Trapped in the Crossfire: Indian workers bore the brunt of the Israel-Iran conflict
About 150 laborers from northern India were stranded in Israeli cities that were struck by Iranian missiles
When sirens wailed across Israeli cities and missiles from Iran struck Israeli territory, about 150 Indian construction workers from the Bahraich district in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh found themselves caught in an increasingly dangerous situation, desperately seeking a way home.
The workers, who traveled to Israel over the past year seeking better economic opportunities, faced a harsh reality: trapped between the promise of steady income and the very real threat of becoming casualties in a regional conflict.
Sandeep, a resident of the Mihipurwa area, spoke to his family on the phone from Hadera, painting a grim picture of daily life under fire. "Missiles are falling here, but we get alerts before they hit," he explained to worried relatives back home. "When the sirens start, we run to the bunkers and hide. These daily situations are affecting our work, and now we just want to come home."
The situation created a painful dilemma for the workers and their families. While the income from Israel has provided unprecedented financial stability - with workers earning around 160,000 rupees (about $1863) per month, compared to much lower wages in rural India - the escalating violence made the cost of this prosperity potentially too high to bear.
Kamlavati, whose husband Gopal has been working in Israel for a year, captured the anguish felt by families back home. "My husband has been working safely in Israel for a year, and in this situation, we demand from the government that he be sent back home safely," she said. "Because now, seeing the conditions in Israel, we are getting scared."
The irony of their situation is not lost on the families. Kamlavati described how the money from Israel has transformed their lives - they've been able to build a new home and provide better opportunities for their children. Her daughter has started attending school, while her younger son is still very small. But the fear for her husband's safety has overshadowed these material gains.
"We are getting money - he gets 160,000 rupees and keeps sending money home regularly, which helps run the household," she explained. "But now, seeing the new house being built doesn't feel good. We just want the children's father to come back."
The workers are part of a larger Indian diaspora in Israel. According to Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, as of December 4, 2024, 6,583 Indian workers had reached Israel for employment, recruited by Israeli authorities and deployed across 195 Israeli companies. Of these workers, 2,325 were engaged in building construction, 1,906 in iron bending, 1,578 in plastering, and 774 in ceramic tiling - all essential skills for Israel's construction industry.
Mihipurwa has been particularly affected by this migration. Local official Shravan Kumar Madeshia revealed that 250 people from the area had filled out application forms for work in Israel, with 150 being selected and currently working there. This represents a significant portion of the area's working-age population, making tensions in West Asia a community-wide concern.
The families of brothers Sandeep and Sanjay exemplify the collective anxiety gripping the region. "Both brothers have been living in Israel for a year, but now seeing the terrible war between Iran and Israel, we want our sons to return home safely," their relatives said.
The conflict escalated dramatically before the countries agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday.
Recent Iranian missile attacks hit residential areas in Tel Aviv, bringing the war directly to neighborhoods where many of the Indian workers live and work.
Israeli rescue workers and security personnel inspect and clear the buildings and area hit by an Iranian rocket on June 16, 2025 in Central Tel Aviv, Israel. Alexi J. Rosenfeld / Getty Images
The tense environment presents a stark contrast to the hopes these workers had when they first arrived in Israel. For many from rural Uttar Pradesh, the opportunity to work in Israel represented a chance to escape poverty and provide for their families in ways that would have been impossible at home. The monthly salary is several times what they could earn in similar work in India.
However, the reality of living in a war zone has quickly overshadowed these economic benefits. The workers described a daily routine of constant vigilance - working while listening for air raid sirens, knowing that at any moment they might need to run for shelter. The psychological toll of this existence is evident in their desperate pleas to return home.
The absence of available flights made their situation even more precarious. Commercial aviation has been severely disrupted due to the conflict, with many airlines suspending or limiting services to and from Israel. This has left the workers with no clear path home, despite their growing desperation to leave.
The Indian government faces a delicate diplomatic challenge in the Middle East. India maintains strong relationships with both Israel and Iran, and has refused to join international condemnations of Israeli actions. New Delhi is accustomed to balancing ties with rival states during crises, but the most recent presented a particularly difficult test.
For the families in Bahraich, the geopolitical complexities matter little compared to their immediate concern: bringing their loved ones home safely. The transformation of their economic fortunes has come at an unexpected cost - the constant fear that their primary breadwinners might become casualties in a conflict that has nothing to do with them.
With hundreds of people requiring hospital treatment, the Indian workers found themselves in an increasingly untenable position. They were neither combatants nor civilians in the traditional sense, but economic migrants caught in the crossfire of a regional conflict.
