
Putin's final 'Hail Mary' meatgrinder assault: 160,000 Russian cannon fodder troops mass for advance in last chance to grab Ukrainian land before Trump's 50-day ultimatum ends
The US President earlier this week announced he was 'very unhappy' with his opposite number in the Kremlin and would slap '100 per cent tariffs' on Russia - plus secondary sanctions on its trading partners - if a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine is not reached in 50 days.
But there is little evidence to suggest that Putin and Kremlin insiders will heed Trump's warning.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov immediately dismissed Trump's declaration on Tuesday, remarking: 'Fifty days... it used to be 24 hours, it used to be 100 days - we've been through all of this.'
Meanwhile, sources in the Kremlin told Reuters this week that Putin intends to simply seize more Ukrainian territory and believes his nation, which has thus far survived the toughest sanctions imposed by the West, can endure further economic hardship.
'Putin thinks no one has seriously engaged with him on the details of peace in Ukraine - including the Americans - so he will continue until he gets what he wants,' one source said.
Russian analysts have said Moscow's forces will aim to bleed Ukraine dry with a strategy of 'a thousand cuts,' using drones and meat grinder assaults to relentlessly pressure many sectors of the front while increasing long-range aerial attacks against key infrastructure.
CNN, citing Ukrainian officials, reported that up to 160,000 Russian troops are massing in preparation to pile into the front, but those numbers have not been verified.
British Army veteran Shaun Pinner, who signed up to fight for Ukraine and was captured by Russian forces on the frontlines in 2023 before being released as part of a prisoner exchange, described the approach as a 'Kremlin Hail Mary'.
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during his meeting with workers at the Marnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works MMK, July 16, 2025
Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their land gains, capturing the most territory in eastern Ukraine since the opening stages of Moscow's full-scale invasion in 2022.
DeepState Map, a Ukrainian open-source live mapping service, suggests Putin's soldiers have managed to secure 1,415 square kilometres (546 square miles) of land in the past three months.
Now, they're closing in on the eastern strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region, methodically capturing villages near both cities to try to cut key supply routes and envelop their defenders.
Capturing those strongholds would allow Russia to push toward Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, setting the stage for the seizure of the entire Donetsk region.
If Russian troops seize those last strongholds, it would open the way for them to forge westward to the Dnipropetrovsk region. The regional capital of Dnipro, a major industrial hub of nearly 1 million, is about 150 kilometres (90 miles) west of Russian positions.
Putin's troops are also already in control of the entire Luhansk region, along with more than 70% of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, and small parts of the Kharkiv region, where they are encircling Lyman and Kupiansk.
Russia's battlefield success of late is due in part to Ukraine's manpower and ammunition shortages after more than three years of brutal war, but can also be attributed in part to a refinement of frontline tactics, specifically the use of drones.
Petro, a senior sergeant with the 38th Marine Brigade fighting near Pokrovsk, told the Kyiv Independent that his unit is experiencing a 'huge problem' with Russia's use of drones and glide bombs.
Rather than relying on tanks and armoured vehicles to grind forward as they did earlier in the war, Russian forces are increasingly deploying swarms of first-person view (FPV) drones to bombard Ukrainian positions and limit the mobility of defenders.
Roman Pohorilyi, co-founder of DeepState Map, added that Shahed-type attack drones are also being used along the contact line, not just to launch attacks on infrastructure.
But groups of unfortunate foot soldiers are nonetheless forced to pile in behind them in a mad dash to overwhelm the defensive lines - a tactic Petro described as 'meat assaults in small groups'.
'Three (Russian soldiers) advance, two are killed, and one reaches the trench.'
Since Trump's return to the White House in January, the US and Russian leaders have shared several personal phone calls.
Trump also dispatched special envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow for a diplomatic visit, and the US has proposed an unconditional ceasefire - but these actions have yielded no results.
This is because there have not been any detailed discussions of the basis for a lasting peace plan - at least not one that takes into account Russian concerns, Kremlin sources told Reuters.
The Russian President has declared repeatedly that any peace deal should see Ukraine withdraw from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022.
He also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces - demands Kyiv and its Western allies have rejected.
Moscow's escalating attacks on Ukraine have tested Trump's patience, and his temper boiled over earlier this week during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office.
'We are very, very unhappy with [Russia], and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100 per cent,' he threatened.
'I'm disappointed in President Putin. I thought we would've had a deal two months ago,' he went on, in reference to the US-proposed ceasefire that Kyiv accepted but was rejected by Moscow.
Perhaps more consequentially, Trump also threatened to levy secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian exports to discourage them from keeping funds flowing into the Kremlin's war chest.
Until now, the US and its European allies have declined to impose measures that would restrict Russia from exporting its oil and gas elsewhere.
Such a move would constitute a dramatic ramping up of Western efforts to back Ukraine as it would likely see Washington and the EU target countries such as China, India and NATO member Turkey, all of whom import huge quantities of Russian energy.
