Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse
Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza.
But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave.
The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a US-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel.
After Netanyahu met Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official said that "an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel," of a need to shift from a truce to a comprehensive deal that would "release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarise the Gaza Strip," - Israel's key conditions for ending the war.
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday that the envoy's visit was seen in Israel as "very significant".
But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force: "An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat."
Israel's Channel 12 on Monday cited an official from his office as saying that Netanyahu was inclining towards expanding the offensive and seizing the entire Palestinian enclave.
What a "military defeat" might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure Hamas.
Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago.
The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials.
While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said.
Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Business
an hour ago
- Arabian Business
Trump's global tariffs take effect, India hit hardest with 50% over Russia oil trade
A sweeping series of new US tariffs targeting more than 90 countries officially came into effect at midnight in Washington, in what is now the most significant protectionist trade action by the United States since the 1930s. The move marks a significant escalation in President Donald Trump's push to overhaul global trade rules under his principle of 'reciprocal tariffs,' targeting countries he says impose unfair barriers on US exports or fail to align with Washington's foreign policy agenda. 'IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!,' Trump wrote on Truth Social moments before the deadline passed. The original tariff deadline of July 9 was extended to August 1, and the new tariffs officially kicked in on August 7. India hardest hit India is among the hardest-hit nations, with a total of 50 per cent tariffs imposed on a wide range of goods. An initial 25 per cent tariff took effect today, with an additional 25 per cent scheduled for August 27. Trump linked the move directly to the nation's ongoing oil trade with Russia. 'India has not been a good trading partner. They do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them… They are buying Russian oil and fueling the Russian war machine,' Trump wrote on August 6. 'India is our friend, but their tariffs on American goods are FAR TOO HIGH. Their obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers are unacceptable. Starting Friday, they will face an extra penalty. America First!' he added in a July 30 post. India has condemned the move, calling it 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' and vowed to protect its national interests. Indian export sectors reacted sharply. Shares of major textile and seafood exporters such as Gokaldas Exports, KPR Mill, and Avanti Feeds dropped 3–4 per cent in early trading. Kerala-based seafood exporters expressed concern they may be priced out of the US market altogether. Semiconductors face 100% import tariff Also taking effect is a 100 per cent tariff on all foreign-made semiconductors, unless they are produced in the US or by firms with ongoing investment in US-based manufacturing. The move is part of the administration's broader effort to bolster domestic chip production and reduce reliance on foreign suppliers. While chipmakers like TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix have large operations in Asia, officials in South Korea and Taiwan say those companies may be exempt from the new rules due to current US investment commitments. The White House has not yet clarified its position. Prices of consumer electronics — including laptops, smartphones, and gaming consoles — are expected to rise by 18–20 per cent as a result of the tariff. US-based firms like Nvidia, which already manufacture chips domestically, may benefit from the policy shift. Wider global impact The tariff rollout impacts countries across Asia, Europe, and the Americas: Brazil: Faces a 50 per cent tariff on exports to the US after Trump accused President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of undermining American tech firms and called the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro a 'witch hunt.' Laos and Myanmar: Penalised with a 40 per cent tariff, both nations have strong manufacturing ties with China — a pattern reflected in several other targets of the policy. Canada: Tariffs rose from 25 per cent to 35 per cent after the White House accused Canada of 'failing to cooperate' in reducing the cross-border flow of fentanyl and other drugs. 'I am announcing a 50 per cent TARIFF on Copper, effective August 1, 2025, after receiving a robust NATIONAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT,' Trump wrote in another Truth Social post. 