Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn
In a public bulletin, the authorities warned that hacking groups affiliated with or supportive of Tehran may still seek to disrupt or disable critical infrastructure systems in the U.S. such as utilities, transportation and economic hubs. Hackers may also target defense contractors or other American companies with ties to Israel, the agencies said.
'Despite a declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' the agencies warned.
The warning of continued cyberthreats after a halt to conventional warfare reflects the often opaque nature of cyber conflict. Hacking groups may have only loose ties to a nation state, and may seek to retaliate as an alternative to traditional military action.
The bulletin outlined recommendations, including the use of regular software updates and strong password management systems to shore up digital defenses.
Hackers backing Tehran have targeted U.S. banks, defense contractors and energy companies following American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — but so far have not caused widespread disruptions.
While it lacks the technical abilities of China or Russia, Iran has long used its more limited capabilities to steal secrets, score political points or frighten opponents.
Analysts have tied some of these activities to groups working on behalf of Iran's military and intelligence agencies. But in other instances, the groups appear to act independently.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney receives praise, blowback after he ‘caved' to Donald Trump's demand to scrap tech tax
OTTAWA–Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing praise and blowback for his decision to ditch the government's digital services tax, a move that on Monday revived trade talks between Canada and the U.S., but opened the Liberals up to accusations of bowing to U.S. President Donald Trump. 'It's very simple. Prime Minister Carney and Canada caved to President Trump and the United States of America,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday afternoon. 'It was a mistake for Canada to vow to implement that tax,' Leavitt said, adding that Carney spoke to Trump Sunday about dropping the measure, which would have required a number of American tech giants to submit their first payments on Monday. Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada and the U.S. have restarted negotiations aiming again to reach a deal by July 21. He says Canada cancelled the digital services tax because it was part of the negotiation and wouldn't make sense to collect the tax and then have to refund them later. (June 30, 2025 / The Canadian Press) Carney, speaking briefly to reporters later that afternoon, confirmed negotiations between both countries had resumed but did not respond to a question about the accuracy of the White House's framing that he 'caved' during the call. The prime minister said he made the concession as 'part of a bigger negotiation,' pointing to the agreement he hopes to reach with the Trump administration to resolve the broader trade dispute by July 21. 'It doesn't make sense to collect tax from people and then…remit them back, so it provides some certainty. And as I just said, negotiations have restarted. We're going to focus on getting the best deal for Canadians. We're making progress,' Carney said. Two days earlier, talks between both countries were put on ice after Trump said he was 'terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada' due to the 'egregious' tax. By Sunday night, Canadian officials announced that the measure, a policy the Liberals had championed for years under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, would be scrapped. A government press release said Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne had cancelled the planned June 30 collection of the tax, and that he would introduce legislation to formally rescind the measure. The digital services tax was enacted in 2024, though it was retroactive to 2022 and set to come into effect this year. It would have imposed a three–per-cent tax on certain domestic and foreign tech giants earning more than $20 million in revenue from digital services, like social media and online advertising services, that require the engagement, data and content contributions of Canadians to operate. Companies that also sold or licensed Canadian user data were also captured by the policy. The Parliamentary Budget Officer estimated in 2023 that the tax would boost Ottawa's revenues by $7.2 billion over five years. But the tax has long served as a trade irritant between Canada and the U.S., prompting fears that it would spark, or be used as a wedge, in a future trade war. Major Canadian business organizations also strongly opposed the measure, warning that the tax would ultimately be passed on to Canadian consumers, businesses, and investors through higher costs. 'Now, with it off the table, we think it's going to lower taxes for Canadians. It's going to make some of their services more cost-effective, but it also sends a signal that we're a good place to do business,' David Pierce, the vice-president of government relations for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, told the Star. Carney's move also won support from the Council of Canadian Innovators (CCI), an association that previously backed the measure as 'a necessary tool to ensure global technology giants contribute their fair share in Canada.' CCI president Benjamin Bergen said in a statement that dropping the tax was a 'strategic move' he hoped would 'renew dialogue' with the U.S. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, an international trade organization, also lauded Canada for walking back a tax the group has long said unfairly targets U.S. exporters. 'We urge other governments that have proposed or enacted DSTs, including the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Pakistan, to follow suit and commit to fair, reciprocal international tax principles,' wrote CCIA president Matt Schruers. While the Liberals had been pushing for a multilateral tax approach through the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, work on that front eventually stalled, prompting Canada to chart its own path forward in the interim. Taylor Owen, director of McGill's centre for media, technology and democracy, said that the U.K. was able to keep its own digital services tax, despite Trump's opposition to the policy, while also signing a trade deal with the U.S. 