Broadcasting of Edinburgh Council committees saved as cost-reduction bid struck back
The online broadcasting of Edinburgh Council meetings will remain unchanged after councillors said the costs required to keep webcasting three committees was worth it.
City officers had asked councillors to approve ceasing broadcasting three council committees with low viewership numbers, in a bid to save around £6,000 per year.
But councillors agreed that the sum was a 'small price to pay' for transparency, deciding at the Policy and Sustainability Committee on Tuesday to keep webcasting three meetings.
Officers had suggested the webcasting of the Pentland Hills Regional Park Joint Committee, the Local Review Body and the Consultative Committee with Parents cease to be webcast.
They said the low viewership of each – with all three together making up under 3% of the council's webcast views in the year to June 30 – made them not worth the cost.
Edinburgh Council has webcast some meetings since 2012, but the covid lockdown saw almost all public meetings begin to be broadcast online.
If approved, the reduction of webcasting would have returned the offering to the pre-pandemic level, with the addition of the Traffic Regulation Orders Sub-Committee and the Edinburgh City Region Joint Deal committee.
Councillors also discussed whether some private meetings, and private portions of public meetings, should be recorded.
Officers recommended that they not be recorded at all, in order to reduce legal risk, but also put forward options where they could be recorded via Microsoft Teams or the city's webcast system.
They suggested that these recordings be deleted as soon as minutes of what was said in each meeting were agreed.
Councillors agreed with officers that private council business should not be recorded on a 9-8 vote, with supporters citing security concerns.
SNP councillor Kate Campbell said: 'Everyone is in agreement that £6,000 to maintain transparency is a small price to pay for democracy.
'Where I think maybe we don't have support, and maybe I'm making a plea to colleagues – we're happy for private business to be recorded through Teams, but we think it should be retained for two years.
'There are a number of reasons why we think that. There's just a lot of discussions we have on private business where they are nuanced and detailed discussions.
'Sometimes it comes to light much later that the focus of that discussion, or where that report was focused, councillors weren't given information they needed at the time.
'It can then result in decisions having been made much later where you can trace back to a committee that was [in private], and currently we're at a real disadvantage where we just don't have a record of that.'
And SNP group leader councillor Simita Kumar remarked that there had been a situation where a decision had been made in private on unlicensed HMOs where councillors did not remember what had been said.
Liberal Democrat group leader Edward Thornley said: 'I'm glad that we seem to have come to an agreement about public meetings.
'On the recording, and storing of private meetings – I don't think we've got enough assurance that this can be done fully securely.'
The Conservative councillors in the committee agreed with the Liberal Democrat position.
Green councillor Alex Staniforth said: 'While I understand some concerns around security, papers can be leaked, and have been leaked. Comments can be leaked, and have been leaked.
'Any one person in this room, were they being unscrupulous, could subtly record the discussion being held. I hope no-one would, but they could do it.
'And having Teams recording of those discussions is more advantageous than it is deleterious to our security. We must face the fact, this place is not leak-proof as it is.
'I don't think [recording the meetings] would make it leakier.'
The SNP group also tried to get the committee to agree to begin recording the Pensions Committee, however, the committee did not agree this.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Scotland takes on record levels of asylum seekers – amid calls for migrant hotel crackdown & protests loom
Glasgow's administration committee met to seek a solution to the mounting crisis 'BREAKING POINT' Scotland takes on record levels of asylum seekers – amid calls for migrant hotel crackdown & protests loom Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A RECORD number of asylum seekers are now staying in Scots hotels, it has been revealed. The Home Office said 6,107 people are bidding for refugee status, double the total a decade ago. And 1,573 are in taxpayer-funded hotels. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 A record number of asylum seekers are now staying in Scots hotels Credit: Andrew Barr 7 Susan Aitken told how a 'rainy day' fund used to cope with the surge had now run dry Credit: Les Gallagher 7 Council chiefs in Scotland's biggest city admit they're buckling under the pressure Credit: PA 7 Hampton by Hilton in Westhill now caters for refugees whose claims are being assessed Credit: Newsline Media Council chiefs in Scotland's biggest city admit they're buckling under the pressure of being the UK's asylum seeker capital — and have begged for extra funding. Residents in Glasgow face council tax rises and cuts to public services to plug a £60million budget shortfall as they struggle to accommodate a surge of new refugees. Home Office figures released show asylum applications across the UK in the 12 months to this June hit an all-time high of 111,084. And 3,884 of them were seeking permission to remain in Glasgow, far outstripping the likes of Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester. The stats sparked concern the city is now a magnet for migrants who gain refugee status down south and are then kicked out of their accommodation. Susan Aitken, leader of the SNP-run council, told how a 'rainy day' fund used to cope with the surge for two years had now run dry. Now senior figures are demanding extra support from both Holyrood and Westminster. Ms Aitken said: 'Glasgow is not only dealing with demand from the UK's largest dispersed population by far but a sizeable number of additional refugees who can't access support elsewhere in the UK.' She added: 'There are people out there who'd seek to exploit this, and indeed are. We see this happening in our communities in front of us.' Glasgow's administration committee met today to seek a solution to the mounting crisis. Migrants to be kicked out of hotel at centre of protests in landmark ruling after asylum seeker's 'sex attack' A source said the local authority will have little option but to raise tax and cut public services to meet a shortfall of more than £60million if the Home Office and Scottish Government do not step in. Deputy leader Ricky Bell said: 'If we don't have a solution, we are facing a very, very difficult budget position for next February.' And chief exec Susanne Millar, who is pleading for Home Office help, said: 'About 94 per cent of the asylum seekers in Scotland are accommodated in Glasgow.' But the threat of cuts to services was slammed by opposition politicians. Tory MSP Annie Wells said: 'SNP councillors in Glasgow need to accept reality. 7 Tory MSP Annie Wells said SNP councillors in Glasgow "need to accept reality" Credit: Getty 7 The Cladhan Hotel in Falkirk was the scene of recent protests Credit: Andrew Barr 7 Protesters from Save Our Future & Our Kids Future demonstrate against uncontrolled immigration Credit: Getty 'Their cash-strapped authority cannot afford to continue with this increasingly expensive policy. 'Citizens are fed up with pothole-plagued roads and filthy streets. They don't want to pay even more in council tax, to get less in return. 'This is after a housing emergency was declared in the city more than 18 months ago.' Ex-Tory councillor Thomas Kerr, who defected in January to Reform UK, hit out: 'Enough is enough. 'Glasgow is at breaking point, the numbers prove it. SNP and Labour have sold out our own people and put others first time and again.' The city received 1,050 homeless applications in 2024/25 from migrants granted leave to remain in the UK. That was up 51 per cent on the previous year. There are now 4,386 mostly migrant households in temporary homeless accommodation in Glasgow, with 1,850 of them in bed and breakfast or hotel accommodation. Elsewhere in the UK, new refugees have 56 days to leave asylum pads if they can't secure onwards lodgings. But many are encouraged to head north by a Scottish Government pledge to accommodate all homeless people. Top 10 UK Councils for Asylum Seekers Source: Home Office figures for June 2025 Glasgow - 3,844 Birmingham - 2,755 Hillingdon - 2,481 Liverpool - 2,361 Manchester - 1,997 Hounslow - 1,775 Belfast - 1,760 Coventry - 1,733 Sandwell - 1,671 Leeds - 1,659 Across Scotland, the number of asylum seekers in taxpayer-funded hotels hit a record 1,573. They have rooms in 10 local authority areas. Those bidding for refugee status have doubled in a decade to 6,107. The three-star Hampton by Hilton in Westhill, Aberdeenshire, now caters exclusively for refugees whose claims are being assessed. One local said: 'We were never consulted on this. It's all men and they stick out as it's a small town.' Plans to change the hotel's use were shrouded in secrecy before the new guests moved in two years ago. It emerged up to 173 males aged 18 to 40 would be put up there. Another town resident said: 'I think if we had any choice in the matter then the community would have rejected this.' In nearby Aberdeen, what was once the city's only beachfront hotel now houses only migrants. The former Doubletree by Hilton has been the site of several protests in recent months. But one local said: 'It has made me feel sorry for the guys. They are not causing anyone any bother.' In Edinburgh's posh west end, residents have voiced concerns over a range of issues at the 62-bed Learmonth Hotel, which is currently used to house asylum seekers. One man, who didn't want to be named, said there should be more communication from operator Mears. He added: 'It can be quite intimidating walking past when there are 20 or 30 young men standing outside having cigarettes. 'There's a lot of litter and a lot of drinking now, unfortunately.' A UK Government spokeswoman said: 'We are working to make sure individuals have the support they need following an asylum decision to help local authorities better plan their assistance with homelessness. 'We have doubled the move-on period to 56 days and mobilised liaison officers to support asylum seekers in Glasgow.' And a spokesman for the Scottish Government said: 'UK Government decisions about the asylum system are creating significant pressures across the UK. We support the call from Glasgow City Council for them to provide adequate funding to support newly recognised refugees and communities."
