India refuses to sign SCO statement over Pahalgam
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defence ministers' meeting couldn't issue a joint communique on Thursday after India refused to endorse the document because it didn't address its terrorism-related concerns, officials aware of the matter said. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh during the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting, in Qingdao, China. (@rajnathsingh)
Defence minister Rajnath Singh, who attended the meeting at Qingdao in China, refused to sign the joint communique as it was silent on the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed but mentioned Balochistan and the hijacking of the Jaffer Express by Baloch militants in March, the officials said, asking not to be named.
Pakistan's insistence on not having any reference to the Pahalgam attack, while retaining the reference to the situation in Balochistan, stymied the finalisation of a joint statement, the officials said. The SCO works by consensus and a joint communique cannot be issued if even one member state doesn't endorse it.
China, the current president of the SCO, has deep military and strategic ties with Pakistan, which it strongly supported during the recent four-day clashes with India under Operation Sindoor. The operation was India's direct military response to the Pahalgam terror strike, the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.
External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal responded to a question about the SCO meeting's failure to issue a joint communique by tacitly pointing to Pakistan's role in the matter.
'I understand [the meet] could not adopt a joint statement. I also understand that certain member countries could not reach consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised. On our side, India wanted concerns on terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country, and therefore the statement was not adopted,' he said.
A press release issued by the Indian side is 'very instructive in how we look at the threat of terrorism', he said.
'The defence minister, in his address, called upon these 11 countries to come together to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations... He also reiterated the need to uphold that the perpetrators, organisers, financers, sponsors of reprehensible acts of terrorism, including cross-border terrorism, need to be held accountable and brought to justice,' Jaiswal said.
Singh further said SCO members must be 'in lockstep in our endeavour in strengthening stability and security in our neighborhood', he added.
In his address, Singh said every act of terrorism was criminal and unjustifiable, and the bloc must unite in eliminating the menace for collective safety and security. He said India launched Operation Sindoor, exercising its right to defend itself against terrorism and pre-empt and deter further cross-border attacks.
During the Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity, and the The Resistance Front --- a proxy of UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) --- claimed responsibility for it, Singh said.
'The pattern of Pahalgam attack matches with LeT's previous terror attacks in India. India's zero tolerance for terrorism was demonstrated through its actions. We have shown that epicentres of terrorism are no longer safe and we will not hesitate to target them.'
India launched the Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 and struck terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), It triggered a four-day military confrontation with Pakistan involving fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the two sides reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10.
The biggest challenges faced by the region were related to peace, security and trust-deficit, with increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism being the root cause of these problems, Singh said.
'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action.'
On May 15, Singh questioned if nuclear weapons were safe in Pakistan's control and custody and demanded that its arsenal be placed under the supervision of global nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), calling the neighbour 'irresponsible and rogue'.
'It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations,' Singh said in Qingdao.
Singh called for proactive steps to check the spread of radicalisation among the youth, acknowledging the significant role of the RATS (regional anti-terrorist structure --- a body under the SCO) mechanism in tackling the challenge. 'The joint statement of the Council of SCO Heads of State on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism' issued during India's chairmanship symbolises our shared commitment.'
SCO is a 10-nation Eurasian security and political grouping whose members include China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran. Their defence ministers' meeting was held as a precursor to the annual summit of its leaders set for the autumn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
India-China Defense Ministers Hold Strategic Talks In Qingdao
India's Defense Minister Rajnath Singh engaged in diplomatic discussions with his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Dong Jun, during his official visit to the port city of Qingdao on Friday. The meeting took place on the margins of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defense ministers' conference. Singh highlighted the importance of maintaining positive diplomatic trajectory between the two nations while cautioning against introducing fresh complications into their relationship. The Indian Defense Minister characterized their dialogue as "constructive and forward-looking," focusing on strengthening bilateral cooperation. "Both nations must sustain this encouraging momentum and refrain from creating additional complexities in our diplomatic relations," Singh stated following the meeting. During their interaction, Singh presented Admiral Dong Jun with a traditional Madhubani artwork, originating from Bihar's Mithila region, symbolizing cultural bridge-building between the two countries. Admiral Dong had previously welcomed Singh upon his Thursday arrival in China. The meeting occurs against the backdrop of gradual improvement in India-China relations following years of border tensions. A significant milestone was achieved in 2024 when both nations successfully completed military disengagement from the contested Depsang and Demchok areas in eastern Ladakh. Relations received another boost with India's announcement of resuming the Kailash Mansarovar pilgrimage to Tibet after a five-year suspension. The sacred journey, halted in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, will recommence on June 30. The pilgrimage schedule indicates the first group will cross into China through Lipulekh Pass on July 10, with the final group returning to India by August 22. Earlier this week, India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on June 23. Their discussion centered on advancing comprehensive bilateral development, including enhanced people-to-people connections between the two nations. This series of high-level meetings signals both countries' commitment to managing their complex relationship while exploring opportunities for cooperation and stability in the region.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How the new U.S. visa rules affect your online privacy
