A New Kind of ‘Illness Realism'
Illness and literature have frequently been bedfellows. Tuberculosis, for example, shortened the life and influenced the work of authors as varied as Robert Louis Stevenson, Franz Kafka, and the Brontë sisters. We can't know what In Search of Lost Time would have looked like if a variety of ailments had not left Marcel Proust in his bed during his youth. To infer that sickness begets literature would be misleading—perhaps even dangerous. But once in a while, it forces a writer to undergo a radical artistic transformation—one so serious that they might reconsider what books can do.
First, here are three new stories from The Atlantic's Books section:
What Christopher Hitchens understood about the Parthenon
The modern voice of war writing
A novelist who looks into the dark
This week, Hillary Kelly wrote for The Atlantic about a visit with Hanif Kureishi, the award-winning British author who, in 2022, at age 68, began to feel faint and lost consciousness. When he awoke in a hospital, he learned that he had broken his neck, and was paraplegic. Kureishi was already well established before his debilitating injury. In fact, he confessed to Kelly, he believes success had made him too comfortable. 'I was happy having a good life,' he said. 'I thought, Fuck it. Why should I spend all day working? … I didn't have much of a desire to write anymore.'
But after his fall, beginning in his first days in the hospital, Kureishi started to write furiously. A flurry of social-media posts earned him sympathy and admiration for his truth-telling. Over two years of immobility and constant care, that intensity has not abated. A new book, Shattered, collects essays from his first year.
In defining what's new about the book's 'illness realism,' Kelly draws on Virginia Woolf, another writer who faced serious health challenges. In On Being Ill, Woolf wrote that 'things are said, truths blurted out' on the sickbed 'which the cautious respectability of health conceals.' Kureishi, Kelly writes, conveys these truths unvarnished: 'He has no distance from himself or his condition, and refuses to add any.' Kureishi told Kelly that he hasn't been able to read since his fall; he hasn't even read his own book.
Last week in The Atlantic, Kristen Martin wrote about another unusual memoir that presents a very different example of how a health emergency can rewire an author's work. Sarah Chihaya's Bibliophobia is, Martin writes, 'an account of how her reliance on books played a major role in a crisis, leading her, for a time, to fear them.' In 2019, after a lifetime of devoted reading, Chihaya was hospitalized in a psychiatric ward, after which she found herself unable to read (or to write the book that would secure her tenure as a Princeton professor). What eventually helped her emerge—and to write this memoir—was a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, which provided 'a new plot for her life, based in reality rather than fiction.'
Writing—of a new, almost unbearably honest kind—seemed to have helped both of these authors communicate intensely isolating experiences to readers. For the ill person, Woolf wrote, 'the whole landscape of life lies remote and fair, like the shore seen from a ship far out at sea.' Yet that seascape, too, belongs to life; most readers find themselves there at some point. And an author may teach them how to navigate the tides.
Hanif Kureishi's Relentlessly Revealing Memoir
By Hillary Kelly
How a tragic accident helped the author find his rebellious voice again
Read the full article.
, by Sarah Viren
At first, To Name the Bigger Lie seems like a straightforward coming-of-age story. As a high-school student in 1990s Tampa, Florida, Viren falls under the sway of her charismatic teacher Dr. Whiles, who is intent on pushing his students to question the nature of the truth. His pedagogy involves exposing his class, often uncritically, to conspiracy theories that include Holocaust denialism. Years later, in 2016, Viren sets out to write a book that treats that period in her life as an allegory for the rise of fascism in the United States. But, partway through the writing, her wife—an academic, like Viren—is falsely accused of sexual harassment, and the ensuing Title IX investigation becomes part of Viren's narrative. The surprising convergences that Viren finds between the case and Dr. Whiles's teaching—both of which turn out to be fraught, harmful ways of trying to access the truth—culminate in a chilling interrogation of the fact-finding methods that our institutions rely on. — Tajja Isen
From our list: Read these books—just trust us
📚 You Didn't Hear This From Me: (Mostly) True Notes on Gossip, by Kelsey McKinney
📚 Loca, by Alejandro Heredia
📚 Blood Ties, by Jo Nesbø
The Dictatorship of the Engineer
By Franklin Foer
Despite this history of failure, Americans haven't shaken the hope that some benevolent, hyperrational leader, immune to the temptations of political power, will step in to redesign the nation, to solve the problems that politicians can't. That hope is unbreakable, because American culture invests engineers with the aura of wizardry. This is true for Elon Musk. For years, the media glorified him as a magician who harnessed the power of the sun, who revived the American space program, who rescued the electric car. Given that hagiographic press, some of it deserved, he could easily believe in his own ability to fix the American government—and think that a large chunk of the nation would believe that, too.
