‘The Pitt' Star Katherine LaNasa Confirmed for Season 2 While Celebrating Emmy Noms From Set With Noah Wyle
Wyle was nominated for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series, and LaNasa got her nod in the Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series category. In the video, shared on Instagram by a crew member and seen below via X, the two hug while soaking up applause from their colleagues in the emergency room of the Pittsburgh Trauma Medical Center. Apparently taking a break from filming Season 2, the excitement is palpable from everyone on set. The Max series was also nominated for Best Drama Series.
More from TheWrap
'Severance' Creator Dan Erickson Breaks Down the 'Self-Induced Anxiety' That Led to Those 27 Emmy Nominations
'The Pitt' Star Katherine LaNasa Confirmed for Season 2 While Celebrating Emmy Noms From Set With Noah Wyle | Video
'Severance' Star Adam Scott Feels 'Pure Delight' Over His Emmy Nom After Expecting Disappointment
'Sesame Street' Updates Elmo X Account Security After Antisemitic Hack: 'No One at the Organization Was Involved'
'I'm overjoyed that the nominations were spread across all the different departments as it reflects our collective effort,' Wyle separately said of his nomination. 'A heartfelt congrats to all my fellow nominees. I'm humbled and grateful.'
the pitt cast and crew celebrating katherine and noah's nominations on set :')) <3 pic.twitter.com/z2Qi7wr2Wx
— keira (@kettlevinyl) July 15, 2025
'To receive this level of recognition at this stage of my career is a delightful surprise,' LaNasa said in her statement following the nomination. 'I am so very proud of 'The Pitt' and especially grateful to Noah, John and Scott for entrusting me with Dana. I am beyond humbled to be included in this group of beautifully talented actresses.'
LaNasa being on set and in costume should quell any concerns fans of the first season had about LaNasa's return. Her character Dana Evans seemed set to quit the hospital after the harrowing events of Season 1 – including a mass shooting that filled the hospital with critical patients. She even played coy when asked whether she would be back for Season 2 in May.
'I think she would probably just spend it at home with her family,' LaNasa told Gold Derby. 'I think she needs a big decompression. I think she just really needs a lot of time to probably process and decompress. Probably needs some therapy.'
HBO Max did not immediately respond to TheWrap's request for comment on LaNasa's return.
'The Pitt' takes place over a single shift at PTMC. It was announced following Season 1 that the second season of the show would take place on the Fourth of July. If the first season revolving around the annual PittFest ended explosively as it did, things will likely get even more intense for the residence and interns of The Pitt in it's sophomore outing.
The post 'The Pitt' Star Katherine LaNasa Confirmed for Season 2 While Celebrating Emmy Noms From Set With Noah Wyle | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
WWE SummerSlam 2025: What Time Does Night 2 Start On Sunday?
WWE has a tough job on its hands. Following Night 1's explosive main event and surprise ending won't be easy, but Night 2 of SummerSlam has its own lineup of potentially explosive matches. The action begins at 6 p.m. ET. You can watch it on Peacock. Here is a look at the entire card. WWE SummerSlam Sunday Match Card - August 3 Undisputed WWE Championship Street Fight John Cena (c) vs. Cody Rhodes Women's World Championship Match Naomi (c) vs. Rhea Ripley vs. IYO SKY Intercontinental Championship Match Dominik Mysterio (c) vs. AJ Styles United States Championship Steel Cage Match Solo Sikoa (c) vs. Jacob Fatu Women's Intercontinental Championship No Disqualification Match Becky Lynch (c) vs. Lyra Valkyria WWE Tag Team Title Six-Pack TLC Match WWE Tag Team Champions The Wyatt Sicks vs. The Street Profits vs. The Motor City Machine Guns vs. #DIY vs. Fraxiom vs. Andrade & Rey FenixWhat Matches Could Steal the Show From John Cena and Cody Rhodes in the Main Event? Everyone will be waiting for the John Cena vs. Cody Rhodes main event. There is a chance that we could see all kinds of outside interference in this Street Fight. I'd be surprised if WWE didn't at least try to match what they accomplished on Saturday night with Seth Rollins' cash-in. That said, keep an eye on the TLC Six-Pack Tag Team Match. The number of athletes combined with the stipulations has my expectations freakishly high for this one. I'm hoping Nathan Frazer, nor anyone he's in a spot with, gets injured. Frazer is a bullet when he's in the ring, and sometimes I worry he's moving a little too fast. It's happened before. Hopefully, he has it all under control and his brilliance will shine through. I'm also fired up for Naomi's title defense against IYO SKY and Rhea Ripley. Naomi is on a run that is similar to what Liv Morgan experienced in 2024, when she was my Female WWE Superstar of the Year. If Naomi can keep the title through the next two PLEs and continues to do the character work that she's done recently, she'll have the spot on lock. Lastly, my eyes are wide open for the Steel Cage Match between Jacob Fatu and Solo Sikoa. The latter has found a way to re-invent himself with some humor, and he now has another faction. I could see either person going over, but it could be time to elevate Jacob into the premier title picture. Yadadamean? Be on the lookout for a post-PLE awards piece.
