Votes at 16 won't necessarily benefit Labour
The only trouble is: has Labour made a fatal miscalculation in assuming that 16- and 17-year-olds will vote for the party? It is received wisdom that the young are more idealistic and left-wing than older people – as per the adage often attributed to Winston Churchill (possibly because of his own political transformation): if you are not liberal at 20 you have no heart, and if you are not a conservative at 40 you have no head. Moreover, it is certainly true that in recent elections age has been a very strong determinant of how people vote: the younger a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Labour; the older a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Conservative.
But will that relationship still hold for 16- and 17-year-olds? There have not been many polls asking for the opinions of this age group, but those held over the past year or so ought to fire a strong warning shot over Labour's bows. They appear to confirm a reluctance to vote Tory among young voters, but also suggest that Reform is remarkably popular among this cohort. A JL Partners poll from July last year suggested that 39 per cent would vote Labour, 23 per cent Reform, 18 per cent Green, 9 per cent Liberal Democrat and just 5 per cent Conservative. That, however, was in the week of the last general election, before Starmer and his government had had a chance to become unpopular.
Another poll was conducted by Find Out Now in February this year. It ought to be emphasised that it didn't ask 16- and 17-year-olds directly for their voting intentions but instead asked their parents how they thought their children would vote – so it is not necessarily the most reliable of polls. It is also worth adding that today's announcement will have no effect on current 16- and 17-year-olds, as they will all be over 18 by the next election anyway; it is today's 13- and 14-year-olds for whom this will make a difference.
Putting that aside, the Find Out Now poll suggested support for Reform at 30 per cent, level with Labour. The Greens were on 17 per cent, the Lib Dems 9 per cent and the Conservatives 7 per cent. The poll also suggested that just over half of 16- and 17-year-olds think immigration is too high – which may help explain their favourability toward Nigel Farage's party.
Overall, both polls suggest that received ideas about how 16- and 17-year-olds will vote may be biased towards the views of middle-class students. We think of young people as being woke and left-wing because we hear an awful lot about the antics of student activists. Yet half the population do not go to university and may well be less motivated by woke ideas than by the fear that migrants are taking some of their potential job opportunities.
The expansion of the franchise to 16- and 17-year-olds could end up being a very big problem for Labour if it means losing the votes of the working-class young. It is also worth noting the strong attraction of the Greens to young voters; that, too, could detract from Labour's vote.
The big losers from votes for 16- and 17-year-olds look like being the Conservatives and also the Lib Dems. In times past, the latter used to cultivate young votes through conference votes to legalise dope and the like. But they no longer seem to be cutting through; they have become a party of the middle-aged and middle-class. As to who the winners will turn out to be, that is harder to answer. But it is certainly not guaranteed to be Labour; on the contrary, it could conceivably help Reform into power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
a minute ago
- Leader Live
Starmer has ‘made a mistake' with plan to recognise Palestinian state
The Government last week said it will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, including a ceasefire and a revival of the two-state solution. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister reiterated that Hamas must release the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and play no role in the government of Gaza. The Government will then make an assessment in September 'on how far the parties have met these steps', the Prime Minister said. During a visit to a farm in Little Walden, Essex, on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch said she would never agree to recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas is still in power in Gaza. She said: 'Absolutely not. No. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. We should not be creating a new terrorist state. 'This is basic stuff, and I don't understand why Keir Starmer doesn't understand that.' The Tory leader added: 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake. What we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home. 'We've been seeing images of a hostage who looks like he's being starved to death, forced to dig his own grave. This is what Hamas is about. 'Now is not the time to reward them for their atrocities and for the massacre they committed on October 7 by giving them statehood recognition. 'We want to see a two-state solution after a peace settlement done in the right way at the right time. It is not the right thing to do now. 'And I'm not surprised that British hostages like Emily Damari have condemned the Government for the approach they've taken.' Ms Damari, a British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year, has said she believes Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his conditional pledge to recognise Palestine. Mrs Badenoch's comments came as it was announced a protest will take place in London this weekend opposing Sir Keir's plans to recognise Palestine as a state. Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine. Marchers will include the relatives of Avinatan Or, who was kidnapped from the Nova music festival with his girlfriend Noa Argamani. Mr Or's cousin Ariel Felber, from London, said: 'Keir Starmer has failed the hostages and their families by not making it a condition that all the remaining hostages are brought home to their loved ones before he can even entertain talk of state recognition of Palestine. 'He urgently needs to correct this.' Steve Brisley from Bridgend, Wales, whose sister and nieces were murdered on October 7 and his brother-in-law Eli taken hostage, said: 'As British families of hostages and victims, devastated by the ongoing suffering of our loved ones, our emotional torture has been exacerbated by the suggestion that the UK may recognise a Palestinian state without securing the release of the hostages as an absolute precondition. 'This is not about politics. This is about basic humanity.' The family members are expected to be joined by Jewish leaders and other supporters on their National March For The Hostages through central London on Sunday afternoon. Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said on X that Hamas's actions 'must never be rewarded' as she highlighted the plight of one of the hostages, 24-year-old Evyatar David. Hamas released a video on Saturday which showed Mr David looking skeletal and hollow-eyed in a dimly lit Gaza tunnel. Ms Hotovely said: 'He is clearly malnourished and ill-treated. A shadow of his former self, his suffering is unimaginable. 'Like countless others who saw it, I was appalled by the sickening footage of Evyatar being forced to dig his own grave. 'This abhorrent footage shows Hamas for what they are – wicked terrorists who seek to inflict as much death, destruction and suffering on as many Jews and Israelis as they can. Their actions must never be rewarded.'