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Skint SNP has lost thousands more members
The SNP has suffered a £1.1million collapse in finances and membership has fallen to below half its peak level. The party's annual accounts revealed a dramatic swing in the beleaguered party's fortunes as it prepares to fight next year's Holyrood election. Last night rivals warned that a party which couldn't even manage its own finances shouldn't be trusted with the nation's money. Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'Eyebrows will be raised about the financial sustainability of the SNP when they have such a deep deficit. People are deserting the SNP. They're skint.' The SNP accounts for the year to December 31 reveal: Membership fell from 64,525 to 56,011 in the year to June, representing a 55.4 per cent slump since the 2019 peak of 125,691 under Nicola Sturgeon SNP income fell by £247,838 to £4.5million, while spending rose £870,062 to £5million Membership income was down £260,928 to £1.8million but donations were up £567,859 to a seven-year high of £937,167 because of bequests The SNP ended 2024 with a £455,254 deficit, after a £661,568 surplus in 2023 Auditors put a 'qualified opinion' on the accounts for a second year as missing paperwork before July 2023 created 'inherent uncertainty' about levels of reserves The value of the infamous SNP motorhome impounded by police has fallen from over £100,000 to £41,284 and the party 'expects its future release' Former chief executive Peter Murrell, who was charged with embezzlement in March, has not asked for the return of £60,000 he loaned the party in 2021 and the money could be 'waived or written off' amid the 'uncertainty' The accounts showed a dramatic swing from a surplus of £660,000 in 2023 to the deficit of £455,000 in 2024. On paper, SNP reserves were £13,315 in the red, down from £441,939 in the black. The slump was driven by 8,514 members leaving and membership income falling £250,000, as well as a £276,000 'restructuring' exercise at SNP HQ to cut jobs and save cash. The Nationalists also spent £800,000 on a disastrous general election campaign under John Swinney in which they lost 39 of their 48 MPs. With the Holyrood election looming, SNP treasurer Stuart McDonald admitted funds to fight it were 'not in the same ballpark' as past years, but said finances were stable. The SNP spent £1.47million on the 2021 Holyrood election – more than any of its rivals – but its weak finances saw it outspent by both Scottish Labour and the Scottish Tories last year. Tory finance spokesman Craig Hoy said: 'Financial incompetence is clearly the SNP's speciality. It is not surprising they are presiding over a growing black hole in Scotland's finances when they cannot get a grip of their own.' He said it was 'remarkable' that the party appeared to be making no effort to repay the money it owed to Mr Murrell. The accounts are more transparent than in past years, including over the impact of Operation Branchform, the police probe into fundraising which saw the estranged husband of Nicola Sturgeon, charged. In his report, Mr McDonald states: 'While we remain by far and away Scotland's largest political party – with 56,011 members as at 1st June 2025 – we continue to face the challenge of membership numbers declining from historic and extraordinary highs.' He said 'very difficult but important changes were required to improve the party's finances' including one to 'downsize our HQ team' from 26 to 19. Redundancies and restructuring had contributed to the deficit but would 'realise significant spending reductions in the months ahead'. 'These steps, though difficult, have stabilised our finances,' he said. The accounts show SNP HQ stayed afloat thanks to borrowing from its branches. These were owed £459,201 last year, more than £100,000 up on 2023. The SNP Westminster group, which produces separate accounts, saw its deficit grow from £87,991 to £155,803 after the general election rout. Scottish Labour doubled its income to £2.1million thanks to a £545,000 boost from UK HQ to fight the election. Dame Jackie said: 'Eyebrows will be raised about the financial sustainability of the SNP when they have such a deep deficit. 'The public will also ask why the party's former chief executive Peter Murrell is set to be given legal aid at the expense of the taxpayer when he has seemingly made no request to the SNP for the outstanding £60,000 he loaned them to be repaid – and that this could now be waived or written off.' An SNP spokesman said: 'The SNP is the largest political party in Scotland by far and it is very encouraging to see extraordinary levels of donations over the course of last year – the highest since 2017.'
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Arts venues should lose funds if they stifle free speech, says ex-minister
A former SNP cabinet minister has demanded arts bodies lose their public funding if they stifle free speech after the 'disgraceful' Kate Forbes cancel culture row. Fergus Ewing said the bid by Summerhall Arts to ban the deputy First Minister from an Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue was 'utter nonsense'. He also took a swipe at John Swinney for taking a week to condemn it. Speaking to the media on Tuesday, the First Minister said it was not 'appropriate' and there was 'no reason why Kate Forbes shouldn't be able to speak at any venue in Scotland'. Summerhall Arts effectively banned Ms Forbes, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP's gender self-ID plans, from returning after she appeared at a political discussion, before rowing back. Bosses set up a 'safe room' for artists and staff when she was in the building, after performers reported being 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in MSP. The arts charity, which was awarded £608,000 in public funds in January, apologised 'unreservedly' and said the booking was an 'oversight' which would not happen again. But after an outcry about censorship - which chimed with similar rows at the Edinburgh Book Festival and National Library of Scotland - Summerhall bosses backed down. Chief executive Sam Gough told the Mail: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages.' Writing on X, Mr Ewing, who quit the SNP in June to stand for re-election in his Inverness and Nairn seat as an Independent, said: 'After a week of silence, our FM eventually gets round to support his DFM and criticise the disgraceful 'cancellation' of Kate Forbes by Summerhall Arts in Edinburgh. 'I have tabled a question to ask the Scottish Government if they will insist any arts body getting a grant must undertake to honour freedom of expression under the law, or else forfeit the grant and repay any amount paid 'Summerhall got bailed out with £600,000 of taxpayers' money - then 'cancelled' Kate Forbes because she was, in their eyes, a 'threat' to the safety of performers. 'What utter nonsense. But will the Scottish Government stamp it out? I doubt it. 'And why are millions of taxpayers' cash being dished out to those who would ban freedom of expression? 'I have countless constituents with special needs kids whose lives would be transformed for a fraction of these eye-watering amounts.' He ended his comments with a pointed quote from 1984 author George Orwell: 'The further society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.' Benny Higgins, chair of the Fringe Society for the last four years, yesterday said freedom of speech was 'crucial' to the festival He told the Herald: 'It's from the embers of the Second World War that this festival was formed. We must support freedom of expression. It's crucial. 'If we don't support freedom of speech within what is legal then we let ourselves down. 'It's something we have got to protect and cultivate. 'I think it would be sad if politicians were not be able to speak at the Fringe. Politics is part of the fabric of our society.' Lori Anderson, director of Festivals Edinburgh, added: 'The Edinburgh festivals - with their bold ideas, brave voices and global reach - are a celebration of possibility. They are spaces for challenge and debate.'
