Inside Hospitals' Digital Command Centers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
During the winter of 2023, staff at Children's Mercy Kansas City were waiting for the "surge": a dreaded period when viral illnesses like influenza and RSV abound, leading to an increase in hospital admissions.
But as the winter bled into 2024, it became clear that something had changed. Children were still getting sick and requiring advanced medical care. However, staff at Children's Mercy weren't "feeling the angst" like they had in years past, according to Dr. Jennifer Watts, the hospital's associate chief medical officer of acute care and inpatient operations.
The difference, Watts said, came from technology. That was the hospital's first year using GE HealthCare's Command Center software, a product that allows it to digitally monitor care delivery and track patients' progress throughout their stay.
It's like the "NASA" control hub for the health system, Watts told Newsweek. During the first winter partnering with GE, Children's Mercy staff began asking, "Is the surge here?"
"They just didn't feel it," Watts said. "We were able to prepare. We were able to have [sufficient] staff present. We got rid of the scramble that typically occurs when you don't prepare for things."
Hospital staff inside Children's Mercy Kansas City's Patient Progression Hub, which uses GE Healthcare Command Center technology to paint a real-time picture of hospital happenings.
Hospital staff inside Children's Mercy Kansas City's Patient Progression Hub, which uses GE Healthcare Command Center technology to paint a real-time picture of hospital happenings.
Children's Mercy Kansas City Patient Progression Hub
Children's Mercy is one of 300 hospitals around the world that use GE's Command Center technology. As hospitals across the U.S. face rising demand for their services—driven, in part, by sicker patients and an aging population—many are turning to these digital "command centers" to improve operational efficiency and polish the patient experience.
Before developing a Patient Progression Hub, driven by GE's tech, Children's Mercy was still dealing with inefficient and outdated processes, according to Watts. Different departments were playing "phone tag" with one another to move patients through the hospital. Information was not centralized, and it was common to see staff with packets of papers in front of them, pinning memos on bulletin boards and communicating with fax machines.
Within seven months of implementing the Command Center technology, the hospital saw an 86 percent reduction in admission delays and cut avoidable bed days by 24 percent—creating capacity for 300 more medical-surgical patients without expanding its facility.
The tech sits atop hospitals' preexisting systems, like staffing platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), to generate a comprehensive, real-time picture of the hospital's caseload and available resources.
"The software really helps connect the strategy to the day-to-day operations," Bree Bush, general manager of GE's Command Center, told Newsweek.
Kristie Barazsu is the president and COO of Duke Health Lake Norman Hospital in Mooresville, North Carolina, and oversees patient flow for Duke Health, which stood up Command Center in 2019. During COVID-19, the health system could use the technology to understand where positive patients were located and deploy personal protective equipment (PPE) from its logistics center.
Command Center also utilizes predictive analytics to help hospitals plan for the future. Duke uses it to forecast the area's census, analyzing overall demand by unit, patient population and acuity.This information has informed the health system's staffing plan, allowing it to reduce reliance on costly, temporary travel labor—and reducing labor expenses by approximately $40 million to date, according to Barazsu.
Rather than viewing the hospitals within Duke's system as independent entities, a tech Command Center has enabled leadership to get the full picture, she added. The system can now move patients from one hospital to another more quickly, allowing it to free up bed space and accept more transfers from other health systems.
"We're not relying on word of mouth or pagers or systems that don't work well," Barazsu told Newsweek. "There's one source of truth."
Staff coordinate care inside UMass Memorial Health's new Digital Hub.
Staff coordinate care inside UMass Memorial Health's new Digital Hub.
UMass Memorial Health
While some health systems are partnering with a tech provider like GE, others are developing internal solutions to manage demand—and to keep tabs on a broadening menu of digital services.
UMass Memorial Health has been on the forefront of the digital revolution, according to Dr. Eric Alper, its vice president, chief quality and chief clinical informatics officer. The health system was an early adopter of electronic intensive care unit (eICU) technology, which allows ICU staff to virtually connect with a critical care physician on overnight shifts.
But a lot has changed since the advent of eICU tech about two decades ago, Alper told Newsweek. UMass Memorial used to run the service from a basement. Eventually it was supporting 150 critical care beds across the enterprise, and it was time for an upgrade.
The health system recently stood up a new Digital Hub, a 20,000-square-foot home for its eICU services, and several other virtual programs, including interpreter services, remote video monitoring, mobile integrated health, "ED at Home," primary care and the Transfer and Access Center, which coordinates the comings and goings of patients across UMass Memorial hospitals.
