logo
‘Exploited' migrant care workers ‘charged £10k for visas'

‘Exploited' migrant care workers ‘charged £10k for visas'

BBC News28-05-2025
Overseas workers hired to look after elderly and vulnerable people claim to have faced threats, exploitation and a "climate of fear" at a care home company.Employees at Lotus Care, which runs 10 care homes across north-west England, said they were often forced to work double shifts because of staff shortages, were denied sick leave, were underpaid and threatened with deportation if they complained.They also alleged they were charged thousands of pounds for free work visas by a Merseyside agency that helped to arrange the jobs.Lotus Care denied malpractice allegations and said its recruitment processes "adhere strictly to industry standards and the legal requirements" of the sector.
The firm said it was "committed to upholding the highest ethical standards" and "unaware" of any visa fees being paid by migrant workers, saying it paid the Home Office for the relevant paperwork itself.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) rated the care at five of the company's facilities "inadequate" or "requires improvement" in recent years.In 2022 at Cressington Court in Liverpool, the CQC found a resident had not been bathed for four weeks and another had lost six stone in six months.And last year, in what was its sixth inspection in a row, the CQC found "overwhelming failures" at Finch Manor, also in Liverpool.The firm previously said it was working to address the issues raised by the CQC and improvements had been recorded by inspectors at two homes in the last 12 months.However, a male migrant worker, who spoke to the BBC as part of its eight-month investigation, said he remained concerned."There's constant pressure and there's a climate of fear because management use the threat of cancelling visas and deporting staff to silence any complaints," he said.A female migrant added that she "can't stand the mental stress"."They put more and more work on us," she said. "If anyone is calling in sick, we have to do double shifts. It's too much – it's like torture."A second female migrant worker told the BBC her friend had been ill and she had been "shouted at and threatened, she was told she needed to go to work".The BBC has seen messages from a WhatsApp group set up by Lotus Care's management to communicate with dozens of overseas staff.In several messages, the migrants are told their licence to work, also known as a certificate of sponsorship (CoS), will be "revoked".
If a CoS is cancelled, overseas workers have 60 days to find a new employer before they are deported."I take it from the silence that you all happy for your licences to be revoked? I will start the process without further delay," the firm's owner, Jaydeep Patel, told the group in one message.In another message, sent after a period of hot weather last year, a senior Lotus Care manager said calling in sick for a fever was "unacceptable", and told the workers to "take paracetamol".Mr Patel added: "40 degrees back home in India!!"Lotus Care said the messages were "selective" and they had been shared by "disgruntled staff members" who "left the service under investigation".Some migrant workers told the BBC the messages and the pressure they put them under affected their ability to work.
'A wad of cash'
The migrants spoken to by the BBC were all placed with Lotus Care through a Merseyside care agency.A whistleblower, who formerly worked at the agency, said she had witnessed "more than 100" migrants arriving at the office between 2022 and 2023.They were going there to make cash payments for CoS, the whistleblower said.She told the BBC she had seen one migrant "handing over a wad of cash in an envelope". "It was obviously thousands of pounds," she said. "A few months later, I saw she was working in a Liverpool care home."If they all paid £10,000 per person, that's hundreds of thousands of pounds."She said two bosses at the agency were "making lots of money", driving expensive cars and taking expensive holidays."They were making a lot of money, you could see the newer cars they were driving, the bigger holidays they were going on," she said.Charging workers for CoS is illegal.The government said the cost, which is £284, should be covered by the employer."These migrant workers travelled halfway across the world for a new life and they just looked terrified," the whistleblower added."Some of the conditions they were to sent to work in were terrible."It's just very sad, the new life that they'd hoped for they didn't really get."The care agency denied the allegations. However, the BBC was told last year that a former senior staff member, Shyam Prabhakar, was actively involved in the illegal sale of care visas.Mr Prabhakar, the director of several takeaway businesses in Liverpool, described himself as a "recruitment consultant" in documents filed with Companies House.
In a secretly recorded call with a researcher posing as a potential client, Mr Prabhakar spoke of care home jobs in Leicester, Peterborough, Kettering and Wrexham.He indicated that the fee for a CoS, and a job, would be between £11,500 and £12,000"Once the interview is done and you get the offer letter, you pay half. And before we give the CoS, you should pay the remaining," Mr Prabhakar said.The researcher asked whether the job was "guaranteed" if the money was paid.Mr Prabhakar said: "Yeah, yeah, yeah."When confronted about the allegations outside his home, Mr Prabhakar told the BBC: "I didn't do anything."He said that someone might have been "framing" him.
'Ripe for exploitation'
Citizens Advice said the exploitation of care workers was something it heard about regularly."Every month we're seeing about 120 people in our advice centres," said Citizens Advice policy manager David Mendes da Costa."Our advisers often see people that have spent thousands of pounds - often more than £10,000 - in order to get a visa and a job in the care sector."They think it's going to pay well and they've been told they'll get good hours and good treatment."But when they arrive, they find out that the hours aren't there. [They] have pay withheld, and they're often treated worse than British employees."Workers with a CoS are reliant on their employer for continued sponsorship to remain in the UK."This puts the employer in a huge position of power and that's why it's really ripe for exploitation," said Mr Mendes da Costa.
He added: "People don't want to raise problems because they know if they're dismissed, they'll not just lose their job, they'll also lose their right to stay in the country."Industry body Skills for Care estimated that around 185,000 people were recruited from overseas on health and social care visas between March 2022 and March 2024.A recent Unison survey of more than 3,000 migrants working in the care sector was told almost a quarter had paid illegal visa fees.Many of those surveyed reported abuse from their employers.Andy Brown, a senior investigator at the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority, told the BBC: "In the first quarter of last year, 61% of all our reports were concerning abuse in the adult social care sector."Mr Brown said abuse was often "in plain sight" and urged the public to look out for signs.He said: "If they're visiting relatives, the biggest one to look out for is people working excessive hours and rarely having any days off. So you'll regularly see the same face."Scavenging for food or asking for food is another [sign], as is not being very social, and having little interaction with others."A Home Office official said: "Allegations of visa abuse are taken incredibly seriously and will always be investigated thoroughly."The spokesman said the government was working to take action "against employers who abuse the visa system, with tough measures that will ban businesses who flout UK employment laws from sponsoring overseas workers".
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram, and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Met Police officers face assault charges over patient restraint
Met Police officers face assault charges over patient restraint

BBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Met Police officers face assault charges over patient restraint

Five Metropolitan Police officers have been charged with inflicting grievous bodily harm (GBH) after a man was restrained during an incident at a 3 April 2023 a man in his 50s was detained by police under the Mental Health Act after reportedly behaving erratically in the street, threatening members of the public and setting fire to his was taken to an Islington hospital, which has not been named, where he "became agitated and was restrained by officers", according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct investigated the incident and then referred it to the Crown Prosecution Service, which decided to press charges against the officers. The man was released from hospital in May five officers charged are PC David Hollands, PC Anthony Bhar, PC Robert Wall, PC Elena Cebotari and PC Dan are based in the Met's Central North Command and have been charged with two counts each of Bhar is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 5 August and the remaining four will appear at the same court on 15 Supt Jason Stewart, who leads policing for Central North Command, said: "It is always a matter of deep regret when a member of public is injured through an interaction with officers and I know this matter will cause concern. "We must now let criminal proceedings proceed unhindered while continuing to maintain an open dialogue with the community."

‘Don't be fobbed off': Readers back Telegraph campaign for prostate cancer screening
‘Don't be fobbed off': Readers back Telegraph campaign for prostate cancer screening

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘Don't be fobbed off': Readers back Telegraph campaign for prostate cancer screening

Michael, David, Paul – the names of just three of our readers who have had to take matters into their own hands when it comes to prostate cancer tests. In the hundreds of replies The Telegraph has received in response to our campaign, there are countless stories where men have had to insist on PSA tests when GPs dismissed their concerns. Prostate cancer kills 12,000 men in this country every year, with one in eight prostate cancer cases being caught at stage 4, when the disease is incurable. If the PSA test were proactively offered to men as part of a targeted screening programme, lives would be saved because more cases would be caught at an earlier stage, when treatment is more successful. That is why The Telegraph is campaigning for a targeted national screening programme for prostate cancer, focused on men who are at the greatest risk of developing the disease. This includes men over 50, black men (whose risk is twice that of white men) and those with a family history of prostate cancer. Following the launch of the campaign, readers who have had prostate cancer in the past or are currently undergoing treatment have shared their stories in the hope it will bring about change for others. 'It's my right to have a test' Paul Harvey, 75, believes he would be dead now if he had not insisted on knowing what his PSA levels were. 'My father died with prostate cancer, so I knew I was a higher risk,' he shares. Mr Harvey, who works part-time for the North Yorkshire Police, asked his GP for a PSA test but was told the test wasn't very accurate and not to bother. 'I insisted. I told her it was my right to have a test, and two weeks later she made me a fast-track referral,' he explains. Mr Harvey was soon diagnosed with a PSA of 10.2 and a Gleason score of 3+4. Gleason is a system used to grade prostate cancer based on the appearance of cancer cells. 'At this point, I joined a local support group and found the Macmillan nurse very helpful in bringing my fears down in size,' he shares. The NHS 'stepped up speed', and Mr Harvey had a robotic prostatectomy followed by radiation therapy a few years later. 'Yes, there are still side effects, but at least I am alive to experience them.' 'I am a strong advocate of testing, and am witheringly blunt with men who say ' I do not want to know what my PSA is,'' Mr Harvey states. 