In response, leading Russian propagandist Igor Korotchenko said Moscow must use the 50-day period before sanctions are imposed to win the war by dramatically increasing the intensity of attacks across the border.
Korotchenko, a former colonel-turned-military analyst and editor-in-chief of National Defence magazine, told state-TV: 'Weakening the potential of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' rear support system will force Ukraine to accept Russia's terms.
'It is necessary to intensify Russian strikes… to the maximum extent possible. Scaling up this approach, we can achieve success.'
Trump earlier this week also struck a deal with NATO counterparts in Europe to send sophisticated weaponry, including sorely needed Patriot air defence missiles, to Ukraine - but insisted that the US would not foot the bill.
'We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending [Ukraine] weapons and [Europe] is going to be paying for them,' he stated.
'We - the United States - will not be having any payment made. We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it.'
The workings of the deal struck between the White House and European nations to provide and finance the delivery of advanced weapons systems to Ukraine were not immediately clear.
Many European countries appeared to get on board with the announcement, though Trump's move to take credit for the additional weapons headed to Ukraine created some mild friction in Europe.
'If we pay for these weapons, it's our support,' said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, speaking after the Brussels meeting, adding that she welcomed Trump's decision.
'So it's European support, and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine ... If you promise to give the weapons, but say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?'
Washington also retains some $3.85 billion worth of Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) left over from the Biden administration at its disposal to provide weapons to Ukraine.
The PDA allows the president to draw from US weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency.
Trump has not sent any weapons to Ukraine that were not previously approved under the Biden administration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hillary Clinton allegedly approved plan to smear Trump in 2016
Congress released a previously classified intelligence report claiming that Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign likely 'ginned up' the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy and wanted the FBI 's help. The Senate Judiciary Committee, under Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, released a 29-page classified file from former Special Counsel John Durham's 'Russiagate' investigation on Thursday. The heart of the explosive allegation: That the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign were aware of - and potentially coordinated - a plan to falsely tie Donald Trump to Russia , a chief U.S. rival. Durham examined the FBI's investigation into potential links between Trump campaign officials and Russia during the 2016 election and concluded the FBI should have not launched the investigation given the evidence it had at the time. The report authored by the special counsel, released publicly for the first time today, shows potential election interference from another country regarding Clinton, false FBI reports to surveil the 2016 Trump campaign and the FBI's failure to investigate Clinton's ties to the Russia collusion allegations, like the infamously debunked Steele Dossier. A March 2016 memorandum stated that in part 'Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the 'Russian mafia.'' 'Based on the Durham annex, the Obama FBI failed to adequately review and investigate intelligence reports showing the Clinton campaign may have been ginning up the fake Trump-Russia narrative for Clinton's political gain, which was ultimately done through the Steele Dossier and other means,' Grassley, 91, said in a statement. 'History will show that the Obama and Biden administration's law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponized against President Trump,' the senator continued. 'This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history. According to sources, the annex was among files stuffed in 'burn bags' that were due to be destroyed before recently being rescued by FBI employees. A person familiar with the discovery speculated to the Daily Mail that it was likely an oversight by previous directors that prevented the documents from being destroyed. The person added that it's likely the documents would have never seen the light of day if the FBI wasn't diligently looking through everything it comes across at the bureau. Within the pages of the annex are private communications between Clinton staff and workers at a George Soros nonprofit cooking up a plan to tie Trump to Russia to distract from scrutiny over the Hillary email server scandal. Leonard Benardo, Senior Vice President of Soros' Open Society Foundations, sent emails to top Clinton staffers that showed Hillary Clinton herself approved of the Trump-Russia plan. That plan included the FBI working on behalf of Clinton, according to Benardo's emails. 'Julie [Clinton Campaign Advisor] says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump,' one of his emails disclosed in the Durham annex states. 'Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' Durham later wrote that Julie Smith, the campaign advisor, 'was, at minimum, playing a role in the Clinton campaign's efforts to tie Trump to Russia.' The emails 'certainly lends at least some credence that such a plan existed,' Durham said. Donald Trump's CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently suggested that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other top Obama aides could be hit with perjury charges over the annex. A spokesperson for Clinton did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment. A spokesperson for the Obamas did not immediately respond to a request for comment either. Ratcliffe said that Obama officials involved with the 'Russia hoax' - the debunked narrative that Russia interfered with the 2016 election on behalf of Donald Trump 's campaign - could be prosecuted. The dossier, a 2016 opposition research file crafted by former MI6 spy Christoper Steele against then-candidate Trump, was a central - and largely debunked - component of the FBI's 'Russiagate' investigation. Ratcliffe has also noted that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan could still be hit with charges, including lying to Congress. has also noted that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan could still be hit with charges, including lying to Congress. 