It might sound paradoxical to move virtual services to a physical location, but centralizing these operations has allowed for better communication, according to Alper, "We're collaborating more effectively by being in the same space, and that's allowing us to reduce some of the silos."
An urgent care provider conducts a virtual visit from Sanford Health's Virtual Care Center.
An urgent care provider conducts a virtual visit from Sanford Health's Virtual Care Center.
Sanford Health
Across the country in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, leaders at Sanford Health shared similar goals. The system stood up its own 60,000-square-foot Virtual Care Center in November, funded by a $350 million gift from its namesake Denny Sanford.
In April, Newsweek followed up on the initiative with Dr. Dave Newman, Sanford's chief medical officer of virtual care.
"One of the biggest things that the Virtual Care Center has done for Sanford is it emphasized the validity of virtual care and digital health," Newman told Newsweek. "The investment in the center and the space has shown that it's permanent, that this is what we're doing to help our patients, not just today or tomorrow but also 20 years from now."
For Watts at Children's Mercy Kansas City, one incident stands out as a testament to the tech Command Center's importance. Anytime there is a mass casualty event, nearby hospitals need to prepare 20 percent of their beds to accept new patients. That's a challenge for most hospitals, given their daily capacity constraints—but when a shooter opened fire on the Kansas City Chiefs' Super Bowl parade in February 2024, Children's Mercy was able to respond.
"This occurred a mile from our children's hospital, and we had no idea up front how many victims we would be receiving," Watts said, "but we were able to use the results of [Command Center predictive] modeling to get us to a point where, yes, we could take 20 percent of our beds and treat all of the victims that may be coming through our doors."
She's excited to see hospitals' virtual command centers and digital services grow, saying, "I think we have opened the Pandora's box here."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill Backing RFK Jr., Elon Musk Priority
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Bernie Sanders is leading a new bill to address a key priority of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who serves as President Donald Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary. Why It Matters Sanders, a Vermont independent, alongside Senator Angus King, a Maine independent, introduced the "End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act," which, if passed, would ban prescription drug advertising on TV, radio, print and digital platforms as well as social media. Critics say these ads contribute to the high price of healthcare while doing little to improve care in the United States, though proponents say the advertisements can improve patients' knowledge of healthcare. Most wealthy countries, with the U.S. and New Zealand being two notable exceptions, ban pharmaceutical drug advertisements. The bill also represents an issue where Sanders, viewed as perhaps the most progressive senator, has found common ground with Kennedy inside the Trump administration, though the secretary has not commented on this bill specifically. What to Know Sanders and King announced the legislation on Thursday, highlighting that the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $5 billion on TV ads in 2024 and that many of these drugs cost more in the U.S. than in other countries that do not allow drug companies to run ads on TV. "The American people are sick and tired of greedy pharmaceutical companies spending billions of dollars on absurd TV commercials pushing their outrageously expensive prescription drugs," Sanders said, describing the fact that the U.S. stands mostly alone in allowing pharmaceutical ads as an "international embarrassment." vSenator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, questions U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a committee hearing on May 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C. vSenator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, questions U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a committee hearing on May 14, 2025 in Washington, director of communications Anna Bahr confirmed to Newsweek his office has reached out to Republicans to join the bill. Bahr pointed to lobbying from the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries as to why the U.S. has not joined other countries in bannign the ads. "Over the past 25 years, the drug companies have spent $8.5 billion on lobbying. Today, they have some 1,800 well-paid lobbyists in Washington, D.C. – including former leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties," she said in a statement to Newsweek. "Unbelievably, that is more than three lobbyists for every member of Congress. During that same period, they have provided over $700 million in campaign contributions. And they are equal opportunity contributors. They contribute heavily to both Republican and Democratic candidates." Secretary Kennedy—as well as Elon Musk, who previously served in Trump's administration—have expressed support for ending pharmaceutical advertising. "Let's get President Trump back in the White House and me to DC so we can ban pharmaceutical advertising," Kennedy wrote in a post to X (formerly Twitter) on November 3, 2024. During his own presidential campaign, Kennedy said he would have issued an executive order ending the advertisements on his first day in office. Newsweek reached out to DHS for comment via the department's press contact form. Caleb Alexander, professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek that while a potential ban's impact on drug prices remains uunclear, there would be benefits to ending these advertisements. Pharmaceutical advertisements can drive up "inappropriate demand" for prescription drugs in settings where they may not be needed, he said. "In terms of the potential benefits of banning [direct-to-consumer advertisements], the most immediate and likely is that it would temper demand for products in settings where they may not be needed," Alexander said. The U.S. has "evolved to believe" the benefits of the ads, such as empowering patients to identify health concerns, outweigh the risks, though much of the research on the topic indicates that the benefits may not be worth the drawbacks, he said. What People Are Saying Alexander told Newsweek: "Direct to consumer advertising has been a lightning rod for controversy, and it remains a curious and unique feature of the U.S. marketplace. While a ban on direct advertising may be welcomed by many, it's not going to fundamentally transform the marketplace for prescription drugs in the United States, simply because DTCA is highly concentrated among a small number of products. It may be a reasonable political and public health target, but I think that if you just look at the way the dollars flow, there's vastly more money spent on marketing drugs to prescribers." Senator Angus King wrote in a statement: "The widespread use of direct-to-consumer advertising by pharmaceutical companies drives up costs and doesn't necessarily make patients healthier. The End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act would prohibit direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs to protect people. This bill is a great step to ensure that patients are getting the best information possible and from the right source: their providers and not biased advertisements." Elon Musk wrote to X in November 2024: "No advertising for pharma." What Happens Next It's unclear whether a majority of senators are also in support of the bill. So far, Democratic Senators Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Peter Welch of Vermont, Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Dick Durbin of Illinois have co-sponsored the bill, according to Sanders' office.