I was fighting for my life in hospital with sepsis and vomiting flesh every day after using a quick-fix to lose weight
A MUM whose weight loss surgery left her "throwing up lumps of flesh" says she "regrets" going for a "quick fix".
Sofia Alessia, 28, piled on the pounds after and during her first pregnancy and went from size 10 to a size 16.
5
5
5
At 16 stone she struggled to shift the weight and decided to go for a gastric sleeve in the UK for a "quick fix".
But the mum-of-one was left ''constantly throwing up lumps of flesh'', and was unable to keep any fluids or food down.
She had to be treated for pneumonia and blood clots in her lungs before then having a gastric bypass fix her issues.
But she developed sepsis and has now been left with two hernias - and is still in constant agony.
Despite losing seven stone Sofia wishes she hadn't rushed into surgery and waited for weight loss jabs to be approved in the UK.
Sofia, an influencer, from Littleborough, Greater Manchester, said: "I'm still in pain every single day. I feel 'drunk' a lot. On bad days I can't get out of bed.
"I rushed it [getting surgery ] and I wished I'd waited and done Mounjaro."
Before becoming a mum, Sofia ''easily maintained'' a size 10 figure but gained weight in 2019, after the birth of her daughter, Ayla-Valentina, four.
She began binging on family-sized packets of crisps and a multipacks of Kinder buenos, and soon inflated to a size 16.
Sofia said: "I didn't know what do. I knew I wasn't happy for my size, but I couldn't stop binge eating. I needed help. I needed a quick fix."
Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons
The new mum booked in for weight loss surgery at what she believed to be a reputable clinic in January 31, 2022.
After the procedure to remove a large part of her stomach, leaving just a thin sleeve, she woke to find herself ''uncontrollably vomiting'' and feeling extreme dehydration.
She was throwing up thick liquid that looked like "lumps of flesh" but despite her condition she was discharged after just 24 hours.
She said: "Everyday was a nightmare that I couldn't wake up from. I was vomiting lumps of flesh every day and night."
Just hours after the operation, Sofia was admitted to Blackburn Royal Hospital, in which she spent three weeks receiving nutrition through a tube due as she couldn't keep food down.
The influencer was then moved to Worcester Royal Hospital for further treatment, and was fitted with a feeding tube, this insertion later revealed two blood clots located in each lung.
Sofia said: "I hadn't seen my family in days, and I couldn't keep anything down. I felt like I was dying, and everything was getting worse and worse."
Her condition continued to deteriorate, and she developed pneumonia, while doctors discovered that more than 80 per cent of her stomach had been removed - causing a stricture.
The clinic sent Sofia a £250 care package of aftercare products and arranged to fix the surgery themselves.
On 21 March 2022, Sofia underwent a gastric bypass, but due to the issues with the previous surgery, they were forced to remove ''almost all" of her stomach.
During the procedure, the surgeon stapled her bowel into her smaller intestine which caused chronic sepsis to quickly develop.
She went straight to Worcester Hospital for further treatment where successfully removed the staples from the lower intestine and stomach, and drained the infection from her body.
5
5
After three months in hospital, on April 9 she returned home.
Sofia said: "I didn't think I would ever say my daughter again. I wasn't getting answers and I felt like I was losing a bit of myself everyday."
Sofia, who now has multiple scars on her stomach, has now lost seven stone but has been left with two internal hernias which requires another surgery to remove.
She has been referred to a specialist to get this surgery and has to take daily painkillers for her agony.
Sofia wishes she held off surgery and tried other methods to lose weight first, saying she could have taken weight loss jab Mounjaro instead - which was approved in the UK in December 2024.
Sofia said: "I wouldn't suggest surgery at all. It's the last resort. I'll always have these scars now. I chose to do it - I've got to deal with it."
Different types of weight loss surgery
For many people who are overweight or obese, they may feel they have exhausted options for weight loss and want to try something more drastic.
Weight loss surgery may be available to them on the NHS if they have a BMI over 40 and have a condition that may be improved with weight loss, such as diabetes.
But the availability of these procedures largely depends on where you live in the UK. People can also pay privately.
Weight loss surgery is a common and safe procedure. However, as with any operation, there are risks, such as a blood clot, a band slipping out of place, a stomach infection, gallstones and excessive skin from weight loss that in most cases, won't be removed on the NHS.
In all of the following options, the space in the stomach is reduced, therefore a person feels fuller after eating less food. They lose weight as a result.
However, it is necessary for them to also learn good eating habits and have a healthy balanced diet, too.
