Franklin Tech and PSU launch tuition-free pathway for vo-tech students
It's a free education for students who want to help build the future.
'Just a tremendous opportunity for some young people that maybe college and a technology degree would have never been possible,' said David Weaver, Joplin Schools School Board member.
Franklin Tech and PSU launch tuition-free pathway for vo-tech students
Controversial council member's transgender comments spark recall effort
Joplin woman charged with child sex crime after minor found in car
Locals say age no excuse to not protest
How does your state spend its lottery earnings?
Leaders of Franklin Technology Center and Pittsburg State University signed an agreement to help students at FTC go to PSU tuition-free.
Up to 10 students a year will qualify for the new 'Crossland College of Technology Enterprise Program.' That will cover the cost of tuition and fees for up to four years.
PSU VP Dr. Karl Stumo is excited about the partnership that crosses state lines.
'We know of the excellence here at Franklin Tech, and we wanted to be a partner with one of the best providers of technical education in the area. So their students are so special, we wanted to develop an equal special relationship here as well,' said Dr. Karl Stumo, PSU VP Student Affairs.
He hopes to see more of those students graduating and staying.
'I think this is a strategy to keep our graduates in the technology and that economic sector in the Four-State region,' said Stumo.
'Hopefully this will help us to grow the enrollment at Franklin Tech and provide more opportunities, and then maybe these partnerships that make us eligible for grants so we're just excited about the possibilities. But it's kind of opening doors. In the past that wouldn't have been possible for our students and that's a win for everyone,' said Weaver.
Students enrolled at FTC next fall will be the first to qualify for the scholarships, which include those pursuing everything from automated manufacturing and auto tech to engineering and HVAC.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
28 minutes ago
- Engadget
Court blocks FTC investigation into Media Matters' alleged scheme against X
The court has blocked the Federal Trade Commission's investigation into Media Matters, the media nonprofit that previously published research showing that ads appeared on X alongside neo-Nazi and other antisemitic content. In 2023, Elon Musk's X filed a lawsuit against the media watchdog following an advertiser exodus. It accused Media Matters of "knowingly and maliciously manufactur[ing] side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp.'s social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white national fringe content." Just this May, the FTC started looking into whether the nonprofit violated antitrust laws by allegedly colluding with advertising and advocacy groups to boycott X. In June, Media Matters sued the FTC, accusing it of unfairly targeting the group in retaliation for past criticisms of X. "The Federal Trade Commission seeks to punish Media Matters for its journalism and speech in exposing matters of substantial public concern — including how has enabled and profited from extremist content that proliferated after Elon Musk took over the platform formerly known as Twitter," the group said at the time. Now, Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan has granted a preliminary injunction in the nonprofit's favor. Sooknanan has agreed with the group that the FTC's investigation is "a retaliatory act" and has noted that it is "likely to succeed on its First Amendment retaliation claim." She wrote in her decision that such probes would deter other reporters from speaking again. "Indeed, the FTC's [investigation] has had its intended effect." Apparently, because of the probe, Media Matters has "decided against pursuing certain stories about the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, and Mr. Musk." "The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration," Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, told The New York Times . "We will continue to stand up and fight for the First Amendment rights that protect every American." As the publication notes, courts had also blocked investigations into the group by the attorneys general in Texas and Missouri. Musk's lawsuits against the nonprofit, however, are still ongoing.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Target Sued In Two Class Actions Over Gift Card Scams
Scammers are big fans of gift cards because they are easy to purchase, easy to send to the scammer and impossible to trace. It is not even necessary for the scammer to be in possession of the actual gift card to use it. Sending the gift card numbers or taking a picture on your phone and transmitting it to the scammer is sufficient for the scammer to use the gift card to buy things that can then be sold and converted into cash. In many instances scammers pose as large companies or government agencies such as the IRS demanding payments. This is called an "imposter scam.' According to the FTC, in 2024 Americans lost $2.95 to imposter scams, second only to investment fraud. In 2021 the FTC noted that Target gift cards were the most popular choice for scammers with scammers asking specifically for Target gift cards in twice as many instances as the next most popular gift card and even when the gift card requested by the scammers was not a Target gift card, the scammers asked their victims to purchase the particular gift cards at a Target store. More recent data of the FTC indicates that Target gift cards were the second most popular gift card of scammers with Apple gift cards being most used by scammers. Recently four victims of the imposter scam sued Target seeking class action status alleging that Target failed to use its own security algorithms and real-time tracking software to prevent these scams. The plaintiffs further allege that Target benefited financially from gift card scams. Responding to the lawsuit a Target spokesperson said 'While we cannot comment on pending litigation, we