Can AI teach us anything about our subconscious? I offered up my dreams to find out
Some say that talking about your dreams is boring, but personally I think otherworldly nocturnal escapades provide far richer fodder for small talk than the footy season or this unseasonal weather. Sadly, not everyone agrees. That's why, when I hear about an AI dream interpretation app, I'm seduced by the potential for a captive, preternaturally intelligent assistant to help me decipher the more baffling corners of my psyche.
AI chatbots such as ChatGPT have a well-known tendency to riff and exaggerate with alarming confidence, but their verbose nature feels well-suited to the free form and highly associative task of dream analysis. Admittedly, trading little understood fragments of our slumbering minds to a tech startup in return for spiritual guidance sounds like the foreboding premise of a terrifying sci-fi horror movie. But the app's fine print promises that dreams are stored 'safely and privately'. Who am I to let an intuitive aversion to welcoming the machine into the last private vestiges of my consciousness get in the way of a good story?
I download the app, punch in a recent, seemingly benign dream – I visit the supermarket to complain about a 'defective condiment', an apathetic checkout worker dismisses my concerns, and I brazenly spread stolen peanut butter on a piece of toast – and hit the 'interpret' magic wand. 'Dreaming ties all mankind together,' the app responds, spouting Jack Kerouac like a bad Tinder date, before proposing that my dream might allude to feelings of dissatisfaction and powerlessness, as well as a desire to assert myself. It's convincing, if uninspired. A clear-eyed analysis of my dream scenario with none of the hallucinatory fervour I came here for.
Hoping to elicit deeper revelations, I goad the AI with some more troubling vignettes. In one, I'm ostensibly helping the police to catch a murderer, while secretly sending him flirtatious texts, seemingly playing them both. The app sees an inner conflict between morality and an attraction to danger. In another, I'm lost, manically careening through a hotel in search of my husband and baby; I pass a heaving dancefloor, a woman making strange, guttural noises, and an idyllic beach that, upon closer inspection, is just a mirage. Apparently, all this rich imagery amounts to a potential conflict between my own desires and societal expectations. Gentle food for thought, but hardly illuminating.
To the developers' credit, the AI is annoyingly even-keeled: it avoids absolutes, reminds me that dreams have multiple meanings and recommends therapy should my dreams begin to get the better of me.
The only thing that catches me off guard are the strange, AI-generated visuals; the hotel quest conjures a pair of dancing potatoes and the inexplicable phrase 'PLE8T PABET'. In contrast, when I share this dream with an in-person community of dream enthusiasts, their insights are genuinely surprising, from noting my strong sense of purpose throughout the quest to observing how unease in a hotel setting evokes films such as The Shining and Lost in Translation.
While the app doesn't exactly shatter and rebuild my sense of self, it has some handy functionalities, such as the ability to identify and search recurring symbols in your dreams. (Try filtering years of handwritten journals for 'mother'.) And it's certainly convenient to grasp for my phone to catch fleeting, early-morning dream fragments, though I still find myself transcribing these digitised dreams back into my diary.
Part of the pleasure of traversing my dreamscape is the ritual element of morning pages over a coffee. The warm glow of the screen kills the romance, especially as I invariably end up on another corner of my phone, spiritually further away from any potential revelations. Perhaps my dream practice is meant to be tactile and reflective, rather than efficient and gamified.
Days later, while I'm pondering what might be lost to humanity should we collectively opt to train algorithms on these sacred messages from our psyches (and wondering what I might inadvertently reveal about myself in writing this article), I have a vivid, alarming dream. I'm standing in front of an audience, preparing to do a presentation on dreams, when a figure from my past interrupts and threatens to read from the dream journal I've carelessly left on my seat. Filled with rage, I force him to recite from his own dream diary, which he does in a silly goblin voice. 'Don't you like me any more? I thought you once loved me?' he presses. The AI interpretation confirms what I already know: my dreams are shy, demure and resolute that at least some of my private interior landscape should remain that way.
In the coming days, my dreams cease entirely, giving the eerie sense that my subconscious is on strike, refusing to clock back on until I promise not to sell it out to AI. Unable to conceive of the drudgery of a life without dreams, I delete the app and any trace of my dream data with it. I uploaded my dreams to AI and all I got was the revelation that my subconscious is a tech-averse luddite.
