Popular principal will stay at Toronto arts school after students, parents push back against transfer
Barrie Sketchley will now stay on as principal of the school where he spent over 30 years of his career until his retirement next June, the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) said Tuesday.
The TDSB — which was recently taken over by a provincially-appointed supervisor due to government concerns of financial mismanagement — announced in June that Sketchley would be moved to Harbord Collegiate Institute for the upcoming school year. That led to pushback from parents and students, who said Sketchley was an integral part of the school community.
In a letter to parents, guardians and students Tuesday, the board said its province-appointed supervisor had reversed the decision to transfer Sketchley.
"Principal Sketchley's deep connection to students, families, and staff has shaped the identity of the school and we look forward to a wonderful school year ahead under Principal Sketchley's continued leadership," said the letter, signed by superintendent of education Jennifer Chan.
A new principal will join Sketchley to work with administration for the school year, the letter said. The new administrator will work as the school's "Centrally Assigned Principal — Transitions," to support students and staff and "select system initiatives related to transitions," Chan wrote.
The province and board have not commented on why Sketchley was originally set to be transferred.
A spokesperson for TDSB said any further comment on the decision would have to come from the Ministry of Education. CBC Toronto reached out to the ministry Tuesday evening, but did not immediately hear back.
The province's decision in June to take over four school boards, including the TDSB, prompted concerns from parents and students worried that their voices would not be heard in board decisions if their elected officials were no longer in charge.
Reversal comes after student, parent backlash
The original decision to move Sketchley led students at Rosedale Heights to walk out of class in protest this past spring. Many told CBC News at the time that Sketchley, who is in his 80s, had helped build Rosedale Heights into a leading arts school where students were given the best opportunities, and he could not be replaced.
An online petition to reinstate Sketchley at Rosedale Heights, which garnered roughly 2,900 signatures, said the principal's "dedication to the arts and his unwavering support for his students have left an indelible mark on our community."
"His absence would leave a void that no other can fill, and the community is deeply concerned about the future of our beloved school without his guidance," it read.
WATCH | Students, parents rally to keep beloved principal from moving schools:
'We do not want him to go': Toronto students rally to reinstate principal
2 months ago
Students at Rosedale Heights School of the Arts staged a walkout in support of their principal. CBC's Clara Pasieka explains why. While it is not policy, it is longtime practice for principals and vice principals to be moved or rotated every five or so years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
8 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
China imposes 75.8% duty on Canadian canola, prompting industry calls for federal support
Canada's canola industry is facing steep losses and urging Ottawa to compensate farmers after Beijing announced a 75.8-per-cent preliminary duty on Canadian canola seed. The Tuesday morning announcement comes toward the end of a one-year anti-dumping probe launched by China in September. Canada's agricultural sector has benefited from extensive government subsidies and preferential policies that distort markets, said an announcement from China's Ministry of Commerce on Tuesday. But Beijing's actions are not about dumping and effectively cut off Canada's most lucrative crop from one of its most important markets weeks before harvest, say many in the sector. Canadian canola is exported in accordance with rules based trade and fair market access, said Chris Davidson, President of Canola Council of Canada. Beijing's tariffs are instead a 'political issue that needs a political resolution,' he said. The anti-dumping investigation came after Ottawa imposed 100-per-cent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles and 25-per-cent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum. Beijing imposed 100-per-cent tariffs on meal and oil in March as retaliation for Ottawa's tariffs. Now all three canola products - meal, seed and oil - are facing Chinese tariffs. 'There are geopolitical forces and we seem to be getting side-swiped,' said Dale Leftwich, Policy Manager at SaskOilseeds, adding that farmers feel like 'collateral damage.' Canola farmers feel their livelihoods are being sacrificed to save the auto industry 'This is fairly devastating right now,' said Alberta farmer Roger Chevraux. His crop is around three weeks away from harvest and it lost $90,000 in value after markets reacted and the price per bushel dropped by $1. Mr. Chevraux will try to hold onto the crop until prices improve. But storage space is limited and September is an expensive time of year. Costs like fuel from running harvest machinery and the bill for fertilizer might force a number of farmers to take a low price. The price could also fall lower. 'We need a return to rules based trade all the way around the world ... We need normal trade we can rely on.' In the meantime, Mr. Chevraux would like to see Ottawa offer compensation. 'They're willing to support other industries in Canada. I sure hope they don't forget about us.' Valued at $4-billion in annual exports, China is the largest market for Canadian canola seed. It is also the largest vegetable oil consumer in the world, with an annual consumption of 38.3 mmt. The product set for China cannot be easily move elsewhere. There have been some promising developments in Ottawa's relationship with China, said Mr. Davidson. In early June, Canada and China trade ministers committed to convening the Joint Economic and Trade Commission. 'We will be looking for the government to double down on those efforts moving forward.'
