Laptop left charging on bed causes house fire in Bendigo
Rebecca Norman
and
Emile Pavlich
, ABC News
Kate Robinson left her laptop on charge in her bedroom while running errangs. An hour later, she returned to find her house and yoga studio engulfed in flames.
Kate Robinson is warning people about the risks associated with leaving devices on charge. (ABC News: Emile Pavlich)
Photo:
ABC News: Emile Pavlich
When Kate Robinson thinks back to the sight of thick black smoke billowing from her roof last month, she becomes deeply distressed.
"There was nothing salvageable," she said.
Ms Robinson's Bendigo home and yoga studio were destroyed by fire on May 30, when she popped out for about an hour to run errands.
She returned to find her home on fire.
"I went into my bedroom and there were flames on my bed almost up the ceiling," she said.
Ms Robinson ran out of the burning building to find her dog, which had made its way outside, and ring triple-0.
She wants to warn others about the risks associated with leaving devices on charge.
The remnants of Ms Robinson's yoga studio after a laptop caught alight while charging on her bed. (Supplied: Kate Robinson)
Photo:
Supplied: Kate Robinson
Fire Rescue Victoria said the fire at Ms Robinson's home on Bakewell Street in North Bendigo was caused by a laptop charging on a bed.
A building insurer and a forensic fire expert showed Ms Robinson the burnt laptop and told her they believed the lithium battery inside the computer overheated on a blanket on her bed, causing it to catch alight.
"Once they started asking me questions about why there was so much intensity around my bed, and what was on my bed … I remembered that the laptop had been charging there," she said.
Ms Robinson said the laptop was an 18-month old AppleMac Pro and it had started to lose charge more often in the lead up to the fire.
"It seemed to be going flat a lot, which can identify a faulty battery," Ms Robinson.
Fire Rescue Victoria commander Craig Houlahan attended the blaze.
"It was clear the fire had actually started from the bed," he said.
"It was quite obvious with the development of the fire that it was the laptop, because of the battery."
Apple Australia has been contacted for comment.
The remains of the laptop after a fire ripped through Ms Robinson's property. (Supplied: FRV)
Photo:
Supplied: FRV
Commander Houlahan said the fire had prompted new warnings about the risks involved with leaving devices on charge unattended.
"The main thing is that if you're charging any electrical device, you have it on a hard surface and that allows it to cool," he said.
Mr Houlahan said across Victoria, there was at least one call to fire authorities every day related to charging devices.
"Over the years that's changed because a lot of our devices now are battery-operated," Mr Houlahan said.
His advice was to think about four key things before charging a laptop, tablet or mobile phone.
These included overheating of batteries through excessive charging, checking devices for damage, not charging in your bedroom and avoiding charging laptops overnight.
He also said working smoke alarms were crucial as a house fire could spread throughout a home within 3 minutes.
"Every bedroom should have a working smoke alarm in it," Mr Houlahan.
Ms Robinson is now living in a rental property offered through her insurer.
She said she was grateful to have been able to save her dog from the fire, and for her community's support, but the experience has stayed with her.
"There's still a lot of grief and sadness about losing my space," she said.
-
ABC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
05-08-2025
- RNZ News
Victorian couple risk losing brand new home after building on wrong block
By Jean Bell and Olivia Sanders Melanie Moor and her partner David were shocked to learn they had built their house on the wrong block. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders Melanie and David Moor were looking forward to a peaceful retirement in an idyllic country town in south-west Victoria. They purchased land in 2021 and, after securing all the relevant permits, installed a driveway and moved a relocatable house onto the 2-hectare block with connecting power, water and a septic system. But three years later, the couple got the shock of their lives when they learnt they had built their forever home on land they did not own. It turns out, they actually owned the property next door. The Moors mistakenly put a house and a shipping container on a block they didn't own. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders The couple said the council was aware of their construction on the site and should have picked up on it sooner. Now, the owner of the block of land where the Moors set up their home has given the couple 14 days to remove the house and return the land to its original state. That 14-day period ends today. The couple first viewed the property in a big subdivision on the outskirts of Camperdown in 2021. "We came down and had a look at it, and we fell in love with it because of the views," Ms Moor said. "We decided then and there: 'Yeah, that's for us.'" They bought it off the plan and put down a $5,000 deposit, but that was where the retirement dream began to unravel. The Moors say they like the rural views from the subdivision. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders Ms Moor said the couple believed they had the right block after the real estate agent took them for an inspection before purchase. The couple said the address numbers on the fence posts also led them to believe it was their block. A spokesperson for the agent told the ABC an internal investigation found the agent had not made any false or misleading claims and that it was the Moors' responsibility to confirm which block of land they owned before starting works. They noted that, given the agent "showed them the property in August 2021 - when it was still part of a larger 8-hectare paddock, had not yet been subdivided, and well before the contract of sale was signed in April 2022 - it is conceivable that some confusion arose on [the Moors'] part during that period," the spokesperson said. Melanie Moor says rates bills including her address had been sent to the wrong block. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders In 2023, prior to settlement, and with approval of the former owner of the block they did own, the Moors had a driveway installed on the block they thought was theirs. The builder who moved the house, and other tradespeople, used the driveway as a reference point to identify the correct lot. The ABC has viewed the builder's relocation job document, which only lists the road name, not the lot number. The Moors have not been able to move into the house because it is not on their land. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders The Corangamite Shire Council approved the Moors' building permit in April 2024. However, the permit documents include an aerial photo illustrating that soil samples were taken from the wrong block. The Moors believe the council should have picked up on that error when reviewing the permit documents. Council reports show that council staff attended the site to inspect the stump holes dug for the house relocation three times in one month. In August 2024, while putting final touches on their new home, Mr Moor received a call from the council informing him to stop work immediately and seek legal advice, after council staff realised construction was happening on the wrong block. "We thought it was a scam," Ms Moor said. Corangamite Shire Council declined to comment on the case as it is related to an ongoing legal matter. The two blocks are right beside each other. Photo: ABC South West Victoria: Olivia Sanders A messy legal battle has ensued. The owner of the block that the Moors mistakenly built their house on lives interstate and bought the block of land from their uncle before he died. The owner was unaware of the construction activity on the land until after the house had been relocated. The Moors proposed a land swap, but in a statement the block owner's lawyers said the blocks were not like-for-like. "The two blocks are not the same - the views are different, and there is an easement registered on the block owned by Mr and Mrs Moor. "There would likely be tax consequences of the proposed land swap," the statement read. In a legal letter seen by the ABC, dated July 22, the block owner issued the Moors a 14-day notice period to remove the house and remediate the land, or the house may be sold. "It was a great shock to [the owner] … to be notified by telephone that someone else had moved their house onto [their] land," the lawyers said in the statement. "[They have] been very patient and have attempted to work with Mr and Mrs Moor over a considerable period of time now, but it appears that the matter is now at an impasse without the assistance of lawyers," the lawyers said. The Moors have sought an extension to the 14-day period through their lawyers, and have since moved the shipping container off the property. Previously, the Moors said they could not afford to move the house to their block and the contractor who originally moved the home also advised the house may not survive another relocation. "We've spent over $500,000 on this," Ms Moor said. "It's our life savings, we've got nothing left." Mr Moor said the house would have to be demolished if it came to that because it was the only option the couple could afford. "It's going to cost more money to just keep going. I don't see there's going to be a winner," he said. - ABC
RNZ News
01-08-2025
- RNZ News
Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?
RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to I recently separated and managed to buy the house and own it myself with a mortgage ... I have been seeing someone that I don't plan to live with. So my question is if you have a relationship with someone for a length of time that you don't live with or share bills with do I need to protect myself with a prenuptial agreement? When does the relationship need to have documentation of what I own and never want to share? People normally think of relationship property issues arising when a couple lives together but you can sometimes be captured even if you're living apart. Victoria University law professor Nicola Peart said this question came down to whether a relationship would qualify as 'de facto' . She pointed to the Property Relationships Act, which sets out a definition of a de facto relationship. But she said none of the criteria were essential to decide that someone was in such a relationships. The act says that the things taken into account include the nature of the relationship, the extent of common residence, whether you have a sexual relationship, the amount of financial interdependence between the parties, the ownership and use of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the performance of household duties and the public aspects of the relationship, as well as the care of children. So it's possible you could tick off those factors while still maintaining separate homes. "Not living in the same house or not sharing finances does not exclude the possibility that a de facto relationship exists. If in doubt, contract out to preserve separate property ," Peart said. My partner of 11yrs received his inheritance last September. Just wondering if I'm entitled to any of it ... we split up just five weeks ago due to an argument. It sort of depends what he did with it when he received it. If it went into a joint bank account you both contribute to and pay bills from, or into a mortgage on your family home, for example, then it's likely to have become relationship property and you would be entitled to a share of it. But if he has kept it separate, you might not be. This would be a good thing to talk to a lawyer about as you work through your separation agreements. If property investors are making a loss, can't they still get something back on taxes? Through a rebate scheme? I thought I heard something about that. It used to be the case that property investors who made a loss on their rental investments could offset that against their other sources of income, such as the salary and wages they received from their job. That would reduce the tax they paid and sometimes meant they got a tax refund at the end of the year. That ended when "residential loss ring fencing" rules were introduced in 2019. "Broadly, these rules quarantine any losses from residential property so they can only be offset against profits from residential property, either carried forward to a future year or offset against other properties in a portfolio. There are some minor exceptions to these rules, for example for property which is or will be taxed on sale, and a property that is also a person's main home," said Robyn Walker, a tax partner at Deloitte. What you might have heard about recently is the reintroduction of interest deductibility. From 2021, investors' ability to include interest payments in their calculation of property profits was phased out. That's returned now, which will usually reduce their tax bills. Walker said another thing you might be thinking of is the Investment Boost policy. "This allows a 20 percent deduction for the cost of new assets which are used for business purposes on or after 22 May 2025. There are some restrictions on this as it does not apply to residential property or improvements to residential property. This restriction covers the building itself, it's possible that Investment Boost can apply to other assets which are included in a residential property but are not part of the property itself - separately identifiable chattels like a fridge. Again, any deductions available under the Investment Boost are also subject to the ring fencing rules." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
22-07-2025
- RNZ News
Grand buddies: Friendships between school kids and the elderly
Twice a week for the past seven years, pupils from Sydney's Glenwood Public School go to visit Whiddon Easton Park Nursing Home. The results, are delightful. Jesse speaks to Glenwood Public School Principal Jay McInney Photo: Glenwood Public School