'I was told a PSA test was not needed' Telegraph reader David, 67, an aircraft engineer, received PSA tests in the past with all low numbers, but had cause for concern when he experienced urethral bleeds on two occasions, six months apart. His bladder was medically examined with a camera, but he was told he was all clear. 'Each time I questioned my PSA levels, but was told a PSA test was not needed,' he says. He then went to a different GP with a separate issue, who asked, with all the intervention, why he had not requested a PSA test. 'I pointed out I had, on numerous occasions, but was refused.' The GP sent him for a PSA test the next day, and found he had hugely increased numbers. A CT scan followed, revealing he had stage 3 prostate cancer. He is currently undergoing treatment at Weston Park Hospital in Sheffield. 'The answer is not to be fobbed off' Michael Evans had annual PSA checks for ten years until 2005, when he noticed the level had risen from 2.2 to 3.4 in one year. Although the level was still low, he admits, he was concerned about the rapid rate of increase, which he knew to be an indicator of cancer. But his doctor dismissed his concerns and later told him that a PSA level of four was the lowest for an NHS referral at the time. So Mr Evans insisted on a private referral, and as a result he was diagnosed with prostate cancer within a week. Two weeks later, he had the gland removed, although he had been offered alternative therapies. The cancer had not spread, and his PSA level has remained undetectable for 20 years. The reader says the PSA test 'is not clear proof and, of course, a high score can also indicate benign conditions. But it's a start, and warrants further investigation. 'Prostate cancer is eminently curable if you catch it early, as I did. The answer is not to be fobbed off and insist on investigation, especially since MRI scans are now safer than the biopsy, which was all that was available in 2005.' 'Astonished' Geraldine Davies's late husband, Ivor Gunton, took part in Bristol University's ProtecT study around the age of 60, close to the time he was winding down his gardening business. He was tested every year and saw a consultant after receiving a PSA of four. The study results provided strong evidence there was a small increased risk of progression and cancer spread from active monitoring, compared to risks of harms to sexual, urinary and bowel function caused by radical treatments. Upon finding a small tumour, the study looked into which treatments were most successful. Mr Gunton had regular monitoring, and after ten years, the tumour had not grown. 'I am astonished that the results of this comprehensive study are not directing action to prevent so many men from dying of this disease. Why have its findings been ignored?' Mr Gunton died of bowel cancer in 2022, but it was in no way related to the prostate cancer, Ms Davies shares. 'My only symptom was backache' Paul Beal was diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer four years ago – his only symptom was a backache. 'Thankfully, my doctor picked it up at a routine asthma test visit after asking about my general health.' 'The Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King's Lynn were fantastic, and I can't praise the Macmillan Centre enough,' Mr Beal says. However, 'the strangest and best thing that came out of the whole thing is that my friend Brian Hallard had the same diagnosis as me, and we went through the whole treatment as a team.' 'We are pleased to tell you that we are both fine and in remission, both with very low PSAs,' Mr Beal adds. The friends are both invited back to the Macmillan Centre every two months or so, to meet with other men with prostate cancer. 'And I have to say what a great bunch of men, and it's good to talk,' Mr Beal shares. The pair also promote getting the PSA test through their separate businesses – World Of Fun, a joke shop, and the Princess Theatre, both in Hunstanton. 'We are very open about getting the message out.'

