Scotland's Hong Kong community thriving despite China fears
Chan (not his real name) is one of those involved in the running of the market.
He tells The Herald: "Our community was established three years ago, a lot of Hong Kong people moved to Scotland and the UK because of the political situation.
'The oppression is still going on so there are still a lot of people moving here.
Read More:
'Three or four years ago we had some volunteers who gave us the idea to set up a community for our own people and think about how we could contribute to the city and how to integrate into this country.
'We started from zero. One day I spoke to a manager at the Barras and we had the idea to do a Hong Kong market, and that's where it all started. This is the third year we've done.
"We have lots of authentic street food, stuff you can't even imagine. Most of the traders make homemade food, it's not something you can find in the restaurant.
"We also have traditional Hong Kong crafts, an exhibition on connections to Scotland, workshops where people can learn traditional Chinese calligraphy and also some cultural exchange workshops and a kung fu performance and Hong Kong music."
As of the 2021 census the population of Scotland born in Hong Kong was just under 12,000 but the data was collected less than two months after a new visa scheme was introduced.
Following the introduction of a new national security law by the Chinese government, British National (Overseas) residents and their dependents can apply for a renewable five-year visa.
This year the first wave of Hong Kongers who arrived under the scheme will be eligible to apply for permanent residency.
The Hong Kong market in Glasgow (Image: Gordon Terris) Lok Pui Lo tells The Herald: "When I first arrived here four-and-a-half years ago it was Covid times so there wasn't a lot of community.
'In the last one or two years there have been a lot of organisations set up by people from Hong Kong like the badminton club, events specifically for Hong Kong people, the New Year market
"Before we get the permanent residency we're still immigrants who don't have a home. If we aren't granted the indefinite leave to remain that means we could be sent back to Hong Kong at any time.
'It's proof that I'm a UK citizen, finally, and I won't have to go back to Hong Kong if things don't work out.'
The fear of going back to Hong Kong is a real one.
In 2019 a proposed bill which would have allowed for the extradition of accused criminals to other territories, including mainland China.
Its introduction came after a 19-year-old Hong Kong resident, Chan Tong-kai, murdered his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan and flew back to Hong Kong.
He admitted to the authorities that he had killed her, but he could not be tried for her murder as it happened in Taiwan, and could not be extradited due to Hong Kong's status as a 'special administrative region' of China since it was handed over by the British in 1997.
Hong Kong had no extradition agreements with mainland China as a safeguard to its separate legal system, and could not do a treaty with Taiwan as Beijing does not recognise it.
When the bill was proposed critics immediately raised fears it could be used to arrest political dissidents, with the largest in the history of Hong Kong erupting.
Protests in Hong Kong The bill was eventually withdrawn on October 23, 2019 but in June the following year a new national security law was passed criminalising "separatism, subversion, terrorism and foreign interference", punishable up to life in prison, which many feared would lead to a crackdown on civil liberties.
In response the British government offered the visa programme to those at risk.
The reach of the Chinese Communist Party is long though, with Amnesty International reporting that students studying abroad are harassed and subject to surveillance to prevent them engaging with "sensitive" issues while overseas.
In 2022 a human rights group alleged the CCP was running a secret police station at the Loon Fung restaurant in Glasgow, though Police Scotland found no evidence of any criminality.
Safeguard Defenders said the Chinese government was using a network of such offices to intimidate dissidents and criminal suspects and try to pressure them into returning to China.
The group's report said 'persuasion to return' involved techniques such as refusing to renew passports; surveillance or punishment of family back in China; or direct threats, surveillance and harassment by undercover agents, embassy and consulate staff, and secret police.
Officially all the police stations were shut down in 2023, but the Hong Kong community feels the eyes of Beijing at all times.
Chan says: "This is something very real for us, it's something we fear every day.
"We see news from Hong Kong and we still see the government arresting people when they arrive there. Three months ago there was a girl who posted something on Facebook when she was living in Japan, she went back to Hong Kong to visit her family and the police arrested her at the airport.
'This tension is always there in our community, the tension hasn't left us even since we moved to this country.
'The long-armed repression is something very real, especially in Glasgow where we know secret police stations are being run in Chinese restaurants. Police Scotland have said they can't find any evidence but to run something like that you don't need any paperwork, all you need is a back room.
