Brits say weaning is the hardest part of parenting as mums and dads share their top 10 worries
WEANING is the hardest part of parenting, according to research.
A POLL of 1,000 parents with kids aged six months to four years, found more than half (53 per cent) named this the biggest challenge with half only having a 'vague idea' of when they should start the process
3
3
And two thirds were worried their child would be allergic to something.
But 36 per cent managed this by introducing one allergen at a time, and more than a quarter (26 per cent) were sure to follow official guidelines.
Furthermore, 36 per cent were afraid their child would choke, with other concerns including ensuring they had a balanced diet and got all the nutrients they needed.
With all this in mind, the most effective weaning foods are yogurt, smashed banana and mashed sweet potato – after 77 per cent felt confident they knew what to introduce first.
And, 44 per cent of babies enjoyed their first experience of solid food, after a few tries.
Family food author Rebecca Wilson is working with Yeo Valley Organic, which commissioned the study and put together a guide of the top tips for weaning.
She said: 'Weaning can be a tough process but it's lovely to see parents felt confident and had a plan in place.
'It's encouraging to see so many are aware of nutrients their children need and yogurt banana and sweet potato are perfect for the introduction of weaning.
'The importance of limiting babies' intake of free-from sugar is very important to not only maintain strong dental health, but also ensure children do not get used to highly sweet flavours, thus enabling enjoyment of a varied nutritious diet including non-sugary flavours like bitter greens and acidic vegetables.
'By mixing real fruit with no added sugar into a bulk ingredient like yogurt, rather than solely offering puréed fruits on their own which contain a very high amount of free-from sugar, you're able to expose babies to a varied flavourful diet without exposing them to an unhealthy high sugar level.'
The research went on to find other worries weaners had included concerns that they would reject the food (31 per cent) and managing mess and food waste (21 per cent).
With 17 per cent spending more than five hours a week cleaning up after messy mealtimes.
While 23 per cent wanted to avoid too much salt or sugar and the same amount were anxious about getting portion sizes right.
As a result, a quarter found the whole period of their lives more stressful than they expected it to be.
But looking back, 47 per cent wish they'd known that weaning is different for every baby, and that it's normal for babies to reject foods at first (39 per cent) – and it doesn't mean they won't learn to enjoy them.
And 75 per cent did feel supported during the process by the people around them, according to the OnePoll stats.
Yeo Valley Organic's nutritionist, Alice Mayor, added: "It's easy to feel discouraged if your baby isn't taking to solids straight away, but persistence and patience are key.
'As the research shows, yogurt is a great option to introduce more solids and textures into a diet as well as mashing up banana and blending veggies.
'Some babies dive right in, while others need more time to explore.
'Mealtimes should be a fun and relaxed experience, not a battle and there may be mess, but this is often a sign your child is enjoying themselves.
'Trust that your baby will get there at their own pace and try to enjoy the messy and funny moments along the way.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Designer Karen Millen forced to issue an apology after sparking backlash by calling breastfeeding mothers ‘selfish'
KAREN Millen has been forced to issue an apology after causing backlash with her claim that breastfeeding makes mothers "selfish". The fashion designer was on Channel 5 show Vanessa on Tuesday when she made the controversial comments, as she weighed in on a viral story about a U.S. mum breastfeeding her three-year-old. 3 3 3 "There's no benefit, is there, for a child to be breastfed beyond six months, really," Karen said when asked for her opinion on the story. "I think it's quite a selfish thing on the mother's part." "Do you?" host Vanessa Feltz asked. "Why do you feel that?" "I do, actually, yeah," Karen continued. "I just think, you know, that's not good emotionally for that child." Influencer and mum-of-two Imogen was among those slamming Karen for the interview, as she said she "can't even bring myself to watch it" because she's "so angry and upset". Calling her a "woman bashing women", Imogen continued in her TikTok video: "Breastfeeding is incredible for your children. "The amount of antibodies, the goodness, everything that comes with that. "We can say how amazing something is without offending every single person in the world. "I just think comments like that should be kept to your own Whatsapp chat." Following the backlash surrounding the interview, Karen issued a statement to Vanessa, as she insisted it wasn't her "intention to upset a lot of your viewers". "The question was aimed at a three-year-old being breastfed, and my thoughts on that," she said. "And my answers reflected that, not the subject of breastfeeding. "I have three children, and I breastfed all three of them up until six, seven months, despite it being incredibly painful. "I got mastitis each time, and cracked and sore nipples. But I did it because I knew it was the best thing for them for at least six months. "So, you know, I think my issue was more on the fact that, you know, as a baby, breast milk is the best. What are the recommendations around breastfeeding? The NHS recommends breastfeeding your baby exclusively (feeding them breast milk only) for the first six months, but it's completely up to you to decide when you want to bring it to an end - and there's really no right or wrong way to do it. The NHS says weaning often happens gradually as your baby begins to eat more solid foods. They note that solid food shouldn't replace breast milk, as there is evidence to suggest breast milk helps a baby's digestive system when processing solid food for the first time. "Once they are eating solids, your baby will still need to have breast milk or formula as their main drink up to at least their first birthday," recommends the NHS. "Cows' milk isn't suitable as a main drink for babies under one, although it can be added to foods, such as mashed potatoes." You can also combine breastfeeding with formula, too and the NHS says "phasing out" of breastfeeding is often the easiest way. For example, dropping one feed in the day or at night time. After around a week, you can begin to think about dropping another. "If your baby is younger than one year, you'll need to replace the dropped breastfeed with a formula feed from a bottle or (if they are over six months) a cup or beaker, instead," they say. You can breastfeed for as long as you want, and while the NHS recommends breastfeeding your baby exclusively for the first six months, you