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Ann Harris, Who Edited a Stack of Best Sellers, Dies at 99
In 1969, after a career writing comedic novels and screenplays, William Peter Blatty wrangled a $10,000 advance to write a decidedly unfunny book, 'The Exorcist.' He wrote a manuscript so scary, he would later tell a British newspaper, that his secretary 'was too spooked to work on it when she was alone in the house.' Before the novel could be published, though, the finer points of plot, character and demonic possession had to be shaped by an editor. The job went to the fastidious Ann Schakne Harris, who in the 1960s was among a group of women to gain recognition for their burnishing skills at Manhattan's publishing houses. For six weeks, Mr. Blatty and Ms. Harris bivouacked at a hotel in New York to sculpt the novel that became the defining entry in a hybrid genre that The New York Times called 'theological horror.' 'The Exorcist,' published in 1971 by Harper & Row (now HarperCollins), became one of the best-selling novels of the decade and sold 13 million copies in the United States. Mr. Blatty died in 2017. Ms. Harris died on June 1 at her home in Manhattan, her daughter Katherine Harris said. She was 99. 'The Exorcist' was her breakthrough after she was in and out of the book business for 20 years, assisting other editors, working part time while raising two children. She was happy in that role, she said, but acknowledged that it 'was a heady thing to have a great big best seller.' 'From the beginning, I knew absolutely that it was going to the top of the list,' Ms. Harris said in Al Silverman's 'The Time of Their Lives: The Golden Age of Great American Book Publishers, Their Editors, and Authors' (2008). 'And I knew that I could make it happen.' A raft of best sellers attended her six-decade career. Among them were 'The Thorn Birds' (1977) by the Australian writer Colleen McCullough; Stephen Hawking's 'A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes' (1988); autobiographies of Betty Ford and Warren Buffett; a smuggled manuscript by the Soviet-era composer Dmitri Shostakovich; and two Pulitzer Prize winners — 'Why Survive? Being Old in America' (1975) by Dr. Robert N. Butler, and 'Toms River: A Story of Science and Salvation' (2013) by Dan Fagin. 'The Thorn Birds,' a generational family saga set in the Australian Outback, was a particular triumph for Ms. Harris. She had essentially discovered Ms. McCullough, who was then a professor and researcher at Yale University. Ms. Harris had acquired Ms. McCullough's first novel, the modestly successful 'Tim' (1974). For 'The Thorn Birds,' Ms. Harris immersed herself in the editing process, as she had with Mr. Blatty. Ms. McCullough would travel to Manhattan from New Haven, Conn., sometimes staying at the Harris family's apartment while they smoothed the novel's contours. In a dedication to Ms. Harris, her son Nicholas Harris said in an interview, Ms. McCullough wrote that the collaboration was 'hard' and 'painful' but invaluable. The Times gave 'The Thorn Birds' — sometimes called the American 'Gone With the Wind' — a mixed review, but it had sold more than 30 million copies worldwide by 2015, when Ms. McCullough died at age 77. The paperback rights sold at auction for $1.9 million, then a record. To edit Ms. McCullough's third novel, 'An Indecent Obsession' (1981), Ms. Harris traveled nearly 9,000 miles to Norfolk Island, an Australian territory in the Pacific, and spent six weeks with the author. 'She was a classic, old-style editor,' Frances McCullough, who worked with Ms. Harris as an editor at Harper & Row, said in an interview. 