UAE airlines temporarily cancel some flights to Pakistan
Some flights from the UAE to Pakistan have been cancelled following cross-border clashes with India.
In a statement sent to ARN News, Etihad Airways said flights to and from Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad have been cancelled on Wednesday a day after three flights were forced to return to the capital.
"Some flights may be rerouted to avoid restricted zones, potentially resulting in extended flight times," the UAE national carrier added.
Emirates Airline also confirmed in a statement that Dubai flights to and from Lahore, Islamabad and Peshawar have been cancelled for a second day on Wednesday.
The carrier added that passengers booked on connecting flights to these destinations also will be impacted "until further notice".
Meanwhile, flydubai said flights to Karachi are operating to schedule on Wednesday and have resumed operations to Faisalabad, Lahore, Multan and Sialkot.
The airlines stated they are closely monitoring the situation and advised travellers to check for updates on its official websites.
ARN has reached out to flydubai for updates.
Qatar Airways have also announced the suspension of services to Pakistan on its social media platforms, citing the closure of airspace.
The airspace closure comes after India reportedly launched airstrikes on targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir earlier this week. Pakistan claims to have responded by downing several Indian fighter jets and carrying out its own retaliatory strikes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Etihad celebrates first flights to Prague, Warsaw
ABU DHABI - Etihad Airways is celebrating the launch of flights to two new destinations in Central Europe – Prague and Warsaw. On Monday 2nd June, the UAE's national airline operated its inaugural flight to the enchanting Czech capital Prague, one of 16 new destinations the airline will add this year. On 3rd June, the airline touched down in Warsaw for the first time, adding the vibrant Polish capital to its expanding European network. "Our new Prague and Warsaw services open doors to countless possibilities," said Antonoaldo Neves, Chief Executive Officer at Etihad Airways. "These new routes create a bridge between two remarkable regions, connecting travellers from the Middle East to the heart of Central Europe, while offering seamless connections via Abu Dhabi to destinations across the Middle East, Africa, Asia, the Indian Subcontinent and Australia.' Operating on the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner, the services feature 28 Business Studios and 262 Economy Smart seats. To celebrate Etihad's expanding network, the airline has launched a competition, The Extraordinary Challenge, daring guests to compete in a race to visit 15 of the airline's new destinations, including Prague and Warsaw, to win five million Etihad Guest miles.
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Assam Chief Minister's Arms Policy May Throw North-East Into Terrible Chaos
By Dr. Gyan Pathak The most vocal Hindutva face in the North-East India, the chief minister of Assam Himanta Biswa Sarma, having shown penchant for igniting communal fire in the past, now seems to have decided on playing with even more terrible fire of arms conflicts, if his new arms policy in the state is of any indication. The decision of the BJP-led Assam government under his leadership to put more arms into the hands of civilians would only accelerate insurgent and communal violence in the entire North-East, which has already been suffering from such menace for quite some time. Himanta Biswa Sarma is all for arming indigenous people in the vulnerable border areas near Bangladesh. He clarified on May 29, 2025, that Assam's new arms licence policy will not apply to areas bordering Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland, because these areas are not considered vulnerable in terms of national security. Two things emerged from his statement – First, border areas of Assam along Bangladesh are vulnerable; and secondly, the border areas along other North-Eastern states are not vulnerable in terms of national security, though these regions have been historically involved in border disputes and armed conflicts. No doubt, border areas along the international border with Bangladesh have been vulnerable, and his government seems to suggest it categorically. The question is who is responsible for that? Providing security to life and property of every citizen in the country is guaranteed by the Constitution of India, and the governments take the guarantee. People living in the border areas are vulnerable only because the Centre is failing in its responsibility in protecting the international border, and the government of Assam unable to protect the Indian citizens within its boundary. BJP government at the centre and in Assam have been always trying to shift their responsibilities of stopping infiltration from Bangladesh on to the opposition, repeatedly telling the country that the opposition political parties have been allowing Muslim infiltrators from Bangladesh, for their vote bank. What the double engine governments of BJP has been doing – in Assam since 2016, and at the Centre since 2014? Why the people living in the areas along the international border with Bangladesh? It is not their failure that people are still vulnerable there? Protecting the citizen is government's responsibility. If the governments with its powerful trained army and armed police force can't give protection, how can civilian protect themselves with just supply of arms? Civilians neither can protect themselves not their arms. We have recently seen it in Manipur, where arms were looted from armed forces by insurgent or militant groups. Chief Minister of Assam, obviously have not taken any lesson from that. That is why the cabinet note said that the policy aims to act as a deterrent to unlawful threats and improve the personal safety and confidence of the indigenous communities. It is a false perception of the government, since we have seen across the country that people with arms have been targeted by militant groups only to snatch arms. After supplying arms who will protect the civilians? Assam government has indirectly admitted by approving new arms policy that the government's security forces were unable to give protection to the civilians in the border areas. Sarma himself said, 'The indigenous people in these districts live in an atmosphere of insecurity due to recent developments in Bangladesh. They face the threat of attacks from the Bangladesh side and even from within their own villages.' The new arms policy would be reportedly implemented in a vast area of Assam in the districts of Dhubri, Nagaon, Morigaon, Barpeta, Goalpara, and South Salmara-Mankachar, where the Muslims of Bangladesh origin form the majority and indigenous population are in the minority. Sarma has said, 'The government will be lenient in providing arms licences to eligible people, who must be original habitants and belong to indigenous communities.' What does it mean? Arms would be supplied effectively to non-Muslims, indigenous people and original inhabitants that is to Hindus. Sarma has stressed that the policy is not aimed at militarizing civilians but to address a long-standing demand since 1985, but no government has dared to take this decision. Though the policy has been brought in the name of border areas, it is likely to be implemented across the state. Here is what Sarma said, 'The government will identify the vulnerable areas where we will grant arms licences to the indigenous people in a liberal manner. Areas like Hatigaon in Guwahati may also be marked as vulnerable area.' There is no doubt that these freely gotten arms may travel to all areas of Assam and also to other states in the North-East especially the bordering states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland. Inter-state border areas would run heightened risks of armed violence, because of border disputes and conflicts. The arms may also fall into the hands of militant groups and insurgents, and in the wrong hands. Putting arms in the hands of the civilians is thus highly risky which is nothing short of propagation of violence and armed conflicts within the state among various groups of people, and also in the entre North-East, which has already been suffering from ethnic, militant, or insurgent violence. India has a precedence of supplying arms to civilians in Chhattisgarh to counter Maoist threat, which led to lawlessness in 2000s. Supreme Court of India had to intervene and declare the policy illegal. Chief Minister of Assam perhaps not learned any lesson from that also. Then there are other issues – such as the heightened risks of communal violence and vigilantism of the armed civilians against others who are not armed. Assam and the North-East is already very sensitive region of the country, as far as communal, ethnic, militant, or insurgent violence are concerned, of which the region has a history. By arming the specific group of civilians through new arms policy purportedly for self-defence, BJP's double engine government is trying to abdicate its core responsibility of providing security to citizens, and encouraging people indirectly to take law in their own hands. Centre and the state must enhance its security presence and drop the policy of arming civilians. In absence of government's security, the idea of arming specific group of civilians is a most dangerous game. (IPA Service)
The National
16 hours ago
- The National
Dubai-Beirut flights: Reopening of Syrian airspace to UAE carriers shaves up to an hour off flight time
The resumption of commercial flights to Damascus is having a positive knock-on effect on flight times to other Middle Eastern destinations, particularly Beirut. UAE airline flydubai resumed flights to Damascus on Sunday after a 12-year suspension. Other airlines are following suit, with Saudi Arabia's flynas reservicing the Syrian capital from June 12 and Emirates set to relaunch flights between Dubai and Damascus on July 16. Data from flight tracking site Flightradar24 shows an Emirates flight from Dubai to Beirut on Monday took 2.51 hours. Five days earlier, on May 27, the same journey took 3.40 hours – nearly 50 minutes more. Qatar Airways also resumed flying over Syria in February, shaving off 45 to 60 minutes of flight time. According to Flightradar24, the current Qatar Airways flight time between Doha and Beirut is approximately 2.45 hours. 'For airlines, the Syrian airspace provides a better air corridor when travelling, especially on westbound flights that are often impacted by headwinds,' said Saj Ahmad, chief analyst at StrategicAero Research. 'So any time saved means fuel is saved too – and that's a cost saving for airlines as well. 'Opening up of commercial airspace provides a double boon for Syria,' he adds. 'Not only will it stand to gain revenue from traffic overflying their territory, it opens up the possibility of other airlines also coming back to the country too.' The UAE's General Civil Aviation Authority announced the resumption of flights between the Emirates and Syria on April 14, following Syrian President Ahmad Al Shara 's visit to the UAE earlier that month during which he held talks with President Sheikh Mohamed. The opening of Syrian airspace in January has also led to shortened flight times between the UAE and Lebanon further north. 'Most UAE flights stopped using Syrian airspace in 2014, adding an extra hour to Beirut-bound flights,' a contributor to LebanonJets, which tracks flights in and out of Beirut, told The National. Dubai's flydubai and Sharjah's Air Arabia resumed flying over Syria en route to Beirut on March 11. The flydubai flights used to take four hours and 10 minutes. 'It has been reduced to three hours and 45 minutes since resuming over flying Syrian airspace from March,' a spokesperson for flydubai told The National. 'We were the first UAE carrier to touch down in Damascus on June 1, offering passengers a daily service from Dubai.' Emirates Airline began flying over Syria last week. Despite the shorter flight times, airlines are yet to revise their fares, the LebanonJets representative points out. At the time of writing, a return ticket between Beirut and Dubai on Middle East Airlines, the flag carrier of Lebanon, cost approximately Dh1,575. On Emirates, the same route costs approximately Dh1,751 while on Etihad, they cost approximately Dh2,275. Due to a high risk to civilian aircraft during the conflict that began in 2011, Syrian airspace was closed off by international carriers. According to the Conflict Zone & Risk Database, an independent airspace monitor for airlines, commercial airlines avoided Syria entirely due to the risk of aircraft being targeted in error or caught in the crossfire during air attacks involving Israel, Russia and Iran. The restarting of regular flights to Syria marks another significant step forward in the nation's postwar recovery. It will also be a major boost for Syrians in the UAE who have been deprived of a direct air link to connect with family and friends for so many years.
