logo
'Entitled mother-in-law tried on my wedding dress and now I need a new one'

'Entitled mother-in-law tried on my wedding dress and now I need a new one'

Daily Mirror2 days ago

A woman has slammed her mother-in-law for trying on her wedding dress and stretching it out so much that she now needs to buy a new one - but others say this is only the start of her issues
A woman has been urged to postpone her wedding after her fiancé allowed his mum and sister to play dress up in her gown, stretching it out in the process. The 26-year-old explained how she has been engaged to her partner for four months and has been excitedly planning her wedding to him for October.
She recently went dress shopping with her mum and fell in love with a gown, which she has now taken home after alterations. However, it seems she'll have to start this process all over again as her future mother and sister-in-law have "ruined" her dress.

She said on Reddit: "My future mother in law kept annoying me and sending me suggestions for choosing the right wedding dress, and said that she knew better and tried to get me to approve of wedding dresses that she chose.

"When she couldn't enforce her decision she demanded that I take her with me to buy my wedding dress so she could have an opinion.
"Before I went shopping I called her to ask if she wanted to come but started making excuses about how busy she was with my sister in law.
"I went shopping with my mum and I was able to find a really nice dress although it cost me a little over what I saved up for, but it was worth it.
"I made some changes to it and it was perfect, it arrived to my apartment at the end of the week, I made sure it was stored in a safe place so it doesn't get ruined."
But when she returned home from her mum's house one day, she noticed her partner and her wedding dress were missing.

Putting two and two together, she assumed he'd likely taken her gown to his mum's house because she wanted to see it in person before the big day.
Annoyed, she confronted him about this. She added: "I was so mad when it was confirmed that my fiancé took it to show it to his mum.
"He said he was gonna be home in 30 minutes after he went to the supermarket I waited for longer than I had to and then when he arrived I ran to get my dress that was buried underneath grocery bags.

"I took it to check on it and it's zipper was broken and the dress itself (fabric) was stretched out, I was like what the fuck happened to it, my mother in law must've tried it on, because it looked ruined.
"The straps were almost loose, I had to call my mother-in-law when my fiancé told me his mom and sister took turns to try it on, I was absolutely livid, she told me she did nothing wrong and that I was making a big deal out of it."
Her future mother-in-law said she'd ay to replace the broken zipper - but the bride-to-be said this wasn't good enough and demanded an entire new dress.

He said: "I told her to pay for a new dress since it was stretched out and no longer fitting, she refused and said that I probably wasn't happy with my dress choice and wanted to her to pay so I could get a new one.
"I yelled at her for trying it on and ruining it, that she and my fiancé were responsible for ruining my dress so they should pay for a new one, It's done, no longer fitting, the straps are in a horrible condition.
"My mum said she'd pay for fixing it but I just hate it now that someone else wore it before me."

Wanting to know whether she's in the wrong, she has taken to social media to ask users for their thoughts.
In response, one user said: "Girl do you hear yourself? Your fiancé took your wedding dress without permission and allowed multiple people to try it on!
"Do you understand how disrespectful and inappropriate that is? You not only have a bad mother in law problem, you have a huge fiancé problem. Needless to say, id be doing more than postponing."
Another user added: "Don't marry him. You will always be second best to his mother and sister. What normal person tries on their future daughter in law /sister in laws wedding dress.
"What's worse he took it round to their place so they could do that. Read the mother in law from hell stories and then run away far and fast."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: Bernie Sanders did not say 'Why not both?' to impeaching Trump and deporting Musk
Fact Check: Bernie Sanders did not say 'Why not both?' to impeaching Trump and deporting Musk

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Bernie Sanders did not say 'Why not both?' to impeaching Trump and deporting Musk