'She took time and pains with authors.' Today, Ms. McCullough said, 'books that need that kind of intense attention tend to be farmed out to freelance editors, who can work on them full time.' The author Stephen Fried, who wrote four books for Ms. Harris, said her editing style was 'active but not aggressive' as she guided writers to make changes in their own voice. He called her nurturing and invariably excited about new ideas, even if trendiness was not immediately suggested by her schoolmarmish appearance. 'She was like if your grandma read everything and knew everything,' Mr. Fried said in an interview. Ann Schakne was born in Manhattan on Sept. 22, 1925. Her father, Harry Schakne, worked at his in-laws' dressmaking business and earlier ran a Jewish newspaper in Detroit. Her mother, Alice (Siegel) Schakne, was a schoolteacher. Ann's interest in medicine as a teenager was impeded by a lack of affinity for chemistry, putting her on course for publishing. She graduated from Hunter College in New York in 1946 with a bachelor's degree in English and received her master's degree from Radcliffe College in 1948, having taken its inaugural publishing course to learn the basics of editing, sales, cover design and publicity. In 1952, she entered the publishing business as a 'reader,' evaluating manuscripts. By the mid-1960s, she had become an editor. In 1980, Ms. Harris left Harper & Row and later that decade joined Bantam, where she edited Dr. Hawking's hugely popular, layman-accessible 'A Brief History of Time.' It sold 10 million copies but her working relationship with Dr. Hawking, the renowned University of Cambridge physicist who died in 2018 after a decades-long struggle with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, was described by some as complicated. For a subsequent book, 'The Universe in a Nutshell' (2001), an apparently frustrated Ms. Harris sent 'a disorganized collection' of Dr. Hawking's writings to Kitty Ferguson, his biographer, asking if it could be assembled into a coherent manuscript, as recounted by Declan Fahy in 'The New Celebrity Scientists' (2015). For one of the Hawking books that their mother edited, Katherine and Nicholas Harris said, a disagreement arose between Ms. Harris and the physicist. A computational error was discovered when the book was sent for peer review, Katherine Harris said, and her mother insisted that it not be distributed until a correction was made. 'Hawking was furious,' she said in an interview. 'As far as I know, he never forgave her.' However, Beth Rashbaum, who edited Dr. Hawking after Ms. Harris left Bantam, and Leonard Mlodinow, a collaborator of Dr. Hawking's, said they did not recall any tensions between the two of them. So captivated was Ms. Harris by Dr. Butler's Pulitzer-winning book about aging in the mid-1970s, she left publishing briefly to work at a longevity clinic he established in 1990 at Mount Sinai Medical Center. (When Ms. Harris was in her 40s, Katherine Harris said, she scrubbed every public reference to her age that she could find. 'Her only plan for retirement was not to retire,' she said.) Along with her daughter and son, Ms. Harris is survived by three grandchildren. Her husband Cyril M. Harris, an acoustical engineer who shaped the sound of many important concert halls, died in 2011. They married in 1949. Her second Pulitzer-winning book, Mr. Fagin's 'Toms River,' was one she acquired, but she retired before it was published by Bantam in 2013. Still, Ms. Harris helped to define the book, Mr. Fagin said in an interview. As he wrestled with whether to tell a local story about chemical leaks, smokestack belches and cancer in a New Jersey town or to more broadly examine the environment and chronic disease, she urged him to 'think big.' 'She believed in the power of books to tell big stories and make a big difference,' Mr. Fagin said.