Starmer should ‘catch and release' migrants, says US border tsar
Starmer should ‘catch and release' migrants, says US border tsar

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer should ‘catch and release' migrants, says US border tsar

Sir Keir Starmer should 'take a page' out of Donald Trump's playbook to solve Britain's immigration crisis, America's border tsar has said. Tom Homan encouraged the Prime Minister to mimic the pugnacious tactics of the Trump admiration by ruthlessly catching and deporting migrants that arrive on Britain's shores. 'Take a page out of the Trump playbook. Two months ago, we had the lowest numbers of crossings in the history of the nation,' Mr Homan told The Telegraph. 'The next month, we broke that record, and this month we're gonna break it again. I would simply look at the Trump and release. 'If they enter the country illegally, they should be detained and put in front of the judge. And if they get voted to be removed, remove them.' Mr Homan, a former police officer who has also served as acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is the public face of Mr Trump's operation to deport as many as a million people in a year. So far, he and his team have deported around 207,000 illegal migrants who illegally crossed America's southern border with Mexico onto US soil in the last three months, a new record. In Britain, more than 25,000 people have crossed the English Channel to the UK in 2025, the highest total this early in the year. 'There has to be consequences. One of the reasons we have the most secure border in the history of this nation.. [is because] we also send a message to the whole world that there's gonna be consequences,' Mr Homan added. Since returning to the Oval Office, Mr Trump has effectively shut down the US's southern border and ordered the round-up and deportation of undocumented migrants. The National Guard and US Marines have been called in to quell protests and support immigration agents carrying out the round-ups in cities like Los Angeles. In Britain, figures such as Nigel Farage, the Reform Party leader, have repeatedly accused Sir Keir of failing to follow a similar course. 'You can't have strong national security if you don't have border security,' Mr Homan added. 'President Trump has the most secure border of my lifetime. I suggest your government, look at what Trump did and take a page out of his playbook and I guarantee it's going to be the same outcome.' Fresh protests erupted in Britain this week amid growing frustration with the decision to house illegal migrants in taxpayer funded hotels. Sir Keir has pledged to end their use by 2029 amid concerns that they are costing taxpayers £4m a day and causing tensions in communities. Tensions over the hotels reached boiling point last month when demonstrations broke out at a hotel in Epping after a migrant tried to kiss a teenager. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has told the Cabinet the Government must take concerns about immigration seriously and do more to alleviate them. Mr Trump's administration has grown increasingly concerned with migration in Europe. JD Vance, the vice-president, accused the continent of engaging in 'civilisational suicide' by refusing to control its borders. Offering the Prime Minister some advice, Mr Trump told him he would have a better chance of holding back the threat posed by Mr Farage if he made it a priority to tackle immigration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store