take significant steps to combat this type of criminal activity and protect consumers.' One of the plaintiffs, Robert Reese received an email from a scammer posing as an Amazon customer service representative who convinced him he needed to send Amazon $10,800 in gift cards, instructing him to get $6,000 of that amount from Target through the purchase of twelve $500 gift cards. HOW TO AVOID GIFT CARD SCAMS Fortunately, scams requiring payment through gift cards are easy to avoid. Anytime anyone approaches you with a business transaction in which you are asked to pay through gift cards, you can be confident that it is a scam. The IRS even posts on its website that it does not accept gift cards as payments. An important thing to remember is that gift cards are gifts, they are not used as a payment method for any legitimate transaction so if you are asked to pay for any business transaction through a gift card, you can be sure it is a scam. Target has also been sued in a class action regarding gift card scams by customers from 21 states who bought Apple gift cards at Target that had been tampered with by scammers that resulted in the scammers emptying the gift cards of their value. The plaintiffs allege that Target is aware of this problem and has not done enough to stop it. This type of scam is called gift card draining. The most common way gift card draining occurs involves scammers going to racks of gift cards in stores and, using handheld scanners, read the code on the strip of the card and the number on the front. They then put the card back in the display and periodically check with the retailer by calling its 800 number to find out whether the card has been activated and what the balance is on the card. Once they have this information, they either create a counterfeit card using the information they have stolen or order merchandise online without having the actual card in hand. Another common way gift card draining occurs is when scammers place a sticker with the barcode of a gift card that the scammers possess over the actual barcode of the gift card in the rack. Thus, when the card is taken by the gift card purchaser to the checkout counter to have the card activated, the funds used to purchase the gift card are credited to the card of the scammer. It is not until the gift card purchaser tries to use his or her card that it is discovered that there are no funds credited to the card. Some retailers, to reduce gift card fraud put a PIN on the gift card so that if the card is used online, the user must have access to the PIN which is generally covered and must have the covering material scratched off in order to be visible. Unfortunately, many purchasers of gift cards are not aware of this, so they don't even notice that the PIN on the card that they are purchasing has already had covering material scratched off by the scammer who has recorded the PIN. HOW TO AVOID GIFT CARD DRAINING As with so many scams, the best place to look for a helping hand is at the end of your own arm. Always inspect the card carefully to make sure that the barcode has not been tampered with in any fashion and that the PIN is still covered and when buying a gift card, only purchase cards from behind the customer service desk. If the card is preloaded, always ask for the card to be scanned to show that it is still fully valued.
Associated Press
14 hours ago
- Associated Press
FTC LAWSUIT VS. GRAND CANYON DISMISSED AGAINST ALL PARTIES
Decision fully exonerates GCU after years of politically motivated lawfare by Biden Administration officials against largest Christian university in country PHOENIX, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted unanimously today to dismiss its lawsuit against Grand Canyon University's largest service provider — Grand Canyon Education — and Brian Mueller, ending years of coordinated lawfare by government officials under the Biden Administration against the largest Christian university in the country. The lawsuit, which had already been dismissed by the United States District Court of Arizona against Grand Canyon University on jurisdictional grounds, has now been completely dropped after all parties filed a joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice with the court. In a unanimous ruling issued by FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson and the other two commissioners, he stated: 'This case, which we inherited from the previous administration, was filed nearly two years ago and has suffered losses in two motions to dismiss. These losses are compounded by recent events: Grand Canyon secured a victory over the Department of Education in a related matter before the Ninth Circuit; the Department of Education rescinded a massive fine levied on related grounds; and the Internal Revenue Service confirmed that Grand Canyon University is properly claiming 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation designation.' GCU President Brian Mueller said he was appreciative that current FTC officials took an objective look at the case and recognized the numerous agencies and courts that have already ruled in GCU's favor on the same allegations. 'As we have stated from the beginning, not only were these accusations false, but the opposite is true,' Mueller said. 'We go above and beyond what is required in our disclosures and are recognized as a leader in this area.' GCU has also maintained that the allegations were a coordinated effort by former officials within the Biden Administration to undermine a thriving Christian university. 'They threw everything they had at us for four years, and yet, despite every unjust accusation leveled against us, we have not only survived but have continued to thrive as a university,' Mueller said. 