'Copper is necessary for Semiconductors, Aircraft, Ships, Ammunition, Data Centers, Lithium-ion Batteries, Radar Systems, Missile Defense Systems, and even Hypersonic Weapons. THIS IS, AFTER ALL, OUR GOLDEN AGE!' Some US allies have managed to negotiate partial relief from the measures. The European Union reached a framework agreement that allows a 15 per cent tariff on goods from the bloc, while Japan and South Korea also secured reductions. Last week, Trump announced a 'full and complete' trade deal with South Korea that sets a 15 per cent tariff on South Korean imports, in exchange for $350 billion in US-controlled investments, $100 billion of which is in energy purchases, and full market access for American goods including cars, agriculture, and trucks. Japan signed a strategic trade agreement with the US in July, accepting a 15 per cent tariff in exchange for $550 billion in US-directed investments and expanded access for American agricultural and automotive exports. Taiwan, a major US trading partner, however, remains in negotiations with Washington after receiving a temporary 20 per cent tariff, with talks focused on semiconductor cooperation and potential pledges for further US investment. Mexico, meanwhile, was granted a 90-day extension on further tariff hikes as trade negotiations continue. The country, however, still faces a 25 per cent tariff during this period, especially linked to fentanyl concerns. Middle Eastern countries, including Gulf states, are largely excluded from punitive tariffs due to their energy exports being exempt, though Iraq, Algeria, Libya, and Tunisia face new levies of up to 30 per cent amid stalled trade talks. Economic disruption expected The average US tariff rate now stands at 15.2 per cent, up from just 2.3 per cent in mid-2024 — a historic jump. The Biden-era tariffs, which were rolled back or frozen, have now not only been reinstated but expanded under Trump's new framework. According to estimates from multiple market research groups, the new tariffs are expected to significantly increase prices across a variety of consumer categories: CATEGORY EXPECTED PRICE INCREASE Clothing & Apparel 36–37% Leather Goods 39–40% Electronics 18–20% Fresh Produce 6.7% Coffee Significant (Brazil hit 50%) Furniture & Appliances 3–5% Automobiles 4–6% The average American household is projected to face $2,400 to $2,700 in additional annual costs due to higher import prices. Low-income families are expected to be the most impacted, given their reliance on affordable imports from tariffed countries. A broader strategy The White House says the goal of the tariffs is to rebuild America's industrial base and restore fairness to global trade. Trump's approach combines economic and geopolitical objectives, applying tariffs not only to correct trade imbalances but also to influence foreign policy decisions — as seen with India's oil purchases and Canada's drug control efforts. In multiple posts, Trump has highlighted his 'America First' vision and the need for trade partners to 'play fair or pay.' 'The August first deadline is the August first deadline — It stands strong, and will not be extended. A big day for America!!!' Trump wrote on July 30. 'Starting Friday, they will face an extra penalty. America First!' he added in another post aimed at India. While the long-term economic effects remain to be seen, the short-term impact is already being felt through market volatility, rising prices, and renewed diplomatic tensions. Trade officials from multiple countries have confirmed ongoing negotiations with the US, but the new tariffs have already redrawn the landscape of global commerce. Trump's use of emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs is facing multiple legal challenges, with a federal appeals court reviewing the case and a potential Supreme Court showdown expected.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Smotrich poses next to 'Death to Arabs' graffiti in illegal West Bank settlement
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich posed near graffiti that called for "Death to Arabs" on Thursday, as he visited an illegal West Bank settlement that was recently recognised by the Israeli government. Smotrich's visit to Sa-Nur, which sits south of the Palestinian city of Jenin, came after the Israeli government quietly recognised the settlement as one of four that would be placed under the control of the Shomron Regional Council. Sa-Nur, Kadim, Ganim and Homesh were evacuated unilaterally by Israel in 2005, without coordination with the Palestinian Authority, during Israel's "disengagement" from Gaza and parts of the occupied West Bank. Images from Thursday's visit showed Smotrich standing near a wall bearing the slogans: "The people of Israel return to Sa-Nur!" and "Death to Arabs." The Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported that Smotrich had told settlers who accompanied him on the visit that Israelis will "return to the places we evacuated in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters A version of the photo later shared by the Shomron Regional Council had the racist graffiti cropped out. In response to the initial photograph, Gilad Kariv, a parliamentarian from the Democrats Party, called the image not just a "Hasbara [public diplomacy] disaster, it is a moral disaster." "This photo may have been taken on top of the hill at Sa-Nur, but it reflects the abyss into which the Netanyahu, Smotrich and Ben Gvir government is dragging us - an abyss of annexation, terrible violence and international isolation," Kariv said. Extremist Israeli politicians and right-wing settlers hold Gaza annexation conference Read More » Smotrich has vowed to restore evacuated settlements like Sa-Nur as part of his broader push to expand settlement activity in the occupied West Bank, despite international opposition