Votes at 16 won't necessarily benefit Labour
The only trouble is: has Labour made a fatal miscalculation in assuming that 16- and 17-year-olds will vote for the party? It is received wisdom that the young are more idealistic and left-wing than older people – as per the adage often attributed to Winston Churchill (possibly because of his own political transformation): if you are not liberal at 20 you have no heart, and if you are not a conservative at 40 you have no head. Moreover, it is certainly true that in recent elections age has been a very strong determinant of how people vote: the younger a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Labour; the older a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Conservative.
But will that relationship still hold for 16- and 17-year-olds? There have not been many polls asking for the opinions of this age group, but those held over the past year or so ought to fire a strong warning shot over Labour's bows. They appear to confirm a reluctance to vote Tory among young voters, but also suggest that Reform is remarkably popular among this cohort. A JL Partners poll from July last year suggested that 39 per cent would vote Labour, 23 per cent Reform, 18 per cent Green, 9 per cent Liberal Democrat and just 5 per cent Conservative. That, however, was in the week of the last general election, before Starmer and his government had had a chance to become unpopular.
Another poll was conducted by Find Out Now in February this year. It ought to be emphasised that it didn't ask 16- and 17-year-olds directly for their voting intentions but instead asked their parents how they thought their children would vote – so it is not necessarily the most reliable of polls. It is also worth adding that today's announcement will have no effect on current 16- and 17-year-olds, as they will all be over 18 by the next election anyway; it is today's 13- and 14-year-olds for whom this will make a difference.
Putting that aside, the Find Out Now poll suggested support for Reform at 30 per cent, level with Labour. The Greens were on 17 per cent, the Lib Dems 9 per cent and the Conservatives 7 per cent. The poll also suggested that just over half of 16- and 17-year-olds think immigration is too high – which may help explain their favourability toward Nigel Farage's party.
Overall, both polls suggest that received ideas about how 16- and 17-year-olds will vote may be biased towards the views of middle-class students. We think of young people as being woke and left-wing because we hear an awful lot about the antics of student activists. Yet half the population do not go to university and may well be less motivated by woke ideas than by the fear that migrants are taking some of their potential job opportunities.
The expansion of the franchise to 16- and 17-year-olds could end up being a very big problem for Labour if it means losing the votes of the working-class young. It is also worth noting the strong attraction of the Greens to young voters; that, too, could detract from Labour's vote.
The big losers from votes for 16- and 17-year-olds look like being the Conservatives and also the Lib Dems. In times past, the latter used to cultivate young votes through conference votes to legalise dope and the like. But they no longer seem to be cutting through; they have become a party of the middle-aged and middle-class. As to who the winners will turn out to be, that is harder to answer. But it is certainly not guaranteed to be Labour; on the contrary, it could conceivably help Reform into power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
ANGELA RAYNER: 'National Minimum Wage was a lifeline for me and other low-paid workers'
Deputy PM Angela Rayner writes for The Mirror as the Low Pay Commission begins its annual work to consult with employers, trade unions and workers on the National Minimum Wage Like many Mirror readers, I know what it's like to graft every day just to cover the bills – but still struggle to make ends meet. As a young single mum, I worked long night shifts as a home help on low pay to get me and my young family through the week. That's why the National Minimum Wage - launched by the last Labour government - was such a lifeline for me and for other low paid workers. It put more money in my pocket and gave me the security and opportunity I needed to get on in life. But after 14 years of Tory failure, stagnation and decline that's no longer the reality for millions of hardworking people across the country who simply cannot afford to get by. This Labour government was elected a year ago on a promise to Make Work Pay. Which is why, within weeks of taking office we told the Low Pay Commission to consider the cost of living for the first time when setting the National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage. As a result, more than 3 million workers got an inflation busting boost to their pay packets from April, worth up to £1,400 a year. This helped raise living standards for the lowest paid who are the backbone of our economy. It also delivered a record cash increase for young people and apprentices – our skilled workers of tomorrow. And today, alongside my friend the Business Secretary, I will urge the Low Pay Commission to build on this success by pushing even further to make a genuine living wage a reality. We want to continue narrowing the pay gap for 18 to 20-year-olds as we move closer to setting a single rate for all adult workers in the years to come. This is our Plan for Change in action. This our promise to Make Work Pay. But it doesn't stop there. This is a government on the side of working people. You are at the heart of our landmark Employment Rights Bill, now going through Parliament. This Bill will tackle the low wages, job insecurity and poor conditions that working people face. It will bring stronger protections against unfair sackings, make sure workers get paid sick pay from day one, and stop you being threatened with dismissal for refusing to take lower pay. And it will guarantee hours and make work more flexible and family-friendly – benefits that will support business by creating a healthier, more productive workforce. Unelected Tory and Lib Dem Lords, cheered on by Nigel Farage and Reform are trying to block these rights in Parliament. But this Labour Government was elected by you to deliver them, and we will not let them get away with it. These historic reforms consulted with employers and trade unions are pro-worker, pro-business and pro-growth. So, if you are in casual work without guaranteed hours, if you are working hard on low pay but can't afford the essentials. Or if you want a country that is fairer for working people - then this Labour government is working for you. And we will keep on delivering.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Without real deterrence, any plan to tackle illegal migration will fail