'It probably shows more than anything that we need new digital governance coalitions that don't include the U.S., but are designed to collectively act in order to pressure the U.S.,' Owen told the Star. On Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called out the Liberals for abandoning their previous support for the measure at the '11th hour,' while interim NDP leader Don Davies said 'abandoning fair taxation of tax giants is unacceptable appeasement.' 'We really are back to square one with the operations of these companies. You know, tens of billions of dollars of revenue, effectively untaxed in Canada,' Keldon Bester, executive director of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project told the Star. 'So I think from a negotiating perspective, as well as a tech policy perspective, it's quite disappointing,' Bester said, adding that other legislation regulating American tech giants, like Canada's online streaming and online news laws, could get tangled up in the trade war next. Allison Christians, the Stikeman chair in tax law at McGill University, said U.S. companies hold immense control over information and media in Canada. 'At some point, you just lose control over a society that you want because your economic prospects depend on a volatile, unreliable trade partner that just changes the deal whenever they want,' Christians said. 'So whatever we do, Trump might come up with something next week that he also doesn't like. And then what? What are we giving up next?'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former FBI agent pardoned by Trump for Jan. 6 charges now serving at DOJ: Sources
A former FBI agent accused of egging on rioters to attack police during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol is now serving in the Justice Department as part of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group," sources familiar with the appointment confirmed to ABC News. Jared Wise was on trial when he was pardoned as part of President Donald Trump's sweeping series of pardons and commutations for nearly all of the more than 1,500 individuals charged in connection with the Capitol attack. According to sources, Wise is now serving in the department as an investigator and counselor to Ed Martin, the former interim D.C. U.S. Attorney, whose permanent nomination to the post was rejected by Republican senators concerned over his past vocal advocacy for Jan. 6 rioters and other controversial actions he took in Trump's first four months in office. MORE: Trump admin live updates: House takes up Senate's version of Trump's megabill The New York Times first reported Wise's appointment at the DOJ. Wise was charged in May 2023 and later indicted, with prosecutors pointing to videos showing him yelling "Kill 'em!" repeatedly as rioters attacked police outside of the Capitol building. He also allegedly entered the building for roughly nine minutes and then continued shouting at police. 'You guys are disgusting," Wise allegedly said in body camera footage recorded by law enforcement. "I'm former law enforcement. You're disgusting. You are the Nazi. You are the Gestapo. You can't see it. . . . Shame on you! Shame on you! Shame on you!' A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment when asked about Wise's appointment. Martin also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump-approved portrait hangs in Colorado Capitol after ‘purposefully distorted' version was replaced
A self-approved portrait of President Trump now hangs in the Colorado Capitol – replacing an earlier version he ripped as 'purposefully distorted' and 'truly the worst.' The new portrait, created by Arizona-based Christian worship artist Vanessa Horabuena, is displayed in the third-floor rotunda of the Denver building's wall of past presidents, occupying the same spot where Sarah Boardman's original painting had hung since 2019. The latest display, donated by the White House, mirrors Trump's intense official presidential photo, depicting him leaning slightly forward with a furrowed brow and a steely gaze. 4 Trump's new portrait, created by Arizona-based Christian worship artist Vanessa Horabuena. AP 'Thank you to the Highly Talented Artist, Vanessa Horabuena, and the incredible people of Colorado,' the commander in chief posted on Truth Social Tuesday. 'Now on display at the Colorado State Capitol!' The previous portrait, featuring a much younger version of Trump, was removed from the famed wall back in March after the president randomly took to social media to criticize it – despite its six-year run on display. The original painting was commissioned after former Colorado Senate President Kevin Grantham, a Republican, raised more than $10,000 through a GoFundMe account during Trump's first term. 4 Trump's original portrait was removed after he lambasted the painting in March. Denver Post via Getty Images 'Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado, in the State Capitol, put up by the Governor, along with all other Presidents, was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before,' Trump raged in March. 'The artist also did President Obama, and he looks wonderful, but the one of me is truly the worst. She must have lost her talent as she got older.' 4 Portraits of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump displayed at the Colorado State Capitol. Denver Post via Getty Images The Colorado Building Advisory Committee, not the governor, oversees the portraits. Boardman, who received backlash following the president's scathing comments, previously told The Denver Post that it was important for her portraits of both Trump and Obama to appear 'apolitical.' 4 Wall of presidential portraits in the Colorado State Capitol featuring Trump's latest creation. AP Colorado Democrats, who are in charge of the legislature, eventually agreed to take the painting down at the request of local Republican leaders. Lois Court, a former state lawmaker who chairs the Capitol Building Advisory Committee, said she received the Trump-endorsed portrait over a month ago and decided on Thursday to hang it this week. 'There was a blank on the wall,' she said. 'It seemed inappropriate. We knew that the White House had sent us this replacement and it simply made sense to put it up.' With Post wires