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Most Women Can Spot 'Toxic Masculinity' After This Many Dates
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Roughly 79 percent of women said they could spot "toxic masculinity" as early as the third date in a new study, which also found that nearly 7 in 10 said there was a growing emotional divide between men and women. Why It Matters Toxic masculinity generally refers to harmful beliefs and behaviors related to masculine ideals taken to the extreme. The phrase can include a wide array of behavior, from actions to dominate and harm women to homophobia, pushing down emotions and being overly aggressive and competitive with other men. As increasing numbers of Americans stay single and women have become financially independent from men today, any hint of toxic masculinity on an early date could be a dealbreaker. Its overall impact on dating culture could also lead to long-term tension between the sexes. What To Know Toxic masculinity is seen as a deal-breaker for many women, according to Match's Singles in America study of 75,000 singles. Among all singles, the traits most closely associated with healthy masculinity were kindness and empathy (34 percent), and nearly 8 in 10 women said they could spot toxic masculinity by the third date. Nearly 70 percent of women said the emotional divide is growing between the genders. The lived experiences of men and women in dating can have stark contrasts. A third of single men said women assume they're only interested in sex, and one in four feel unfairly labeled commitment-phobic. "It's understandable that women are turned off by toxic masculinity right now. The feminist movement is being eroded by a historic backlash against the #MeToo movement. We are in scary times for sure," Dr. Wendy Walsh, a relationship expert from DatingAdvice, told Newsweek. "However, can we please slow the roll on the toxic masculinity finger pointing? Ladies, please! Every male behavior isn't toxic. It may just be, well, it may just be a masculine trait. Now, I'm not saying that toxic masculinity doesn't exist, nor that it doesn't hurt women. It's there and it does. But is it overdiagnosed? For sure." On the other hand, many women felt misjudged as only looking for a provider over a partner, and often felt men believed they were looking for hookups over a meaningful connection. File photo of a man and woman dining in New York City's Bryant Park on August 13, 2021. File photo of a man and woman dining in New York City's Bryant Park on August 13, the growing gap between men and women, singles are more likely to believe in love now than they were in 2014. The belief in love at first sight nearly doubled from 34 percent to 60 percent in that time frame, and 73 percent of all singles still believe in forever love. Roughly seven in 10 even said they believe in destiny when it comes to relationships. "Today's singles are rejecting the one-size-fits-all approach to dating," Garcia said. "The human desire for love has not changed, but the ways in which single adults pursue and prioritize it are radically evolving." The study also found that nearly half of singles in their 40s were having sex at least once a month, and 93 percent said sexual compatibility and chemistry are key factors in romantic relationships. "By their 40s, many singles have outgrown the pressure to perform or conform," said Dr. Amanda Gesselman, director of Sex and Relationship Science at Match, in a statement. "They know what they like, and they're unapologetic about it. For them, sex isn't about experimentation, it's about refinement." Still, 47 percent of all singles reported feeling burned out by dating, and 54 percent feel drained by the modern dating scene. What People Are Saying Dr. Wendy Walsh, a relationship expert from DatingAdvice, told Newsweek: "It is important that women notice when a man feels threatened by a woman's power and attempts to compensate through bragging, intimidation, and that age-old psychological trick that many men use—putting down a woman to undermine her self-esteem." Dr. Justin Garcia, chief scientific adviser to Match and executive director of the Kinsey Institute, said in a statement: "There's a disconnect between the way many people define masculinity, and how men and people who date men want them to show up in relationships. Kindness and empathy are universally desired traits when it comes to finding a romantic partner, and this year they rose even higher up the rankings. Emotional depth, among both men and women, is incredibly valuable as singles search for someone they can reliably weather the storms of life with." What Happens Next For some women, toxic masculinity might be confused with a desire for traditional gender roles, Walsh said. "Gender roles are learned within families, and there are still plenty of men who need a little nudge and education in this area to make things feel fair at home. But I think it's an overreach to call a man like this 'toxic' when he's just been conditioned by his family of origin," Walsh said. However, Walsh said far more men than women are diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder, with up to 7 percent of men potentially having the disorder. Since narcissists tend to be the "poster boys" for toxic masculinity, it makes sense why women are on guard, Walsh said. However, there are still differences between genders that may need to be understood before establishing a healthy relationship, she added. "Just like in politics, I think men and women need move closer to the middle. It's unrealistic to hope your boyfriend will think and feel just like a girlfriend," Walsh said. "You can marry a girlfriend if you like. We all need to understand that there are documented sex brain differences. Understanding, male psychology would help many women in their dating lives just as it is incumbent on men to learn how women think, feel and behave. The best relationships happen when partners have curiosity and empathy for each other."
