logo
Why global governance is failing

Why global governance is failing

Arab News16-03-2025

https://arab.news/8yy2p
The UN was established in 1945, succeeding the failed League of Nations, in a bid to pull humanity back from the brink of self-destruction. It was a bold experiment in collective security, designed to prevent another world war and manage conflicts through diplomacy rather than violence.
Yet, 80 years later, we find ourselves back on the precipice of disaster. Global temperatures have breached the 1.5 degrees Celsius threshold that scientists see as a Rubicon for reining in climate change over the long term. Public trust in institutions — and in democracy — is critically low and geopolitical tensions are rising. What happened?
The UN has, justifiably, drawn criticism for a variety of reasons. The composition of the Security Council is antiquated. Violent conflict and even genocide still occur with alarming frequency. And the organization has proven to be generally ineffectual, overly bureaucratic and unfair in its treatment of the Global South.
But the inadequately diagnosed problem is that the UN is bringing a 20th-century logic to bear on the 21st century's fundamentally planetary problems. Today's most urgent challenges — such as climate change, pandemics, artificial intelligence regulation, financial contagion and supply chain disruptions — do not respect national borders, yet UN institutions remain stuck in a framework of nation states jealously guarding their sovereignty. Our international institutions simply were not designed to address essentially systemic issues indifferent to national borders. The UN is not just slow, it is structurally incapable of tackling such problems at scale.
With even conventional governance structures faltering in the face of heightened tribalism and nationalism, any proposed new paradigm of planetary governance runs the risk of sounding utopian. Fortunately, the world already has a serviceable blueprint: the EU. For all its flaws, this bloc has demonstrated that a supranational federation can work, allowing previously warring countries to pool sovereignty in exchange for economic and political stability. Nor is this such a radical idea. In a 1946 Gallup poll, 54 percent of Americans believed that 'the UN should be strengthened to make it a world government with power to control the armed forces of all nations, including the US.'
In 2024, by contrast, 58 percent of Americans thought that the UN was doing a 'poor job.' This description suggests that the UN needs to take a bolder approach. Big, planetary issues like global warming are what philosopher Timothy Morton calls 'hyperobjects.' They are 'entities of such vast temporal and spatial dimension' as to require a fundamentally different kind of human reasoning. To change how we think about such problems calls for both an intellectual and a psychological shift — beyond the nation state, or what Benedict Anderson famously called 'imagined communities.'
The UN is bringing a 20th-century logic to bear on the 21st century's fundamentally planetary problems.
Antara Haldar
Intellectually, planetary thinking requires its own theoretical framework. This demand is not new. In the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes saw a need for a global currency and proposed the 'bancor' to replace the dollar-focused Bretton Woods institutions. Hannah Arendt also advanced her own vision of planetary politics. And Pierre Teilhard de Chardin developed his concept of the 'noosphere' (collective human consciousness). In more recent scholarship — from Johan Rockstrom's work on 'planetary boundaries' to Bruno Latour's description of our ecological age — the intellectual elements of a new planetary paradigm are beginning to come together.
Psychologically, we need a new narrative. The historian Yuval Noah Harari argues that human civilization is built on shared myths, such as nationalism and capitalism. If planetary governance is to succeed, it needs to tell a compelling new story, one that moves beyond outdated ideas about sovereign nation states to acknowledge humanity's interconnectedness.
To reach people where they are, rigorous planetary thinking must be accompanied by stronger local thinking. Improvements to our governance structures must look both 'up' and 'down,' as the Berggruen Institute's Jonathan Blake and Nils Gilman have put it. Global governance cannot succeed without resilient, empowered local structures. The nation state would remain one element, but cities, regions and local networks would be given more attention and integrated into planetary decision-making. This kind of nested approach could offer an alternative to the outdated system of nation states without requiring its wholesale dismantling.
The growing urgency of planetary crises — from the 2008 financial crash to pandemics and climate change — graphically illustrate the inadequacies of the UN in its current form. The UN itself emerged from the shell of the League of Nations and now it is time to build anew. Governance must pivot from the nation state-based logic of the Bretton Woods system to the planetary sensibilities of the bancor. Even if the UN had succeeded in uniting the world's nations, its current design would be unequal to a moment defined by inherently planetary challenges. It is time to imagine new communities centered on our planetary realities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions
US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions

Saudi Gazette

timean hour ago

  • Saudi Gazette

US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions

WASHINGTON — The United States has ordered the departure of nonessential staff from several diplomatic and military posts across the Middle East, citing rising regional tensions and the growing uncertainty around stalled nuclear talks with Iran. The State Department announced Wednesday it had directed nonessential personnel to leave the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. Additionally, it authorized voluntary departure for staff and family members in Bahrain and Kuwait. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the optional exit of military dependents across the region, according to U.S. Central Command. 'These decisions are based on the most recent security assessments and our unwavering commitment to the safety of Americans abroad,' said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. The move comes amid faltering negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, which U.S. officials say appears to be nearing a critical impasse. The sixth round of talks, tentatively planned for this weekend in Oman, now appears unlikely to proceed, according to two U.S. officials. President Donald Trump, speaking on the "Pod Force One" podcast, voiced skepticism about the potential for a deal. 'I'm getting more and more less confident about it,' he said, blaming delays on Tehran and hinting at potential military action should diplomacy fail. In response, Iran's Defense Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that any conflict would place all U.S. bases in the region within Iranian reach. 'If conflict is imposed on us, the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours,' he said, adding that Tehran was fully prepared to retaliate. The situation has also prompted maritime security concerns. The UK Maritime Trade Operations center issued a warning to vessels transiting the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Strait of Hormuz, citing potential military escalation. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency is considering a motion to censure Iran over its nuclear activities — a move that could reactivate UN sanctions suspended under the 2015 nuclear deal, which the Trump administration exited during his first term. While the U.S. drawdown affects only limited personnel, it signals growing concern about the stability of the region. Iraqi officials, however, downplayed the threat, noting no direct indicators of danger in Baghdad. — Agencies

US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions with Iran
US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions with Iran

Saudi Gazette

timean hour ago

  • Saudi Gazette

US pulls nonessential staff from Middle East posts amid rising tensions with Iran

WASHINGTON — The United States has ordered the departure of nonessential staff from several diplomatic and military posts across the Middle East, citing rising regional tensions and the growing uncertainty around stalled nuclear talks with Iran. The State Department announced Wednesday it had directed nonessential personnel to leave the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. Additionally, it authorized voluntary departure for staff and family members in Bahrain and Kuwait. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the optional exit of military dependents across the region, according to U.S. Central Command. 'These decisions are based on the most recent security assessments and our unwavering commitment to the safety of Americans abroad,' said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. The move comes amid faltering negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, which U.S. officials say appears to be nearing a critical impasse. The sixth round of talks, tentatively planned for this weekend in Oman, now appears unlikely to proceed, according to two U.S. officials. President Donald Trump, speaking on the "Pod Force One" podcast, voiced skepticism about the potential for a deal. 'I'm getting more and more less confident about it,' he said, blaming delays on Tehran and hinting at potential military action should diplomacy fail. In response, Iran's Defense Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that any conflict would place all U.S. bases in the region within Iranian reach. 'If conflict is imposed on us, the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours,' he said, adding that Tehran was fully prepared to retaliate. The situation has also prompted maritime security concerns. The UK Maritime Trade Operations center issued a warning to vessels transiting the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Strait of Hormuz, citing potential military escalation. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency is considering a motion to censure Iran over its nuclear activities — a move that could reactivate UN sanctions suspended under the 2015 nuclear deal, which the Trump administration exited during his first term. While the U.S. drawdown affects only limited personnel, it signals growing concern about the stability of the region. Iraqi officials, however, downplayed the threat, noting no direct indicators of danger in Baghdad. — Agencies

UK meeting hails Saudi Arabia's pivotal role in supporting humanitarian causes
UK meeting hails Saudi Arabia's pivotal role in supporting humanitarian causes

Saudi Gazette

time8 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

UK meeting hails Saudi Arabia's pivotal role in supporting humanitarian causes

Saudi Gazette report JERSEY — Senior representatives from donor countries and international humanitarian organizations attended the high-level meeting organized by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Pooled Fund Working Group (PFWG) in Jersey, the United Kingdom. At the end of the meeting, participants praised Saudi Arabia's pivotal role in supporting humanitarian causes. They highlighted the importance of maintaining this international momentum to ensure sustainable response efforts and amplify their impact on the ground. The meeting served as a key milestone in global efforts to enhance financing mechanisms and response to humanitarian needs. Saudi Representative in the Donor Support Group for OCHA and Assistant Supervisor General of the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Centre (KSrelief) for Planning and Development Dr. Aqeel Al-Ghamdi participated in the meeting. Speaking on the occasion, Al-Ghamdi emphasized the importance of enhancing joint action and coordination among donor countries and UN institutions to ensure equitable and effective access to aid, particularly for the most vulnerable groups. He also reiterated Saudi Arabia's commitment, under the leadership of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman and Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman, to continue supporting global humanitarian efforts, contributing to the protection of lives and the improvement of living conditions in affected communities. Al-Ghamdi pointed out that the Kingdom is one of the leading and largest international donors in the humanitarian field, noting that Saudi Arabia, in recent years, has spearheaded notable humanitarian and development initiatives through KSrelief, which has reached more than 107 countries, implemented in partnership with UN agencies and international organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store