shouldn't feel like you cannot continue for longer. The World Health Organization says: "Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended up to 6 months of age, with continued breastfeeding along with appropriate complementary foods up to two years of age or beyond." "And beyond being a baby, growing into a toddler, I just found it more difficult to come to terms with how that would benefit a three-year-old, a toddler. "So anyway, everyone has their own personal choice and decision in these things, and I respect that. "And as a woman, to women, I do respect your choices, and I do want to support you. "So my apologies once again - I hope you forgive me." But many people in the comments section were unwilling to accept the apology, with one writing: "This issue was that there was no balance and it was factually incorrect. "As a programme you should know better. Very disappointing. "Karen Millen came across as really smug and was quite rude, there was no compassion from her!" "We don't accept her apology. Cancel Karen Millen," another urged. "Well that's not an apology is it," a third sighed. As someone else called it the "most pathetic apology ever". "Karen Millen specifically mentioned breastfeeding past 6 months," they added. "She likened it to an addiction. She is completely uneducated and ignorant of the FACTS and recommendations by WHO (the World Health Organisation). "That is what she should apologise for. Not a half hearted back peddle. "She judges parents that breastfeed past 6 months - shameful." Vanessa concluded by saying: "The World Health Organisation recommends that children be breastfed exclusively for the first six months of their lives, and then up to the age of two and beyond that, if it suits the family." Others insisted that Karen is entitled to her own opinion, with some agreeing with her. "Apologise for your own opinion?? Why?" one questioned. "I don't see why she she should apologise," another added. "Karen is 100% right," a third insisted.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Welcome to the 'National Health State': Half of all public spending will go on NHS by the end of the decade despite alarm at dire productivity... and bosses STILL want more
The growing stranglehold of the NHS over public spending was underlined today as Brits digest Rachel Reeves ' plans. A respected think-tank has insisted the UK is turning into the 'National Health State' after another major funding boost. In an extraordinary spree, the Chancellor allocated an extra £29billion per year and more cash for capital investment. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, pointed out that amounted to 90 per cent of Labour 's extra public spending. She cautioned that continued a 'trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade'. The latest huge cash injection comes despite concerns about progress in improving productivity in the NHS. Health service chiefs have also been warning that more money will be needed, with nurses already balloting for industrial action over an inflation-busting 3.6 pr cent pay offer. Matthew Taylor, of the NHS Confederation, which represents health organisations, said: 'Difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29billion won't be enough to cover increasing costs of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it. 'On its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, told the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester that the health service has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. But he added: 'We all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, the day-to-day cost pressures... but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount.' Ms Curtice said defence was another winner from the Spending Review, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although the think tank's director Paul Johnson warned the money may not be enough. He said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review - but stopped short of ruling them out. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning over ‘unsafe' American sweets with cancer risks
British consumers are being warned against purchasing Jolly Rancher sweets due to potential cancer risks, according to the Food Standards Agency (FSA). The popular candies contain mineral oils, food additives that, when consumed regularly over time, may pose health risks, the FSA stated. These chemical compounds, including mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (Moah) and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (Mosh), are added to confectionery items to prevent stickiness and create a glossy appearance. However, their use does not comply with UK law. Hershey, the US producer that owns the Jolly Rancher brand, has been collaborating with the FSA to remove all Jolly Rancher products from the UK market since 2024. Despite these efforts, some British businesses continue to import the sweets, the agency noted. The affected products include Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, " Misfits" Gummies, Hard Candy Fruity 2 in 1, and Berry Gummies, the FSA confirmed. Consumers are advised to avoid these products to mitigate potential health risks. A food alert published by the FSA on Wednesday said: 'Consumption of the affected sweets is of toxicological concern, especially in younger age groups and where consumers eat a lot of the products or eat them regularly. 'Moah can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time. Moah is a genotoxic carcinogen, therefore no exposure is without risk to human health.' It added: 'If you have bought any of the above products, do not eat them. 'Instead, dispose of them at home. If you are concerned, notify your Trading Standards department or environmental health department in the local authority you purchased it. 'For consumers, don't buy them, and if you've eaten these products, there should be no immediate cause for concern, as food safety risk is low, but don't eat any more.' The agency has also urged UK retailers and food businesses to cease all imports and sales of the candy brand, and asked enforcement authorities to ensure the products are removed from the shelves. The FSA said: 'Food businesses who import these products are advised to discontinue import and distribution of products. 'Food businesses selling these products in the UK are advised to immediately stop sales, undertake product withdrawals and where there have been retail sales, to undertake product recalls. 'The Hershey Company, who is the brand owner, has taken action to remove these products from the UK market. 'We are asking enforcement authorities to make immediate contact with businesses who may have been supplied with or received the affected products, and to take action to ensure that the non-compliant and potentially unsafe products are withdrawn from the market and where sold at retail, recalled. 'We are also asking the local authorities to inform the FSA of product recall and withdrawal actions.'