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Assisted Dying Laws Across US
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New York has recently joined a number of other U.S. states that have made assisted dying legal. The state's Senate approved a bill on Monday allowing constituents with terminal diagnoses to end their lives on their own terms, and the legislation is now headed to Governor Kathy Hochul for her to sign into law. There are currently 10 states, as well as the District of Columbia, that have passed laws making medical assistance in dying (MAID) legal, according to Death With Dignity, and a number of others are considering similar legislation this year. Why It Matters Assisted dying laws are extremely divisive and are being considered and sworn into law in various countries across the globe. Those in favor say the legislation allows terminally ill individuals to seek medical assistance in ending their lives under specific conditions, promoting personal autonomy and a relief from suffering. Critics have voiced concern over suicide contagion, a phenomenon where increased exposure to suicide is believed to trigger suicidal behavior in others, and what the legislation means for the deaths of patients struggling with depression. What To Know In the U.S., California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington all have legislation in place that enables those in the states to access MAID. Oregon was one of the first countries in the world to establish this form of support for patients and did so in 1997. Since then, other assisted dying laws in the country have utilized the state's legal framework for their own MAID legislation, according to the BBC. New York is not the only state that has been eyeing such legislation, as more than 15 other states have also been deliberating MAID laws this year. These states include Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Tennessee. In America, for a patient to have access to medically assisted dying, they typically have to be terminally ill and expected to die within six months, under the terms of the "Death with Dignity Act," according to an Oregon government report. They must also be over the age of 18 and capable of making and communicating health care decisions. A patient's request to access MAID services must also be approved by two doctors, and their request must be witnessed by two adults, who have no claim to any form of inheritance in the incidence of the patient's death. Should they feel it necessary, the doctors can refer the patient for a psychiatric evaluation. While MAID laws remain divisive, a Gallup poll conducted last year found that seven in 10 Americans, so 71 percent, believed medical doctors should be "allowed by law to end a patient's life by some painless means if the patient and his or her family request it." What People Are Saying Professor Thaddeus Mason Pope, a professor of law at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Minnesota, told Newsweek: "Millions of Americans die every year. Hospice and palliative care can address the physical and existential suffering of most but not all dying patients. MAID is for the small subset whose suffering is refractory to other measures." He added: "Nearly 20 states considered MAID legislation in 2025, and many of these bills made significant progress passing one or both legislative chambers. While fewer than 1 percent use MAID, nearly 75 percent of the public want to have this option. Decades of experience in other states shows a solid patient safety track record. Generally blue states pass MAID legislation and red ones do not. Few expect to see MAID authorized in the South or even the Midwest except for Illinois and Minnesota." Alan Meisel, professor of law Emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pennsylvania, told Newsweek: "Assisted dying laws allow people who are near the end of life to die in a dignified fashion, without being hooked up to medical machinery which only extends the process of dying, often in a painful way. People have understood how undignified the dying process can be and are seeking to implement laws that have proved highly successful in other states and countries." He added: "The states that have been hesitant to enact such laws are often those with large populations of people whose religious beliefs hold that a scintilla of life, no matter how painful or undignified, must be preserved at all costs. These people are often not in the majority but can be very vocal in opposing such laws and therefore state legislators can be reluctant to enact such laws, even though a majority may support them, because they are afraid of damage to their political careers." What Happens Next As a significant number of states are set to discuss possible MAID legislation in the coming months, there could be an increase in the legalization of the practice in America.