Read the full article.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
Sign up for The Wonder Reader, a Saturday newsletter in which our editors recommend stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight.
Explore all of our newsletters.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Briton tells of ‘heartbreaking' moment he put children into body bags in Gaza
A British paramedic has told of the 'heartbreaking' moment he put two dead children in body bags shortly after arriving in Gaza. Sam Sears, 44, from Kettering, Northamptonshire, said his three weeks with frontline charity UK-Med was a 'conveyor belt of carnage', treating a 'steady stream' of patients with blast, shrapnel, and gunshot wounds. Mr Sears said on arrival he was thrown straight into a mass casualty incident where two children, aged nine and 11, died from blast injuries. He said: 'I was tasked with moving the two deceased children out the way to make space for other casualties coming in. I put the children in body bags and zipped them up. 'In the UK I've had to deal with a number of deceased children, but the difference was I'm never involved with putting them in a body bag. It's normally a very calm, slow situation, allowing parents time to grieve. 'So it was particularly heartbreaking putting a child in a body bag, seeing their face for the last time, then moving them out the way so we could treat more people. 'Part of me felt guilty that there was no dignity for them because the emergency situation meant it was a case of 'they are dead, let's get them out the way to free the beds'. 'But there was simply no alternative because with such a high volume of casualties, we had to focus on people we might be able to save.' Mr Sears, a paramedic with East Midlands Ambulance Service, who has also carried out humanitarian work in other countries, said that Gaza is like the Ukraine conflict or the earthquake in Turkey 'times one thousand'. He told of seeing a boy, aged about eight, who was 'lifeless behind the eyes – just numb' after losing his whole family in an explosion. The paramedic said a 16-year-old boy was left paralysed and needing amputation after suffering blast and shrapnel wounds and that his 18-year-old brother wept when told he would now have to care for him alone. He also told of seeing more pregnant women and newborn babies suffering severe malnutrition because the mothers lacked the nutrients to breastfeed. Mr Sears, who returned to the UK on July 31, added: 'It might sound weird, but I am keen to return to Gaza. What keeps you going is that you really are making a difference and saving lives. 'That first night, another child came in with shrapnel embedded in their stomach and bleeding internally. I was personally convinced they would die, but we got him to surgery within 20 minutes. 'Next day when I saw them they were recovering well and the prognosis was really good. Gaza's the hardest thing I've ever done but moments like that that keep you going. We have saved that child's life.' Some £19 million of funding from the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has enabled UK-Med to treat more than 500,000 patients at the two UK Government emergency field hospitals in Gaza. The conflict in Gaza began when Palestinian militant group Hamas attacked southern Israel on October 7 2023, killing about 1,200 people, mostly civilians. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, which does not distinguish between militants and civilians and operates under the Hamas government. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to recognise a Palestinian state by September unless Israel meets a series of conditions towards ending the conflict in Gaza. The Prime Minister also urged Hamas to disarm, release its remaining Israeli hostages, and accept it will have no part in the future governance of Gaza. On Saturday, the UK announced another £8.5 million for UN aid to Gaza. The money, to be delivered through the UN's Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is part of a £101 million UK commitment to the Occupied Palestinian Territories this year.


NBC News
11 hours ago
- NBC News
Why U.S. politicians are up in arms about new internet rules in Britain
A growing number of U.S. politicians are condemning a new British law that requires some websites and apps — including some based in the United States — to check the ages of users across the pond. A bipartisan group of members of Congress visited London recently to meet counterparts and air their concerns about the U.K.'s Online Safety Act, which went into effect July 25. Vice President JD Vance has been criticizing the law for months, as have privacy advocates who argue that the law infringes on free expression and disproportionately hurts vulnerable groups. Vance criticized the U.K. again on Friday, this time in person at the start of a visit to the country. Sitting alongside British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and speaking to reporters, Vance warned the U.K. against going down a 'very dark path' of online 'censorship' that he said was trod earlier by the Biden administration. The U.K. Online Safety Act is aimed at preventing children from accessing potentially harmful material online, and internet companies are now asking British users to verify their ages in a variety of ways, including with photos of their IDs, through a credit card provider or with selfies analyzed via age-check software. But the sweeping nature of the law has caught some Britons by surprise. They're being asked to prove their age not only for pornography websites but also before they can listen to songs with explicit lyrics or access message boards to discuss sensitive subjects. Reddit, for example, is restricting access to various pages including r/stopsmoking, r/STD and r/aljazeera. Reddit said in a post about its enforcement of the law that for people in the U.K., it was now verifying ages before they can 'view certain mature content.' A spokesperson for the company said r/STD — a message board focused on questions of sexual health — is restricted because of explicit images. They said r/stopsmoking is restricted because it deals with harmful substances and that r/aljazeera — which is not affiliated with the news organization of the same name but deals with similar topics — is restricted because it depicts serious injury or violence. To get around the new law, the use of virtual private network software that can mask a person's location, also known as VPNs, has surged in the U.K. The primary argument of U.S. politicians who oppose the law is that they don't want American tech companies to have to comply, even if they're serving British customers. