logo
The environmental destruction of Gaza

The environmental destruction of Gaza

Kuwait Times28-05-2025

Samia Alduaij
The past 19 months have unfolded as one of the most brutal acts of environmental and human destruction in modern history, and nowhere is this more apparent than in Gaza. The sheer scale of devastation in this besieged enclave transcends immediate humanitarian catastrophe — it is ecological warfare, or ecocide, by design. From the systematic targeting of infrastructure to the widespread contamination of soil and water, Gaza has been transformed into a wasteland, where nature and life are equally under siege.
Having worked in international development and environmental assessments across the region, I've seen firsthand how conflict distorts ecosystems. My work with The World Bank in Lebanon following the 2006 oil spill was a sobering experience — an oil slick contaminating 150 km of Mediterranean coastline due to Israeli airstrikes. But Gaza is a different scale altogether: Not just an oil spill, but a complete unraveling of human and environmental systems.
As of January, more than 80 percent of Gaza's water and sanitation infrastructure has been destroyed. All six wastewater treatment plants have been bombed, and over 1,025 miles of water pipes reduced to rubble. Every day, over 100,000 cubic meters of raw sewage flow into the Mediterranean, devastating marine life and threatening coastal nations.
Before the war, 97 percent of Gaza's water was already unfit for human consumption. Now, communities have access to only 7 percent of their pre-war water supply. Israel's bombardments have destroyed desalination plants, water wells and distribution networks, and the March blockade further strangled access to essential water services. The environmental implications are profound — salinization, groundwater depletion and diseases spreading through contaminated water.
The carbon cost of this war is staggering. The emissions generated by Israeli military operations in Gaza have already surpassed the annual carbon footprint of 230 climate-vulnerable nations. And yet, Israel brands itself as a green, vegan-friendly, tech-savvy utopia — a grotesque example of environmental hypocrisy.
Israel has managed to successfully greenwash its image, even as it siphoned off Gaza's groundwater for kibbutzes situated just across the border — some of the same kibbutzes that were attacked on October 7. These communities, ironically marketed as models of sustainable agriculture, irrigate their lawns and farms with stolen water. This is water apartheid in its most brazen form. Israelis consume an average of 300 liters per day; in Gaza, it was just 26 liters per day before the war. Now, it is far less. Gaza's aquifers are systematically overdrawn, contaminated and inaccessible to its own population.
Agricultural collapse is another front of this ecocide. More than 83 percent of plant cover and 48 percent of tree cover have been obliterated. An estimated 75 percent of Gaza's 1.3 million olive trees have been destroyed. These are not just trees — they are anchors of food security, economic livelihood and cultural heritage. Over 7,500 greenhouses and 2,000 agricultural sites have been decimated. This is an intentional erasure of Gaza's food sovereignty.
Toxic weapons, including white phosphorus, have further poisoned the soil. The Strip is buried under millions of tons of rubble containing asbestos, heavy metals and radioactive particles. These will continue leaching into the air and water for generations. The long-term health effects are already being felt. There are documented cases of polio resurgence and children born with severe deformities, including one without a brain. This is not collateral damage. This is deliberate biological and environmental warfare.
Even before the war, Gaza's environment was suffocating under the strain of blockade, overpopulation, and occupation. But the current destruction has pushed it into the realm of total collapse. This is not just a humanitarian crisis — it is an ecological one that threatens regional stability.
Ecocide must be recognized as a crime under international law. Gaza offers a textbook example of why. When the environment is weaponized, it becomes not just a casualty of war, but a stage for annihilation. The world must acknowledge this environmental warfare — not as an unfortunate side effect of conflict, but as a core strategy of occupation and control. Gaza is not just dying — it is being systematically erased, root by root, aquifer by aquifer.
This is a war not just on people, but on the land.
NOTE: Samia Alduaij is an environmental specialist who has worked for the UN and the World Bank. She is one of the founders of Sustainable Living Kuwait, a local initiative that promotes sustainable living solutions.
[email protected]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coral-rich Greek archipelago hopes to gain from trawler ban
Coral-rich Greek archipelago hopes to gain from trawler ban

Kuwait Times

time18 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Coral-rich Greek archipelago hopes to gain from trawler ban

As a reddish dawn broke over the tiny, coral-rich Greek archipelago of Fournoi, Manolis Mytikas's wooden fishing boat slowly glided home, his nets almost empty. The modest catch nevertheless quickly drew several islanders in search of fresh fish, a rarity in past years in this island chain in the northeastern Aegean Sea, which has fewer than 1,500 inhabitants in total. 'Today, there were two of us heading out to sea, and we caught some fish by chance,' said the 76-year-old fisherman, his skin deeply tanned by the Mediterranean sun. 'Yesterday, we earned 30 euros ($34). The day before yesterday, not a penny. Sometimes, we don't even have enough to eat,' he told AFP. But things could be looking up for this small corner of the Aegean Sea. Last month, the Greek government banned bottom trawling in the waters around the archipelago, to protect a recent discovery of exceptionally rich coral reefs. Greece is also outlawing bottom trawling in national marine parks by 2026 and in all protected marine areas by 2030, the first country in Europe to take such a step. Fishing is generally allowed in protected marine areas worldwide, often even by trawlers, which scrape the seabed with a huge funnel-shaped net. 'Finally!' Mytikas exclaimed when told of the ban. 'They've ravaged the sea. They plough the seabed and destroy everything.' At the island port, his colleague Vaggelis Markakis, 58, compared trawlers to 'bulldozers'. 'If we stop them from coming here, our sea will come back to life,' Mytikas said. 'The sea will be filled with fish again.' Research conducted in this archipelago by the conservation groups Under the Pole, which organizes diving expeditions in extreme environments, and Archipelagos, in collaboration with European scientific institutions, has highlighted the existence of major underwater animal populations. At depths between 60 and 150 meters (around 200 to 500 feet), scientists have documented over 300 species living on the seabed under minimal light. Fishing trawlers docked with "doors" (heavy metal that widen the net opening) at the port of Nea Michaniona. Workers operate next to a fishing trawler docked with "doors" (heavy metal that widen the net opening). Fishing trawlers docked at the port of Nea Michaniona. This photograph shows corals in the deep sea off the coast of the Greek island of Fournoi. This photograph shows corals in the deep sea off the coast of the Greek island of Fournoi. 'Underwater forests' 'What we discovered is beyond imagination - vast coral reefs dating back thousands of years, still intact,' gushed Anastasia Miliou, scientific director of Archipelagos. The sea floor-dwelling species discovered include vibrantly red gorgonians (Paramuricea clavata) and black corals (Antipathella subpinnata). 'When these organisms occur at high densities, they form true underwater forests,' said Lorenzo Bramanti, a researcher at the CNRS Laboratory of Ecogeochemistry of Benthic Environments. But these habitats are extremely sensitive. 'A single trawl pass is enough to raze them,' warned Stelios Katsanevakis, professor of oceanography at the University of the Aegean. And the damage can be potentially irreversible, added Bramanti. 'Once destroyed, these forests may take decades or even centuries to recover,' said the marine scientist, who has worked on corals in the Mediterranean, Caribbean and Pacific. 'No one doubts that cutting down a forest is an ecological disaster. The same is true for animal forests,' Bramanti said. Setting an example By banning bottom trawling around Fournoi, Bramanti hopes Greece will set an example for other Mediterranean countries, he said. 'We must act quickly, because these are among the last ecosystems still untouched by climate change,' given that they are located at depths greater than 70 meters, he said. 'And we risk losing them before we even truly understand them.' But the measure has left industrial fishing professionals fuming. HYT, There are around 220 bottom trawlers in Greece, and sector representatives complain restrictions on their activity are excessive 'We were not invited to any kind of discussion on this matter,' said Kostas Daoultzis, head of the trawler cooperative at the northern port of Nea Michaniona, one of the country's main fish markets. Daoultzis said the decisions were 'based on reports from volunteer organizations lacking scientific backing'. He said trawlers already avoid coral areas, which can damage their equipment. Fournoi fishermen counter that trawlers do fish in their waters, but turn off their tracking systems to avoid detection. Under pressure globally, trawling is likely to be on the agenda at a United Nations Ocean Conference next week in the French city of Nice. Daoultzis said he fears for the survival of his profession. 'Our fishing spaces keep shrinking. Our activity is under threat, and consumers will suffer - fish prices will skyrocket,' he warned. - AFP

Five countries win seats on the UN Security Council
Five countries win seats on the UN Security Council

Arab Times

timea day ago

  • Arab Times

Five countries win seats on the UN Security Council

UNITED NATIONS, June 4, (AP): Five countries won seats on the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday in uncontested elections and will start serving two-year terms in January on the UN's most powerful but deeply divided body. The 193-member General Assembly held a secret-ballot vote for the five rotating seats on the 15-member council. Bahrain received 186 votes, Congo 183 votes, Liberia 181 votes, Colombia 180 votes and Latvia 178 votes. This will be the first time on the council for Latvia, which was forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union and gained independence again after its collapse in 1991. Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braže told reporters after the vote her Baltic nation is ready for the responsibility, saying, "Our historical experience puts us in the position to understand, empathize with, and forge partnerships across every region in the world.' "We know the value of freedom,' she said. "We know the fragility of peace and the power of multilateralism to safeguard it.' Braže said Latvia will spare no effort to achieve just and lasting peace in Ukraine and to alleviate suffering in the Middle East, Gaza, Africa and other conflicts around the globe. Bahrain will be the Arab representative on the council, and Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani said his country's election to the council for a second time reinforces its determination to be "a proactive contributor" to international peace and security. "Our goal is to fortify peace and stability within our region,' Al Zayani said, stressing that resolving the decades-old Palestinian-Israeli conflict is "the cornerstone for achieving peace in the region.' The immediate requirement, he said, is a ceasefire and massive influx of humanitarian aid into Gaza, the release of all hostages taken from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and progress toward a two-state solution and "a viable state of Palestine.' The Security Council is mandated in the UN Charter with ensuring international peace and security, but it has failed in the two major conflicts because of the veto power of Russia on Ukraine and the United States. There have been decades of efforts to reform the Security Council to reflect the geopolitical realities of the world in 2025, not of the post-World War II era 80 years ago, when the United Nations was established. But they have all failed. The council still includes five veto-wielding permanent members - the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France - and 10 elected members from the U.N.'s different regional groups. One major failing is the absence of a permanent seat for Africa or Latin America and the Caribbean.

The slow environmental destruction of the West Bank
The slow environmental destruction of the West Bank

Kuwait Times

timea day ago

  • Kuwait Times

The slow environmental destruction of the West Bank

The slow environmental destruction of the West Bank By Samia Alduaij In the last 19 months, the world's attention has been rightly focused on Gaza, however, the slow suffocation of the West Bank is becoming an insidious form of environmental warfare — waged not only through bullets and bulldozers but through policy, settlement expansion and the systemic theft of natural resources. This slow, methodical form of destruction is often obscured by legal jargon and bureaucratic language, but its long-term impact is equally devastating. Water access is a prime example of environmental apartheid. While Israeli settlers in the West Bank enjoy uninterrupted water access — averaging 300 liters per person per day — Palestinians in the same region receive only 73 liters on average. In some communities, water is available just a few hours a week. Palestinians are forbidden from digging their own wells, and rainwater harvesting is criminalized. Water springs have been seized by Israeli settlements, cutting Palestinian communities off from natural sources they've used for centuries. In Jerusalem, the disparity is just as stark. Jewish residents receive water 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In contrast, areas of East Jerusalem, home to Palestinian families, receive water only 1-2 days per week — or sometimes for just 4-9 hours per week. This artificial scarcity has ripple effects on health and agriculture. In Gaza, 26 percent of diseases were waterborne before the recent war, and the same threats loom over West Bank communities as aquifers are contaminated and over-extracted, further degrading water quality. Settler violence compounds this structural violence. In Masafer Yatta — a cluster of villages in the South Hebron Hills made famous by the Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land — settlers have reportedly polluted Palestinian water wells by dumping dead goat calves into them. This not only endangers public health and livestock but also terrorizes communities relying on those sources. In other parts of the West Bank, settlers have released wild boars into Palestinian farmland, destroying crops and deterring farmers from working their land. Sewage dumping from Israeli settlements is another form of ecological sabotage. In many areas, untreated wastewater flows directly onto Palestinian agricultural plots, poisoning the soil and rendering it unfit for cultivation. Over time, these toxins accumulate in the food chain, threatening both livelihoods and long-term public health. Perhaps most symbolic of this environmental violence is the systematic destruction of olive trees. Since 1967, over two million olive trees — some of them thousands of years old — have been uprooted by Israeli authorities and settlers. Olive trees are not just agricultural assets; they are symbols of Palestinian heritage, economic resilience, and spiritual rootedness. Their destruction is an attack on identity and history. Settler attacks on olive groves tend to spike during harvest season, a deliberate tactic to destroy both the yield and the morale of Palestinian farmers. But the trees resist. Despite repeated attempts to erase them, olive trees have shown a remarkable ability to regrow — even in areas overtaken by non-native pine forests planted by the Jewish National Fund (JNF), an NGO that has been tasked since the early 20th century with making Palestine look and feel like Europe for the colonial settlers. These afforestation projects are often praised internationally as green initiatives, yet they serve a purpose: Ecological colonization. Many of these forests, such as the Birya Forest in northern Occupied Palestine, were intentionally planted over the ruins of destroyed Palestinian villages. They dry the land, increase fire risk and disrupt biodiversity. But beneath the layers of imported pine, the roots of ancient olive trees persist, pushing through the soil to reclaim their place. Their reemergence in JNF parks is a quiet form of resistance — a natural refusal to be erased. The tactics used today echo the horrors of the past. During the 1948 Nakba, Israeli forces reportedly poisoned wells in depopulated Palestinian villages as part of a biological warfare campaign codenamed 'Cast Thy Bread'. Typhoid bacteria were used to contaminate water sources, to prevent Palestinians from returning to their homes. This early form of environmental warfare laid the groundwork for the policies that persist today. NOTE: Samia Alduaij is an environmental specialist who has worked for the UN and the World Bank. She is one of the founders of Sustainable Living Kuwait, a local initiative that promotes sustainable living solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store