During the recent crisis, when families in rural India waited anxiously for news from their loved ones, and workers huddled themselves in bunkers to the sound of sirens, one could not help but be reminded that in our interconnected world, no conflict is truly local, and its human toll extends far beyond the immediate theater of war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Congress: Election Commission move to revise rolls an admission that all not well
The Congress on Thursday said the Election Commission's announcement of a special intensive revision (SIR) of the voting lists in poll-bound Bihar is a 'clear and explicit admission… that all is not well with India's electoral rolls'. Other Opposition parties, too, objected to the move, arguing that the month-long exercise will disenfranchise lakhs of vulnerable voters ahead of elections this year. The EC had said Tuesday that all existing electors in Bihar who were not on the rolls in 2003 would have to again provide documentation proving their eligibility. This was to be the beginning of a nationwide exercise. A Congress committee tasked with looking into elections said in a statement Thursday: 'In simple terms, the EC wants to discard the current electoral rolls entirely and create a fresh new electoral roll for the state… This is a clear and explicit admission by the EC that all is not well with India's electoral rolls. Exactly what the Congress party and the Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi have been repeatedly pointing out with evidence from Maharashtra.' The eight-member EAGLE committee said: 'Lakhs of Union and state government officials will now control and dictate who has correct documents and who doesn't, who gets to vote in the upcoming Bihar elections etc. This carries a huge risk of willful exclusion of voters using the power of the state machinery.' At a meeting of political parties with Bihar's Chief Electoral Officer Wednesday in Patna, representatives from the INDIA bloc — including the RJD, Congress, CPI(ML) Liberation and CPI(M) — unanimously rejected the SIR, calling it a ploy to exclude poor, rural and minority electors. RJD Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha told The Indian Express that the party would go to the EC. 'This is a massive exercise, and with the Bihar election notification expected in just two-and-a-half months, the timing is questionable. This process could have started much earlier. We feel very strongly that this entire exercise, is it a kind of cover? Cover to make sure that people from subaltern classes and minorities, backward and Dalits, are you going to invisibilise them?' he said. Opposition parties flagged concerns on the commission's stringent documentation requirements. The new rules set different proof thresholds by birth cohort. Voters born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, are required to provide proof of either parent's Indian citizenship, while those born after December 2, 2004, need documentation for both parents. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the EC was 'acting like a stooge of the BJP' and asked whether the move was a backdoor attempt to implement the NRC. 'I don't understand the reason behind the EC move or the rationale behind selecting these dates. This is nothing short of a scam. I seek clarification from the Commission on whether they are trying to implement the NRC through backdoors. In fact, this looks to be more dangerous than the NRC which every political party in opposition must resist,' she told reporters. The Congress statement said the EC rules on birth certificates are 'arbitrary, whimsical and onerous on the estimated 8.1 crore eligible voters in Bihar in 2025'. CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, too, drew parallels with Assam's NRC exercise and argued in a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner that completing the verification of '78 million voters' in one month was 'logically absurd and a logistical nightmare'.
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India refuses to sign SCO statement over Pahalgam
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defence ministers' meeting couldn't issue a joint communique on Thursday after India refused to endorse the document because it didn't address its terrorism-related concerns, officials aware of the matter said. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh during the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting, in Qingdao, China. (@rajnathsingh) Defence minister Rajnath Singh, who attended the meeting at Qingdao in China, refused to sign the joint communique as it was silent on the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed but mentioned Balochistan and the hijacking of the Jaffer Express by Baloch militants in March, the officials said, asking not to be named. Pakistan's insistence on not having any reference to the Pahalgam attack, while retaining the reference to the situation in Balochistan, stymied the finalisation of a joint statement, the officials said. The SCO works by consensus and a joint communique cannot be issued if even one member state doesn't endorse it. China, the current president of the SCO, has deep military and strategic ties with Pakistan, which it strongly supported during the recent four-day clashes with India under Operation Sindoor. The operation was India's direct military response to the Pahalgam terror strike, the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal responded to a question about the SCO meeting's failure to issue a joint communique by tacitly pointing to Pakistan's role in the matter. 'I understand [the meet] could not adopt a joint statement. I also understand that certain member countries could not reach consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised. On our side, India wanted concerns on terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country, and therefore the statement was not adopted,' he said. A press release issued by the Indian side is 'very instructive in how we look at the threat of terrorism', he said. 