'Even when I'm speaking with you, I said going into the interview that I don't want to disclose my identity, and that's for the same reason.
"It's a very broad law, and after it passed they did arrest a lot of people.
'That's why as an organisation we always keep a very low profile and are very careful about what we're doing, and a lot of organisations have been silenced.
'A lot of us have family who still live in Hong Kong, so even when we're just making a market like this we are very careful.
'There are a lot of Chinese students who study here and we are sure that not all of them are students. We're being monitored, that is something that is undeniable for us.
'This fear still exists even living in this country.'
The Hong Kong market in Glasgow (Image: Gordon Terris) The Hong Konger community may be small but it's growing, and keen to become a firm part of Scotland's cultural milieu.
Chan says: "When we started our community we started to research some of the links between Scotland and Hong Kong and we found there's a big historical relationship.
'Three governors of Hong Kong were Scottish and one of the most well-regarded governors of Hong Kong, David Wilson, has the longest footpath in the country named after him.
'We tried to dig out the history and we've made an exhibition that we'll show at the Hong Kong market.
'We want local people to understand that we are moving here but we're not coming to claim benefits we're coming to integrate in this country. The Hong Kong market is a chance to show that too.
"We welcome everyone, and the most important thing is that we want to help local people understand why we're here and what we're doing.
'In the exhibition we have a small part where we interview some of the Hong Kong people about what they've been doing since they moved to this country: what have they contributed, what have they established?
'One of the interviewees started a bicycle charity, and that's the kind of thing we want to show especially since immigration has been such a hot topic recently.
'We want to break the bias against immigrants.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UK is no better prepared: key takeaways from Covid inquiry's test, trace and isolation module
The Covid inquiry has spent the past three weeks on the UK's attempts to control the pandemic through test, trace and isolation. Here we look at the key findings from the module and experts' recommendations for future pandemic preparedness. Testing people for infection, tracing their contacts, and isolating those at risk of passing on bugs is a mainstay of outbreak control. The UK could handle local outbreaks such as norovirus, salmonella, mpox and meningitis, but the pandemic called for radical scaling up. At its peak, NHS test and trace was able to process 800,000 virus tests a day. Lateral flow devices bolstered the capacity. Nearly 16 million people who tested positive were contacted, with more than 31 million contacts. Public Health England developed a Covid test within two weeks of Chinese scientists publishing its genetic sequence. The first case in England was diagnosed on 31 January. Scientists knew the outlook was bleak. 'It was very clear at that stage that we were heading towards a major event, a pandemic that would have a big, big impact,' Prof Christophe Fraser, who worked on Covid apps in the pandemic, told the inquiry. The UK needed to expand testing fast, but on 12 March nearly all community testing and contact tracing was abandoned. Instead, people with symptoms were asked to self-isolate. Prof Alan McNally, an infectious disease expert at the University of Birmingham, was 'flabbergasted'. Days later, the director general of the World Health Organization, Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus, reiterated the call for all countries to 'test, test, test', isolate the infected and test their contacts. There was no plan for nationwide testing. Ministers and many scientific advisers had focused on a flu pandemic, which might tear through the population too fast for testing to help. 'What a catastrophic error that was,' Pete Weatherby KC, for Covid Bereaved Families for Justice, told the inquiry. 'It started with no planning, no capacity, no contact tracing, lab analysis or isolation infrastructure for anything other than the occurrence of a limited high-consequence disease outbreak, and perhaps most significantly, too little support for those most likely to spread the virus if they did not test and isolate.' Rather than building on the expertise and equipment in NHS labs, universities and research institutions, the UK pursued a private, centralised testing programme. It was built 'virtually from scratch', Dominic Cook at Deloitte told the inquiry. The decision had its critics. The Francis Crick Institute in London reconfigured to test its employees, local hospital staff and eventually care home residents. Soon, they were turning up to 4,000 tests a day in 24 hours. 