Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun policies
Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia 'immediately and without hesitation' tackled the shooter to subdue him before law enforcement arrived, Brigadier Gen. John Lubas said at a news conference Wednesday.
But they didn't have firearms to shoot back because of a policy first enacted decades ago to ensure safety by limiting armed members on army bases to military police. The suspect in the shooting, logistics Sgt. Quornelius Radford, used a personal weapon, Lubas said.
Questions about why soldiers didn't have weapons were buzzing online after at least one video of the incident on social media appears to show service members in uniform running to safety amid a lockdown that lasted about an hour, instead of firing back at the shooter.
While some have questioned why many service members in the area during the shooting didn't use weapons to defend themselves, others have questioned whether existing regulations do enough to prevent shootings on bases. The shooting is the latest in a growing list of violent incidents at American military installations over the years — some claiming upward of a dozen lives.
Experts say that there are reasons for long-standing regulations on military bases, despite their limitations.
Department of Defense policy in place for decades
Department of Defense policy prohibits military personnel from carrying personal weapons on base without permission from a senior commander, and there is a strict protocol for how the firearm must be stored.
Typically, military personnel must officially check their guns out of secure storage to go to on-base hunting areas or shooting ranges, and then check all firearms back in promptly after its sanctioned use. Military police are often the only armed personnel on base, outside of shooting ranges, hunting areas or in training, where soldiers can wield their service weapons without ammunition.
The federal policy leaves little room for local commanders to use discretion about how the policy is enforced. That means the regulation applies even in Georgia, a state with some of the most lax gun regulations in the country, where Fort Stewart is located.
Designed to protect national security
Robert Capovilla, a founding partner for one of the largest military law firms in the country, strongly believes in the Second Amendment. But he said that the strict firearm policies on military bases exist for a reason.
'A lot of these installations are involved in top-secret operations, dealing with top-secret information, and because of that you need a heightened security,' said Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and defense attorney. 'You simply don't want folks walking around a federal installation with personal weapons.'
He said he has traveled to 'nearly every single major military installation' in North America for his work. Whenever he visits an installation, he said armed military police have a visible presence almost constantly on base. He added that he doesn't believe Wednesday's shooting could have been prevented if military personnel had been armed at the time.
Limitations to military gun regulation
Firearms on military bases are more regulated than most states in some ways, according to former military prosecutor and defense counsel Eric Carpenter. But he said that the limitations on gun control on military bases parallel gun policy debates in the public more broadly.
'You don't forfeit all of your rights when you enter the military,' Carpenter said. 'Outside of a military situation, the service member has just as much Second Amendment right as anyone else.'
For example, it could be fairly straightforward for a service member living off-base to bring a weapon onto the military installation, Carpenter said, because a senior commander can't regulate gun ownership off base.
There is also scant legal ground for leadership to confiscate a gun when a service member is exhibiting signs of a mental health crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially posing a threat to themselves or others. In recent years, those gaps have come under more scrutiny because of mass shootings, he said.
'All those rules aren't going to prevent someone from doing what the guy did today,' Carpenter said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Hundreds honor security guard killed in New York office tower shooting
NEW YORK (AP) — Hundreds turned out to honor the life of Aland Etienne, the security guard who was killed last month at a Manhattan office tower by a gunman targeting the headquarters of the National Football League. An immigrant from Haiti who came to the U.S. in 2017 with a dream for a new life, Etienne was remembered as a dedicated father and grandfather who was faithfully working at his security post when the gunman suddenly opened fire on July 28. 'My brother will be remembered as a hero. A humble, steady, kind New York hero,' said Smith Etienne, Aland's brother, in a statement. 'Aland made the ultimate sacrifice, choosing bravery and selflessness over fear. In his final moments, he acted to protect others.' The memorial service was held Saturday in Brooklyn for Etienne, 46, the last of the four shooting victims to be laid to rest. A New York City police officer, an investment firm executive and a real estate firm worker were also killed. The gunman wounded a fifth person before taking his own life. Like Etienne, slain NYPD Officer Didarul Islam, who was working a department-approved private security detail that day, was an immigrant. Islam was Bangladeshi-American. Manny Pastreich, president of Etienne's union, 32BJ SEIU, said Etienne represents not only essential workers who are the backbone of New York City, but also immigrants who come to the U.S. to build a better life and contribute in both large and small ways. 'His legacy will serve as a reminder of the contributions of immigrants, and the sacrifices, they make every day,' Pastreich said in a statement. Security officers from buildings across New York held a vigil last week to honor Etienne.
