and understanding', expert witnesses could make people feel comfortable about making decisions when 'quite frankly, the evidence isn't there', he said. Concerns over the use of expert witnesses have been raised in relation to the case of Lucy Letby, the neonatal nurse convicted of murdering seven babies. Lawyers appealing against her conviction argue that the expert evidence presented at her trial was flawed. Expert witnesses were also criticised during the Post Office scandal, where subpostmasters were convicted of stealing based on evidence from IT experts that has been subject to criticism. Expert witnesses are used in both criminal and civil courts to give information and opinion on matters relevant to the case that would be considered outside the knowledge of a judge or jury. They are supposed to give an objective and unbiased opinion, according to guidelines from the Crown Prosecution Service, and can be instructed by the prosecution and the defence. But there are no formal controls on who can describe themself as an expert or training required to ensure they understand legal procedure. Jack Straw, a former justice secretary, said there was a 'nagging worry' that expert witnesses were not being properly regulated. He said courts often encourage both sides to agree on using one expert witness, to save on time and costs, but 'in my view this emphasises even more the need for there to be better regulation of expert witnesses' to ensure reliability. Nazir Afzal, a former chief crown prosecutor for north-west England, said there are 'a number of issues' with the system. He said it would generally be up to a judge to decide whether somebody has the relevant expertise, which becomes more complicated if the area of expertise is related to 'lived experience' rather than science. With international experts, he said, it may also be difficult for a court to verify their qualifications. He also said there were issues with 'expert shopping', where lawyers will consult different experts until they find one who will say what they need them to. The law firm Bond Solon offers expert witnesses training, and also runs an annual survey that looks at improving standards of expert evidence. More than a third of experts who responded to the 2024 survey said they had experienced 'hired gun' experts in their field in the past year, referring to people who provide 'evidence to substantiate the opinion preferred by the instructing party'. One in four also said they had been pressured by solicitors to produce biased opinions. Simon Berney-Edwards, the chief executive of the Expert Witness Institute, a not-for-profit membership body for expert witnesses which provides training, vetting and a directory, said there 'is no bar set' to ensure people not only have the correct qualifications, but that they understand legal procedure. 'There is no thing that says [expert witnesses] have to be registered with their professional body, or with any regulatory body. The onus on vetting the quality of their expert remains very much with the legal team,' he said. 'Many people will say that they're doing expert witness work but haven't had one bit of training. Where you've got people that don't understand what they're doing, that's where you get the problems, the possible miscarriages of justice.' Expert witnesses are paid for their time, and although in criminal cases – particularly those funded via legal aid – it is not always very lucrative, people can make large sums in civil and medico-legal work. Prof Sir Norman Williams, a former president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, carried out a government commissioned review into gross negligence manslaughter prosecutions against medical professionals in 2018 that found widespread concern about expert witnesses. The review found issues with 'the quality and consistency of opinion provided by healthcare professionals acting as expert witnesses' that may not be uncovered until trial or appeal, and made recommendations for more training. 'Ideally one would like to see a system that was better regulated, but I can't see that happening easily,' Williams said. 'You have to be somewhat concerned that problems [highlighted in the review] can recur, because some cases are very complex, they're difficult for juries to appreciate. If all the factors aren't taken into consideration, there could be miscarriages of justice.' Jonathan Lord, an NHS consultant gynaecologist and co-chair of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists abortion taskforce, said there is concern among medics about some witness evidence that has come before the courts. 'They are hired by one side, not the court, and many have substantial earnings from this work, so conflicts of interest that would not be acceptable in other professional spheres are embedded into the system,' he said. 'While they are supposed to be neutral, given the large payments involved and the need to be called and engaged again in the future, it's hard to be reassured that bias doesn't creep in.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store