South Wales Guardian
a minute ago
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer has ‘made a mistake' with plan to recognise Palestinian state
The Government last week said it will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, including a ceasefire and a revival of the two-state solution. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister reiterated that Hamas must release the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and play no role in the government of Gaza. The Government will then make an assessment in September 'on how far the parties have met these steps', the Prime Minister said. During a visit to a farm in Little Walden, Essex, on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch said she would never agree to recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas is still in power in Gaza. She said: 'Absolutely not. No. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. We should not be creating a new terrorist state. 'This is basic stuff, and I don't understand why Keir Starmer doesn't understand that.' The Tory leader added: 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake. What we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home. 'We've been seeing images of a hostage who looks like he's being starved to death, forced to dig his own grave. This is what Hamas is about. 'Now is not the time to reward them for their atrocities and for the massacre they committed on October 7 by giving them statehood recognition. 'We want to see a two-state solution after a peace settlement done in the right way at the right time. It is not the right thing to do now. 'And I'm not surprised that British hostages like Emily Damari have condemned the Government for the approach they've taken.' Ms Damari, a British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year, has said she believes Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his conditional pledge to recognise Palestine. Mrs Badenoch's comments came as it was announced a protest will take place in London this weekend opposing Sir Keir's plans to recognise Palestine as a state. Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine. Marchers will include the relatives of Avinatan Or, who was kidnapped from the Nova music festival with his girlfriend Noa Argamani. Mr Or's cousin Ariel Felber, from London, said: 'Keir Starmer has failed the hostages and their families by not making it a condition that all the remaining hostages are brought home to their loved ones before he can even entertain talk of state recognition of Palestine. 'He urgently needs to correct this.' Steve Brisley from Bridgend, Wales, whose sister and nieces were murdered on October 7 and his brother-in-law Eli taken hostage, said: 'As British families of hostages and victims, devastated by the ongoing suffering of our loved ones, our emotional torture has been exacerbated by the suggestion that the UK may recognise a Palestinian state without securing the release of the hostages as an absolute precondition. 'This is not about politics. This is about basic humanity.' The family members are expected to be joined by Jewish leaders and other supporters on their National March For The Hostages through central London on Sunday afternoon. Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said on X that Hamas's actions 'must never be rewarded' as she highlighted the plight of one of the hostages, 24-year-old Evyatar David. Hamas released a video on Saturday which showed Mr David looking skeletal and hollow-eyed in a dimly lit Gaza tunnel. Ms Hotovely said: 'He is clearly malnourished and ill-treated. A shadow of his former self, his suffering is unimaginable. 'Like countless others who saw it, I was appalled by the sickening footage of Evyatar being forced to dig his own grave. 'This abhorrent footage shows Hamas for what they are – wicked terrorists who seek to inflict as much death, destruction and suffering on as many Jews and Israelis as they can. Their actions must never be rewarded.'
