4 seek Joplin School Board seats
Joplin voters on April 8 will elect two to the Joplin Board of Education.
There are four candidates in the race, including incumbent David Weaver and two who formerly served on the board. One of the two seats to be filled is that of the current board vice president, Donnie Greenlee, who is not seeking reelection.
In addition to Weaver, candidates for the three-year terms are two who previously served, Derek Gander and Lori Musser, and Thomas Ross.
David Weaver
Weaver is seeking a second term, having been elected in 2022.
He is an accounting and finance professor at Pittsburg State University.
He said he was influenced to seek an elective post in the Joplin School District because his family has a long history in public education. He said his mother was a teacher and his wife, daughter and sister are all involved in public education.
Weaver holds a bachelor's degree in education from Ozark Christian College, a bachelor's degree in business administration from Missouri Southern State University, an MBA in accounting from Missouri State University, and a master's degree in communication from PSU.
He currently serves in leadership positions for 10 area nonprofit organizations.
'I believe in public service and giving back to the community,' Weaver said. 'My son will graduate from Joplin High School in May. I believe my leadership skills, educational background and knowledge of finance and accounting make me uniquely qualified to be reelected to the Joplin Schools Board of Education.'
Derek Gander
Gander previously served two board terms. He was first elected in April 2017 and was returned to office in April 2020. He ran again last year.
He owns a home inspection business in Joplin andworked in the construction industry for more than 30 years. He has two children in the school district.
His said his experience in business and with the school district led him to run again.
'I served two terms with pride and integrity. I have Missouri-required board training along with being a parent of two students. Being a small business owner and being financially responsible for budgeting, paying local taxes and payroll allows me to understand the business side of the district. Having two students enrolled in the district along with being an active previous board member allows me to understand the day-to-day responsibilities and challenges in the classroom. I served previously during the time of COVID and played an instrumental role in helping in the design of our reentry plan. I see similar challenges now as we return to being financially responsible as we tighten our belts and focus on the mission, educating our students,' Gander said.
Lori Musser
A former teacher and school administrator, Musser also has previously served on the board.
She was first elected to the board in 2016 to complete the unexpired term of Lane Roberts. She then was reelected in April 2018 for a three-year term, which has given her five years of experience. that, along with her 38 years of working in education, led her to seek a school board position again.
'During my 26-year career in K-12, I have served as a parent educator, classroom teacher, reading specialist, school guidance counselor, and school principal. I then continued my education career for 12 more years in higher education as an adjunct professor, academic success coach, and coordinator of disability services. More importantly, I am a mother of two and a grandmother of four. These years as an educator provide me with the background knowledge and expertise that will serve me well if I am granted the opportunity to serve on the board once again,' Musser said.
Thomas Ross
Ross, is a business owner who previously worked for the city of Joplin for 10 years following the Joplin tornado.
He has not run before for the board but previously ran against Lane Roberts for the District 161 seat to represent Joplin in the Missouri House of Representatives.
He said he believes his qualifications to serve on the board come from his professional and personal experiences.
He worked for the city of Joplin in the engineering department overseeing some city projects. That experience, he said, gave him a foundation in problem-solving, budget oversight and advocacy. He also cited his involvement in the Joplin community, volunteering with Kiwanis, Vita Nova and various other nonprofits.
He said that his reasons for wanting to serve on the board are that 'I am committed to making a positive difference for the students and families in Joplin. I am passionate about improving our educational system and working collaboratively with fellow board members to help Joplin Schools provide children with the best education possible to prepare them for their future.
'As a father of two, with my eldest just two years away from entering the school system, I have a personal stake in the success of our schools. I am fully invested in the future of our children and the quality of education they receive, which sets me apart from others seeking the open board positions,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Looking ahead to Missouri special session, Show Me Sports Investment Act
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Missouri General Assembly's special session reconvenes Monday, and it's the House side of the rotunda's turn in Jefferson City. The state Senate passed a trio of bills last week, one providing a plan to fund up to half of stadium projects for the Chiefs or Royals or Cardinals in St. Louis. The Missouri State House will consider the Show Me Sports Investment Act. The stadium funding bill sets the framework for the Royals and the Chiefs to pay back some of the costs for new and renovated venues. Construction bonds would be paid back using tax money generated at the stadiums and would cover up to 50% of the cost to build it. The teams would have to qualify to have access to that money. The stadiums would need to be built for football or baseball, have more than 30,000 seats, and cost at least half a billion dollars. On Sunday, Rudi Keller, the deputy editor of the Missouri Independent, discussed what could happen as the special session continues this week. Kansas City superheroes assemble behind local child battling cancer 'A member of the House budget Committee who will consider the spending bill on Tuesday said there is an assumption the House will pass this, and that's correct. I also talked to the Chair of the House Budget Committee earlier today, and it turns out he's not going to be demanding anything new. So as long as there aren't serious demands that endanger the bill from the House, much as the way demands from Senators resulted in a change to the call, I'm anticipating this will go relatively smoothly this week,' Keller said on 4 The People. The stadium funding bill does not have the words 'Royals' or 'Chiefs' in it, but a big reason for the calling of this special session was to find a way to keep both teams in the state and counter the plans of Kansas lawmakers. Nearly a year ago, the Kansas legislature approved a bill to utilize STAR bonds to cover stadium construction costs. The deadline for that bill is coming up at the end of June. 'If Kansas believes that we could really be in the conversation, you could see some limited extension,' said Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson. 'The way the law is written, it could be extended for up to a year. I don't see that happening.' You can watch the full conversation with Masterson and Keller here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Alan Roden's RBI double
Blues Have Clear Free-Agent Defenseman To Target One area the St. Louis Blues should be looking to improve this off-season is the right side of their defense. Bringing in a top-four right-shot defenseman would certainly give their roster a boost as they look take another step forward in 2025-26. 4:17 Now Playing Paused Ad Playing
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Jackson County legislators could finally end 6-month budget freeze. What to know
After nearly six months without an active budget, Jackson County legislators are seeking community feedback on Monday as they may finally be reaching a compromise to get something passed. The half billion-dollar budget has been held in flux since the beginning of the year throughout months of infighting between members of the legislature and County Executive Frank White, who vetoed the proposed budget in its entirety on January 9. Now, the legislature will be voting on its latest round of edits to the plan on Monday. Monday's meeting will kick off with a public hearing regarding the budget before legislators vote on the proposal. However, a double final vote — on whether to approve the proposed amendments, then whether to pass the budget — will not take place until the legislature's next meeting, at the earliest. The legislature typically meets weekly on Mondays. All meetings of the Jackson County Legislature, including Monday's hearing, are open to the public. Legislators initially voted 5-4 to approve this year's budget for the first time at the very end of last year, on Dec. 31, before White vetoed it. In a letter to the legislature sent the same day of his veto, White called the proposed budget legally and fiscally irresponsible. He criticized its proposed increases to the legislature's own operating budget and its proposed cuts to public safety, arts and corrections staff. 'This budget, as amended, does not reflect the values of Jackson County,' White wrote. 'It prioritizes political gamesmanship over public safety, economic stability, and the well-being of our residents.' Months later, county legislator Charlie Franklin introduced a further amended version of the budget, with over $11 million in additional appropriations included to be allocated to various county agencies. That's what legislators will be voting on on Monday. The proposed amended budget would put additional money toward the public safety and parks departments, as well as toward county administrative offices and the legislature itself. While some of the extra money would be allocated from the county's 2025 general fund and other budget categories, more than $10 million would come from taxes collected from marijuana sales. In the months that legislators and White have remained at an impasse over the budget, multiple county agencies and services — including the Jackson County Prosecutor's Office, the Parks and Recreation Department and dozens of tax-funded programs — have been unable to access the majority of their funding. Some 'emergency' funding has been released on a case-by-case basis to maintain the day-to-day operations of municipal organizations or satisfy specific grants and contracts. For example, before Monday's meeting, the budget and finance committee will vote to advance an ordinance releasing funding for renovations at Jackson County's family court, and to fill a two-year contract for food services at the Jackson County Detention Center. In the months the budget has remained frozen, tension between the county executive and the legislature has continued to build. Four members of the legislature sued White in February over his budget veto, and three legislators wrote to Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey in May, asking for an investigation into White's conduct. Meanwhile, an effort to recall White is in full swing, with organizers gathering more than half of the signatures needed to put a recall vote on the ballot. The recall effort primarily stems from voters' frustration with how White, along with county assessment director Gail McCann Beatty, set property tax values on real estate during the 2023 assessment cycle. Whenever it is passed, the budget will remain in effect through December 31, 2025.