and concerns over escalating tensions. In May, Israel's government approved the construction of 22 new settlements in the West Bank, including the legalisation of nine unauthorised outposts. The Sa-Nur settlement has symbolic and geographical importance due to its location near the ancient Palestinian village of Sanur, which includes the ancient fortress of Al-Jarrar and a vast agricultural meadow known as Maraj Sanur. Jamal Juma', a coordinator at the Palestinian grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, told Middle East Eye that Israel's government was hell-bent on reoccupying areas they withdrew from in 2005. "They've already reoccupied Homesh, so that's why this criminal settler minister was there [in Sa-Nur] to declare the return of settlers," Juma' said. "With all that's going on in the West Bank - colonisation, ethnic cleansing and the siege on Palestinians - [Israel is] fast taking steps towards finishing their plan to ghettoise Palestinians and annex the West Bank," he added. Far right in ascendancy Israel's far right is ascendant in the wake of the war on Gaza, and has several ministers in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet. Last month, Smotrich vowed that "Gaza will be entirely destroyed" and its Palestinian population will "leave in great numbers to third countries". How Netanyahu's plan to occupy Gaza is bringing the Israeli army to its knees Read More » He also declared that Israel would "apply sovereignty" in the occupied West Bank before the next Israeli general elections in October 2026. A majority of Israelis back the expulsion of all Palestinians from territory controlled by Israel, according to a recent poll by Pennsylvania State University. The survey, conducted in March and published by Haaretz newspaper, found that 56 percent of Israelis support the forced expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel. Last month, Israel's parliament approved a non-binding motion that called for the annexation of the occupied West Bank. The symbolic gesture does not affect the legal status of the West Bank, but it will help build momentum towards a possible move on the territory, which has been occupied by Israel since 1967.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How Netanyahu's plan to occupy Gaza is bringing the Israeli army to its knees
This week, Israeli media reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had decided to order the army to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. According to reports, Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir is strongly opposed to such a move and has even threatened to resign. If these reports are true, the importance of this moment is difficult to overstate. Such a head-on clash between the government and the army puts Netanyahu and his government in a position that challenges not only the military but also the will of much of the Israeli public. For a long time, polls indicate that most Israelis support ending the war in exchange for a deal that would see Hamas releasing its remaining captives. In recent weeks, this public demand has grown. A Channel 12 News poll last month shows that 74 percent of Israelis support signing such a deal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The army warns that the full occupation of Gaza will risk the captives' lives. The government is fully aware of these dangers: Culture Minister Miki Zohar admitted that expanding the war would put the remaining captives in grave danger. If the decision to occupy the entire Gaza Strip is indeed made, it marks a moment when Netanyahu's government abandons what most of the public wants. The government is leading Israel to a move with unknown results and significance for the country, for the army and even for Netanyahu himself. In turn, this uncertainty is fuelling opposition to the war, both by the public and the army. This week's appeal by various former heads of the security forces to end the war, which included people who led the military, Mossad, Shin Bet and the police, indicates the army's grave concerns about fully occupying the Palestinian enclave. The former officials believe that in practice Israel has nothing more to achieve in Gaza, and to some extent attests to the army's position. This is also what most of those demonstrating in the streets against the government think. This view, which sees the continuation of the war as futile, stems from a failure to achieve the government's stated goals of the war. Hamas resistance in Gaza continues, despite the severe damage it has suffered, and Israeli soldiers continue to be killed. Similarly, the military has not been able to secure the release of the hostages as it had promised in March after Israel unilaterally ended the ceasefire. But fear of a pointless war is not the whole story of Israeli opposition to the onslaught. There are two internal and external aspects that can be added to the list of Israeli grievances. More Israelis, including from the political mainstream, are expressing reservations, and sometimes even opposition, to Israel's war crimes in Gaza. It began at the end of 2024, when former defence minister Moshe Yaalon said that Israel was carrying out ethnic cleansing in the northern Gaza Strip. It intensified after Israel collapsed the ceasefire, with former prime minister Ehud Olmert acknowledging that Israelis were committing crimes in Gaza. A demonstrator wearing a mask depicting Benjamin Netanyahu during an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv on 31 July 