Tara Kenny is an arts and culture writer based in Naarm/Melbourne
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
I tested out ‘the best ChatGPT hack' after fashion fans reveal how they can always get discount on their clothes
THE cost of living crisis has everyone keeping a close eye on their spending, especially when it comes to life's little luxuries. But every now and then, you might need to treat yourself or buy something new, and with prices as they are, it can be a bit daunting. 2 Savvy shoppers, however, have discovered a clever way to snag discounts every time they shop - and it couldn't be easier. While many people rely on Googling discount codes, this often means wading through endless websites, squinting at the fine print, and sharing your personal details, only to find the code doesn't even work. But some deal hunters have uncovered a much simpler trick. One shopper, known as ' linzooutloud ' on TikTok, shared a clever money-saving tip that's taking the internet by storm. The secret? Using ChatGPT. She claimed it was 'the best ChatGPT hack.' ChatGPT is an AI tool designed to help with all sorts of tasks, from answering questions to offering suggestions. It's like having your own virtual assistant that understands your queries and provides helpful responses - perfect for making shopping easier and potentially cheaper. According to shoppers, all you need to do is type in the company or retailer's name, the month and year, and ask for an active discount code. They claim it scans the internet for you, finding codes in seconds. Many users are calling the hack 'life-changing' and a 'game changer' for their shopping experience. So, naturally, I decided to put it to the test. Trying out a range of shops and sites, I found it's definitely worth a go - even if it doesn't always work. Since it's so quick to search, it only takes a few seconds. First, I searched for general discount codes, simply entering 'activated discount codes for June 2025,' and the results were impressive. ChatGPT provided a wide variety of codes across fashion brands like Next, BloomChic, and True Classic; technology and electronics, including Temu and HP; and home and lifestyle options for sites like eBay and AliExpress. When I narrowed down my search to clothing, it got even more specific, offering codes for ASOS, JD Sports, Boohoo, River Island, M&S, and Fashion Nova. But it didn't stop there. I tested discount codes for medical items, including weight loss jabs like Ozempic and Monjaro, and found plenty of options from reputable online pharmacies. After trying out a few, they worked seamlessly. As for fashion codes, the success rate was more mixed. While many worked well, codes for Marks & Spencer, Next, and River Island weren't recognised. It's easy to see why this trend is going viral on TikTok – it's a quick and simple way to potentially save a few extra quid on your purchases. Even if it doesn't work every time, it's worth a shot for the chance to avoid paying full price. How to get cheaper broadband if you're on Universal Credit MANY people in the UK are unable to afford internet access - here is help available if you're struggling to make ends meet while claiming Universal Credit.. Several internet companies provide special discounted rates for customers who are on Universal Credit or other benefits. BT offers a basic phone and broadband package for households that claim certain benefits. You could be eligible to get the cheaper broadband deal if you get one of the following benefits: Income Support Income-based Jobseeker's Allowance Pensions Credit (Guaranteed Credit) Employment and Support Allowance (Income related) Universal Credit (and are on zero earnings) The monthly phone line rental costs £5.16, and includes free weekend calls for up to an hour to 0845 and 0870 numbers. It also comes with a call allowance of £1.50 and a £10 monthly price cap. You can add broadband to the BT Basic line for £10.07. The price cap means that no matter how many calls you make, the most you'll pay each month is £15.16 or £20.07 with broadband, if you keep with the eligible calls included within the price cap. If you make fewer calls it will be less and you can choose to have either monthly or quarterly bills. Virgin Media also offers a cheaper deal for people on Universal Credit. However, the £15 a month Virgin Essentials offer is only available to existing customers - but it could be a good option if you're already signed up and are looking to reduce your costs. It is a 30-day rolling contract so you can switch back to your usual service when and if you're ready to. The broadband deal doesn't come with a phone line, and there's no way of adding one, so this probably isn't the right deal for you if you need a landline for emergencies. Other cheaper options include Hyperoptic's Fair Fibre plan, which offers benefits claimants money off broadband packages, and customers in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire could get a good deal with KCOM. It's important to shop around when you're looking for a new broadband deal as other internet packages could be more suited to your needs. You should use a price comparison website to find the best fit for your budget.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Revealed: Thousands of UK university students caught cheating using AI
Thousands of university students in the UK have been caught misusing ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools in recent years, while traditional forms of plagiarism show a marked decline, a Guardian investigation can reveal. A survey of academic integrity violations found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, equivalent to 5.1 for every 1,000 students. That was up from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23. Figures up to May suggest that number will increase again this year to about 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students – but recorded cases represent only the tip of the iceberg, according to experts. The data highlights a rapidly evolving challenge for universities: trying to adapt assessment methods to the advent of technologies such as ChatGPT and other AI-powered writing tools. In 2019-20, before the widespread availability of generative AI, plagiarism accounted for nearly two-thirds of all academic misconduct. During the pandemic, plagiarism intensified as many assessments moved online. But as AI tools have become more sophisticated and accessible, the nature of cheating has changed. The survey found that confirmed cases of traditional plagiarism fell from 19 per 1,000 students to 15.2 in 2023-24 and is expected to fall again to about 8.5 per 1,000, according to early figures from this academic year. The Guardian contacted 155 universities under the Freedom of Information Act requesting figures for proven cases of academic misconduct, plagiarism and AI misconduct in the last five years. Of these, 131 provided some data – though not every university had records for each year or category of misconduct. More than 27% of responding universities did not yet record AI misuse as a separate category of misconduct in 2023-24, suggesting the sector is still getting to grips with the issue. Many more cases of AI cheating may be going undetected. A survey by the Higher Education Policy Institute in February found 88% of students used AI for assessments. Last year, researchers at the University of Reading tested their own assessment systems and were able to submit AI-generated work without being detected 94% of the time. Dr Peter Scarfe, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Reading and co-author of that study, said there had always been ways to cheat but that the education sector would have to adapt to AI, which posed a fundamentally different problem. He said: 'I would imagine those caught represent the tip of the iceberg. AI detection is very unlike plagiarism, where you can confirm the copied text. As a result, in a situation where you suspect the use of AI, it is near impossible to prove, regardless of the percentage AI that your AI detector says (if you use one). This is coupled with not wanting to falsely accuse students. 