Ex-ASIO chief questions Australia's defence spending amid Western budget boosts
The 'real issue' with Australia's defence spending is not if the Albanese government is splashing more cash but whether it is 'enough' and flowing 'fast enough', an ex-spy chief says.
Duncan Lewis headed the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) from 2014 to 2019.
Since departing the country's domestic spy service, he has become chair of the European Australian Business Council and the Australian arm of weapons maker Thales.
Mr Lewis said on Monday there was no doubt Labor had increased the defence budget since coming to power.
'The government has increased defence expenditure and spending over the last couple of years, and the projections going forward continue that increase,' he told the ABC.
'The real issue is whether it is enough and whether it is fast enough.'
Mr Lewis noted that the defence budget was sitting about 2 per cent of GDP or $59bn.
Under Labor's spending commitments, that would increase to about 2.35 per cent of GDP by 2034 – the same year the Albanese government has warned a major conflict could break out.
At roughly $100bn in the space of a decade, Mr Lewis said 2.35 per cent was 'a sizeable increase'.
'But the question is, is it enough to have the kind of defence force that we might require in the future?' he said.
Anthony Albanese is facing domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially 'imminent' threat from China in the Indo Pacific.
But the Prime Minister has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO's decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
The Trump administration has asked Australia to lift spending to 3.5 per cent.
Both Labor and the opposition have pushed back on that target, with the Coalition proposing 3 per cent instead.
Asked point blank if 2.35 per cent of GDP was enough, Mr Lewis said he thought Australia would need to front up more.
'I'm of the view that if we are going to run a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, together with an effective defence force that's capable of doing the kind of things that we expect might be required in the future, there will have to be an increase in due course,' he said.
'But look, I'm cognisant of the fact that there are competing challenges for the public purse, and it's up to the government to get their balance right.
'But I think there is a sense of urgency in this matter, which is not universally being exhibited, and I think that needs to be something that we should pay more attention to.'
Mr Lewis also said defence companies were not getting the 'certainty' needed to do business in Australia.
'There is a concern that we are unable to get into long-term, reliable partnerships with government,' he said.
'The defence industry in Australia requires long term, regular contractual arrangements if we are to develop sovereign defence capability, and that is a stated objective of the government.
'You can't have just episodic buys and expect defence companies to continue operating in Australia.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
Nude model's money woes exposed
Given the couple's propensity for their Instagrammable lives to be also regularly snapped by the paparazzi, the recent on-again/off-again listing of the Darling Point apartment co-owned by nude artist Dina Broadhurst and her ex-partner, builder Max Shepherd, kept gossip column readers riveted for months until its recent sale. The price guidance for the Etham Ave garden apartment sat at $11.5m for its abandoned December auction, and by the time of its rescheduled June auction, had dropped to $8.4m. It apparently fetched $8m in its undisclosed pre-auction negotiations this month. MORE: Aus pub's $500m collapse, staff owed $7m There has been a continuing backdrop of intricate financing of their renovation project after kicking off with a standard NAB mortgage. The duplex apartment, with 280sq m of indoor-outdoor living space, had cost $5.2m unrenovated in 2022, which was followed by a 'Cinderella transformation' by emerging interior designer, Josh Knight from Glebe. 'No expense was spared to deliver a home of high-end luxury showcasing bespoke design by Studiojos,' its marketing advised. Though the couple had split by mid-2023 after 4½ years together, NSW Land Registry documents indicate that about April 2024, the duo secured second mortgage funding from Greg Reed's Benchmark Property Finance. MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay The extra $500,000 finance was obtained at 24 per cent for nine months to a total 70 per cent loan to value ratio. By last September, it sat at $1.16m with the funding agreement specifying the apartment needed to be listed for sale within five months with a 'reputable agent'. By February this year, the loan expiry date had been extended to August. It has also emerged that veteran Sydney businessman Basil Sellers had separately lent Shepherd $260,000 in 2022, with the amount owing at $358,000 last month. Shepherd moved on and stepped out with his Vanderpump Rules star girlfriend Vail Bloom, while Broadhurst remains devoted to her 365,000-strong Instagram following and her risqué self-portraits. One of her artworks has just been installed in the conference room of Ray White Touma Taylor in Redfern. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes

Courier-Mail
41 minutes ago
- Courier-Mail
Anthony Albanese denies Donald Trump ‘snubbing' him amid meet worries