Claim: U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders said, "Elon is calling for Trump's impeachment. MAGA is calling for Elon's deportation. Why not both?" Rating: As U.S. President Donald Trump and tech billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in a war of words over social media in early June 2025, many people online attributed a quote to Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT. According to a Reddit post, Sanders allegedly said: "Elon is calling for Trump's impeachment. MAGA is calling for Elon's deportation. Why not both?" (Reddit user u/Pumuckl4Life) Even though he has been a critic of Trump and Musk, Sanders never said the above words. We found no evidence in his publicized statements, in the news media or on his social media accounts to corroborate the claim. As such, we rate this claim as an incorrect attribution. We reached out to Sanders for comment on whether he made the above statement. A spokesperson from his office denied the above claim. We also looked for examples of Sander's comments to the media by searching for segments of the above quote on Google News. If Sanders had said this in public it would have been widely covered by news media publications. We also found no similar statements on Sander's Senate website or his social media accounts. However, on June 5, the Facebook group U.S. Democratic Socialists did post the statement without attributing it to anyone. Sanders has used similar language. In a June 6 post from his official campaign account on X. Sanders criticized both Trump and Musk by using their arguments to bolster his point: Trump's right: The easiest way to save money is to eliminate the "Billions and Billions" in corporate welfare Elon Musk has received. Musk's right: Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" is a "disgusting abomination" that must be defeated. Let's do both. It'll be a win-win for America! Sanders was referring to Trump's threats to cut off federal subsidies and contracts with Musk's companies, which could cost Musk billions of dollars. He also was referring to Trump's tax and spending bill, which Musk called a "disgusting abomination" on X. Since Trump's inauguration, Sanders has been traveling the country on a "Fighting Oligarchy Tour" looking to build up resistance to the Trump administration. While Sanders did not advocate for Musk's deportation, in February 2020, he did vote to convict Trump in the Senate impeachment trial during his first administration. He also voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial in 2021. Meanwhile in June 2025, Steve Bannon, a former aide to Trump, called for an investigation into Musk's immigration status: "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." "Bernie Sanders Brings His Fight against 'Oligarchy' to Philadelphia." WHYY, Accessed 6 June 2025. Booker, Brakkton. "Trump Impeachment Trial Verdict: How Senators Voted." NPR, 13 Feb. 2021. NPR, Breslow, Jason. "In a Break with Trump, Elon Musk Calls the GOP Megabill a 'Disgusting Abomination.'" NPR, 3 June 2025. NPR, Accessed 6 June 2025. Liles, Jordan. "Trump Once Calling Epstein 'fun' and 'Terrific Guy' Resurfaced during Feud with Musk." Snopes, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Trump Threatens to Cut off Elon Musk's Federal Subsidies. That Could Cost Tesla and SpaceX Billions." CBS News, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Pager, Tyler. "Steve Bannon Says He Told Trump to Investigate Elon Musk's Immigration Status." The New York Times, 5 June 2025. Accessed 6 June 2025. "Senator Sanders Votes to Convict President Trump " Senator Bernie Sanders." Senator Bernie Sanders, Accessed 6 June 2025.

'Baby, We're Ordering That Pill': 15-Year-Old Girl's Secret Chats Shock Brother, Reddit Reacts
'Baby, We're Ordering That Pill': 15-Year-Old Girl's Secret Chats Shock Brother, Reddit Reacts

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

'Baby, We're Ordering That Pill': 15-Year-Old Girl's Secret Chats Shock Brother, Reddit Reacts

Last Updated: A teen's private WhatsApp chat left open on a laptop led her brother to discover a troubling relationship, prompting concerns about family responsibility and youth vulnerability The responsibility of raising and guiding children does not rest solely on parents but extends to every member of the family. A supportive and open home environment is vital to help young people navigate the complexities of adolescence. However, not all feel safe enough to share their struggles. In today's digital age, many youths are increasingly influenced by external forces – peers, online communities, or manipulative individuals – who may lead them astray. As a result, instead of turning to their families, some choose secrecy, hiding important aspects of their lives out of fear, confusion, or misplaced trust. In a recent case, a young man uncovered disturbing information about his sister after she inadvertently left her WhatsApp account logged in on his laptop. Shocked by what he read, he turned to social media to share his experience. Disturbing Details Shared Online A Reddit user, posting under the handle @babidi_bada_boom-500 in the group r/indiasocial, detailed a harrowing experience involving his 15-year-old sister. Accompanying the post was an image of the WhatsApp interface, revealing the source of his distress. The user explained that his sister had accessed WhatsApp on his laptop and failed to log out. Upon opening it, he found private messages, presumably from her boyfriend, that left him stunned. 'I feel my family has failed, I have failed as a brother, and my parents have failed in raising my sister. I cannot describe the pain I feel after seeing this," he wrote. The user stated that he recognised the name of the boy his sister had been speaking to, someone he had previously warned to stay away due to inappropriate behaviour. He was particularly distressed to find the boy persuading his sister to convert to Christianity and noted that his sister appeared complicit in the exchange. The WhatsApp conversation also alluded to the boy procuring medication, implying the couple may have engaged in unprotected sexual activity. While uncertain about the exact nature of the medicine, the brother was deeply troubled and turned to the online community for guidance on how to proceed. First Published: June 06, 2025, 14:27 IST