Scottish Sun
2 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Whether you like it or not, Donald Trump has his moments – you can't help admire how gallus he is
A FEW days of Donald Trump all up in your grill and it becomes easier to see why so many Americans have bought into him. The guy was on transmit from the moment he touched down here to visit his two Scottish golf courses until the moment he left. 3 If you tune in long enough, Trump will eventually say something you agree with. Credit: AFP 3 You can't help but admire how gallus he is, writes Bill Leckie Credit: Getty And the fact is that if you tune in long enough, he'll eventually say something you agree with. Sure, you'll have to wade through a morass of childish nonsense to get there. And, yes, chances are it'll be something that bears no relation to the actual subject he's meant to be talking about. But just as a 36-handicap golfer might one day get a hole in one, so Trump has his moments that you find yourself agreeing with, whether you want to or not. Try walking the walk, Nic WEE Nicola says women politicians need to support each other more to combat the levels of abuse highlighted in a new report on gender inequality in politics. You know, the way she reacted to former Prime Minister Theresa May's coughing fit at a Tory conference by turning up on an SNP platform laughing and waving a packet of Strepsils. So, when your electorate has the attention span of an elderly goldfish, and when he repeats so much of what he says in social media snippets . . . well, no wonder he's become a master of the kind of soundbite that sways polls. It's not a healthy way for politics to go. It's the death of reasoned debate at the knifepoint of arrogant bluster. He remains the embodiment of the belief that the longer and louder you keep telling a lie, the quicker it becomes accepted as the truth. It's easy from a pond's width to wonder how someone this transparent has managed to con the world's biggest democracy not once, but twice. Then you see him in action on your own doorstep. And for all that it doesn't make him any less dislike- able, you can't help but admire how gallus he is. Donald Trump hits first ever shot at opening of new Trump North Sea links golf course Busybodies don't give us weather warnings… they give us stupidity warnings AS I write this, it's blowing a gale, but the rain's just stopped and the sun's come out. No, scrub that – it WAS sunny until halfway through that sentence, then it went back to being battleship grey overhead. And now, 40-odd words in, it's hosing down again. In other words, just another Scottish day of four seasons in the blink of an eye. The kind of day when we all used to live by the words of Billy Connolly that there's no such thing as bad weather, only the wrong clothes. The kind of day, sadly, that no longer exists now we've been brainwashed into believing the world's about to end just because it's a little big windier or wetter or hotter than it's meant to be. Welcome to the era of the Weather Event, when anything above a little bit blowy needs to be called a storm and when storms need to be given names. Which is when the problems REALLY start. 3 Welcome to the era of the Weather Event, when anything above a little bit blowy needs to be called a storm Credit: Reuters See, the human brain is brilliant at dealing with everyday stuff that it keeps in its filing cabinets, stuff so normal that it becomes second nature — and in this dreich-ish little country where we live, nothing becomes more second nature-ish than dealing with the climate. Example? You look outside, it's bright and sunny. You go outside and it's deceptively Baltic. You go back in and get a jumper. It's simple as that, Or, at least, it used to be. But now? Suddenly we're losing our minds about something this basic; or, maybe more accurately, the forecasters and the government and all sorts of other busybodies are hell-bent on trying to MAKE us lose our minds. For instance, first thing yesterday there was a statement issued by a guy called Jim Dale from an organisation called British Weather Services which read: 'Remember, this is summertime — and a Bank Holiday in Scotland — so some 'summer articles' in gardens and on beaches are going to be there; slides, picnic tables, swings, all ready to by thrown around by the wind. 'That's the danger we've got at the moment. These warnings are put out for very good reason. 'If you're venturing out, keep away from the forest and keep away from the coastal plain where the sea will be coming in.' Next thing, ScotRail was putting out an appeal for us to 'secure garden furniture, trampolines and tents' so they don't 'blow onto the tracks'. I'm sorry, but these aren't weather warnings. They're STUPIDITY warnings. The perfect example of organisations nannying the life out of us, making out that we're incapable of calculating the simplest decisions that dictate our own comfort and safety. And you know what? Anyone who really is stupid enough to NEED advice like this probably deserves to become a victim of natural selection anyway. If that sounds harsh, good. Because I'm sick of this concept that we need our hand held over so many things as our brain — the most phenomenally-complex and brilliant computer that will ever exist — is somehow considered incapable of understanding what's good and bad for our health. We see it in dumb-as-a-stone food packaging, like the packet of couscous I bought the other day with a picture on the front of a bowl of couscous and the words 'serving suggestion'. We see it in trigger warnings at the start of TV shows made in the Seventies and Eighties which apparently may contain content that doesn't align with how we see things in 2025. We hear it in the pointless apologies from telly and radio sports commentators when an effects microphone picks up some 'bad' language. That one really gets me. I mean, is it really anything we don't hear every day? Can we not make our own minds up about whether we approve or disapprove, about whether or not we want to tut and switch off? Plus, where's the sense in apologising for something that the commentator isn't responsible for? It's all part of this idiotic, scared-of-their-own-shadows attitude that's sweeping through society and which looms over us darker than ever whenever one of these 'weather events' comes around. This isn't to say that Storm Whatever-They-Called-It didn't cause a lot of people some inconvenience, that it didn't disrupt travel or force events to be cancelled or leave damage in its wake. All I'm saying is that this is what the weather's always done, right back to the dawn of time. And that not only have we always survived, but we've learned from it and developed new and better ways of coping. You just wouldn't think so from the way we're mollycoddled through this sort of — and I'm a little sick in my mouth even writing the word — crisis. We're resilient, us humans. Most of us want to get to work no matter what, to push ahead with our leisure plans, to keep the world turning. And 99.999 per cent of us tend not to play frisbee with trampolines near railway lines. But whereas throughout history it's been down to the other 0.001 per cent of the population to either learn NOT to do stupid things or suffer the consequences, today we're all judged by their lack of basic common sense. Anyway, I'm away for the messages now. In shorts, a parka, flip-flops and a balaclava. Because it's great being Scottish. And a little bit mental.