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Anthony Albanese has denied Donald Trump is 'snubbing' him amid growing concerns in both Australia and the US that the two leaders have not yet had a face-to-face. The Prime Minister did a morning media blitz on Tuesday to champion a host of cost-of-living measures kicking in. But with Australian products still slugged with US tariffs and concerns AUKUS could be on the rocks, his relationship with the US President dominated. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has denied US President Donald Trump is 'snubbing' him. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire / Nicolas Tucat / AFP Appearing on Nine's Today, host Karl Stefanovic put it to Mr Albanese that Mr Trump 'couldn't give a rat's about meeting with you'. 'I think it's so disrespectful,' Stefanovic said. 'And why don't you just tell him to bugger off?' But Mr Albanese took a different view, insisting he has a 'respectful' relationship with Mr Trump. 'No, not at all, and we've had really constructive discussions,' he said. 'I've been respectful of the President and I must say that he's been respectful of me as well when he rang to congratulate me on the election.' Mr Albanese added that he'd had 'constructive discussions with members of the US administration, as have my ministers'. 'But the President has a view about tariffs – it's different from Australia's view and it must be said that it's different from past presidents' views as well,' Mr Albanese said. 'And what most economists realise, (is) that free and fair trade is a good thing for the world and America has benefited from that.' X SUBSCRIBER ONLY Mr Albanese said he had 'a right to represent Australia's national interests', and Mr Trump 'has a right to adopt his America First policy, as he calls it'. Pressure has ramped up on Mr Albanese to secure a meet after his scheduled bilateral meeting with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit fell through last month. On Monday, two of the staunchest supporters of the US-Australia alliance in Washington urged Mr Albanese to visit the White House. Republican representative Michael McCaul and Democrat colleague Joe Courtney are co-chairs of a congressional working group on AUKUS. Mr McCaul said Mr Albanese going to 'the White House would be a great gesture on the Prime Minister's part, that I think would go over very well'. 'That would be very sound advice for him to do that,' he told the Australian Financial Review. Originally published as Anthony Albanese denies Donald Trump 'snubbing' him amid meet worries

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Messed up': Sydney restaurant sparks fury over ‘live' dish
A Sydney restaurant has sparked outrage after serving a seemingly live lobster to customers. Korean seafood restaurant, Getbawi, opened its doors in late 2024 and has quickly garnered a following as one of the few Sydney restaurants specialising in hoe, or authentic raw seafood. But footage of what appears to be a live lobster being eaten by customers has now sparked controversy online and thrown concerns for animal welfare into the spotlight. In a clip posted to TikTok, a customer can be seen recording two other diners eating a lobster as it twitches and moves its legs. 'Wow, live lobster eating,' the cameraman says before asking if it's good. 'It's good, it's actually good,' replies one of the diners. Commenters were quick to express their shock over the clip with some branding it as 'straight up cruel.' 'How do you enjoy a meal while watching the poor thing suffer?,' questioned one viewer. 'This is so wrong,' wrote another. 'So cruel,' agreed a third. A spokesperson from Getbawi told that in order to ensure the freshest seafood they 'take the lobster from the aquarium when the customer orders and kill it straight away.' When asked how they respond to claims of animal cruelty a staff member replied, 'I can see how some people might think about it like that.' He added: 'It's for the freshness, we do it for the fish too. We have live fish for our sashimi.' The lobster is priced off market price but could set you back over $180 per kg. The Getbawi spokesperson did not agree with claims that its lobster is served alive. Lobsters sometimes exhibit movement after death due to residual nerve and muscle activity. When a crustacean is killed, its nervous system doesn't always shut down instantly and its muscles may continue to contract, resulting in twitching and movements. In Australia, the protection of shellfish under animal welfare laws is minimal. Most states and territories exclude crustaceans from their definitions of 'animals' under animal welfare legislation. In NSW the Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 protects crustaceans, but only when they are being prepared for sale or offered for consumption in places like restaurants or wet markets. In South Australia, Queensland, Tasmania and Western Australia, crustaceans are not included within the definition of animal and therefore have no protection under animal cruelty laws. A spokesperson for PETA told 'Prosecutors must throw the book at this restaurant for its disgusting and egregious breach of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, which clearly prohibits 'producing food for human consumption, in a manner that inflicted unnecessary pain upon the animal'.' The PETA spokesperson continued: 'The pain this lobster must've endured when his body was ripped apart and his delicate flesh sucked out is unimaginable. Research shows that lobsters have sophisticated nervous systems made up of ganglia throughout their bodies – this makes them extra-sensitive, meaning that they can feel every moment of their prolonged deaths when they're immersed in boiling water or eaten alive. 'This restaurant must immediately lose its licence, and people upset by this can do their part to help lobsters and other sea animals by leaving them off their plates.'