SIR – Once again, Labour is looking at the problem of small-boat Channel crossings from the wrong end of the telescope. Instead of allocating an extra £100 million to the National Crime Agency to target people smugglers ( August 4), there has to be a concerted effort to address the reasons why so many want to come to Britain in the first place. Deterrence must be the starting point. This should include: a reduction in the benefits payable, and immediate cessation if an asylum claim is rejected; strategic and operational action to prevent illegal working; changes in the law to prevent endless appeals against asylum refusal; immediate deportation of failed claimants (as well as visa overstayers); safe but basic housing as an alternative to hotels; and tougher criteria to determine asylum eligibility. Until such action is taken, I confidently predict that the additional funds won't make an iota of difference. Peter Higgins West Wickham, Kent SIR – The Government has pledged more money to help with the 'one in, one out' scheme agreed with France last month, which is still only at the pilot stage. After a year in office, it continues to make things up as it goes along. Sir Keir Starmer's promise to 'smash the gangs' rings as hollow as ever. Charles Penfold Ulverston, Cumbria SIR – I am increasingly alarmed by the Government's handling of mass migration. Britain is absorbing large numbers of people without adequate checks, long-term planning or public consent. British taxpayers are funding accommodation, welfare and legal aid for individuals who, in some cases, have criminal records. Meanwhile, the needs of law-abiding citizens are being sidelined. There is a growing perception that we, the British public, are being unfairly treated for raising concerns. We are scrutinised, silenced and stretched thin, while individuals arriving illegally are afforded leniency and protection. Many no longer feel safe in their own communities, and public services are at breaking point. This is not sustainable – morally, socially or economically. The Government must urgently reassert control of our borders, enforce meaningful vetting and put the rights and safety of British citizens first. Leila Edwards Thame, Oxfordshire SIR – The RNLI has responded to claims that it has been acting as a 'taxi service' for migrants ('RNLI makes no apology for saving Channel migrants in distress', report, July 30). Anyone who has watched the television series Saving Lives at Sea will be aware of the selfless bravery and expertise of RNLI volunteers. In the case of a sinking dinghy, do the charity's critics expect a lifeboat crew just to take one look and turn around? Marilyn Parrott Altrincham, Cheshire
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Parents beat Labour's VAT on fees raid by paying £500m up front
Parents of children at Britain's leading private schools may have avoided Labour's tax raid by offering up fees in advance. Hundreds of millions of pounds in fees were paid upfront last year to avoid the 20 per cent VAT, which came into effect on January 1, analysis by the Daily Telegraph shows. Britain's top 50 independent schools received £515 million in advance fees last year, up from £121 million in 2023, according to research of the latest annual accounts at Companies House and the Charity Commission. • More than fifty UK private schools shut since Labour put VAT on fees By handing over school fees before Labour's deadline, wealthy parents may have avoided up to £103 million in VAT, with that sum expected to be even higher when taking into account all of the UK's 2,600 private schools. Parents at some schools tried paying up to five years' fees before the January deadline to dodge Labour's tax, the analysis shows. The large scale of advance payments could impact Labour's plan to raise revenue, tax experts have warned. However, the Treasury says that the Office for Budget Responsibility considered the use of prepayment schemes when making its forecasts for how much money would be raised by the VAT raid. Fees gathered from prepayment schemes, which are used to pay for one or more years of a pupil's education in advance, have risen across the UK's most expensive schools, including Brighton College, which recorded £50.1 million in total prepaid fees last year — an increase of £4.1 million from 2023. Only 86 of its pupils were covered by the school's prepayment scheme last year. That figure jumped to 819 last year as parents scrambled to beat the VAT deadline. Eton College collected £52.7 million in advance fee payments last year, up £16.6 million from 2023. At Winchester College, fees collected in advance rose from £4.4 million in 2023 to £19 million in 2024. Labour maintains that its tax raid is aimed at targeting Britain's wealthiest families and will raise more than £1.8 billion a year for state schools in ten years. However, with wealthy parents forking out large sums to Britain's most prestigious schools, it is the smaller private schools that are likely to be affected the most. The government predicts that 100 schools could shut over the next three years, with more than 50 independent schools already announcing their closures as a result of the policy, the Telegraph reports.
