Shares and the rand stay strong in a week of drama
As the over-recovering in the price of petrol currently stands at 19 cents per liter and forty-one cents for diesel, with prospects for lower global oil prices and a stronger Rand over the next six months.
Image: Pixabay
The ALSI once again on a record high
Despite all the attention on the RSA (Ramaphosa) and Trump(US) standoff to gain political points at the news conference last Wednesday, as well as the 'don't want to cut the national government salary account' third national budget, financial markets in South Africa seem to react on the real issue of the US/SA negotiations, South Africa's promising inflation data and foreign investment interest, that pushed the Rand/$ exchange rate to a new record level for 2025 and the ALSI to a new all-time record.
The ALSI closed Friday higher for the fourth consecutive week at an all-time high of 93 529. This is a weekly rise of 1.0% and now has gained 10.8% since the beginning of the year and 18.0% over the last year. Once again, this movement is in sharp contrast to equity prices in the US and Europe.
The above bullish movement in equities underpins more favourable economic prospects for South Africa during 2025. Gold and Platinum continuous upward movements, the inflation rate increasing only marginally from 2.7% in March 2025 to 2.8% in April (seven consecutive month lower than the midpoint of 4.5%) and the decision by treasury to increase the fuel levy by 16 and 15 cents per liter, without putting a burden on the motorist over the short run all contributed to the positive sentiment on markets.
As the over-recovering in the price of petrol currently stands at 19 cents per liter and forty-one cents for diesel, with prospects for lower global oil prices and a stronger Rand over the next six months. Issues that matter after the trade negotiations between the US and SA
It seems that genuine issues that were talked to in the white house between President Trump and President Ramaphosa were favourable for South Africa. It is expected that the AGOA agreement will continue, President Trump will attend the G20 summit, at talks in boost bilateral trade and investment, will continue.
Trade, Industry & Competition Minister Parks Tau said in an interview in Washington 'We are ready to negotiate on the offer submitted and while we are negotiating, we are proposing that the US maintains the reciprocal duty at no more than 10%,'.
Analysts are now starting to remodel the possible effects of more positive prospects for South-Africa /US trade and investments on South Africa's economic growth rate and the Rand/$ exchange rate.
This just after the Minister of Finance have downgraded the country's economic growth rate from 1.9% to 1.4% on the back of President Trump's tariff announcements on 'Liberty Day' at the beginning of April.
The minister of communications and digital technologies Solly Malatsi announced in a policy directive the proposed relaxing of Black economic empowerment (BEE) policies in the ICT sector. This will give the green light for the billionaire Elon Musk's Starlink to commence business in SA.
This may pay the part for other foreign businesses towards direct foreign investments in other sectors in South Africa.
The Rand/$ on its lowest level for 2025
On the foreign exchange market, the Rand improved against the US$ over the week by twenty-two cents to its strongest level this year of 17.88/$. Against the British £ the Rand depreciated by sixteen cents to R24.12/ £ and against the Euro by thirteen cents to R20.24/€.
The stronger Rand/$ rate, lower fuel prices over the last two months and the strong surge in the prices for gold, platinum and palladium are likely to keep the inflation rate below 3.0% till the next meeting of the MPC in June.
A cut of twenty-five basis points in the repo rate by the MPC became more a certainty, with the odds of another twenty-five basis points cut within the next six months, also a growing possibility. Especially if further trade talks with the US lead to a stronger Rand and precious metal prices continue to rise. US and European equities lower on tariff threats
On some global equity markets prices dropped sharply after US president Donald Trump again fueled the trade war by warning to levy high tariffs on the EU and smartphone giant Apple.
In Europe equity prices traded down 1.7%, the S&P 500 in the US lost 0.67% after the announcement trading 1.9% down over the week. 1.1% cent in early trading. President Trump wants to introduce a fifty per cent tax in June on all imports to the US from the EU, including on pharmaceuticals and luxury items.
He also intends to impose a twenty-five per cent tariff on Apple and Samsung on iPhones sold in the US but produced elsewhere. Prospects for this coming week
This coming week domestic and foreign investors await the release of South Africa's producer price inflation rate for April to be released by STASSA on Wednesday. It is expected that the annual increase in the PPI will be 0.7%.
This is higher than the annual producer inflation rate of 0.5% recorded for March 2025. The country's balance of trade numbers for April will be published on Thursday and the budget balance on Friday.
Globally, the US will release the Federal Reserve Open Market Commission (FOMC) minutes of their meeting in April.
The reasons for keeping its bank rate unchanged will be revealed. Its second estimate of GDP economic growth rate will be announced on Thursday.
The personal income and spending figures for April in the US will be announced on Friday. Canada will release its GDP growth rate for Q1 2025 on Friday.
Chris Harmse is the consulting economist of Sequoia Capital Management and a senior lecturer at Stadio Higher Education.
Chris Harmse is the consulting economist of Sequoia Capital Management and a senior lecturer at Stadio Higher Education.
