Holy Rosary Church still at risk of demolition. Here's where things stand now
As cardinals of the Catholic Church make their way to Rome to choose the next pope, a choice over what to do with a historical church looms over Tacoma. The Church of Our Lady of the Holy Rosary would need costly repairs to function again. Everyone at least agrees about that. But from there things get complicated.
A local group made an offer to purchase and run the church in 2024, but the local parish and the Archdiocese of Seattle has turned them down. Archbishop Paul Etienne decreed again in March that the Holy Rosary will be relegated to 'profane, but not sordid' use. That would decommission the church and make it possible to sell the property, and for a wrecking crew to take down the 104-year-old Gothic-style local landmark.
Some local Catholics have made it clear they want to stop a potential demolition. They've raised funds and formed a legal entity that could purchase the property. They already appealed to the Vatican once and submitted their proposal to the local parish and the Archdiocese. As they did the last time the Archdiocese made this decree, they've now appealed to the Vatican again.
The church is an eye-catching feature of the Tacoma skyline, and the prospect of losing it brought out strong reactions in Catholics and non-Catholics alike when the parish's plans first came to light in 2019. Even Mayor Victoria Woodards chimed in, pledging to help in what way she can.
But the fate of the church isn't up to local government. Historical landmark laws don't apply to properties owned by religious organizations, and regional Catholic leadership has the authority to decide. Any arguments against those decisions are based in the Catholic Church's canon law, the same opaque set of rules and norms clerics will follow when choosing a replacement for Pope Francis.
The local disagreement over whether Holy Rosary can or should go on as a church (and above all stay standing) is thorny. No one seems to agree on how valuable the property is. Or how extensive or costly repairs to the church would be. Or even what the process is for transferring the church to a lay organization.
It's enough to make status updates from the Papal conclave, which are delivered through a chimney using different colors of smoke, seem straightforward.
Tacoma Catholic Jack Connelly created a legal entity, Domus Dei Porta Coeli LLC, to buy the Holy Rosary property. Working with fundraisers for Save Tacoma's Landmark Church, he wants to purchase the property, fix up the church and eventually convert the surrounding property into a Catholic cultural center.
The church would still serve as a place of worship in this plan, but it wouldn't have a dedicated priest or weekly services. The surrounding property could include gardens with Catholic statuary designed for contemplation.
The parish, called the Parish of Saint John Paul XXII, and the Archbishop in Seattle didn't go for it, saying the offer wasn't workable.
Connelly believes that the Archdiocese of Seattle wants to get more money for the property by making it possible to raze the church, which Etienne's decree does. He also thinks that strategy isn't going to make as much money as the Catholic leadership might hope. It costs money to raze a church.
For its part, the Archdiocese has pointed to the millions of dollars it would take to restore the church. They estimate a price tag of $17 million or more. Archdiocese chief communications officer Helen McClenahan emphasized that the decision came from the parish in Tacoma, and not as a top-down order from leadership in Seattle. That decision came after engagement with the community, including Connelly's group, and a lot of 'prayer and discernment,' she added.
While the church is historic, Catholics in Tacoma are part of the present. As much as it might be a beautiful part of the skyline, it's also supposed to serve the needs of the parish, McClenahan said, and that's no longer possible.
Connelly disputes the Archdiocese's stance. The $17 million price estimate includes a list of nice-to-have things that aren't related to getting the building up to code, he said. For example, a new HVAC system would be nice, but he's willing to put up with the archaic boiler system if it means saving the church.
Without knowing all of the many (many) details of the property's condition and what the law requires, it's hard to say whether Connelly and his cohorts have a viable plan. It is clear that many Tacomans want to keep the church intact. Catholics see it not only as a holy place where they've celebrated first communions, weddings and funerals, but as a way to attract people to their faith.
But what that would look like, and the path to making it happen, is anything but clear.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk fight reveals fragility of relationship between Silicon Valley and White House
The falling out between President Trump and Elon Musk is just the latest reminder that the relationship between the new White House and the titans of technology has turned out to be complicated. The CEO of Tesla (TSLA) was among several big names from Silicon Valley awarded prime seats for the president's Jan. 20 Capitol inauguration, alongside Meta (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, Amazon (AMZN) chair Jeff Bezos, and Google (GOOG) CEO Sundar Pichai. In the five months since, the president has either confronted all of their companies in court or applied pressure on those firms with his own words. Musk and Trump made their break official last week in a series of social media posts that featured insults and threats hurled by both men. The other executives and their companies had already been grappling with a tougher-than-expected stance on their industry. Zuckerberg, for example, was not able to convince Trump to stop an antitrust trial against Meta from going forward this spring. The president has since threatened Cook's Apple with 25% duties on overseas-made iPhones and criticized the iPhone maker's ramped-up production in India. Meanwhile, the company is defending against an antitrust lawsuit led by the Justice Department, filed during President Joe Biden's administration. Trump's Justice Department has also pushed ahead with a Biden-era recommendation for a judge to break up Pichai's Google empire. Trump even called Bezos to complain about Amazon after it was reported that the online retail giant was considering displaying the cost of tariffs next to prices on its site. Trump said Bezos "solved the problem very quickly.' Yet Amazon still faces a lawsuit from Trump's Federal Trade Commission that is due to start in February 2027. The FTC, which brought the case during Biden's term in office, told a judge in the spring that it needed to push the original October 2026 trial date due to Amazon's litigation delays. One of the biggest questions facing the tech world as Trump took office was how aggressive Trump's antitrust enforcers would be following four years of a Biden administration marked by legal fights with many of Silicon Valley's biggest names. By sustaining many of these cases and probes against Big Tech, Trump has parted ways with traditional Republican-style enforcement, legal experts say. "This isn't the Bush administration," Trump's FTC chair Andrew Ferguson told a group of American CEOs this spring in Washington, D.C., referring to one of the weakest US antitrust enforcement periods in modern history. Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Anat Alon-Beck expects the Trump administration will continue to rein in Big Tech, especially given bipartisan support for the idea that Big Tech currently has too much power. There have been some positive developments for the tech firms too. Big Tech has gained the benefit of a relaxed regulatory environment, especially in the industry of artificial intelligence, making fundraising and complying with securities laws easier. In an executive order titled 'Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,' the president rescinded Biden's executive order on AI safety and directed federal agencies to remove regulatory obstacles to US global AI dominance. "So they have to take what they can get from the current administration," Alon-Beck said. One tech giant that does have an early win from Trump is Microsoft. President Trump's antitrust cops ended what had become an uphill government effort to unwind Microsoft's (MSFT) $69 billion acquisition of video game maker Activision Blizzard that also began during the Biden administration. The decision came when the FTC voluntarily dropped a lawsuit that Biden's FTC boss, Lina Khan, first filed against the tie-up in December 2022. But Microsoft may not emerge unscathed, either. Bloomberg has reported that Trump officials at the FTC are also broadening a probe into Microsoft and its relationship with AI upstart OpenAI ( The probe was first launched by Khan, a key architect of a new movement seeking to expand the legal theories that can give rise to antitrust claims. In June of last year, multiple news organizations reported that the probe also involved a DOJ investigation into chipmaker Nvidia's (NVDA) competitive conduct. The probe was to address concerns over the company's dominance in the market for microprocessors that power AI. The Trump administration has not indicated it has dropped the investigation. And in April, Nvidia said in a regulatory filing that the president had kept in place Biden's export restrictions on the company's H20 AI chips to China. As for Musk, Trump this past weekend said he had no desire to repair the relationship, which he said was over. He warned there would be 'serious consequences' if Mr. Musk financed candidates to run against Republicans who voted in favor of the president's domestic policy bill. But on Monday, Trump made some conciliatory comments about Musk and Tesla. "I'd have no problem with it," Trump said at a White House event on Monday when asked if he would be willing to speak with Musk. "I'd imagine he wants to speak with me." He added, "I wish him well, very well actually." Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note on Monday that he doesn't expect Trump and Musk to fully patch their soured relationship but would not be surprised if it improved in the months ahead. At the end of the day, Ives wrote, "Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons," including a federal framework for autonomous vehicles. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Tanzania's First Female Leader Championed Human Rights. Now She's Turning to Repression.
Samia Suluhu Hassan, Tanzania's first female president, came to power as a renowned defender of human rights. She is clinging to it, critics say, by locking up and torturing those who stand in her way. In recent months, Hassan's government has orchestrated abductions and killings of several political rivals, rights groups say. A senior opposition leader was found dead—beaten and doused with acid—after being abducted by security agents, according to his political party. Authorities closed a top newspaper, which had published stories about his death. A Catholic priest is battling for his life after surviving a brutal beating by unknown assailants as he returned from a conference where he made remarks critical of the government.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents
The majority of House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to participate in Washington, D.C. elections on Tuesday. The House of Representatives passed a bill led by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, to prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in elections in the nation's capital. It passed 266 to 148, with 56 Democrats joining Republicans in passing the measure. One Democrat voted "present," while 148 voted against the bill. "I believe strongly in not having federal overreach, but we have jurisdiction, Congress has jurisdiction over Washington, District of Columbia…and we don't like to utilize our jurisdiction and our authority, but in this case, they've gone too far," Pfluger told Fox News Digital in an interview before the vote. D.C.'s progressive city council passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting non-U.S. citizens the ability to vote in local elections if they've lived in the district for at least 30 days. Scoop: House Gop Memo Highlights Republican Wins In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Read On The Fox News App Noncitizens can also hold local elected office in the D.C. government. The local measure has been a frequent target of GOP attacks, with Republican national security hawks raising alarms about the possibility of hostile foreign agents participating in D.C. elections. But progressive Democrats like Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., who spoke out against the bill on Tuesday afternoon, have dismissed that as an implausible scenario. "Republicans claim that Congress has a constitutional duty to legislate on local D.C. matters, but this is historically and legally incorrect. Republicans legislate on local D.C. matters only when they think they can score political points, such as by demonizing immigrants," Frost said during debate on the House floor. "They only bring it up to the floor when they think they can score political points, taking away the democratic rights of people here in D.C. and home rule." Frost also argued that it was "highly unlikely" foreign officials would vote in those elections, claiming they would have to "renounce their right to vote in their home country" and because "D.C. has no authority in federal matters." But Pfluger, who spoke with Fox News Digital before the vote, was optimistic that it would get at least some Democratic support. He noted that 52 Democrats voted for the bill when it passed the House in the previous Congress. It was never taken up in the formerly Democrat-controlled Senate, however. "It's hard to go back to your district as a Democrat and say, yeah, I want foreign agents to be able to vote in our elections – 'Oh yeah, it's not federal elections,' some may say. But it has an impact on the way the city is run," Pfluger said. Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference "This could be Russian embassy personnel, they could be Chinese embassy personnel – a number of folks. It's just wrong. It goes against the fabric of our society," he added. Another bill receiving a vote on Tuesday is legislation that would grant D.C. police the ability to negotiate punishments via collective bargaining, and would help shield the capital's police force from at least some liability by installing a statute of limitations against the Metropolitan Police Department. That legislation was introduced by New York Republican Rep. Andrew article source: 148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents