When Juhi Chawla's plea moved a nation: The 1992 song that left cinema halls in tears
Released in 1992, the film starred
Juhi Chawla
in a role that marked a striking departure from her usual cheerful persona, a role that revealed her incredible emotional depth as an actress.
At the heart of the story was a complex and heart-wrenching situation: Juhi's character, in a desperate attempt to bring happiness to her childless marriage, arranges her own husband's second marriage. Nagma played the co-wife, and the story's emotional weight came to a head in the film's most iconic song, a tearful plea by Juhi to both her husband and the second wife, begging them not to leave the home they now shared.
Juhi's Tearful Performance Won Hearts
The song, 'Ghar Chhodkar Na Jao Kahin, Tumhein Ghar Na Milega Kahin,' became the emotional cornerstone of the film. Audiences in 1992 were reportedly left in tears. Juhi was known for her lighthearted charm and delivered a soul-shattering performance filled with innocence, pain, and grace. Her tearful eyes and vulnerable voice in the sequence broke away from her earlier screen image and established her as a powerhouse of emotion and subtlety.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
A Song That Transcended the Screen
The melody was composed by Laxmikant–Pyarelal. It was paired with
Lata Mangeshkar
's haunting voice. The lyrics captured the anguish of a woman losing her place in her own home. The song surely created a moment that continues to stir hearts even today. Much of the credit for the song's enduring legacy goes to the dream team behind it.
Decades may have passed, but 'Ghar Chhodkar Na Jao Kahin' remains etched in memory. 'Bewaffa Se Waffa' was directed by
Saawan Kumar Tak
and starred
Vivek Mushran
, Juhi Chawla, Nagma, Goga Kapoor, Mehmood, and Pran in the lead.
Juhi Chawla's Wedding Story: How Her Mother-In-Law Stood In Times Of Distress
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Danica Patrick fuels controversy by backing Sydney Sweeney amid outrage over American Eagle's anti-woke ad
Danica Patrick fuels controversy by backing Sydney Sweeney amid outrage over American Eagle's anti-woke ad (Image via Getty) Danica Patrick is speaking up after Sydney Sweeney 's new American Eagle ad caused a storm online. On Sunday, July 28, 2025, Patrick posted on Instagram, asking why people were so upset with the campaign. The ad, featuring Sydney Sweeney modeling jeans with the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans', was released last week and has sparked anger on social media. While many are calling it a hidden message promoting 'white beauty,' Patrick doesn't see the problem and she's not the only one backing Sweeney. Danica Patrick reacts to Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad The backlash began after American Eagle launched its fall 2025 campaign on Friday, July 26, starring 27-year-old actress Sydney Sweeney. Smiling and posing in several outfits, she was shown in the ad under the heading "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans". Although many internet users considered the line to be a covert call advocating white beauty norms especially given Sweeney's blond hair and blue eyes, it was obviously a word play. Danica Patrick, a former NASCAR star who recently backed Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, aired her opinions on Instagram Stories. 'Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the new AE ads?! Very confused,' she wrote on July 28. WWE legend Sgt. Slaughter, whose real name is Robert Remus, also showed his support. On July 29, he posted on X (formerly Twitter), 'Attention @sydney_sweeney, YOU GO GIRL & That's An Order!!' Slaughter is a former WWF Heavyweight Champion and appeared on WWE SmackDown just last week during a tribute to Hulk Hogan, who passed away on July 26. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How to Trade ETH/USD Without Holding Ether IC Markets Learn More Undo ESPN's David Dennis Jr and others criticize the ad's hidden message While some celebrities are defending Sydney Sweeney, others are calling out the ad. On July 30, ESPN analyst David Dennis Jr posted online, saying he didn't notice the problem at first until 'experts on eugenics and fascism' explained the deeper meaning. He later added sarcastically, 'I'm just happy these AE ads are making it safe for conventionally attractive blue-eyed blonde women to be accepted again.' Also Read: 'I Have A Husband': Veronika Kudermetova's Bold Reply To Holger Rune's Private Message Fuels Gossip Across Tennis World Salon magazine also criticized the ad, saying the phrase 'great genes' has been historically used to praise whiteness and thinness. Publicist Alexandria Hurley told that she doesn't believe this was a mistake. 'It's a strategy,' she said. 'Sydney has leaned into controversy before this is not an accident.' The ad is still up on billboards and stores across the U.S., keeping the debate very much alive. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
High court upholds summons to Kangana Rananut in ‘Rs 100' tweet defamation case
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by actor-turned-MP Kangana Ranaut challenging her summoning by a Punjab court in a defamation case, making it clear that the magistrate has duly applied mind to the material on record while summoning her. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya, in a detailed 15-page order, said, "There are specific allegations against the petitioner who is a celebrity, that false and defamatory imputations by her in the retweet have dented the respondent's (Mahender Kaur) reputation and lowered her in her own estimation, as also in the eyes of others. Therefore, filing of the complaint to vindicate her rights cannot be termed mala fide." Ranaut is accused of defaming 73-year-old Mohinder Kaur, a farmer activist, through a tweet during the height of the farmers' protests against the now scrapped farm laws in 2020. Ranaut allegedly misidentified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and implied that such women could be hired to participate in protests for Rs 100. "Such remark, prima facie proves that the intent of the accused was to paint the complainant as a person of dubious integrity who is protesting without any cause and just for financial gains," the high court observed. Ranaut's counsel had contended that the trial court misconstrued provisions of Section 202 of CrPC and argued that she had only re-tweeted content by 'Adhivakta Gautam Yadav', who was not arrayed as an accused. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She grew up to be America's sweetheart... can YOU guess? Watch More Undo The counsel pleaded that the retweet was made in good faith, without intent to harm Kaur's reputation, and in the absence of mens rea, the magistrate should not have proceeded. The order was passed on Feb 22, 2022. Senior advocate G K Mann, representing the complainant, argued that there was no dispute that Ranaut herself made the defamatory on the face of it retweet, which contains serious allegations against Kaur's character. Mann also said that Ranaut had shown no remorse or tendered any apology, suggesting intentional harm. The bench concluded that the summoning order was passed after due application of mind to the facts and preliminary evidence. The court also noted that it was not the petitioner's case that the retweet was not made by her. Regarding the complaint being filed solely against Ranaut, the judge observed, "Still further, because the respondent has filed a complaint only against the petitioner and not against the person to whom the original tweet has been attributed, in itself cannot be a ground to contend that the complaint is mala fide." 'Extra responsibility' on celebrities "As she (Kangana) holds a position of influence over the masses, she has extra responsibility on her shoulders to verify the truthfulness of the remarks made by her. It is evident from the evidence led by the complainant that the accused (Kangana) made the impugned defamatory remark without going into the truthfulness... She even failed to tender any apology to the complainant after knowing the truth." Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya Complaint was filed in 2021 The defamation complaint was filed on Jan 4, 2021, by Mohinder Kaur of Fatehgarh Jandia village in Bathinda. Kaur initiated the case in Bathinda court against Ranaut for her tweet (which was later deleted) that identified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and claimed such women could be hired for protests for Rs 100. Kaur had provided evidence asserting that Ranaut's words had damaged her image. The farmer stated that her family, owning 12 acres of land, found the accusation of protesting for a mere Rs 100 intolerable. MSID:: 123044276 413 |
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Were Travis Kelce and Ryan Reynolds quietly feuding before Taylor Swift cut ties with Blake Lively over legal drama?
What began as one of the most high-profile Hollywood friendships is now rumored to be unraveling behind closed doors. Taylor Swift and Blake Lively, once inseparable, have reportedly 'halted' their close bond after Lively became entangled in a legal battle with actor-director Justin Baldoni. But while Swift's withdrawal may appear sudden, sources suggest a deeper strain may have already existed—particularly between Swift's boyfriend, NFL star Travis Kelce, and Lively's husband, Ryan Reynolds. Taylor Swift was caught off guard after being named in legal drama between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni The tension emerged publicly when Lively filed a lawsuit involving Baldoni, her It Ends With Us co-star, alleging reputational damage. In the process, Taylor Swift was unexpectedly pulled into the narrative, labeled by Lively as one of her 'dragons' in court documents. Baldoni briefly subpoenaed Swift before withdrawing, a move critics said was an attempt to weaponize her fame. Insiders claim Swift was 'blindsided' and had no desire to be associated with the legal mess. 'Taylor wants no part in this drama,' one source revealed. In response, she reportedly distanced herself from Lively altogether, leading to what appears to be a quiet but firm end to their once-public friendship. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Global Indices Are on the Move — Time to Trade! IC Markets Learn More Undo Travis Kelce 's rumored discomfort with Reynolds may have foreshadowed the social split While Swift's fallout with Lively has been widely discussed, attention has now turned to Travis Kelce, who some say never quite fit into Reynolds' Hollywood circle. According to reports, Kelce 'never vibed with Reynolds,' finding him more performative than authentic. Though he kept polite company at events, insiders now claim Kelce's discomfort may have foreshadowed Swift's eventual break from the couple. This subtle clash between NFL grit and Hollywood glam may have quietly driven a wedge between the two power couples long before legal issues erupted. Also Read: 'Once he is done playing….': Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift discuss future plans and hint at marriage down the line For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