Image: Supplied
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Mixed news at the pump: fuel levy rises while prices drop
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed the EFF's urgent bid to block a controversial fuel levy hike—just as fuel prices dip. From midnight, levies rise by 16c (petrol) and 15c (diesel), despite constitutional questions. It's a pump paradox: taxpayers pay more, but pump prices briefly fall. In a ruling handed down yesterday, Judge Nathan Erasmus found that the EFF's application lacked urgency and did not meet the legal threshold for interim relief. The court did not engage with the broader constitutional challenge itself, which the EFF had previously framed in its initial filing as a possible Part B of its legal strategy. A tax fight rooted in Budget 3.0 The levy increase was announced in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's revised Budget 3.0, tabled in May following the political fallout and eventual withdrawal of VAT hikes in earlier budget versions. Treasury estimates the fuel levy will raise about R4-billion in the 2025/26 fiscal year. The EFF has argued that the use of Section 48(1) of the Customs and Excise Act to implement the fuel levy increase amounts to an unconstitutional bypassing of Parliament. Section 77 of the Constitution requires that all new taxes be passed via a money Bill through the National Assembly. Arguments on constitutional compliance Representing the EFF, Advocate Mfesane Ka-Siboto told the court: 'The fact that this has happened before does not make it lawful. Past practice is not a substitute for constitutional compliance.' He described the move as a case of 'taxation without representation.' The Treasury, represented by Advocate Kameel Premhid, countered that Section 48(1) had long been used lawfully to adjust fuel levy schedules. He argued the measure was an administrative amendment within an existing framework, not the introduction of a new tax requiring legislative approval. What this means for you For consumers, the fuel levy increase translates into higher petrol and diesel prices at the pump, effective immediately. This could lead to broader knock-on effects on transport costs, food prices and inflation, particularly for lower-income households who spend a greater share of their income on fuel-linked expenses. Treasury maintains the hike is necessary to address fiscal gaps left by the abandoned VAT proposal. The fuel levy increase will be offset by a decrease in fuel prices – which also kicks in on Wednesday, 4 June. The Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) announced the following price decreases yesterday: Petrol 93 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5cents/litre. Petrol 95 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5 cents/litre. Diesel (0.05% sulphur): ⬇️ 36.9 cents/litre. Diesel (0.005% sulphur): ⬇️36.9 cents/litre. Commenting on the changes, the DMPR noted that over the last month, there has been a decrease in the average Brent Crude oil price from US$66.40 to US$63.95, largely on the back of continued global trade uncertainty, Parliament distances itself from the damage Parliament, which was cited in the court papers, but not the target of any relief, issued a brief statement after the judgment: 'Although cited in the application, no relief was sought against Parliament. Parliament's position throughout the proceedings was to abide by the outcome of the court process. Accordingly, Parliament will comply with the court's ruling.' Oversight loophole or legal mechanism? In its legal representations, Treasury has argued that Section 48(6) of the Act ensures Parliamentary oversight by requiring the amended tariff to be tabled after the fact. The EFF, however, contends this form of post-implementation tabling falls short of the constitutional threshold for public finance legislation. EFF's Part B remains unclear In a short statement on X after the ruling, the EFF said: 'We are committed to fighting the fuel levy increase in court and in Parliament.' However, the party did not explicitly confirm that it would pursue the Part B constitutional review. Whether the EFF returns to court or not, the broader legal and political debate over fiscal authority, oversight and the democratic control of taxation is likely to persist. DM


eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump to attend NATO summit in The Hague
THE HAGUE - US President Donald Trump will attend a NATO summit in The Hague later in June, where his demands to ramp up defense spending will dominate the agenda, the White House said Tuesday. Trump has long criticized NATO partners for not paying their fair share and had not previously confirmed he would attend the meeting, his first with the transatlantic alliance since his return to power. "I can confirm he will be going to the NATO summit, yes," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing when asked by AFP if Trump would attend. Ukraine's war with Russia will also be on the agenda, with President Volodymyr Zelensky confirming on Tuesday that his country has been invited. Zelensky and Trump had a major Oval Office row in February. Republican Trump threatened to withdraw altogether from NATO during his first term, and has since threatened to defend only those allies that he thinks are spending enough on defense. His administration has also raised the prospect that it could look to shift forces away from Europe to focus on threats elsewhere like China -- while causing tensions with allies Canada and Denmark by threatening their territory. His core demand is for NATO members to spend five percent of GDP on defense, claiming that Washington is bearing most of the burden for their defense. None of NATO's 32 members -- including the United States -- currently hit that level. To make him happy, alliance chief and former Dutch premier Mark Rutte has floated a proposal for 3.5 percent of GDP on direct defense spending by 2032, and 1.5 percent of broader security-related expenditures. Such a deal could let Trump claim a win by reaching his headline figure even if not all of it is new spending.


eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Discussing BBBEE redress policies effect on the economy
JOHANNESBURG - The critique of South Africa's so-called "racial policies" by the United States has again put BBEE in the spotlight. READ: Ramaphosa defends BEE policies in Parliament Broad-based economic empowerment measures were put in place to counter apartheid policies that disadvantaged different groups of South Africans through poorer education, a lack of promotion and confiscation of their assets and rights. Many have argued it's not working. An academic says that the complex problems affecting the country's economic growth cannot be reduced to policies aimed at redress. Dr Khwezi Mabasa, the Economic and Social Policy Lead at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung South Africa, discussed this with eNCA.