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said he raised his objections with U.K. government officials during meetings in London at the end of July. In a statement after his return, he said the law and other European regulations 'create a serious chilling effect on free expression and threaten the First Amendment rights of American citizens and companies.' 'We absolutely need to protect children and keep harmful, illegal content off these platforms — but when governments or bureaucracies suppress speech in the name of safety or regulation, it sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the core of Western democratic values,' Jordan said. The issue may come to a head in a couple of different venues. That could be the courts if any tech companies file lawsuits over the law, or it could come up in trade negotiations if President Donald Trump decides to press the issue with British politicians, although they say it's not open to debate in trade talks. Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist and Meta board member with close ties to the Trump administration, recently called U.K. leaders to complain about the law, the Financial Times reported Friday. A spokesperson for Andreessen said the report was not true. The U.K.'s Online Safety Act is one of the most comprehensive national laws that any democracy has ever passed to try to curtail potentially harmful content online in the name of children. Parliament passed the law in 2023, and the government went through two years of writing detailed rules before putting the law into effect last month. The law is notable for a combination of reasons: the variety of content it applies to, the potential fines and the possible international reach. A wide array of content is at issue. While the 'primary' focus of the law is online material such as pornography and suicide, it also requires websites to age-gate content with bullying, serious violence, 'dangerous stunts' and 'exposure to harmful substances.' That has covered relatively mainstream services such as Spotify and Microsoft's Xbox gaming system. Companies that don't comply face potential fines of up to 10% of their global revenue, which for the biggest companies could be billions of dollars. The British regulator Ofcom, short for Office of Communications, says companies must use ' highly effective age assurance ' to restrict the riskiest types of content. And the U.K. has not been adamant that it won't allow international borders to stymie enforcement. Ofcom says it plans to apply the law to services with 'a significant number' of U.K. users, services where U.K. users 'are a target market' and services that are 'capable of being accessed' by U.K. users with a 'material risk of significant harm' to such users. The law appears to retain strong support among the British public. About 69% said they supported the new rules in a YouGov poll taken after implementation began, and 46% said they supported it 'strongly.' But 52% said they do not think the law will be very effective at preventing minors from accessing pornography. The law was passed during a previous, Conservative-led government and took effect under the current, Labour-led government. But the far-right party Reform U.K. is pushing for a repeal of the law. Party leader Nigel Farage, a former member of Parliament, has called it 'state suppression of genuine free speech,' and his party is running high in polls. 'Millions of people have noticed that what they're getting on their feeds is different to what it was,' Farage said at a recent news conference. Farage also met with visiting members of Congress last week, and the talks turned heated with Farage and Democrats exchanging insults, according to Politico, although the dispute appeared to be more about Trump's free speech restrictions than about the U.K. law. Most U.S.-based tech companies say they are complying with the new law. Microsoft said in a blog post that Xbox users in the U.K. would begin seeing notifications 'encouraging them to verify their age' as a 'one-time process,' with actual enforcement starting next year. If users don't comply, Microsoft warned, they'll lose access to social features of Xbox but will still be able to play games. Discord said it was implementing new default settings for all U.K. users, in effect treating everyone like a minor with heavy content filtering unless they verify that they're adults. Discord says users can choose to verify their age either with a face scan or an ID upload. Elon Musk's X has also restricted posts, including information about the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, according to the BBC. X and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. But a few services are not complying. The far-right social media site Gab, which allows white supremacist views and other extremist content, said in a notice on its website that it had received notices from Ofcom and, rather than comply, decided to block the entire U.K. from accessing its site. The company said in the notice: 'We refuse to comply with this tyranny.' Preston Byrne, a U.S. lawyer who specializes in technology issues, has said on X that he plans to file a lawsuit soon on behalf of an unnamed client seeking to quash possible enforcement of the British law within the United States. The subject has been simmering for months ahead of the law's implementation, and it came up in February when British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited the White House. In an Oval Office meeting, a reporter asked Trump what he thought of the U.K. approach to free speech, and Trump tossed the question to Vance, who expressed concern. 