Winnipeg Free Press
12 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
‘No safety rules': Concerns grow as AI-generated videos spread hate online
At first it appears to be a quirky video clip generated by artificial intelligence to make people laugh. In it, a hairy Bigfoot wearing a cowboy hat and a vest emblazoned with the American flag sits behind the wheel of a pickup truck. 'We are going today to the LGBT parade,' the apelike creature says with a laugh. 'You are going to love it.' Things then take a violent and disturbing turn as Bigfoot drives through a crowd of screaming people, some of them holding rainbow flags. The clip posted in June on the AmericanBigfoot TikTok page has garnered more than 360,000 views and hundreds of comments, most of them applauding the video. In recent months similar AI-generated content has flooded social media platforms, openly promoting violence and spreading hate against members of LGBTQ+, Jewish, Muslim and other minority groups. While the origin of most of those videos is unclear, their spread on social media is sparking outrage and concern among experts and advocates who say Canadian regulations cannot keep up with the pace of hateful AI-generated content, nor adequately address the risks it poses to public safety. Egale Canada, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, says the community is worried about the rise of transphobic and homophobic misinformation content on social media. 'These AI tools are being weaponized to dehumanize and discredit trans and gender diverse people and existing digital safety laws are failing to address the scale and speed of this new threat,' executive director Helen Kennedy said in a statement. Rapidly evolving technology has given bad actors a powerful tool to spread misinformation and hate, with transgender individuals being targeted disproportionately, Kennedy said. 'From deepfake videos to algorithm-driven amplification of hate, the harms aren't artificial– they're real.' The LGBTQ+ community isn't the only target, said Evan Balgord, executive director of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network. Islamophobic, antisemitic and anti-South Asian content made with generative AI tools is also widely circulating on social media, he said. 'When they create the environment where there's a lot of celebration of violence towards those groups, it does make violence towards those groups happening in person or on the streets more likely,' Balgord warned in a phone interview. Canada's digital safety laws were already lagging behind and advancements in AI have made things even more complicated, he said. 'We have no safety rules at all when it comes to social media companies, we have no way of holding them accountable whatsoever.' Bills aimed at addressing harmful online content and establishing a regulatory AI framework died when Parliament was prorogued in January, said Andrea Slane, a legal studies professor at Ontario Tech University who has done extensive research on online safety. Slane said the government needs to take another look at online harms legislation and reintroduce the bill 'urgently.' 'I think Canada is in a situation where they really just need to move,' she said. Justice Minister Sean Fraser told The Canadian Press in June that the federal government will take a 'fresh' look at the Online Harms Act but it hasn't decided whether to rewrite or simply reintroduce it. Among other things, the bill aimed to hold social media platforms accountable for reducing exposure to harmful content. A spokesperson for the newly crated Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation said the government is taking the issue of AI-generated hateful content seriously, especially when it targets vulnerable minority groups. Sofia Ouslis said existing laws do provide 'important protections,' but admitted they didn't aim to address the threat of generative AI when they were designed. 'There's a real need to understand how AI tools are being used and misused — and how we can strengthen the guardrails,' she said in a statement. 'That work is ongoing.' The work involves reviewing existing frameworks, monitoring court decisions 'and listening closely to both legal and technological experts,' Ouslis said. She added that Prime Minister Mark Carney's government has also committed to making the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes a criminal offence. 