'That sort of speed is absolutely critical to protect vulnerable people,' said Sir Paul Nurse, the Nobel laureate director of the Crick. 'We could have scaled up to about 10,000 [tests a day] in a month if we'd had the money.' Nurse and others pushed for a Dunkirk-inspired big ships and small boats approach, where the UK's existing labs provided local testing until the Lighthouse labs were ready. Nurse estimated the UK's smaller labs could process up to 200,000 tests a day. But ministers had other plans. They sent the army to collect PCR machines for use in the centralised Lighthouse labs. In an email to colleagues shared at the inquiry, McNally wrote: 'That's a massive 'fuck you' to the whole of UK academia.' Early in the pandemic, the NHS listed Covid symptoms as a new continuous cough and high fever. Other symptoms were only added later. It meant many people who had Covid didn't realise. Prof Tim Spector, who pioneered the Zoe Covid app, flagged loss of smell or taste as a symptom in March 2020. It wasn't recognised by the NHS until May. Some people with Covid had no symptoms. Fearing that asymptomatic healthcare workers could spread the virus to patients, Nurse and Sir Peter Ratcliffe, another Nobel laureate at the Crick, wrote to the then health secretary, Matt Hancock, to call for testing of all healthcare workers. A response arrived three months later. Weekly Covid tests were not offered to asymptomatic care home staff and NHS workers until July and November 2020 respectively. Local testing centres popped up from spring 2020 but many failed to consider the most vulnerable. Disabled people found some sites inaccessible. Many centres favoured people with cars. 'If you were doing this again, you'd set up your first set of testing sites in local community halls in Tower Hamlets, not in Chessington World of Adventures,' Dido Harding, who led NHS test and trace, told the inquiry. Online booking systems excluded people without computers or mobile phones. People were sent to the nearest available test site, regardless of practicalities. Robin Swann, the former health minister in Northern Ireland, said some residents were directed to Scotland. 'The Irish Sea hadn't been taken into consideration,' he said. The Lighthouse labs were the powerhouses of the UK's testing capability. Setting them up was hectic. Beyond the machines needed to test samples, labs needed safety cabinets, trained staff, workflows and operating procedures. Post-doctorate and research fellows volunteered to move, while other scientists were seconded to staff them. McNally helped set up the first lab in Milton Keynes, which ran 28,000 tests a day at the end of its first month. A major frustration was the enormous team of Deloitte consultants, he said, which had 'no expertise' in lab work, infectious disease or diagnostics. The need for high standards at testing labs was made clear by failures at the private Immensa lab in Wolverhampton. In 2021, it issued tens of thousands of incorrect test results. 'In the long list of Covid disasters and scandals, this is pretty near the top,' McNally said. England alone had to recruit and train 15,000 contact tracers. To be effective, 80% of contacts of infected people had to be traced. In 2020 the figure was far lower. Scores of people avoided tests because they couldn't afford to self-isolate. Lady Harding pressed for better support but Rishi Sunak, then chancellor, refused 'at every opportunity'. Had we done more, fewer would have died, she believed. Diary entries from Patrick Vallance, the former chief scientist, echoed her concerns, saying ministers 'always want to go for stick, not carrot'. One note had Boris Johnson, the prime minister, saying: 'We must have known that this wasn't working. We have been pretending it has been whereas secretly we know it hasn't been.' In a later note, he said: 'We haven't been ruthless enough. We need to force more isolation. I favour a more authoritarian approach.' The Lighthouse laboratories were dismantled, the equipment sold off and staff returned to their previous jobs. If another pandemic strikes in December, McNally told the inquiry: 'We will be exactly where we were in January, February of 2020.' He and others urged the UK to mirror Germany's federated lab system where a mix of university, commercial and animal health labs perform routine testing but can switch to pandemic testing when needed. Harding stressed the need for a mass test-and-trace system that considered the most vulnerable from the start. 'They're the most exposed to every infectious disease and that means you have to put isolation support at the forefront of your testing and tracing system,' she said.
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump administration continues to target international students. What to know and what could be next.
Lawsuits, next-day countersuits, backtracking and mass confusion. International students find themselves at the center of a dizzying legal landscape as the Trump administration continues to crack down on immigration. Here's what to know as the Trump administration keeps attempting to put up legal barriers to international students' ability to study in the U.S. What's the latest? Just Wednesday, a judge granted Harvard an extension on an injunction that blocked the administration's attempt last week to stop the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign-born students. An estimated 4,700 or more foreign-born students have been impacted since the Trump administration began revoking visas and terminating legal statuses in March. A few have also been detained in high-profile cases. In just the past two weeks, students across the country were granted a nationwide injunction against the administration. Some scholars have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement as well. Meanwhile the State Department announced that it is 'aggressively' targeting an additional group of Chinese scholars out of national security concerns. But in spite of its legal losses, the federal government has doubled down on its efforts to target international students. On Tuesday, the Trump administration stopped scheduling new student visa interviews for those looking to study in the U.S., according to an internal cable seen by NBC News. Meanwhile, the State Department is preparing to expand its social media screening of applicants, the cable said. The next day, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the government would be looking to revoke the visas of Chinese students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' It's still unclear what 'critical fields' the administration will be looking into and what types of connections to the CCP are under scrutiny. The State Department referred NBC News to comments by spokesperson Tammy Bruce during a news briefing Thursday in which Bruce said the department does not discuss the details of its visa process due to privacy concerns. 'We use every tool that we have to vet and to make sure we know who's coming in,' Bruce said. 'In this particular case, the United States is putting America first by beginning to revoke visas of Chinese students as warranted.' How did the Trump administration revoke the visas and statuses of international students? For months, there was mass confusion among schools and international students about the criteria the government used to abruptly terminate visas and statuses, with little to no notice to students. But in late April, the Department of Homeland Security revealed at a hearing that it used the National Crime Information Center, an FBI-run computerized index that includes criminal history information. The agency said fewer than two dozen employees ran the names of 1.3 million foreign-born students through the index, populating 6,400 'hits.' And from there, many students experienced terminations of their records in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), which maintains information about nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors. The method was sharply criticized by legal and policy experts, who pointed out that the database relies on cities, counties, states and other sources to voluntarily report their data. This means that it may not have the final dispositions of cases, potentially leading to errors in identifying students. At another hearing in April, Elizabeth D. Kurlan, an attorney for the Justice Department, said that going forward, Immigration and Customs Enforcement will not be terminating statuses based solely on findings in the crime information center. She also told the court that ICE would be restoring the legal status of international students who had their records terminated until the agency developed a new framework for revocations. Shortly afterward, an internal memo to all Student and Exchange Visitor Program personnel, which is under ICE jurisdiction, showed an expanded list of criteria for the agency to terminate foreign-born students' legal status in the U.S., including a 'U.S. Department of State Visa Revocation (Effective Immediately).' Though students would typically have the right to due process and defend themselves before their status is terminated, visa revocation itself is now grounds for the termination of status, according to the memo. The administration has also taken aim at students who have been active in pro-Palestine protests, including Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, who were both detained in March. Öztürk has since been released from ICE custody. 'Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas,' Rubio said at a news conference in March. Has anyone been successful in challenging the Trump administration? Students across the U.S. from Georgia to South Dakota have been winning their lawsuits against the Trump administration, with judges siding with plaintiffs and allowing them to stay in the U.S. Last week, a judge issued an injunction blocking the Trump administration from terminating the legal statuses of international students at universities across the U.S. It's the first to provide relief to students nationwide. The day after the Trump administration terminated Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification — a move that would force the university's foreign students, roughly a fourth of its student body, to either transfer or lose their legal status — the Ivy League school sued the administration. And hours later, a judge issued an injunction. In addition to Öztürk, others who were detained are no longer in ICE custody, including Georgetown scholar Badar Khan Suri and Mohsen Mahdawi, a U.S. permanent resident who was born and raised in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. The judge in Khan Suri's case ruled that his detention was in violation of the First Amendment, which protects the right to free speech, and the Fifth Amendment, which protects the right to due process. What might be next for international students? Though the recent nationwide injunction provides some relief, students can still be vulnerable to visa revocation. Legal experts say the temporary restraining order blocks the government from arresting or detaining students, or terminating their legal statuses. But it's possible that visas can still be revoked. And many expect the Trump administration to hit back. 'This is a federal district court decision. It is not a final decision, and it seems likely that the executive branch will appeal this decision,' Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School. Mukherjee also added that the Chinese international students referred to in Rubio's new statement are likely not protected by the injunction either. 'What they're likely to claim in court in defense of this policy is that the secretary of state and the executive branch deserves deference with regard to quote, unquote, foreign affairs,' Mukherjee said. However, with backlash already brewing, Mukherjee said she expects that the policy will be challenged legally, with immigration attorneys and activists arguing that it is unconstitutional. Legal experts said that with many decisions surrounding international students' fate far from decided, foreign-born scholars should first and foremost remain in the country. She also said it's important to seek legal counsel in the event that students are also eligible for other forms of relief, including asylum or other humanitarian visas. Razeen Zaman, director of immigrant rights at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, said it's particularly important for American citizens to speak out against the immigration policies on behalf of foreign-born students, as many of these students may not be able to push back themselves. 'You have to have a certain amount of resources to be able to do that. You have to have a certain amount of connections. There's even some people who are too afraid to seek counsel,' Zaman said. 'U.S. citizens have the most protections. … And the reality is, even if you're stopped at the border, they do have to still let you in as a U.S. citizen.' And given how the Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of more than 500,000 immigrants from four Latin American countries, Zaman said, it's likely that even more groups will be targeted without fierce advocacy and protest. 'This is about the First Amendment today. It's Chinese people, the CCP, whoever they decide is tied to the Chinese government,' Zaman said.
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
British man arrested in the US is accused of spying for China
A British man is facing charges in the US after being accused of spying and smuggling arms for China. John Miller, 63, from Tunbridge Wells, Kent, has been accused of carrying out interstate activities with Cui Guanghai, 43 from China. The US Justice Department confirmed it was trying to extradite the pair from Serbia. Both 'solicited the procurement of US defence articles, including missiles, air defense radar, drones, and cryptographic devices with associated crypto ignition keys for unlawful export from the United States to the People's Republic of China', according to released documents. Miller told a neighbour he often visited the Far East for work and also allegedly referred to Chinese President Xi Jinping as 'The Boss', The Mail on Sunday reported. He and Mr Guanghai are accused of attempting to prevent a protest against Xi's attendance at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit in November 2023. The two men allegedly targeted the suspected protester's car by installing a tracker on the vehicle and even slashing its tyres. On a separate occasion, the duo are said to have tried to thwart another protest against the Chinese president by paying £27,010 to two dissenters to renounce their intention to post an online video feed depicting two new artistic statues of Mr Xi and his wife Peng Liyuan. The pair allegedly paid around £7,400 via wire transfer to a US account for a cryptographic device which they intended to export from the US to China. They reportedly considered several methods to ship the device undetected, including concealing it in a food blender and sending it via Hong Kong. Violation of the Arms Export Control Act – the most serious offence the pair are accused of – carries a maximum of 20 years in prison. If found guilty, Miller could face maximum penalties of five years in prison for conspiracy, five years in prison for interstate stalking, and 10 years in prison for smuggling. Deputy attorney general Todd Blanche said: 'As alleged, the defendants targeted a US resident for exercising his constitutional right to free speech and conspired to traffic sensitive American military technology to the Chinese regime. 'This is a blatant assault on both our national security and our democratic values. This Justice Department will not tolerate foreign repression on US soil, nor will we allow hostile nations to infiltrate or exploit our defence systems. 'We will act decisively to expose and dismantle these threats wherever they emerge.' US attorney Bill Essayli, for the Central District of California, said: 'The indictment alleges that Chinese foreign actors targeted a victim in our nation because he criticised the Chinese government and its president. More Trending 'My office will continue to use all legal methods available to hold accountable foreign nationals engaging in criminal activity on our soil.' Akil Davis, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Los Angeles field office, said: 'The FBI will not tolerate transnational repression targeting those in the United States who express dissenting opinions about foreign leaders. 'Both defendants face serious stalking charges in Los Angeles and my office intends to hold them accountable for bullying a victim, a critic of the PRC (People's Republic of China), and targeting him with violence.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Two shot dead at popular Irish pub in Costa del Sol holiday resort MORE: Why so many young Brits are being 'manipulated' into smuggling drugs MORE: Brothers deny killing commuter as he walked home from tube station 41 years ago
