logo
‘Exploited' migrant care workers ‘charged £10k for visas'

‘Exploited' migrant care workers ‘charged £10k for visas'

BBC News7 days ago

Overseas workers hired to look after elderly and vulnerable people claim to have faced threats, exploitation and a "climate of fear" at a care home company.Employees at Lotus Care, which runs 10 care homes across north-west England, said they were often forced to work double shifts because of staff shortages, were denied sick leave, were underpaid and threatened with deportation if they complained.They also alleged they were charged thousands of pounds for free work visas by a Merseyside agency that helped to arrange the jobs.Lotus Care denied malpractice allegations and said its recruitment processes "adhere strictly to industry standards and the legal requirements" of the sector.
The firm said it was "committed to upholding the highest ethical standards" and "unaware" of any visa fees being paid by migrant workers, saying it paid the Home Office for the relevant paperwork itself.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) rated the care at five of the company's facilities "inadequate" or "requires improvement" in recent years.In 2022 at Cressington Court in Liverpool, the CQC found a resident had not been bathed for four weeks and another had lost six stone in six months.And last year, in what was its sixth inspection in a row, the CQC found "overwhelming failures" at Finch Manor, also in Liverpool.The firm previously said it was working to address the issues raised by the CQC and improvements had been recorded by inspectors at two homes in the last 12 months.However, a male migrant worker, who spoke to the BBC as part of its eight-month investigation, said he remained concerned."There's constant pressure and there's a climate of fear because management use the threat of cancelling visas and deporting staff to silence any complaints," he said.A female migrant added that she "can't stand the mental stress"."They put more and more work on us," she said. "If anyone is calling in sick, we have to do double shifts. It's too much – it's like torture."A second female migrant worker told the BBC her friend had been ill and she had been "shouted at and threatened, she was told she needed to go to work".The BBC has seen messages from a WhatsApp group set up by Lotus Care's management to communicate with dozens of overseas staff.In several messages, the migrants are told their licence to work, also known as a certificate of sponsorship (CoS), will be "revoked".
If a CoS is cancelled, overseas workers have 60 days to find a new employer before they are deported."I take it from the silence that you all happy for your licences to be revoked? I will start the process without further delay," the firm's owner, Jaydeep Patel, told the group in one message.In another message, sent after a period of hot weather last year, a senior Lotus Care manager said calling in sick for a fever was "unacceptable", and told the workers to "take paracetamol".Mr Patel added: "40 degrees back home in India!!"Lotus Care said the messages were "selective" and they had been shared by "disgruntled staff members" who "left the service under investigation".Some migrant workers told the BBC the messages and the pressure they put them under affected their ability to work.
'A wad of cash'
The migrants spoken to by the BBC were all placed with Lotus Care through a Merseyside care agency.A whistleblower, who formerly worked at the agency, said she had witnessed "more than 100" migrants arriving at the office between 2022 and 2023.They were going there to make cash payments for CoS, the whistleblower said.She told the BBC she had seen one migrant "handing over a wad of cash in an envelope". "It was obviously thousands of pounds," she said. "A few months later, I saw she was working in a Liverpool care home."If they all paid £10,000 per person, that's hundreds of thousands of pounds."She said two bosses at the agency were "making lots of money", driving expensive cars and taking expensive holidays."They were making a lot of money, you could see the newer cars they were driving, the bigger holidays they were going on," she said.Charging workers for CoS is illegal.The government said the cost, which is £284, should be covered by the employer."These migrant workers travelled halfway across the world for a new life and they just looked terrified," the whistleblower added."Some of the conditions they were to sent to work in were terrible."It's just very sad, the new life that they'd hoped for they didn't really get."The care agency denied the allegations. However, the BBC was told last year that a former senior staff member, Shyam Prabhakar, was actively involved in the illegal sale of care visas.Mr Prabhakar, the director of several takeaway businesses in Liverpool, described himself as a "recruitment consultant" in documents filed with Companies House.
In a secretly recorded call with a researcher posing as a potential client, Mr Prabhakar spoke of care home jobs in Leicester, Peterborough, Kettering and Wrexham.He indicated that the fee for a CoS, and a job, would be between £11,500 and £12,000"Once the interview is done and you get the offer letter, you pay half. And before we give the CoS, you should pay the remaining," Mr Prabhakar said.The researcher asked whether the job was "guaranteed" if the money was paid.Mr Prabhakar said: "Yeah, yeah, yeah."When confronted about the allegations outside his home, Mr Prabhakar told the BBC: "I didn't do anything."He said that someone might have been "framing" him.
'Ripe for exploitation'
Citizens Advice said the exploitation of care workers was something it heard about regularly."Every month we're seeing about 120 people in our advice centres," said Citizens Advice policy manager David Mendes da Costa."Our advisers often see people that have spent thousands of pounds - often more than £10,000 - in order to get a visa and a job in the care sector."They think it's going to pay well and they've been told they'll get good hours and good treatment."But when they arrive, they find out that the hours aren't there. [They] have pay withheld, and they're often treated worse than British employees."Workers with a CoS are reliant on their employer for continued sponsorship to remain in the UK."This puts the employer in a huge position of power and that's why it's really ripe for exploitation," said Mr Mendes da Costa.
He added: "People don't want to raise problems because they know if they're dismissed, they'll not just lose their job, they'll also lose their right to stay in the country."Industry body Skills for Care estimated that around 185,000 people were recruited from overseas on health and social care visas between March 2022 and March 2024.A recent Unison survey of more than 3,000 migrants working in the care sector was told almost a quarter had paid illegal visa fees.Many of those surveyed reported abuse from their employers.Andy Brown, a senior investigator at the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority, told the BBC: "In the first quarter of last year, 61% of all our reports were concerning abuse in the adult social care sector."Mr Brown said abuse was often "in plain sight" and urged the public to look out for signs.He said: "If they're visiting relatives, the biggest one to look out for is people working excessive hours and rarely having any days off. So you'll regularly see the same face."Scavenging for food or asking for food is another [sign], as is not being very social, and having little interaction with others."A Home Office official said: "Allegations of visa abuse are taken incredibly seriously and will always be investigated thoroughly."The spokesman said the government was working to take action "against employers who abuse the visa system, with tough measures that will ban businesses who flout UK employment laws from sponsoring overseas workers".
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram, and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE 'If you were in a changing room in Harrods, there was a good chance Mohamed Al Fayed was watching': Explosive new book claims store was awash with spy cameras - even in women's staff toilets and locker rooms
EXCLUSIVE 'If you were in a changing room in Harrods, there was a good chance Mohamed Al Fayed was watching': Explosive new book claims store was awash with spy cameras - even in women's staff toilets and locker rooms