Are you a victim of ‘dry begging'? Here's how to make sure passive-aggressive manipulation doesn't ruin your relationship
Are you a victim of ‘dry begging'? Here's how to make sure passive-aggressive manipulation doesn't ruin your relationship

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Are you a victim of ‘dry begging'? Here's how to make sure passive-aggressive manipulation doesn't ruin your relationship

Even in the healthiest of relationships, conflicts are bound to arise. But how you deal with them speaks volumes about the strength of your bond. Passive-aggressive phrases like 'I guess I'll just do all of the laundry this week' or 'most people would be happy their partner does this' are prime examples of 'dry begging,' a phenomenon that couples counselors, therapists and other mental health experts are starting to call out. Advertisement Uncomfortable as it can get, direct communication is the leading way experts recommend dealing with dry begging. oulaphone_00168 'Dry begging operates by exploiting social cues and emotional signals rather than making direct requests,' explains Darren Magee, an accredited UK-based counselor, in a YouTube video that has since amassed almost half a million views. 'It usually involves dropping hints, displaying some kind of need or vulnerability, or making emotional demonstrations,' Magee elaborates. 'All of these are aimed at creating a sense of obligation in others.' Advertisement Whether the person dry-begging realizes it or not, the tactic creates a situation where the other party feels compelled to help or agree — essentially preying on empathy. 'The key to a healthy, long-term relationship is the ability of a couple to communicate and understand the other on a deeply vulnerable level where each person lets their guard down,' relationship therapist Hope Kelaher tells Brides. 'Taking a passive-aggressive stance is the exact opposite: In worst-case scenarios, I have seen it not only leads to communication breakdown, but to increased conflict, partner withdrawal, mistrust, confusion, poor self-esteem, and, in the worst cases, the end of a relationship.' Advertisement Though it's not an expression you'll find in psychology or counseling textbooks, it's a surprisingly common move that you or your partner may not even realize you're doing. On a Reddit thread that broached the topic of the relatively new term, one user was shocked to find that dry begging is more common in relationships than many would assume. 'When I saw this a few days ago, my reaction was, 'Wait, there's a word for that?!?!'' they replied under the original post. Magee suggests that while sometimes dry begging is unconscious behavior that stems from a fear of rejection or worries over coming across as a burden, it is also a tactic of emotional manipulation that narcissists often employ. Advertisement 'Narcissists generally have a fragile self-image that they want to protect. Asking for help directly might make them look or feel vulnerable, weak or dependent. These are traits they might associate with inferiority. 'Dry begging allows them to hint at their needs without compromising their sense of superiority or self-sufficiency,' he adds. Excessive dry begging can often drive wedges between people, leading to neglect or avoidance. That being said, in many relationships — whether they're platonic, familial or romantic — people are unaware of their own red flags. Dry begging 'is not always manipulative — it certainly can be — but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. First, look at what's the intention, and is it a pattern,' Aerial Cetnar, a therapist and owner of Boulder Therapy and Wellness in Colorado, tells HuffPost. 'It's common that people are not really taught how to ask for things in a way that's really clear and direct,' Cetnar continues. 'Sometimes they resort to dry begging because it feels like it's a hint and they'd rather it be a hint that gets rejected than a clear ask to be rejected.' Experts agree that when a pattern of manipulation arises, even if it seems as subtle as dry begging on occasion, it may be time to have an open conversation about the issue and seek help from a professional to resolve it. Any pattern of behavior is difficult to break, but whether you or your partner is the dry beggar in question, experts advise, it's an important step to recognize that people can't read minds. Communication, in other words, is key. Advertisement Identifying the presence of dry begging in a relationship is only the first step to mending damage done by passive-aggressive manipulation. The Bay Area Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) Center suggests engaging in a grounded, calm conversation that can prevent triggering a defensive reaction from either party — avoiding blame is important, according to experts at the center. From there, Magee and Cetnar both emphasize that setting boundaries, engaging in direct communication, seeking personalized professional guidance, and, if necessary, evaluating the status of the relationship itself are excellent next steps to preventing future dry-begging incidents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store