'It is unfeasible to simply move every single assessment a student takes to in-person. Yet at the same time the sector has to acknowledge that students will be using AI even if asked not to and go undetected.' Students who wish to cheat undetected using generative AI have plenty of online material to draw from: the Guardian found dozens of videos on TikTok advertising AI paraphrasing and essay writing tools to students. These tools help students bypass common university AI detectors by 'humanising' text generated by ChatGPT. Dr Thomas Lancaster, an academic integrity researcher at Imperial College London, said: 'When used well and by a student who knows how to edit the output, AI misuse is very hard to prove. My hope is that students are still learning through this process.' Harvey* has just finished his final year of a business management degree at a northern English university. He told the Guardian he had used AI to generate ideas and structure for assignments and to suggest references, and that most people he knows used the tool to some extent. 'ChatGPT kind of came along when I first joined uni, and so it's always been present for me,' he said. 'I don't think many people use AI and then would then copy it word for word, I think it's more just generally to help brainstorm and create ideas. Anything that I would take from it, I would then rework completely in my own ways. 'I do know one person that has used it and then used other methods of AI where you can change it and humanise it so that it writes AI content in a way that sounds like it's come from a human.' Amelia* has just finished her first year of a music business degree at a university in the south-west. She said she had also used AI for summarising and brainstorming, but that the tools had been most useful for people with learning difficulties. 'One of my friends uses it, not to write any of her essays for her or research anything, but to put in her own points and structure them. She has dyslexia – she said she really benefits from it.' The science and technology secretary, Peter Kyle, told the Guardian recently that AI should be deployed to 'level up' opportunities for dyslexic children. Technology companies appear to be targeting students as a key demographic for AI tools. Google offers university students a free upgrade of its Gemini tool for 15 months, and OpenAI offers discounts to college students in the US and Canada. Lancaster said: 'University-level assessment can sometimes seem pointless to students, even if we as educators have good reason for setting this. This all comes down to helping students to understand why they are required to complete certain tasks and engaging them more actively in the assessment design process. 'There's often a suggestion that we should use more exams in place of written assessments, but the value of rote learning and retained knowledge continues to decrease every year. I think it's important that we focus on skills that can't easily be replaced by AI, such as communication skills, people skills, and giving students the confidence to engage with emerging technology and to succeed in the workplace.' A government spokesperson said it was investing more than £187m in national skills programmes and had published guidance on the use of AI in schools. They said: 'Generative AI has great potential to transform education and provides exciting opportunities for growth through our plan for change. However, integrating AI into teaching, learning and assessment will require careful consideration and universities must determine how to harness the benefits and mitigate the risks to prepare students for the jobs of the future.' *Names have been changed.
Fashion United
2 days ago
- Fashion United
Luxury and AI: Are superhuman customer advisors on the horizon?
With the emergence of chatbot applications driven by artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or Gemini, web browsing and search habits have evolved considerably. The effectiveness of these tools and the new behaviours they induce have influenced purchases and raised the expectations of luxury brand consumers to a higher level of demand in terms of customer experience. This was a major development to which brands are adapting by redefining the standards of excellence in their customer service. Yet, only few high-end fashion marketplaces or luxury brand e-shops have deployed a customer service that fully satisfied their buyers. This was one of the first conclusions drawn from a new Boston Consulting Group (BCG) study on Customer Experience and AI in Luxury. According to this document, 56 percent of respondents stated they were not satisfied with their luxury shopping experience. Luxury customers interviewed in the survey expressed their frustration at having to enter their personal data several times and stated they did not feel recognised or valued when customer advisors had no knowledge of their preferences. They also indicated impersonal and inconsistent follow-up and engagement from advisors after purchase. Today, most customers (64 percent) still made their purchases in-store, but the share of online purchases increased: 38 percent of customers stated that they shopped more online for luxury goods than three to five years ago. In addition, the study pointed out that even when the final purchase took place in-store, luxury customers spent time researching and planning from their screens. According to BCG experts, brands had no choice but to implement AI within their teams to design new operating models that would give customer advisors new capabilities. "Customer advisors become "superhuman" thanks to instant access to customer information, proactive suggestions and the ability to write personalised communications," the study stated. The full implementation of AI as a full member of the team would thus make it possible to offer exceptional customer service on a large scale. However, the dose of artificial intelligence used would always have to be used with a great deal of common sense so that the aura of luxury was maintained and the service did not fall into robotisation. Finally, with extensive personalisation resulting from the collection and processing of vast quantities of customer data, brands would have to ensure they did not lose consumer trust through the use of data deemed too intrusive. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@