'We do have, of course, a special relationship with our friends in the U.K. and also with some of our European allies. But we also know that there have been infringements on free speech that actually affect not just the British — of course, what the British do in their own country is up to them — but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens,' he said. Starmer defended his government's approach. 'We've had free speech for a very, very long time in the United Kingdom, and it will last for a very, very long time. Certainly, we wouldn't want to reach across U.S. systems and we don't, and that's absolutely right,' he said. British Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy later said the U.K. would not make any changes to the Online Safety Act as part of trade negotiations with the Trump administration. American privacy advocates are watching the debate play out with alarm, concerned that similar age verification laws — like new state laws targeting the Apple and Google app stores — would upend the internet closer to home. 'Young people should be able to access information, speak to each other and to the world, play games, and express themselves online without the government making decisions about what speech is permissible,' wrote Paige Collings, a senior speech and privacy activist at the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, in a blog post Tuesday.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure
Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure originally appeared on Parade. When you go to your yearly check-up at the doctor's office and find out you have high blood pressure, you might feel concerned. High blood pressure can cause an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, kidney problems, eye problems and even dementia, among other health concerns. The good news is? Working to lower your blood pressure doesn't have to be some huge, life-changing, time-consuming feat. In fact, according to a 2023 study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, one short bout of exercise can lead to changes in months, and cardiologists back this up. The exercise in question: wall sits. 🩺SIGN UP for tips to stay healthy & fit with the top moves, clean eats, health trends & more delivered right to your inbox twice a week💊 How Wall Sits Can Lower Blood Pressure Sounds pretty random, right? Parade asked cardiologists to explain how it works—and their answers were fascinating. 'Holding a wall sit isometrically squeezes the big thigh muscle without joint movement,' says , a preventive cardiologist with Baptist Health South Florida. ('Isometrics' are exercises that constrict a particular muscle.) 'That brief 'muscle-clamp' temporarily narrows blood flow, then triggers a rebound widening of the arteries and, over weeks, trains blood vessels to stay more relaxed at rest.' Related: Whether You're Dealing With High Blood Pressure or Want to Avoid It in the Future, Here Are the 25 Best Foods to Eat Want to understand further what's going on behind the scenes? , an interventional cardiologist and regional chief medical officer at VitalSolution, says the physiological mechanisms underlying those effects include improved autonomic regulation (aka increased parasympathetic and reduced sympathetic activity), reductions in resting heart rate and decreased total peripheral resistance. In other words—and on a very basic level—it relaxes your body, in a way. Doing wall sits to lower your blood pressure is a pretty effective option, too, when you look at the numbers. According to the study, doing wall sits (for as long and as often as suggested, which we'll get into below) can lower the systolic number (the first number) by eight and the diastolic number (the second number) by four. Related: Want to Prevent Heart Disease? A Huge Study Says This Is the Exact Blood Pressure You Should Aim For How Long and How Frequent Should Wall Sit Sessions Be? The study looked at meta-analysis research and clinical guidelines to determine the sweet spot for how long the wall sit 'should' be. The result: two minutes, or 120-second holds. Dr. Iluyomade explains this length is long enough to work, but short enough to avoid heart rate spikes and knee strains. 'Longer durations may increase discomfort and reduce motivation, potentially impairing adherence and performance,' Dr. Kalra study suggests doing four of those two-minute holds with equal rest in between. If that sounds too daunting, that's okay—do what you can. 'If you're not there yet, build up with shorter holds, but the eventual goal is four full rounds of two minutes each,' Dr. Iluyomade far as frequency goes, the recommendation is three sessions a week for four to twelve weeks. Then, you can go down to one to two sessions a week. Just keep going. 'Long-term adherence is crucial for sustained blood pressure control, as discontinuation leads to reversal of benefits,' Dr. Kalra says. Other Ways To Lower Blood Pressure Of course, wall sits alone won't cure high blood pressure concerns. The cardiologists also recommend the following: 150 minutes of brisk walking or cycling a week Regular aerobic and dynamic resistance exercise Eating lots of produce, potassium-rich foods and not too many high-sodium foods Getting seven hours of quality sleep Limiting alcohol Practicing stress-relieving habits, such as box breathing and mindfulness If necessary, taking medication and blood pressure checks at home Related: This Arm Position Gives the Most Accurate Blood Pressure Reading, New Study Finds When it comes to lowering your blood pressure, the steps you need to take are similar to the ones you would take for other health concerns: Add nutritious food into your diet, exercise, reduce stress levels, get enough sleep and the list goes on. But if you're looking for one, quick movement that leads to results and is backed by both cardiologists and research, may we suggest a few wall-sit sessions? Up Next:Sources Dr. Adedapo Adeyinka Iluyomade, MD, a preventive cardiologist Dr. Nishant Kalra, MD, an interventional cardiologist High blood pressure (hypertension), Mayo Clinic Exercise training and resting blood pressure: a large-scale pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, British Journal of Sports Medicine Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure first appeared on Parade on Aug 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared.