
Paul Revere's Many Rides
Commentary
A scrap of paper in the Massachusetts State Archives tells a great story. Dated August 1775, it is an invoice for £11, one shilling (about $2,000 today) submitted to the Massachusetts provincial government by Paul Revere.
Half of Revere's expenses were for riding. From April 21st to May 7th, he charged five shillings a day for 'riding for the Committee of Safety' and £1 for 'keeping two Colony horse[s]' for ten days. This was not payment for Revere's 'midnight ride,' but rides afterward spreading news of the famous events of April 19th.
Boston's selectmen had sent Revere on his first ride 'to carry the Account of the Destruction of the Tea' to New York in December 1773. The following spring they sent him to Philadelphia with a message for the Continental Congress. In September 1774 they had him bring the Suffolk County Resolves to Congress, which called for colonial opposition to British tax policies.
In December Revere rode to Portsmouth, New Hampshire, to alert the militia that British troops were on their way and that they needed to remove the cannon and ammunition from Fort William and Mary. Alarmed by Revere, the militia secured the munitions.
In mid-April 1775, Revere rode to warn Concord that General Thomas Gage, Massachusetts Governor and commander of British forces, had his eye on the munitions they stockpiled. On his route back to Boston, he met with local patriots to work out a warning system to alert them when the British marched. They knew something was in the works.
Related Stories
4/24/2025
4/22/2025
At ten in the evening on April 18th, Joseph Warren, the leader of Boston's Committee of Safety, called in Revere and patriot William Dawes (he had hurt his wrist spiriting one of the cannon out of Boston). Confirming that the British were setting out that night, Warren sent Revere and Dawes to carry word to Concord, Revere by rowing across to Charlestown, Dawes by Boston Neck (he successfully got by British sentries by pretending to be a drunken farmer).
Bound for Concord, Dawes and Revere knocked on the doors of those in their communication network, who then sent riders off to alert other towns. They met in Lexington and then continued to Concord, along the way meeting young Doctor Samuel Prescott. The three rode together until a British patrol stopped them in Lincoln. By this time, British troops were stepping ashore some 15 miles away in Cambridge and could hear church bells ringing in the distance. Their mission was no longer a secret.
Prescott spurred his horse and continued in the darkness to Concord. Dawes raced toward a house, shouting that he had lured some British soldiers into their trap; the British stopped chasing. Dawes then walked back to Lexington.
Revere tried jumping his horse over a wall, but six more British soldiers emerged to stop him. The commander demanded to know the prisoner's name. When he heard 'Revere,' he stopped. 'What?' said he. 'Paul Revere?''
They knew his name.
Because of this ride, so do we.
Since horses, and men, need to be fed, being a messenger was just one of Revere's many tasks.
The August 1775 invoice also includes £3 for printing a thousand impressions, possibly the Massachusetts currency they hired him to create. Revere engraved this on the reverse side of his 'Boston Massacre' copper plate, which is the reason that plate and other Revere engravings remain in the Massachusetts Archives. Later in the 1790s, Revere would build a copper rolling mill, the first in the United States, to make the copper plates lining the hulls of the
USS Constitution
and other frigates.
Revere presented this invoice in August, and on August 22nd the House of Representatives approved payment of £10, four shillings. Speaker James Warren (no relation to Joseph, who had been killed at Bunker Hill) and House secretary Samuel Adams signed the invoice, and then sent it for approval to the executive council. All told, Samuel Adams, James Otis, John Adams, and 12 other councilors signed this slip of paper to pay Revere for his service.
We do not have an invoice for Revere's famous midnight ride, but he was not riding for pay. Whether or not Massachusetts paid him for his important work the night of April 18th, we all remain in debt to him, and to those who answered his call.
From
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Airfield falls silent to remember Old Sarum squadrons with key role in WWII
OLD Sarum Airfield fell silent on Tuesday morning (June 10) to commemorate specialist squadrons founded during the Second World War. Several Air Observation Post (AOP) squadrons were founded at the former RAF airfield in the early 1940s, including Squadron 653, which moved to Normandy in June 1944 and supported the Army in France and the Netherlands. During the war, AOP squadrons flew unarmed aircraft to spot enemy targets, radioing their locations to direct artillery fire. Veterans and serving members of the Army Air Corps watch the memorial service (Image: Spencer Mulholland) Later, in 1957, the Army Air Corps (AAC) was created from the foundations of the Glider Pilot Regiment and Air Observation Post Squadrons. Veterans in the Air Observation Post Association were joined by past and present members of the AAC at the airfield on Tuesday to commemorate the formation of Squadron 653, 83 years on. The AAC flew an Apache helicopter to the airfield at 10am, and the ceremony began next to a memorial dedicated to AOP squadrons an hour later. Lieutenant General Sir Gary Coward, president of the Air Observation Post Association, served in the 653 in Germany in the early 1980s. During the ceremony, he said: 'We are here today to commemorate the formation of 653 Squadron in June 1942; one of 12 British Air OP squadrons created during the Second World War. During that conflict, 117 members of the Air OP made the supreme sacrifice. 'Their courage was recognised by the award of two DSOs (Distinguished Service Order), five MCs (Military Cross), 132 DFCs (Distinguished Flying Cross), a DFM (Distinguished Flying Medal) and a Military Medal. 'Eighty-three years on, we will remember them. 'A number of us here today serve, and have served, in 653 Squadron, continuing the proud traditions first laid down here at Old Sarum in 1942, in Normandy in 1944 and beyond.' An Apache helicopter landed on the grass airstrip at 10am (Image: Spencer Mulholland) He told the assembled crowd that his father-in-law had also served in the squadron in Normandy as a flight medic. He said: 'It took a while, and a few whiskeys, to draw these memories out of him in later life.' The service took place next to Hangar 3, a First World War structure that was badly damaged by a large fire in April. Read more: Salisbury Business Expo set to welcome hundreds of firms Read more: Salisbury runners unite against cancer and raise £53k Sir Gary said: 'On behalf of the association, can I thank the airfield owner, Mr Grenville Hodge, and his team for allowing us to hold this event today, and for remediating the site after the tragic events of April 17.' He also thanked the Boscombe Down Aviation Collection for supporting the event and his fellow members of the Air Observation Post Association committee. Attendees then enjoyed a tour of the aviation collection and a buffet lunch.


Los Angeles Times
9 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
A Word, Please: When phrases lose their popularity
Not long ago in this column, I talked a bit about the expression 'step foot,' as in 'I wouldn't step foot in that store.' The first time I heard it, I was embarrassed for the speaker who, I was sure, meant 'set foot.' The second, third and fourth times I heard it, I sensed a change was underway — and I'm not a fan of change (that's an understatement). Eventually, I looked it up and learned that 'step foot' is slowly gaining on 'set foot,' whether I like it or not. Figures of speech, like words, evolve. Take 'vicious cycle,' for example. For a solid century, there was no 'vicious cycle' — at least not in published writing. Pretty much everyone who could get near a printing press agreed the expression was 'vicious circle.' The idea behind the expression, of course, is that of being stuck in a loop, a bad one. Merriam-Webster defines 'vicious circle' as 'a chain of events in which the response to one difficulty creates a new problem that aggravates the original difficulty.' As the 20th century dawned, 'vicious circle' continued to dominate, but suddenly it had some competition. 'Vicious cycle' was emerging as a contender. 'Vicious circle' held onto its lead until just about a decade ago, when 'vicious cycle' nosed ahead. At the same time, the original and originally correct expression 'vicious circle' started to dive. I'm not optimistic about its future. 'Top up' is another term that caught my eye lately, and not in a good way. I started seeing it in travel articles pondering whether it's worthwhile to buy airline miles to 'top up' your existing balance enough to book a flight. My whole life, the expression I heard was 'top off.' According to Merriam-Webster, 'top off' is a phrasal verb that has two definitions: The first is 'to end (something) usually in an exciting way.' So an athlete may top off their career with a final victory, or a nice dinner can be topped off with dessert and coffee. The second definition is similar to the first: 'to fill (something) completely with a liquid.' Be it a mug of coffee or a tank of gas, when it's not quite full and you fill it all the way, you're topping it off. 'Top up,' meanwhile, was a perfectly fine way to say 'top off' if you're British. But it wasn't for us, I thought. We were top-off people. Turns out that's not quite right. 'Top up' has been in print as long as 'top off,' and though the American version has always been more popular in American publishing, 'top up' has never been far behind. I was wrong about that, but I was even more wrong about 'You've got another think coming.' I couldn't understand how anyone could make the embarrassing mistake of using 'think' in this expression. Obviously, the correct version was 'You've got another thing coming.' I never considered the context. The expression follows a stated or implied statement of 'If you think X …' so 'another' makes sense because you've already had one think. Of course, a think is a thing. So it's not wrong to say you've got another thing coming. And that's lucky for modern English speakers, because Ngram Viewer shows that 'another think coming' started to decline in popularity about 10 years ago while 'another thing coming' is becoming more popular than ever — just when I was getting used to 'think.' For me, there are two takeaways from these trends. One, the language will keep changing. And two, change will continue to annoy me. — June Casagrande is the author of 'The Joy of Syntax: A Simple Guide to All the Grammar You Know You Should Know.' She can be reached at JuneTCN@

Epoch Times
13 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Raise Those Banners High: How and Why We Revere the Stars and Stripes
On June 14, 1777, the Continental Congress The real credit for Flag Day, however, goes to a Waubeka, Wisconsin, schoolteacher—