'The defence minister, in his address, called upon these 11 countries to come together to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations... He also reiterated the need to uphold that the perpetrators, organisers, financers, sponsors of reprehensible acts of terrorism, including cross-border terrorism, need to be held accountable and brought to justice,' Jaiswal said. Singh further said SCO members must be 'in lockstep in our endeavour in strengthening stability and security in our neighborhood', he added. In his address, Singh said every act of terrorism was criminal and unjustifiable, and the bloc must unite in eliminating the menace for collective safety and security. He said India launched Operation Sindoor, exercising its right to defend itself against terrorism and pre-empt and deter further cross-border attacks. During the Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity, and the The Resistance Front --- a proxy of UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) --- claimed responsibility for it, Singh said. 'The pattern of Pahalgam attack matches with LeT's previous terror attacks in India. India's zero tolerance for terrorism was demonstrated through its actions. We have shown that epicentres of terrorism are no longer safe and we will not hesitate to target them.' India launched the Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 and struck terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), It triggered a four-day military confrontation with Pakistan involving fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the two sides reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10. The biggest challenges faced by the region were related to peace, security and trust-deficit, with increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism being the root cause of these problems, Singh said. 'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action.' On May 15, Singh questioned if nuclear weapons were safe in Pakistan's control and custody and demanded that its arsenal be placed under the supervision of global nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), calling the neighbour 'irresponsible and rogue'. 'It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations,' Singh said in Qingdao. Singh called for proactive steps to check the spread of radicalisation among the youth, acknowledging the significant role of the RATS (regional anti-terrorist structure --- a body under the SCO) mechanism in tackling the challenge. 'The joint statement of the Council of SCO Heads of State on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism' issued during India's chairmanship symbolises our shared commitment.' SCO is a 10-nation Eurasian security and political grouping whose members include China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran. Their defence ministers' meeting was held as a precursor to the annual summit of its leaders set for the autumn.
India.com
42 minutes ago
- India.com
‘You Have 12 Hours – Save Your Wife And Kids': Israel's Covert Calls That Shattered Iran's Nerves
New Delhi: Inside hotel rooms, military bases and secret compounds across Iran, top officers were jolted by phone calls they never expected. On the line – a calm voice in flawless Persian, warning them their lives were ticking down. 'You have 12 hours. Take your wife. Take your children. Get out.' Some hung up in disbelief. Others vanished. And a few, as Israel claims, did not survive the warning. This was not just war with missiles. It was psychological warfare. A parallel operation. A whisper campaign backed by precision airstrikes and names checked off a death list. The Other War While Israeli drones and stealth jets were hitting Iranian missile sites and nuclear bunkers, another operation was underway – one with no coordinates on a map. Code-named 'Rising Lion', the covert campaign targeted Iran's nerves. One phone at a time. Three operatives involved in the mission – along with a leaked recording – confirmed the plan's scope to The Washington Post. Around 20 senior Iranian officials received direct calls. The message was blunt. Stop backing Ayatollah Khamenei or join the dead. A chilling audio clip, now circulating among intelligence watchers, captures one such call. An Israeli operative speaks softly but firmly, 'You are on our list. We are closer than your carotid artery. Remember that.' The target was a high-ranking general. He reportedly escaped. Others did not. From Threat to Aftershock Israeli sources claim some of the men warned by phone were killed soon after. The calls were not bluffs. They were preludes. The strikes that followed wiped out important names – Major General Hossein Salami of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corpse (IRGC), Major General Mohammad Bagheri of Iran's armed forces and others. Subsequent calls invoked their deaths. One officer recalled a voice saying, 'I am calling from the country that, two hours ago, sent Bagheri and Salami straight to hell. You are next if you do not wake up.' Letters at the Door The pressure was not only through phones. Some officers found anonymous letters on their doorstep. Others were contacted through their spouses. It was personal, deliberate and meant to rattle men deep inside the regime's ranks. No bombs. No gunshots. Just fear. The campaign's goal? To paralyse succession planning. To ensure that after the decapitation strikes on top brass, those next in line would hesitate. Ayatollah Khamenei, reportedly hiding in a bunker during the height of the war, struggled to replace fallen commanders. One Israeli security official put it simply, 'We wanted those left behind to doubt everything. Their safety. Their futures. Their leader.' Despite the psychological pressure, no large-scale defection surfaced from the IRGC or Iran's armed forces. But insiders say the fear ran deep. At mid-levels, command chains frayed. Paranoia was growing. And that was always the point. This was not only about breaking bunkers but breaking resolve and killing silence whisper by whisper.
