
US Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship, voting rights before current term concludes
WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump's bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally.
The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6.
The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the US.
The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years.
These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies.
Decisions also are expected in several other important cases.
The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools.
Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity.
The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools.
The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court.
Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024.
Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time.
The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life.
At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act.
Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography.
Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous.
The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court nationwide injunction ruling: What are Justices Barrett and Jackson's arguements
The US Supreme Court on Friday handed President Donald Trump a major victory by ruling to curb the power of federal judges to impose nationwide rulings impeding his policies. However, the issue of whether the administration can limit birthright citizenship still remains unresolved. Trump welcomed the court's 6-3 ruling, declaring that his administration can now proceed with numerous policies such as his executive order aiming to restrict birthright citizenship. US Supreme Court ruled on nationwide injunction by federal judges on Friday(AFP) "We have so many of them. I have a whole list," Trump told reporters at the White House. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who authored the ruling, directed lower courts that blocked Trump's order on birthright citizenship to reconsider. She and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had completely different arguments in their opinions. Jackson and other liberal justices wrote a joint dissent. The Biden-nominee, in her solo dissent, said 'disaster was looming'. 'It gives the Executive the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate,' she wrote. Barrett quickly rebuked her colleague. 'We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary. No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law. But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation—in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so," Barrett wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent, added: "The majority ignores entirely whether the President's executive order is constitutional, instead focusing only on the question whether federal courts have the equitable authority to issue universal injunctions. Yet the order's patent unlawfulness reveals the gravity of the majority's error and underscores why equity supports universal injunctions as appropriate remedies in this kind of case." Trump called the ruling a 'monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law'. "It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation," Trump said of nationwide injunctions. (With inputs from Reuters)


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Would bomb Iran again...': Trump drops bombshell amid escalating Iran-Israel conflict
President Donald Trump said on Friday he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran was enriching uranium to a level that concerned the United States, and he backed inspections of Iran's bombed nuclear sites. "Sure, without question, absolutely," Trump said when asked about the possibility of new bombing of Iranian nuclear sites if deemed necessary at some point. At a White House news conference, Trump said he plans to respond soon to comments from Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei, who said Iran "slapped America in the face" by launching an attack against a major U.S. base in Qatar following last weekend's U.S. bombing raid. Trump also said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency or another respected source to be able to inspect Iran's nuclear sites after they were bombed last weekend. Show more Show less


Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Stresses July Tariff Threat, Bessent Teases Extension
President Donald Trump hardened his threat to raise tariffs on certain countries by his July 9 deadline, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signaled there may be some extensions to wrap up major pacts by the Labor Day holiday. The statements Friday are the latest sign that some negotiations with larger partners may extend past early July, but that Trump is weighing higher rates for smaller economies that have not reached agreements with the US. 'At a certain point over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we're going to send out a letter, we talked to many of the countries that we're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States,' Trump said Friday at a White House press conference. Asked if the mid-July deadline was set in stone, Trump suggested he could even shorten the timeline for trading partners seeking deals. 'We can do whatever we want. We could extend it, we could make it shorter,' Trump said. 'I'd like to make it shorter. I'd like to just sent letters out to everybody, 'Congratulations, you're paying 25%.'' Taken together, the remarks injected further uncertainty into what the president will decide when it comes to tariff levels for some of the country's top trading partners. Earlier in the day, Bessent said on Fox Business 'we have countries approaching us with very good deals' but said that they all might not be finished by the date when Trump's April 2 country-based tariffs are set to kick back in. He noted Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's comments from a day earlier that the White House has imminent plans to reach agreements with 10 major trading partners. 'If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18 — there are another important 20 relationships — then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,' Bessent said. This year, Labor Day falls on Sept. 1. Nearly five dozen countries and the European Union are facing higher rates on July 9, barring a deal. Later, when asked about Bessent's comments, Trump declined to respond directly when asked which countries may be completed by Labor Day. The Treasury chief reiterated that there are 18 important trading partners, and noted that the US has already done a deal with the UK and reached an accommodation with China, so those two 'are behind us for now.' Trump in April put tariffs on dozens of American trading partners on pause for three months a week after declaring them, when markets panicked over the possibility they could trigger a global recession. Lutnick, speaking on Bloomberg Television on Thursday, said that Trump was prepared to finalize a slate of trade deals in connection with that July timeframe. 'We're going to do top 10 deals, put them in the right category, and then these other countries will fit behind,' Lutnick said. Trump and his advisers initially laid out ambitious plans for the negotiating period, suggesting concurrent talks with dozens of partners on reducing trade deficits, eliminating barriers to American goods and reshoring more manufacturing. 'We've got 90 deals in 90 days possibly pending here. And it was par for the course, actually it was a birdie for President Trump to do exactly what he did, which was pause for 90 days,' White House trade adviser Peter Navarro told NBC's Meet the Press back in April. EU officials are optimistic they can reach a deal by the July 9 deadline to avoid a tariff hike. Trump has threatened a 50% levy on the bloc, which is planning its own countermeasures. But that has not happened, as some trading partners have dug in on negotiations and with Trump indicating he would be willing to just unilaterally impose tariff levels if he was unhappy with the terms obtained in talks. It is also unclear how comprehensive the trade deals the administration is moving to lock up will be. Such agreements can typically take years to negotiate. The pact with the UK that Trump has hailed as comprehensive still leaves critical points unresolved, and the China accord leaves open questions about fentanyl trafficking and US exporters' access to Chinese markets. Trump has suggested India is one nation that could be close to finalizing a deal. A team of Indian trade officials was slated to hold meetings with officials in Washington this week. Bessent separately said Friday that the US isn't looking to reshore all types of manufacturing, but instead focus on higher-value products. 'We are going to bring back precision manufacturing jobs,' he said at an event held by the Faith & Freedom Coalition. 'We're not going to make socks and towels again,' he added, noting that he recently took criticism for saying that the textile output of his childhood in South Carolina wasn't going to return. 'We're going to have high-end, craft manufacturing,' he continued, citing uniforms for first responders and US military as examples. The Treasury chief said South Carolina was among the places that were 'left by the wayside' following China's entry into the World Trade Organization, a time he characterized as 'capitalism without guardrails.' With assistance from Akayla Gardner and Josh Wingrove. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.