'In this fast-moving space, we believe it's better to get regulation right than to move too quickly and get it wrong,' she said, noting that Ottawa is looking to learn from the European Union and the United Kingdom. Slane said the European Union has been ahead of others in regulating AI and ensuring digital safety, but despite being at the 'forefront,' there is a feeling there that more needs to be done. Experts say regulating content distributed by social media giants is particularly difficult because those companies aren't Canadian. Another complicating factor is the current political climate south of the border, where U.S. tech companies are seeing reduced regulations and restrictions, making them 'more powerful and feeling less responsible, said Slane. Although generative AI has been around for a few years, there's been a 'breakthrough' in recent months making it easier to produce good quality videos using tools that are mostly available for free or at a very low price, said Peter Lewis, Canada Research Chair in trustworthy artificial intelligence. 'I've got to say it's really accessible to almost anybody with a little bit of technical knowledge and access to the right tools right now,' he said. Lewis, who is also an assistant professor at Ontario Tech University, said that large language models such as ChatGPT have implemented safeguards in an effort to filter out harmful or illegal content. But more needs to be done in the video space to create such guardrails, he said. 'You and I could watch the video and probably be horrified,' he said, adding 'it's not clear necessarily that the AI system has the ability to sort of reflect on what it has created.' Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. Lewis said that while he isn't a legal expert, he believes existing laws can be used to combat the online glorification of hate and violence in the AmericanBigfoot videos. But he added the rapid development of generative AI and widespread availability of new tools 'does call for new technological solution' and collaboration between governments, consumers, advocates, social platforms and AI app developers to address the problem. 'If these things are being uploaded…we need really robust responsive flagging mechanisms to be able to get these things off the internet as quickly as possible,' he said. Lewis said using AI tools to detect and flag such videos helps, but it won't resolve the issue. 'Due to the nature of the way these AI systems work, they're probabilistic, so they don't catch everything.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 10, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Prosecutors may appeal to Supreme Court on 1979 missing child Etan Patz case
NEW YORK (AP) — Prosecutors said Friday they might appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to try to preserve a murder conviction in the 1979 disappearance of 6-year-old Etan Patz, a bewildering case that went unsolved for decades. A federal appeals court recently overturned the conviction of Pedro Hernandez, the former convenience store clerk who became a suspect over 30 years after the New York City first-grader vanished. The appeals court ordered him freed unless he's retried 'within a reasonable period.' Prosecutors asked the appeals court Friday to hold off sending the case back to a lower-level federal judge to set a retrial date. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office wrote that it is 'currently determining whether to file a petition' to the Supreme Court this fall. A message seeking comment was sent to Hernandez' lawyers. He already has been tried twice — his 2017 conviction came after a prior jury couldn't reach a verdict. Etan disappeared while walking little more than a block to his school bus stop. He became one of the first missing children pictured on milk cartons, and his anguished parents helped reshape how American law enforcement agencies responded to missing-child cases. Other parents, meanwhile, became more protective of children over the years after Etan's case and others. No trace of Etan was ever found. After many years, his parents eventually had him declared legally dead. Investigators scoured the city, and even overseas, for leads. But no arrests were made until 2012, when police got a tip that Hernandez — who worked in Etan's neighborhood when the boy was last seen — had made remarks in the ensuing years about having harmed or killed a child in New York. Hernandez then told police that he'd offered Etan a soda to lure him into the basement of the shop where Hernandez worked. The suspect said he then choked the boy and put him, still alive, in a box and left it with curbside trash. Hernandez's lawyers say he confessed falsely because of a mental illness that sometimes made him hallucinate. The attorneys emphasized that the admission came after police questioned him for seven hours without reading him his rights or recording the interview. Hernandez then repeated his admission on tape, at least twice. The trials happened in a New York state court, but the Hernandez appeal eventually wound up in federal court. At issue was the trial judge's response to jurors' questions about whether they had to disregard the recorded confessions if they found the first, unrecorded one was invalid. The judge said no. The appeals court said the jury should have gotten a more thorough explanation of its options, which could have included disregarding all of the confessions.