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
The Three Crumbling Pillars Of The MCU: What's Going On?
It has not been a great year for Marvel, with three films ranging from 'not great' to 'pretty decent' at the box office in the space of Thunderbolts, Captain America: Brave New World and now Fantastic Four. Add onto that a couple shows that were lobbed out without much fanfare (Ironheart, Eyes of Wakanda) and a supposed fan-favorite that was underwatched (Daredevil: Born Again), and 2025 was not ideal. But of course, the general sense is that post-Endgame, the MCU has been lost at sea to some extent, and has not and likely will not reach the peak of Endgame and everything that came before. Why? You can say the ever-cited 'superhero fatigue' or the fact that movie tickets cost too much, but in the context of Marvel, it's more than that. In my view, there are three main pillars of the MCU that have had cracks shooting through them for years now. Too Many Releases, And Too Many Disconnected Releases Even Marvel realized eventually that dumping out something like three shows and three movies a year was overkill, and will allegedly tone that down from here, but it took more than a half decade to figure it out. It was overwhelming and many fans would just throw up their hands and be content to miss one film or another. Marvel has previously said that their movies felt too much like 'homework,' where'd you have to watch X other movie or show to know what's happening in the next movie. While that was true to some extent, The Marvels had three characters that required viewing of a first film, and two separate TV shows to know all the leads, that didn't happen all that often. Rather, it was that the stories were mostly disconnected, not leading toward any sort of ultimate goal that made any amount of sense. There was this vague idea for a minute that Kang would be the new Big Bad, first introduced in Loki, of all places, and then he showed up in the third Ant-Man movie, of all places, and was beaten by…ants. You can see the problem. Elsewhere, what did we have? Black Widow, a prequel film that should have been made years earlier for it to make sense. The Eternals, a moonshot full of people no one had ever heard of. Now more recently Thunderbolts, an assembled cast of C-listers from over the past 6-8 years or so. While they are throwing many of these characters together for the new Avengers movies, this has not been a coherent, connected plan. Abandoned Heroes This has two meanings, namely that post-Endgame, characters were simply lost. Iron Man was famously killed. Captain America time traveled, aged and has never been seen again. Hulk showed up in co-star and cameo roles at best, and was never the full focus of a film. Thor had one great movie and one so bad it killed hype for his character. There has not been an ability to build up a core cast like this again. Recently, Sam Wilson's new Captain America (mantle passing, in that case, was also a big problem) was tasked with assembling a new Avengers. Which would be…who, exactly? After all these years, it feels like we don't have a re-formed cast that makes any sense. Also by 'abandoned heroes,' we have one-and-done offerings. That would be the aforementioned Eternals, but also Shang-Chi, who was built up to be a hugely important character and then never got any sequel. None of these new-era heroes have gotten more than one movie focused on them specifically, something that was not the case with Iron Man, Captain America and Thor especially in the run-up to the various Avengers movies. The Nostalgia Trap Card One point here is that well, there are still huge-earning movies in this era, two of the highest being Spider-Man: No Way Home and Deadpool and Wolverine. These movies were entertaining, sure, but they both relied heavily on audience connections not with the story, but with the mere appearance of characters they used to love. In Spider-Man, of course, that was two previously Spider-Man in the form of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield. In Deadpool and Wolverine, it's easy to even lose count, from Chris Evans taking up the mantle of Johnny Storm, Ben Affleck-era Jennifer Garner Elektra, Blade. They threw everything at the wall. You are eventually going to run out of nostalgia to pull from here. Even now, what's the big focus of the upcoming Avengers Doomsday? The return of a slew of FOX-era X-Men past the Deadpool and Wolverine ones, and then the return of Robert Downey Jr. himself, which I would consider a different form of nostalgia, in this case for a better era of the MCU itself, even if he's playing a different role. The story is that the MCU's biggest star is somehow back. Those are my takeaways from what's going on. There's more past that, but it's been rough, and I'm not sure when it's going to get better from here. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