The story so far: On June 23, the U.S. Embassy in India said in an X post, 'Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law.' With that update, the process for securing certain types of U.S. visas — including for studying there — has become precarious. How does this affect students' visa applications? While social media vetting for U.S. visas has been in place since 2019, the new announcement signals that foreign students are set to face unprecedented levels of surveillance when travelling to the U.S. for study and/or work. Some of the social media accounts that users will now have to flag on their visa application and make public for inspection include Reddit, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter (now X), Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube, apart from several Chinese social media platforms and other websites that users may submit independently (such as Threads, Bluesky, unlisted blogging spaces, or personal websites). This means that both personal and professional qualifications, posts, replies, uploaded photos/videos, past comments, tagged pictures/posts, status updates, and even 'liked' content will need to be made visible to U.S. government authorities, where possible. Why are U.S. immigration officers checking social media accounts? In light of pro-Palestinian student protests and anti-ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) demonstrations across U.S. cities, officials likely want to make sure that Indian students coming into the country will not support such activities or express anti-Israeli views during the ongoing conflicts in West Asia. Vetting visa applicants' social media feeds also means that authorities can check if the individual's views align with those of the conservative Trump government that is in power. How long will social media accounts have to be left open? U.S. visa seekers are being asked to list all social media handles they have used in the last five years, and then make them public. Users can first carry out a social media audit to clean up their accounts and remove any sensitive or personal media before opening it up to the public. Minors should carry out this activity with the guidance of a trusted adult. Notifications, app alerts, messaging filters, and parental controls may need to be updated as well, to prevent disruption after the account goes public. No official guidance has been issued as to how long the accounts need to be left open. However, visa applicants who want to play it safe can keep their accounts publicly visible from the time they submit their application up to the time they pass their immigration checks after entering the U.S. However, visa applicants who are not comfortable with keeping all their social media accounts public should contact their relevant institutions or admissions officers in order to learn the latest policies and know when it is advisable to go private again. While deleting social media accounts entirely may sound like a way to avoid this hassle, remember that some tech companies keep even deleted accounts active for several weeks or months. These accounts of yours may still show up in search results when the vetting process begins, possibly jeopardising the visa application. What are the risks of making social media accounts public? Privacy, censorship, and security risks abound. First and foremost, many Indian students who apply for U.S. visas for academic study are usually minors in high-school. For them, keeping their social media accounts set to private is more than just a personal preference; it is crucial for their safety online. Many young users learning to navigate online spaces might post highly personal content or photos and videos across private accounts, secure in the knowledge that only people close to them can see their content. Now, however, those hoping to go to the U.S. for study will either have to make their accounts public or scrub personal content from their channels. The new requirement will also make U.S. visa applicants, and especially children, more vulnerable to digital security crimes such as bullying, hacking, sexual harassment, stalking, blackmail, identify theft, and doxxing. Increased levels of targeted advertising through accounts made public, including advertising aimed at kids, is another potential threat to consider. Is it legal to make visa applicants set their social media accounts to public? Privacy experts have slammed the U.S. government's new social media vetting requirements, likening the country's approach to that of an authoritarian regime. However, they note it is difficult to claim that privacy laws are being broken as visa applicants can choose to ignore the request, though they put their visa application at risk by doing so. Sophia Cope, Senior Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an American digital rights group, said there were many valid reasons for people to have private social media accounts, such as wanting to interact and share content only with trusted contacts. 'The U.S. government is endorsing the violation of a fundamental principle of privacy hygiene by asking those seeking student or exchange visas to set their social media accounts to 'public' for the purpose of visa vetting,' said Cope in response to The Hindu. 'Ascribing a nefarious intent and penalizing would-be students or visitors to the U.S. for keeping their online presence shielded from the general public or for not even being active on social media is an outrage. Moreover, government social media surveillance invades privacy and chills freedom of speech, and it is prone to errors and misinterpretation without ever having been proven effective at assessing security threats,' she explained. 'The U.S. must end this dangerous practice.'
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Thackeray brothers Uddhav, Raj to unite against ‘Hindi imposition' in Maharashtra schools, lead march
For the first time, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) leader Raj Thackeray are expected to appear together as they plan to participate in a protest march on July 5. The march opposes the Maharashtra government's move to make Hindi mandatory as a third language in primary schools. In a post on X, Sanjay Raut said, "जय महाराष्ट्र! 'There will be a single and united march against compulsory Hindi in Maharashtra schools. Thackeray is the brand!' In another post on X, Thackeray asserted that the event will be a display of Marathi unity and cultural pride. Raj Thackeray said, 'We will not allow Hindi imposition from the beginning, and we have decided to organise a march from Girgaum Chowpatty on July 6 to oppose it. There will be no flags in that march. The entire march will belong to the Marathi people. The Marathi agenda will be the only focus. The leadership of that march will be by a Marathi person.' He stressed that the rally will feature no political flags and will be rooted solely in Marathi identity. 'The sole agenda will be Marathi. The leadership of this march will also be by a Marathi person,' Thackeray said, making it clear that the initiative transcends political lines. Meanwhile, NCP chief Sharad Pawar said that while Hindi is widely spoken across the country, it should not be forced upon young students, especially at the primary level. "My view is that Hindi should not be made compulsory in primary education. There is no issue with children learning Hindi after Class 5. But we must analyse how many languages a child of a certain age can realistically learn and what linguistic burden that places on them," Pawar said. "If the pressure becomes too much and results in the mother tongue being sidelined, then that is not acceptable," he added. Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray said that no language should be forced, emphasising that it will create an additional burden on the students. "We demand that no language should be forced. What we have been learning so far should continue. Education should be enhanced, but no language should be forced. Why is it just Hindi? How much do you want to burden the children? Focus on what they are already studying, restructure it is a little, make it better," he said. The state government last week issued an order, stating Hindi will generally be taught as the third language to students in Marathi and English medium schools from Classes 1 to 5. The government maintained that Hindi would not be compulsory, but mandated consent of at least 20 students per grade in a school for studying any Indian language other than Hindi. Union Minister Ramdas Athawale on Thursday blamed the estranged cousins for politicising the language issue. He termed their opposition to Hindi as 'unconstitutional' and urged the Maharashtra government not to bow to political pressure. Like anyone else, the Thackerays also have a right to protest in a democracy, the minister said. We will not allow Hindi imposition from the beginning. (This is a developing story)
