Scrapping Worcestershire councils would save £20m a year, report says
Scrapping Worcestershire's seven councils and replacing them with a single authority could save more than £20m a year, according to a report.The study, by consultants PwC, also suggested an alternative option of splitting the county into two new unitary councils – north and south - could save £4.3m a year.Politicians are currently divided over the two options, after the government asked council leaders to produce proposals to merge the county's two-tier system.Councils are required to produce a business case for changes by the end of November.
Any new local authorities could be up and running as early as April 2028, following elections in May 2027.
At present, Worcestershire has one county council, responsible for services including roads and social care, sitting above six district councils that run services such as bin collections and housing.
"One Worcestershire council would be more effective and efficient," said Simon Geraghty, the Conservative leader of the county council, at a scrutiny meeting on Tuesday.Following the publication of Labour's devolution white paper, his administration commissioned consultants PwC to provide an independent review of the options.Its work, the Future Worcestershire Proposal, suggested moving to a single "unitary" authority could cost £11.9m in one-off costs, but save £20.6m a year.PwC estimated another option, of splitting the historic county in two, would cost £16.9m, and save only £4.3m a year.Its consultants also said the proposed north and south councils would both face further financial challenges.A northern council, formed from Bromsgrove, Redditch and Wyre Forest would take a smaller share of council tax, but a higher proportion of deprived communities, for instance.In addition, demand for expensive services such as home-to-school transport and special educational needs provision would "disproportionately impact" a southern council formed of Worcester, Wychavon and Malvern Hills, consultants found.However, the report was criticised by Lynn Denham, the Labour leader of Worcester City Council, for containing too many assumptions and inaccuracies.
At the moment, Worcestershire's political leaders appear deadlocked over which option is best.Although Worcestershire County Council and Wyre Forest District Council have argued a single unitary authority is the only option to meet the government's criteria, both Worcester City Council and Malvern Hills District Council have said they would prefer the county be split in two.Three other districts, Bromsgrove, Redditch and Wychavon, said both options needed further exploration.At the scrutiny meeting, Conservative member Emma Marshall and Liberal Democrat Tom Wells questioned whether statutory services such as social care would take priority over things like arts funding, once councils were combined."Whether we end up with a model that is countywide, or north and south, is it not the case that districts' discretionary services are now at risk, to support the statutory services we are struggling to provide?" Wells asked.To protect services, Geraghty said any future local authority would learn from the best practice of other existing unitary councils across England.While councillors in Worcestershire have until November to submit a business case for proposals to the government, any negotiations are likely to be interrupted by county council elections on 1 May.
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X, and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Surge in support for Reform in by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, warns expert
A SURGE in support for Reform in a hotly-contested by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, an expert has warned. Nigel Farage's party finished a close third with more than 26 per cent of the vote narrowly behind both Labour and the SNP in the ballot in Hamilton, Scotland. The party said it was a 'remarkable' turnaround picking up 7,088 compared to just 58 votes in the constituency in 2021 as it attempted to win its first seat in Holyrood. Election guru John Curtice said it would be a 'serious misreading' to believe that Labour had turned round its election fortunes, with the Scottish elections next May. He told the BBC: 'Reform are making the political weather north of the border, as indeed they are south of the border.' Reform deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP.' The performance came just hours after Zia Yusuf resigned as party chair plunging the party into chaos following a row about banning burqas. In a parting shot, he said he no longer believed trying to get Nigel Farage elected as PM was a 'good use of my time'. Mr Yusuf's shock resignation - just weeks after masterminding their local elections triumph - came after an internal row about banning the burqa. The multi-millionaire ex-businessman had attacked the party's newest MP Sarah Pochin as 'dumb' for asking Sir Keir Starmer to outlaw the Muslim face covering in the Commons. But insiders said tensions at the top of Reform had been brewing for some time, with the chairman feeling increasingly sidelined. In a statement, Mr Yusuf said: 'Eleven months ago I became Chairman of Reform. Watch moment Nigel Farage makes back door exit as Reform UK leader dodges protesters in Scotland 'I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' 2
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Swinney is punished for decades of SNP failure in crushing by-election defeat
'Humiliated' John Swinney saw his party beaten by Labour in another by-election amid claims voters punished the SNP for 18 years of 'abject failure'. Just hours after the First Minister confidently predicted there was 'no way' Labour could win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Holyrood seat, Anas Sarwar's party triumphed by 602 votes in what should have been a safe bet for SNP. The surprise win, achieved in spite of voter fury at UK Labour cuts and a media-shy candidate dubbed the Invisible Man, left SNP activists reeling at the count. New MSP Davy Russell said the Nationalists had 'broken the NHS, wasted money, and after nearly two decades, they don't deserve another chance'. And Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'John Swinney has been humiliated by this result. 'The voters have clearly punished the SNP for their 18 years of misrule.' In other developments: Nigel Farage said Reform UK's strong third place showed it was 'just getting started in Scotland' Russell Findlay apologised to voters after the Scottish Tories came fourth, saying 'My party let you down in government and we accept responsibility for our mistakes' Former SNP cabinet secretary Alex Neil said 'the current SNP leadership needs to be replaced urgently', while former SNP deputy Jim Sillars accused Mr Swinney of a 'manifest failure to read the street' and called him 'unfit' to lead Ex-SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC said her party was 'stagnant' and 'needs a major rethink' An elated Mr Anas Sarwar yesterday said it was the springboard to a Labour win at Holyrood and predicted the era of Nationalist rule was coming to an end. Celebrating with Mr Russell and a throng of activists in the summer sun, Mr Sarwar said it was 'pretty obvious' that Mr Swinney was now on 'borrowed time'. He said the SNP had run a 'shameful' campaign that glossed over the party's record and tried to focus on Reform because Mr Swinney 'knows the record is one of abject failure'. He said: 'What we're seeing now is the running down of the clock. This is an SNP government that has lost its way. The balloon is burst. They're out of ideas.' Mr Sarwar said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 - which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. At a low-key press conference in Edinburgh, a dejected Mr Swinney admitted his party had not recovered last year's general election thrashing, when it lost 39 of its 48 MPs. 'The SNP's made some progress but it's not enough and we've got to make further progress before the elections next May,' he said. The by-election was triggered by the death of SNP minister Christina McKelvie from cancer at the age of 57. It was one of the ugliest campaigns in modern Scottish politics, with accusations of racism levelled against Reform after it homed its attacks on Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. A Reform campaign advert claimed Mr Sarwar had said he wanted to 'prioritise the Pakistani community' based on a 2022 speech in which he said no such thing. Mr Swinney tried to use the advert and Reform's rising support to turn the contest into a battle between his own party and Nigel Farage's and exclude Labour. He claimed it was a 'two-horse race' in which Labour didn't feature. 'I'm confident we've done enough to win the contest,' he said on the eve of the poll. 'Labour can't win. It's over for the Labour Party. There's no way they can win here, after the disastrous record of the Labour government.' But Labour's traditional door-by-door campaigning and an affable local candidate who highlighted deteriorating public services under the SNP narrowly won out. Mr Russell erased an SNP majority of 4,582 on a 7 per cent swing to Labour. Labour's share of the vote was 31.5 per cent, down from the 33.6 per cent at the 2021 Holyrood election. The SNP's vote share slumped by more than a third from 46.2 per cent to 29.3 per cent. Despite hype about overtaking Labour or even winning, Reform UK came third, but achieved a 26.1 per cent share despite not having a Holyrood candidate in the seat before The Scottish Conservatives came fourth but narrowly held on to their deposit.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Labour hails ‘incredible' by-election victory – but can it see off Reform to win Holyrood in 2026?
Against expectations, Labour won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election for the Scottish parliament. Anas Sarwar, its leader in Scotland, hailed the result as an 'incredible victory' and declared that voters are 'tired of SNP failure' but have 'rejected Reform 's poison'. However, with a little less than a year before the next elections at Holyrood, it's by no means clear who the next first minister will be. What happened in Hamilton? The by-election was held following the death earlier this year of Scottish government minister, Christina McKelvie. Labour's Davy Russell won after a swing of more than 7 per cent from the SNP to Labour, with 8,559 votes, beating SNP candidate Katy Loudon on 7,957 and Reform's Ross Lambie on 7,088. Mr Sarwar said: 'The choice is stark next year ... it is about choosing a government here in Scotland. The choice is stark – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.' Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisted his party was 'delighted' with coming third. 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result,' he said. Was it an 'incredible victory' for Labour? No. Labour did far worse than in a 2023 by-election for Westminster, and in last year's election. It even did a little worse here than it did in the 2021 Holyrood elections. What's more, it was hardly ahead of the SNP or, more shockingly, Reform UK. A shift of a few hundred votes out of the total of 27,155 cast could have swung it for any of three main contenders. It was really a three-way fight, and could easily have been won by either of the other two, with Labour possibly finishing a close third. The outstanding features were the collapse in SNP and Conservative support, plus a Reform UK surge in unpromising territory. What does it tell us about Labour? This took place in the central belt, where Labour staged a remarkable revival last year but has since suffered a steep decline, so the result was broadly in line with what opinion polls are telling us. So who will win the Scottish elections next year? Nobody, in the sense that the SNP will suffer heavy losses and Labour may do scarcely better than it did in 2021. On the current showing, the SNP will most likely emerge as the largest party unless Labour can stage a recovery and take voters away from the SNP, who've been in power since 2007. On the basis of this by-election and the opinion polls, no one will get anywhere near an overall majority, and it will be difficult for any realistic majority to be cobbled together. The Scottish election system has a good deal of proportionality in it which means that, unlike the first-past-the-post arrangement for the House of Commons, many more parties will gain a larger representation. Thus it seems likely that the SNP, Labour, Reform, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and possibly the Scottish Greens and Alba will be represented to some extent. The SNP, despite its slump since 2021, may well still be the largest single party, on about 32 per cent of the vote, ahead of Labour. But the SNP would need the support of other, mostly unionist, parties if it wanted to govern on a truly stable basis – at the moment, an unlikely scenario. Alternatively, the SNP, possibly under new leadership, could follow the example of Alex Salmond in his first term as first minister from 2007 to 2011, and govern on a 'policy by policy' basis as a minority administration. Either way, the relative weakness of the SNP would stymie any further push for independence. But Labour, who beat the SNP in Scotland at last year's Westminster election, will be disappointed in 2026 if they fail to retake Holyrood, which they once dominated so effortlessly.