2025, calling for a stop to the war on Gaza (AFP/Jack Guez) Now they are joined by a growing number of public figures, such as author David Grossman, a beacon on the Israeli left, who last week said that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. More soldiers are speaking about how they are unable to live with what they have done and what they have seen in Gaza. And the images of starving Palestinians have contributed to the growing resistance to Israel's crimes in Gaza, even though the Israeli media is conducting a propaganda campaign that denies the famine and Israel's role in creating it. International image At the same time, the demand to end the war is also linked to the international image of Israel following mounting pressures from its allies and the world. Naftali Bennett, who aspires to be Israel's next prime minister, recently returned from the United States and testified that Israel has become a 'leper state'. According to Bennett, a move to fully occupy the enclave must not be carried out without taking into account international public opinion. Bennett, who does not oppose the killing of Palestinians - morally or politically - understands, like others in Israel, that the country is moving towards global isolation. Such isolation could have fateful economic consequences. Israel's trade agreements with the European Union, which constitute a significant pillar of the Israeli economy, are in jeopardy. Poland, which until recently was considered one of Israel's allies in the EU, came out against its actions in Gaza in a statement made by Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Former Israeli PM Bennett says Israel is seen as a 'leper state' in US Read More » It is not just economic concerns that are troubling Israelis. Just yesterday, a German football team cancelled the signing of an Israeli player in light of his support for the war. The chairman of the Israel Football Association said this week that it has become more difficult to find places in Europe that will agree to host Israeli teams, which have been unable to hold European fixtures domestically since the war began. From here, the road to exit football's flagship European competitions is short. Large numbers of Israelis are beginning to comprehend the cost of Israel's war on Gaza. They are seeing how Israel is perceived in the world today as a pariah state, as a lonely nation. In fact, apart from the Trump administration - and even there, it seems that there are cracks - there is no one in the world who accepts the Israeli story on Gaza anymore. The world's perception of Israel, as Israelis perceive it, has a fundamental impact on the demand to end the war. Often, Israelis' initial response to international criticism is accusations of antisemitism, misunderstanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or that the world does not know Palestinians and Arabs. However, when international criticism is so harsh, it can crack even this set of defence mechanisms. According to a Channel 12 News poll, about 56 percent of Israelis fear that in the future they will not be able to travel abroad due to Israel's bad image. Israel will become an isolated island, they fear, which will create a sense of ghetto. In addition, most Israelis, apart from some supporters of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, see themselves as part of the western world. For Israelis, being outcast from the West is a fatal blow to their very identity. Therefore, the continuation of the war poses a great threat to the Israelis themselves. Affecting capabilities Concerns of international isolation are evident also in the Israeli army. Despite the central role that the United States plays in arming Israel, it is not the only country with which Israel has arms trade relations with. Weapons and parts of aircraft also come from European countries such as Britain, France, Germany and Italy, whose governments have come under severe pressure to end ties with the Israeli military apparatus. Therefore, along with the fear of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, the military is very concerned about the influence of international public opinion on its very capabilities. In conclusion, the Israeli army is concerned about the order to occupy the entire Gaza Strip because of various reasons. The military is very concerned about the influence of international public opinion on its very capabilities The army, which still sees itself as the people's army, is afraid of losing its unifying status in Israeli society. The full occupation of the Gaza Strip with its unknown consequences, the danger to captives and soldiers, the pointlessness of the war and the growing Israeli isolation, could lead to a rift between the people's army and its people, who see such a move as a crime against the hostages or against the Palestinians. The consequences of such a rift could be a failure to report for army reserve duty, which has been suffering from a manpower shortage. If the army makes such a move, it risks becoming a mercenary force that is completely loyal to the settlers, a process that has been going on for some time but could become even more literal. Now the Israeli army finds itself in a decisive moment. On the one hand, the army can listen to the public and end the war, and on the other hand, it can agree to Netanyahu's demand to occupy the entire Gaza Strip and bring about an unprecedented rift between the military and many in the Israeli public. We are now facing a dramatic moment in the war on Gaza.