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE 'If you were in a changing room in Harrods, there was a good chance Mohamed Al Fayed was watching': Explosive new book claims store was awash with spy cameras - even in women's staff toilets and locker rooms

Sexual predator Mohamed Al Fayed spied on customers using the changing rooms at Harrods for decades, according to claims made by his former bodyguard. Speaking in an explosive new book, the security man said there was a 'good chance' that shoppers using the facilities at the Knightsbridge store during his reign were being 'watched' by the serial rapist. In the Monster of Harrods due to be released on Thursday, the bodyguard known only as Biggie said the store was awash with cameras which also recorded inside the female staff toilets and locker rooms. 'People don't talk about this - there were cameras right up to the entrance and slightly inside the changing rooms used by Harrods customers, which meant if you were in a Harrods changing room during the Fayed era, there was a good chance that he was watching you,' Biggie revealed. The installation of cameras, as well as bugging telephones, was said to have been ordered by the head of security ex-detective John Macnamara so Al Fayed could keep tabs on and seek out potential victims. 'The guys looked at the screens as if their lives depended on it. But they also realised that many of the questions Macnamara asked were about females who had caught Fayed's eye, so there was also a lot of sniggering as they watched women in changing rooms and toilets,' said Biggie. Biggie, who was described as 6ft 4in and 20st, was employed as one of the very first 'generals' in Al Fayed's security detail after he purchased the iconic store in 1985. Harrods, which was owned by Al Fayed for 25 years before he sold it in 2010, said last night: 'Nothing in our records suggest cameras existed in any staff or customer areas where personal privacy would have been compromised.' Alison Kervin, author of the book who interviewed 60 witnesses, survivors and former employees, claimed that around forty screens transmitted information from every inch of the store 24/7. She said the cameras were 'everywhere' and meant that 'working at Harrods was like living in the Truman Show'. Another member of staff, known as 'the Engineer' because of his role in phone bugging, said there were 'recording devices everywhere' and everything that was transmitted was filed away. 'I'd have to make sure they were working and we were picking up everything was important that we did the recordings and kept everything properly filed,' he is quoted as saying. He said Al Fayed would sometimes demand to see a particular recording or listen in to what was said in a meeting room. The man said that no one was 'off limits' and that he bugged everyone from financial directors and board members to chauffeurs and body guards. Al Fayed, who died without facing justice aged 94 in 2023, was exposed as a prolific sex offender last year and more than 500 victims and witnesses have since come forward. Emma Jones, a human rights lawyer for Leigh Day which represents a number of the victims, said the latest revelations highlighted the need for a public inquiry into how his offending was allowed to continue undeterred for decades. 'The fact that there could be covert surveillance, CCTV or any kind of recording in areas such as toilets and changing rooms beggars' belief and is truly shocking. 'If true this would have serious and far-reaching ramifications in terms of breaching people's right to privacy,' she added. Last week survivors handed a letter to Downing Street calling for an inquiry to examine claims of a cover up and allegations that the serial rapist was enabled by the iconic store and the police. Scotland Yard previously revealed that it is investigating the role of at least five potential enablers who are alleged to have aided Al Fayed. Harrods, which was sold to wealth fund Qatar Holdings, has previously said it is 'appalled' by allegations of sexual abuse by Al Fayed and have been investigating whether any current members of staff were involved. The Monster of Harrods: Al-Fayed and the secret, shameful history of a British institution published by HarperCollins goes sale on Thursday here.

Al Qaida terrorists tried to poison UK water supply, says ex-security minister
Al Qaida terrorists tried to poison UK water supply, says ex-security minister

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Al Qaida terrorists tried to poison UK water supply, says ex-security minister

An al Qaida militant cell sought to poison London's water supplies but were thwarted by the security services, a former counter-terrorism minister has revealed. Details of the foiled 2008 extremist plot were given by Lord West of Spithead, who was in office at the time, as the Government was tackled at Westminster over steps to protect the Britain's reservoirs against attack by hostile forces. It follows the publication of comprehensive military plans to safeguard the UK in the face of threats from Vladimir Putin's Russia and China. Sir Keir Starmer said the strategic defence review (SDR), published earlier this week, would create a 'battle-ready, armour-clad' nation. The move comes against the backdrop of ongoing concerns about the vulnerability of critical national infrastructure to attack. Pressed in Parliament over whether there had ever been an attempt or a plan uncovered to contaminate the UK's water supply, environment minister Baroness Hayman of Ullock said: 'My understanding is that there has not been such an incident, but that does not mean that we should be complacent. 'We know that our water and energy infrastructure are both potentially vulnerable to hostile attacks.' But moving to correct his frontbench colleague, Lord West, who served as Home Office minister for security and counter-terrorism from 2007 to 2010, said: 'In 2008 there was an attempt by eight al Qaida operatives to poison north London water supplies. 'I am pleased to say that our agencies worked brilliantly to stop it happening.' The former Navy chief, who sits on Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee, added: 'As a result, in the Home Office we put in hand a whole series of work on police response times, indicators of where the outflows from reservoirs went and new barriers. 'Where has all that work gone? These things somehow seem to disappear. There should be some reports, and hopefully someone did something about it.' Responding, Lady Hayman said: 'That is extremely interesting and very helpful of my noble friend. I will certainly look into it, because it is an important point.' Earlier, the minister told peers: 'The Government's first duty is to protect our national security and keep our country safe. 'Defra (the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) recognises that the drinking water supply is a potential target for hostile actors. 'It works with water companies and partners across Government to understand and monitor threats to water supply and to consider responses as appropriate to protect the security of our water system.' But Labour peer Lord Harris of Haringey, who is chairman of the National Preparedness Commission, said: 'I wonder whether her department is being a tad complacent in talking simply about monitoring the threat rather than looking at what practical arrangements can be made. 'For example, how do we deal with a drone which is flown over a reservoir and deposits something in there? 'The panic effects of that being known to have happened and not necessarily knowing what the substance is would be enormous.' Lady Hayman said: 'Tackling the diverse range of state threats – not just drones but many other threats – requires a cross-government and cross-society response. 'We need to draw on the skills, the resources and the remits of different departments and operational partners. 'In Defra, we work closely to look at the threats and the appropriate levels of response, specifically drawing on expert advice from the National Protective Security Authority, the National Cyber Security Centre and the Home Office, as well as carrying out threat assessment with policing partners.' Former Metropolitan Police chief Lord Hogan-Howe, who led the UK's largest force from 2011 to 2017, said: 'For about 15 years, I have been worried about the water supply – the large and small reservoirs, the pipes that connect them and, of course, the water treatment plants. 'I worry that there is sometimes confusion between the Home Office, Defra and others about who is looking after security.' The independent crossbencher added: 'It needs to be higher in the priorities than it presently appears.' In reply, the minister said: 'I can assure him that we discuss these matters with the Home Office. 'One thing that we have been trying hard to do in Defra and other departments since we came into government is to work better across Government.'

RAF chief set to be new head of armed forces
RAF chief set to be new head of armed forces

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

RAF chief set to be new head of armed forces

The head of the RAF is set to be appointed as the new chief of the British armed forces, according to reports. Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton is thought to be in line to be the next Chief of Defence Staff. The position is currently held by Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, who has been in the role since 2021. According to his biography on the Government website, Sir Richard joined the RAF in 1989 as a university cadet, and served as deputy chief of the defence staff from 2019 to 2022. The appointment comes as the Government has pledged to increase defence spending in the UK to 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. The Ministry of Defence said: 'This is speculation. The appointment process is ongoing and any announcement will be made in the usual way.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store