Gastric bypass
The stomach is divided into two using a staple. The smaller part is connected to the intestines, effectively cutting how much space there is in the stomach by half.
The operation takes around two hours.
Gastric band
A band is tied around the top of the stomach and inflated so that it tightens.
The operation takes three to four hours.
Gastric balloon
Patients swallow an empty balloon which is attached to a tube.
The balloon is filled with water via the tube, taking around 20 minutes, so that it fills around two-thirds of the stomach space.
Sleeve gastrectomy
Around 80 per cent of the stomach is removed in surgery to make it much smaller and a sleeve shape.
The operation takes between one and three hours.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Several US Jolly rancher sweets unsafe to eat, FSA says
A number of products from a brand of US sweets are "unsafe to eat" and contain ingredients which could increase the risk of cancer and cause damage to DNA, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has businesses and consumers are being urged to stop buying and selling the Jolly Ranchers products, owned by US company FSA says they contain chemical compounds - mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH) and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) - which are "not compliant with UK laws".The products pose a safety risk if consumed regularly over time but there is "no immediate cause for concern, as [the] food safety risk is low", the agency adds. In a food alert published on Wednesday evening, the FSA said: "MOAH can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time."MOAH is a genotoxic carcinogen, therefore no exposure is without risk to human health."MOAH and MOSH are used in confectionary to prevent stickiness and create a glossy to the agency, The Hershey Company has been working with the UK government body to remove the affected Jolly Rancher products from the UK market since 2024, but some businesses in Britain have continued to import the affected products are: Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, Jolly Rancher 'Misfits' Gummies, Jolly Rancher Hard Candy Fruity 2 in 1, and Jolly Ranchers Berry food agency is advising people who have any of the listed products to not eat them and dispose of them at home. If consumers have any concerns, they are being asked to notify the Trading Standards department or environmental health department in the local authority they made the purchase agency said it was asking enforcement authorities to make "immediate contact" with businesses which had been supplied with or received any of the products, and take action to ensure they were withdrawn from the market.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Britain morphing into ‘National Health State', says think tank
Britain is turning into a 'National Health State', a think tank has said after the Chancellor gave the NHS a major funding boost in her spending review. The health service was the big winner of Wednesday's spending review, receiving an extra £29 billion per year for day-to-day spending and more cash for capital investment. Overnight, the Resolution Foundation said Rachel Reeves's announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although the think tank's director Paul Johnson warned the money may not be enough. He said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UK consumers urged not to buy ‘unsafe' American sweets amid cancer concerns
UK consumers are being urged not to buy a brand of 'unsafe' sweets which could increase the risk of cancer, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has said. Candies from the Jolly Rancher brand contain mineral oils, a food additive which can pose health risks if consumed regularly over a sustained period of time, the agency said. The chemical compounds in the products: mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (Moah); and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons, (Mosh); are used in confectionary to prevent stickiness and create a glossy appearance, but do not comply with UK law. US producer, Hershey, which owns the brand, has been working with the FSA to remove all Jolly Rancher products from the UK market since 2024 – but some businesses in Britain continue to import their products, the agency added. The affected products include the Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, 'Misfits' Gummies, Hard Candy Fruity 2 in 1, and Berry Gummies, the FSA said. A food alert published by the FSA on Wednesday said: 'Consumption of the affected sweets is of toxicological concern, especially in younger age groups and where consumers eat a lot of the products or eat them regularly. 'Moah can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time. Moah is a genotoxic carcinogen, therefore no exposure is without risk to human health.' It added: 'If you have bought any of the above products, do not eat them. 'Instead, dispose of them at home. If you are concerned, notify your Trading Standards department or environmental health department in the local authority you purchased it. 'For consumers, don't buy them, and if you've eaten these products, there should be no immediate cause for concern, as food safety risk is low, but don't eat any more.' The agency has also urged UK retailers and food businesses to cease all imports and sales of the candy brand, and asked enforcement authorities to ensure the products are removed from the shelves. The FSA said: 'Food businesses who import these products are advised to discontinue import and distribution of products. 'Food businesses selling these products in the UK are advised to immediately stop sales, undertake product withdrawals and where there have been retail sales, to undertake product recalls. 'The Hershey Company, who is the brand owner, has taken action to remove these products from the UK market. 'We are asking enforcement authorities to make immediate contact with businesses who may have been supplied with or received the affected products, and to take action to ensure that the non-compliant and potentially unsafe products are withdrawn from the market and where sold at retail, recalled. 'We are also asking the local authorities to inform the FSA of product recall and withdrawal actions.'