'They conspired against President Trump, they conspired against the American people,' the CIA director said. 'So, I'll leave it to Pam Bondi and our DOJ and Kash Patel and our FBI to investigate the conspiracy to do what, and what charges that they're capable of bringing.' However, some critics have slammed Ratcliffe for not releasing 'Russiagate' documents when he served as director of national intelligence during Trump's first term. 'Can anyone explain why John Ratcliffe, who held the same position as Tulsi (DNI) under Trump, totally failed to identify the Russian collusion coup hoax against Trump and was then promoted by Trump to head the CIA,' podcast host Clint Russell wrote on X. Last week, DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents that she claims show how Obama-era intelligence officials 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork.' She released a September 2020 report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 presidential election. The file disputes the claim that Russia interfered with Trump's first election on behalf of the Republican.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Megyn Kelly says Trump risks alienating women voters if he pardons Diddy: ‘This will not help'
Right-wing political commentator Megyn Kelly urged President Donald Trump not to offer Sean ' Diddy ' Combs a pardon, warning him it would 'not help' the Republican Party win over young women voters. Kelly, the former Fox News host who now has a popular podcast, issued the warning to the president after seeing reports on Wednesday that Trump was not ruling out offering Combs a pardon. 'Trump should not pardon Diddy. He doesn't deserve it,' Kelly wrote on X. 'He's a Trump hater. He's a woman abuser. MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other. This would not help. GOP struggling w/young female voters, most of whom will HATE a Diddy pardon.' Later, on Kelly's podcast, The Megyn Kelly Show, she reiterated her points about how potential women voters would perceive Trump's pardoning of Combs, a 'serial woman abuser,' as a 'miscarriage of justice.' 'The GOP is already struggling with female voters and they're not all lefties. There are young, conservative women who aren't in love with Trump or MAGA, there are. And this will not help,' Kelly said. Combs was found guilty on two counts of transportation for prostitution purposes earlier this month in federal court in New York. The music mogul faced a roughly eight-week-long trial on allegations of sex trafficking and racketeering as well, though he was acquitted on those charges. Regardless of the legal punishment Combs faces for his conviction, his reputation has been tarnished by the trial, which revealed Combs had physically, emotionally, verbally, and sexually abused several women, including his ex-girlfriend, singer Cassie Ventura. Throughout the trial, witnesses painted Combs as sexually deviant and uncontrollably angry – at any moment, he could become physically violent. 'We all saw the videotape of him beating the hell out of Cassandra Ventura. But there was so much more testimony about the other women he repeatedly beat all the way up to when he was arrested. He doesn't deserve any of Trump's mercy,' Kelly said. Trump has not formally agreed to pardon Combs, but when confronted with the question back in May, he did not rule it out. "I would certainly look at the facts," Trump said to Fox News reporter Peter Doocy. "If I think somebody was mistreated – whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact." Rumors escalated on Wednesday after Deadline reported that an unnamed Trump administration source said a pardon was being 'seriously considered.' The White House declined to comment on the speculation to Deadline. On her podcast, Kelly also pointed out that not only would a pardon be poorly perceived by women, but the situation could also inflame anger directed at the administration for its handling of the Epstein Files. Trump has declined to release any remaining documents related to the government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender who was accused of abusing women and girls and running a decades-long sex trafficking scheme. The president said on the campaign trail he would release the files. Various senior members of the administration had also theorized about undisclosed information related to Epstein. Many people, including a large portion of Trump's base, believed the government concealed Epstein's 'client list' of high-profile individuals. '[Trump's] in trouble because he's making it look like, to the MAGA base, he's part of the elite cabal that covers for other members of the elite cabal,' Kelly pointed out. 'Trump pardoning Diddy will create another Epstein for him.'


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready
The European Union is working on the assumption that the United States will impose a 15% tariff on most EU exports from Friday, even though the two sides have yet to complete a key document clarifying how the agreement will operate. Last weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement that would see 15% duties imposed on around two-thirds of EU produce, worth around 380 billion euros ($434 billion). The tariffs are set to enter force on Friday, but as of Thursday the two sides were still working on a joint statement that would lay out the terms of their understanding, European Commission spokesman Olof Gill said. The document wouldn't be legally binding. 'It is the clear understanding of the European Union that the U.S. will implement the agreed across the board tariff ceiling of 15%,' Gill said. The commission negotiates trade terms on behalf of the the EU's 27 member countries. Carve outs were agreed for a range of 'strategic' goods like aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, some drug generics or natural resources. Gill said that 'it is also our clear understanding that the U.S. will implement the exemptions to the 15% ceiling.' 'The U.S. has made these commitments. Now it's up to the U.S. to implement them. The ball is in their court,' Gill said. European wine and spirits won't escape the 15% levy on Friday, but may do later as negotiations on additional exemptions to the new tariff regime continue, he said. Before Sunday's meeting, Trump had threatened the bloc with 30% tariffs, which the EU's top trade official said would effectively mean the end of trade between them. Over the last three months, the commission drew up retaliatory measures worth tens of billions of euros to enact should the talks fail. Those countermeasures are due to take effect on Aug. 7, but Gill said that 'if everything goes as expected,' they would be frozen. 'If we have reached a deal, we don't need the retaliatory tariffs,' he said.