CTV News
8 minutes ago
- CTV News
Bick's pickles disappear from some Canadian shelves amid tariff dispute
Some Canadian shoppers have noticed something missing from their local grocery store shelves - and experts say it's a case study on how tariffs can reduce choices and raise prices. Bick's pickles, the iconic brand founded in Canada in 1951, is now owned by U.S.-based TreeHouse Foods. While the cucumbers and jar lids are sourced in Canada, the pickles are processed in the U.S. before being shipped back north. Under current trade rules, that makes them subject to counter-tariffs Ottawa imposed in response to U.S. duties on Canadian goods. 'It's a bit weird because the Bick's product is actually more Canadian than some properly labelled Canadian pickles,' Sylvian Charlebois, professor of food distribution and policy at Dalhousie University, told CTV's Your Morning Tuesday. Charlebois says the policy, aimed at pressuring Washington, ends up hurting domestic competition. 'We're tariffing products that are actually grown in Canada. If you reduce supply, prices tend to go up.' Some Canadian retailers will still carry Bick's, he noted, but availability will be reduced. Alternatives like Mrs. White's pickles, made in Canada, are still on store shelves. Ian Lee, a business analyst at Carleton University, calls the situation a 'lose-lose proposition' that punishes Canadian farmers, manufacturers and consumers. 'The jar gets hit by Canadian tariffs,' Lee told CTV News Channel in an interview Monday. 'The profit margins in grocery retailing are already razor-thin, so some stories just take them off the shelf.' According to CTV News Winnipeg, a Sobeys in the city let customers know that tariffs will impact what they can stock on their shelves. In July, a sign placed in the Winnipeg store on a shelf that normally holds Bick's Pickles read, 'Bick's Pickles are currently unavailable as an unfortunate impact of tariffs. We are pleased to offer a selection of alternatives for your shopping convenience.' The tariffs were introduced as retaliation to U.S. duties introduced by U.S. President Donald Trump. But Lee says mimicking the U.S. approach does more harm than good. 'We're poking Donald Trump in the eye but we're hurting Canadians in the process,' Lee said. has reached out to TreeHouse Foods, Sobeys and Loblaw for comment.
National Post
38 minutes ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Challenge to Saskatchewan pronoun law a waste of time, money and effort
People hold pride flags while attending a rally against the Saskatchewan government's legislation on pronouns in schools, in front of Saskatchewan legislature in Regina, on Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Heywood Yu It is tempting to dismiss a court challenge over a Saskatchewan pronoun law as a waste of legal resources and time, a squandering of taxpayers' money and a misreading of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors And yet one person interviewed by the CBC said that because of the law she had 'kids come up to me saying they were afraid that they were going to die, basically, because of their homes being unsafe.' Well, clearly, if teenage boys and girls feel they are going to die because parents aren't using their preferred pronouns then obviously no expense should be spared. This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays) By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again On Monday, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decided to prolong this travesty of justice by sending a challenge over the provincial government's pronoun policy back to a lower court. The government passed its pronoun law using section 33 of the Charter (the notwithstanding clause.) Nobody is challenging that the government didn't have the right to do that. Also, the court case started over the government's original policy (before it passed a law.) That policy has been repealed so that part of the case is entirely moot. However, the appeal court said the original judge did have the right to declare whether he thought Charter rights had been limited — but he didn't have to. The judge can use his discretion about whether to make a declaration or not. So the appeal court is saying the Saskatchewan government has done nothing wrong but a judge still has the right to scold it if he believes the Charter has been infringed in some way. No one should be surprised if the headline on this article is: Judges uphold judge's right to chide government. And all this legal brouhaha is because the Saskatchewan government — quite sensibly — believes that schools shouldn't be in the business of allowing young children to impulsively change their pronouns without telling their parents. In 2023, the Saskatchewan government agreed on a policy that teachers and schools must get written consent from parents before using the preferred pronoun of a student under 16. Premier Scott Moe said at the time that the policy was about 'the rights of a parent to ensure they are involved in their child's decision.' When a non-profit group called the UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity at the University of Regina launched a court challenge over the policy, the government put the pronoun policy into law and coupled it with the notwithstanding clause. UR Pride claimed that the government's policy was infringing students' Charter rights under Section 7 (everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person) and Section 15 (every individual is equal before and under the law.) The group now also claims that Section 12 (everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment) has been infringed.