'That is a testament, first and foremost, to the strength and dedication of our faculty, staff, students and their families. Above all, it speaks to our unwavering belief that the truth would ultimately prevail.' BACKGROUND: A COORDINATED CAMPAIGN Shortly after GCU filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education challenging its nonprofit classification, then-FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra publicly announced in October 2021 that his agency would work alongside ED and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to intensify scrutiny of for-profit institutions — a category which Democrats historically have opposed and which ED controversially kept GCU in 2019 despite prior approvals from all other regulatory bodies. Those agencies, under the guise of 'consumer protection,' collectively launched five investigations against GCU in what essentially were fishing expeditions requesting voluminous amounts of information in hopes of uncovering wrongdoing. Each claim by one agency subsequently triggered copycat lawsuits and investigations by the other agencies for the same claim, flooding GCU with duplicative allegations and forcing the university to expend thousands of employee hours and millions of dollars to defend itself. The major 'findings' of those inquiries — which were related to GCU's doctoral disclosures and nonprofit status — have now been repeatedly discredited or dismissed by multiple agencies and courts. Doctoral program disclosures: GCU's financial disclosures around continuation courses in its doctoral programs — which are common in higher education — were deemed a 'substantial misrepresentation' by former ED officials despite the fact that GCU provides more transparency than is legally required or that other universities typically provide. The same allegations, which resulted in an unprecedented fine of $37.7 million by ED, were reiterated in the FTC lawsuit. Numerous independent agencies and courts have refuted or dismissed those accusations: Notably, former ED officials, including Federal Student Aid Chief Operating Officer Richard Cordray and Secretary Miguel Cardona, did not cite any student complaints in imposing their unprecedented fine, yet publicly accused GCU of 'lying' to its students and called for the university to be 'shut down.' Nonprofit status: GCU's 2018 return to its historic status as a 501(c)(3) Arizona nonprofit institution, which followed a lawful and transparent process, was repeatedly contested by ED and cited again in the FTC lawsuit despite the fact that it had been approved or acknowledged by: In light of the Ninth Circuit ruling and IRS reaffirmation, ED is currently re-examining its classification of GCU as it pertains to Title IV funding and the university is hopeful that a decision will be rendered soon. Ten Arizona Congressional members have sent a bipartisan letter urging ED to recognize GCU's nonprofit status. VA audits: A VA State Approving Agency (SAA) inquiry in 2023 claimed that two factual and commonly used statements in GCU's advertising – 'Cybersecurity experts are in high demand' and 'Every company needs cybersecurity' – were somehow 'erroneous, deceptive or misleading.' Seventeen of the top 23 undergraduate cybersecurity programs in the U.S. News and World Report rankings have made similar statements about a variety of their cybersecurity programs. To our knowledge, none of those well-respected institutions have received any type of review of their advertising claims by the VA. After GCU disputed the findings and detailed its extensive processes to ensure the validity of its statements in marketing and advertising communications, the SAA was satisfied with GCU's response and took no further action. Second (2024) and third (2025) VA/SAA risk-based audits, both triggered by the FTC lawsuit, resulted in 'no substantiated findings' after they completed thorough on-campus examinations of the university's disclosures and processes. A LARGER PATTERN The disturbing pattern in the allegations brought by former agency officials in the Biden Administration is that they center on practices that are commonplace among institutions in higher education, yet GCU was singled out for disproportionate and unusually aggressive scrutiny. 'This was not about protecting students and went well beyond normal regulatory activity,' Mueller said. 'The language used by these officials, the record fines they sought, and the baseless accusations they made all point to a broader ideological agenda.' This 2024 commentary from the Goldwater Institute summarized the situation: 'The real motivation for department bureaucrats seems clear: even if they can't prove their allegations against GCU, they intend for the process to be the punishment.' LOOKING FORWARD With the FTC lawsuit now dismissed and all federal government allegations resolved in its favor, GCU is focusing on the future. 'We support common sense government oversight but we vehemently reject ideologically driven, weaponized government actions that are not applied equally and equitably to all institutions,' Mueller said. 'As an institution that has a strong record of cooperation and great relationships with 26 different regulatory and accrediting bodies, we are doing an exemplary job of addressing the many challenges that are plaguing higher education while also living out our Christian mission both on our campus and in the surrounding community. That is reflected in the growing demand from students and families who are seeking a higher education option at GCU that is affordable and taught from a Christian worldview perspective. That mission, not politics, is our motivation and we look forward to putting our full attention to those efforts in the future.' About Grand Canyon University: Grand Canyon University was founded in 1949 and is Arizona's premier private Christian university. GCU is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission and offers 353 academic programs, emphases and certificates for both traditional undergraduate students and working professionals. The University's curriculum emphasizes interaction with classmates, both in-person and online, and individual attention from instructors while fusing academic rigor with Christian values to help students find their purpose and become skilled, caring professionals. For more information, visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Grand Canyon University
